throbber
Received: 2 March 2017 |  Revised: 25 May 2017 |  Accepted: 31 May 2017
`DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.499
`
`R E V I E W
`
`Monosodium glutamate as a tool to reduce sodium in
`foodstuffs: Technological and safety aspects
`
`Hellen D. B. Maluly  | Adriana P. Arisseto-Bragotto | Felix G. R. Reyes
`
`Department of Food Science, School of Food
`Engineering, University of Campinas, Rua
`Monteiro Lobato, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
`
`Correspondence
`Hellen D. B. Maluly, Department of Food
`Science, School of Food Engineering,
`University of Campinas, Rua Monteiro Lobato
`80, CEP 13083-862 Campinas, São Paulo,
`Brazil.
`Email: hdbmaluly@gmail.com
`
`Funding information
`PROEX/CAPES, Grant/Award Number:
`3300301702P1; Institute for Glutamate
`Sciences in South America (IGSSA)
`
`Abstract
`Sodium chloride (NaCl) is the most commonly used ingredient to provide salty taste to
`foods. However, excess sodium in the bloodstream has been associated with the de-
`velopment of several chronic noncommunicable diseases. In order to limit sodium in-
`take to levels considered safe, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends for
`adults a daily intake of not more than 5 g of NaCl (less than 2 g of sodium). One of the
`strategic actions recommended by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) to
`reduce sodium intake is reformulation of processed foods. This recommendation indi-
`cates there is an urgent need to find salt substitutes, and umami compounds have
`been pointed as an alternative strategy. Like salty, umami is also a basic taste and the
`major compound associated to umami is monosodium L- glutamate (MSG). The availa-
`ble scientific data on the toxicity of MSG has been evaluated by scientific committees
`and regulatory agencies. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives
`and the Scientific Committee on Food of the European Commission established an
`acceptable daily intake (ADI) not specified, which indicated that the substance offers
`no health risk when used as a food additive. The United States Food and Drug
`Administration and the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
`classified MSG as a Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) substance. In this paper, an
`overview about salty and umami taste physiology, the potential applications of MSG
`use to reduce sodium content in specific industrialized foods and safety aspects of
`MSG as food additive are presented.
`
`K E Y W O R D S
`Monosodium L-glutamate, salty taste, sodium chloride, umami taste
`
`1 |  INTRODUCTION
`
`Over the last few years, significant changes have occurred in the global
`food market, which are mainly due to the growth of the population
`and cities, including Brazil (Trading Economics 2013). These facts may
`be one of the reasons for the increase in the commerce of processed
`foods, such as canned and ready- to- eat products. In 2014, marketing
`studies verified an increase in 9% in this sector, and the expectation
`
`in 2019 is that it could reach a retail volume of 13% of food sales (3.1
`billion units of canned products) (Euromonitor International 2015).
`According to a survey conducted by Brazil Food Trends 2020 (Ibope
`Inteligência 2010), this improvement in the market of processed foods
`may have partly occurred in Brazil due to changes in lifestyle and an
`increased demand from consumers for more convenient products, in
`addition to new launchings and promotional activities. The results also
`pointed out that sensorial quality (indicated by 23% of the consumers
`
`This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
`provided the original work is properly cited.
`© 2017 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
`
`Food Sci Nutr. 2017;5:1039–1048.
`
`
`
`  |  1039www.foodscience-nutrition.com
`
`
`
`Ex. 1187
`
`

`

`1040  |    
`
`interviewed), along with health and wellness (indicated by 21% of
`the consumers interviewed), were shown by researchers as future
` consumption trends, which reflect the new demands of consumers.
`In this sense, certain types of products have been more highly valued,
`especially those with reduced sodium, sugar and fat content.
`Sodium chloride (NaCl) is the most used ingredient to provide a
`general flavor in foods. In addition to its role in taste, NaCl and other
`food additives that contain sodium have other functions such as pres-
`ervation, the acceleration of fermentation reactions and texture main-
`tenance (Henney, Taylor, & Boon, 2010). However, excess sodium in
`the bloodstream has been associated with the development of various
`noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), also known as chronic diseases
`that are not passed from person to person, including hypertension and
`other heart problems, kidney disease, stomach cancer, and osteoporo-
`sis. To limit sodium intake at safe levels, the World Health Organization
`(WHO) recommends a maximum daily consumption of 5 g of salt
`(NaCl) for adults, which is equivalent to less than 2 g of sodium/day
`(WHO 2007).
`Based on data published by the Brazilian Household Budget Survey
`(Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares – POF) carried out in 2002–2003
`and 2008–2009, Brazilians have been consuming a large amount of
`sodium (4.7 g of sodium/day), which corresponds to more than twice
`the safe level (less than 2 g of sodium/day) proposed by the World
`Health Organization (WHO, 2007). In 2013, a study conduct by Sarno,
`Claro, Levy, Bandoni, and Monteiro (2013) also demonstrated that
`processed foods contributed to at least 25% of the sodium intake
`(mainly the sodium coming from NaCl addition) by middle- class and
`upper- class families of the country.
`The results of these studies were used to strengthen the commit-
`ments between the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Ministério da Saúde
`– MS) and the Brazilian Association of Food Industries (Associação
`Brasileira das Indústrias da Alimentação – ABIA), which were signed in
`2007 and stimulated food producers to improve the supply of health
`foodstuffs, including products with reduced sodium content. To de-
`velop strategies to reduce sodium intake to 2 g/day until 2020, the
`government renewed the agreements (BRAZIL 2007).
`Among these strategies, which should also take into account the
`sensory quality of foods, the use of flavor enhancers such as mono-
`sodium L- glutamate (MSG) can be considered a promising alternative
`with a great potential for application in the food industry (Jinap &
`Hajeb, 2010). MSG, which is the sodium salt of L- glutamic acid (or L-
`glutamate – dissociated form), is the most well- known flavor enhancer
`used in foods, but other molecules such as nucleotides (inosinate and
`guanylate), other glutamate salts associated with ammonium, potas-
`sium and calcium, and other additives that contain elevated concentra-
`tions of L- glutamate, named Natural Flavor Enhancers (NFE), such as
`yeast extract and products from wheat and soy fermentation, are also
`available in the market to enhance the flavor of foods (McGough, Sato,
`Rankin, & Sindelar, 2012; Yamaguchi & Takahashi, 1984).
`According to the Technical Report on Sodium Content in Processed
`Foods published by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (Agência
`Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária – ANVISA) in 2012 and 2013, some
`industrialized products such as soups, stocks and seasonings, instant
`
`noodles, certain snacks, processed meats and parmesan grated cheese
`exhibit very high sodium contents (ANVISA 2012, 2013; Sarno et al.,
`2009). The use of MSG and other flavor enhancers in these foodstuffs
`is allowed in Brazil (ANVISA, 2001) and by the Southern Common
`Market (MERCOSUR 2010). Thus, in this paper a review about salty
`and umami taste physiology, the potential applications of MSG to
`reduce sodium content in specific industrialized foods and safety as-
`pects of MSG as food additive are presented, in order to contribute to
`the development of food products reduced in sodium without impair-
`ing the sensorial quality of the foods and the health of the population.
`
`2 |  TASTE PHYSIOLOGY:
`SALTY × UMAMI TASTES
`
`Physiological mechanisms involved in taste perception have been
`discussed by researchers since the beginning of the 20th century
`(Trivedi, 2012).
`Regarding the salty taste, which is promoted by sodium chloride
`and potassium chloride, among other substances, the hypothesis has
`suggested that ion dissociation occurs when these molecules are in
`contact with saliva. Sodium ions, specifically cross- specific ion chan-
`nels, named ENaCs, which are in the membranes of taste cells. After
`the ions go in, membrane depolarization occurs, charging it positively.
`This depolarization increases the membrane electric potential and
`stimulates taste nerves, sending signals to the brain to recognize the
`salty taste or the presence of ions that activate the electric poten-
`tial (Beauchamp & Stein, 2008; Chandrashekar et al., 2010; Geran &
`Spector, 2000).
`In relation to the umami taste, glutamate or nucleotides get in con-
`tact with their specific G protein–coupled receptor – GPCR (mGluR4
`– metabotropic glutamate receptor 4, TR1/TR3), which are pres-
`ent in the taste buds of the mammalian tongue (Nelson et al., 2002;
`Chaudhari et al. 2009). G- proteins are high- molecular mass com-
`pounds with different protein subtypes; each one has two subunits:
`Gα and Gβγ. One of the mechanisms earlier proposed suggested that
`substances responsible for umami activate the Gα subunit of GPCR.
`However, more recent investigations have shown that the main path-
`way for umami taste transduction seems to be related to the Gβγ sub-
`unit (Chaudhari & Roper, 2010).
`After the interaction between umami- GPCR, the βγ subunit dis-
`connects from the Gαβγ complex and activates the enzyme phospho-
`lipase C, leading to generate IP3 (inositol triphosphate). IP3 connects
`with calcium channels, existing in the endoplasmic reticulum, thus
`stimulating the opening and release of calcium (Ca++) through the cy-
`tosol. Calcium ions, now in elevated concentrations in the cytoplasm,
`connect with TRPM5 channels in the membrane, promoting the fast
`influx of sodium through the cell and, consequently, depolarizing the
`membrane. The combined action between the elevation of calcium
`and membrane depolarization provokes the opening of the gap junc-
`tions, which are probably composed by pannexins (Pax1), thus pro-
`moting the release of a large amount of ATP to the extracellular space
`(Chaudhari & Roper, 2010; Kinnamon, 2009).
`
`MALULY et AL.
`
` 20487177, 2017, 6, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.499 by Iowa State University Library, Wiley Online Library on [06/12/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
`
`Ex. 1187
`
`

`

`The released ATP stimulates the afferent nerve fibers, and at the
`same time, they excite adjacent presynaptic cells, which promote the
`release of 5- HT (serotonin) and NE (norepinephrine), providing the
`gustative sensation in the brain. So far, it is known that if the taste
`buds are stimulated with umami substances, signals are reflected in
`the primary and orbitofrontal gustative cortex (de Araújo, Kringelbach,
`Rolls, & Hobden, 2003).
`The interactions between the sensations of umami and salty tastes
`were evaluated by Yamaguchi and Kimizuka (1979). The authors ver-
`ified that some intensification of the salty taste occurs when umami
`substances are present. The main impact is the increase in salivary
`secretion, smoothness and continuity of the flavor in the mouth.
`Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms of the gustative reception are not
`clear and need more investigation (Chaudhari & Roper, 2010).
`
`3 |  APPLICATION OF FLAVOR ENHANCERS
`AS A TOOL TO REDUCE SODIUM CONTENT
`IN SPECIFIC FOOD PRODUCTS
`
`Free glutamate occurs naturally in several foods, such as tomatoes,
`parmesan cheese, meats, peas, corn, mushrooms, and asparagus,
`among others. On the other hand, free glutamate may also be found
`in processed foods as a result of the use of MSG as a flavor enhancer
`(Yamaguchi & Ninomiya, 2000).
`Since the 1950s, flavor enhancers, such as MSG, have been used
`in Brazil. ANVISA allows the use of MSG in several meat products,
`canned vegetables, food service preparations and fillings, among oth-
`ers. For milk products, the use is allowed only in grated cheese. For
`all products, the regulation specifies the use as quantum satis (suffi-
`cient to obtain the desired technological effect) (ANVISA 2001, 2010,
`2015).
`In comparison to NaCl, glutamate salts such as MSG or monoammo-
`nium L- glutamate and disodium inosinate and guanylate, have low or
`no sodium content (Figure 1). There is an appropriate amount of MSG
`for NaCl replacement with maintaining acceptance of the food. This is
`because an excess of MSG does not promote the umami taste and, on
`the contrary, could lead to an undesirable sensation (Jinap & Hajeb,
`2010). The recommendation for MSG use as food additive is 0.1%–
`0.8% of weight, which corresponds to the amount of free L- glutamate
`present naturally in tomato or parmesan cheese (Beyreuther et al.,
`2007). For MSG, the amount of sodium is 12.28 g/100 g, and this is
`1/3 of the sodium when compared to NaCl (39.34 g/100 g). To use
`
`    |  1041
`
`MSG in a homemade recipe, such as 500 g of foodstuff (rice, minced
`meat, etc.), a simple replacement of 1/2 teaspoon of NaCl (2.5 g) by
`1/2 teaspoon of MSG (2.0 g) reduces sodium content in about 37%
`(Maluly, Pagani, & Capparelo, 2013).
`The following sections present potential applications of MSG to
`reduce sodium content in specific foods.
`
`3.1 | Soups
`
`Yamaguchi and Takahashi (1984) were some of the first research-
`ers who tested different concentrations of NaCl and MSG in soups
`with reduced sodium content. The authors evaluated sensory panels
`via the consumption of sumashi-jiru, a popular soup in Japan, made
`with dried bonito fish. The scales used by the sensory panels varied
`in a range of seven points that considered the amount of NaCl and
`palatability: from “extremely strong or palatable” (+3) to “extremely
`weak or unpalatable” (−3). Each panelist evaluated nine samples ran-
`domly and considered the concentration of 0.81 g/100 g of NaCl and
`0.38 g/100 g of MSG as an ideal formulation. The authors verified
`that the reduction in the NaCl amount did not affect the palatability of
`the salty taste. With these concentrations, it was possible to reduce
`sodium content and maintain acceptability. This research suggested
`that to increase the palatability of reduced sodium products, MSG
`content should be tested at fixed concentrations while varying the
`levels of NaCl until finding the most appropriate combination. This is
`the best strategy to reduce the total sodium content in soups without
`influencing their palatability.
`A recent study conducted by Jinap et al. (2016) investigated the ac-
`ceptance of a sodium reduction in spicy soups (curry chicken and chili
`chicken) by Malaysian panelists, replacing NaCl with MSG. The authors
`verified that MSG could maintain the acceptability of the soups. The
`high score of acceptability was given for the soups with 0.8 g/100 g
`and 0.7 g/100 g of NaCl and MSG, respectively. These amounts corrob-
`orate a previous study published by Yamaguchi and Takahashi (1984),
`who noted that MSG could reduce the sodium content by 32.5%.
`
`3.2 | Stocks and seasonings
`
`Stocks and seasonings containing NaCl are generally the main vehicles
`to elevate sodium consumption, according to the POFs (2002–2003
`and 2008–2009) (Sarno et al., 2009, 2013).
`To evaluate the acceptance of stocks and seasonings with low-
`sodium content, Rodrigues, Junqueira, et al. (2014) performed a
`
`F I G U R E   1  Structures and sodium
`content of monosodium glutamate
`monohydrate, disodium inosinate and
`disodium guanylate
`
`MALULY et AL.
`
` 20487177, 2017, 6, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.499 by Iowa State University Library, Wiley Online Library on [06/12/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
`
`Ex. 1187
`
`

`

`1042  |    
`
`sensorial evaluation with garlic seasonings in three recipes of rice with
`0%, 25% and 50% less NaCl. The seasonings were made with different
`proportions of NaCl, KCl (potassium chloride) and MSG. The authors
`verified that the panelists did not notice a strange or bad taste in the
`preparations, although it was reported that they contained less salt. In
`general, the preparations with less sodium were well accepted and the
`authors concluded that to these panelists, this choice could be a good
`alternative to reduce sodium content in homemade recipes.
`Since the first industrialized stock cube was created by Julius
`Maggi in 1863 in Switzerland, there have been significant modifica-
`tions on the formulations and consumption profile of this product. The
`western population is the largest consumer of stock cubes, mainly due
`to the convenience and flavor enhancement of the meals. However,
`NaCl is used in large concentrations in these products, which led to
`a fourth monitoring agreement to reduce sodium content, which was
`signed between the ABIA and the Brazilian Ministry of Health in 2013
`(IDEC 2014).
`MSG is commonly added to stock cubes since it can intensify the
`overall flavor and increase the impact, continuity and complexity of
`the final preparation. For stocks, the technological recommendation is
`15%–25%, and for seasonings, the recommended levels are 50%- 70%
`(when up to 10% NaCl is used) or 8%–10% (when more than 10% of
`NaCl is present in the product). These percentages can vary according
`to the ingredients added. Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) are
`suggested in order to comply with the technological recommenda-
`tions and maintain the sensorial characteristics of foods (Maluly et al.,
`2013).
`A Malaysian study conducted with commercial products identified
`high concentrations of free glutamate in the chicken stock powder
`(170.90 ± 6.40 mg/g). The authors also verified that the high concen-
`trations were not from the addition of MSG alone but from the addi-
`tion of yeast extract. These concentrations were considered safe, but
`slightly high for some technological protocols. Therefore, sensorial and
`composition analyses are suggested so that reduced sodium prepara-
`tions do not exceed the technological limit of the umami taste sensi-
`tivity (Jinap & Hajeb, 2010; Khairunnisak, Azizah, Jinap, & NurulIzzah,
`2009).
`
`3.3 | Instant noodles
`
`Noodles are produced from wheat flour, buckwheat flour, rice flour
`or maize starch. These formulations can be modified according to the
`technology involved (Fu, 2008). Noodle dough needs NaCl, which has
`three different functions: gluten strengthening and elasticity, flavor
`and texture improvement, and the inhibition of microorganism growth
`and enzyme activation. Generally, 1%–3% and 8% NaCl are added to
`noodle formulations and Udon (a thick dough made with wheat flour
`or buckwheat), respectively (Fu, 2008). To rice flour noodles, which
`contain at least 7% protein, the main function of NaCl is to sustain the
`elasticity. Nevertheless, NaCl can reduce water penetration and in-
`crease the cooking time if the salt content is not controlled (Sangpring,
`Fukuoka, & Ratanasumawong, 2015).
`
`In addition to the use of NaCl in noodle dough, salt is also added in
`the seasoning. The analyses of 22 samples of instant noodles available
`in the Brazilian market raised a great concern mainly because the re-
`sults showed average levels of sodium content at 1,798 mg/100 g, with
`concentrations ranging between 1,435 mg/100 g and 2,160 mg/100 g
`when considering the overall product (dough + seasoning) and its re-
`constituted version (ANVISA 2012).
`The umami taste has a large impact in this kind of foodstuff since
`the seasonings are derived from meat and vegetables stocks, which
`are rich in glutamate, inosine and guanosine monophosphate. In the
`food industry, the use of umami substances in seasonings is extensive,
`and their recommended concentrations are 10–17 g/100 g for MSG
`or monoammonium glutamate (MAG), 0.5–0.7 g/100 g for disodium
`inosinate, and 0.3–0.7 g/100 g for the mixture of I + G (disodium ino-
`sinate + guanylate) (Maluly et al., 2013).
`In addition, it is suggested here that the technological recom-
`mendations concerning the use of flavor enhancers not be exceeded.
`Thereby, to reduce sodium in these products, the first approach is
`to create strategic government campaigns and warn the population
`about the reward of flavor variety in order to avoid food monotony,
`which will depend on consumption education and food behavior mod-
`ifications (Henney et al., 2010).
`
`3.4 | Meat products
`
`In general, meat products contain high sodium contents. NaCl is added
`for preservation purposes since it can prevent the growth of some
`pathogenic bacteria, extend the shelf life, ensure safety and tex-
`ture, and make the products softer (mainly lean meat) and with bet-
`ter flavor. Table 1 shows some processed meat products consumed
`in Brazil and their sodium contents, according to the Brazilian Food
`Composition Table (TACO, 2011).
`In an attempt to minimize the problems associated with high so-
`dium consumption, diverse protocols have been developed without
`compromising sensorial quality and the safety of meat products. Thus,
`Ruusunen, Simolin, and Puolanne (2001) verified an intensification of
`flavor when MSG, disodium inosinate (IMP) and guanylate (GMP) nu-
`cleotides were added to Bologna sausage formulations. The authors
`also demonstrated that even MSG added alone enhanced the senso-
`rial quality of the products. The salty taste sensation was improved in
`sausages with MSG.
`Quadros, Rocha, Ferreira, and Bolini (2015) evaluated the senso-
`rial profile of a fish (Mackerel) hamburger with reduced sodium. The
`hamburgers were formulated with whole minced fish after remov-
`ing residues via washing, such as hemoglobin and soluble proteins,
`which may interfere in the flavor and shelf- life of the preparations.
`The concentrations of 1.5 g/100 g and 0.75 g/100 g of NaCl as-
`sociated with 0.3 g/100 g of MSG were used in the different for-
`mulations. The results showed that MSG did not interfere directly
`with the final scores, but it contributed to the increase in accep-
`tance scores among products containing 0.75 g NaCl/100 g (50%
`reduction).
`
`MALULY et AL.
`
` 20487177, 2017, 6, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.499 by Iowa State University Library, Wiley Online Library on [06/12/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
`
`Ex. 1187
`
`

`

`T A B L E   1  Processed meat products and sodium content.
`
`Processed meat
`products
`
`Sodium
`content
`(mg/100 g)a
`
`Sodium
`content/
`portion (mg)
`
`Portion (g)b
`
`81
`1443
`5875
`869
`1252
`1090
`1126
`1374
`
`1351
`
`1176
`1432
`1456
`1212
`1021
`
`1039
`
`1574
`50
`125
`1256
`666
`
`Formed ham
`Jerked beef, cooked
`Jerked beef, raw
`Beef burger, raw
`Beef burger, fried
`Beef burger, grilled
`Chicken sausage, raw
`Chicken sausage,
`fried
`Chicken sausage,
`grilled
`Pork sausage, raw
`Pork sausage, fried
`Pork sausage, grilled
`Bologna sausage
`Cooked ham with fat
`covering
`Cooked ham without
`fat covering
`Salami
`Belly pork, raw
`Belly pork, fried
`Salty cod fish, braise
`Sardine, canned
`aValues from TACO (2011).
`bCalculation determined through the RDC nº 359, 12/23/2003 (ANVISA,
`2003).
`
`30
`30
`30
`80
`80
`80
`50
`50
`
`50
`
`50
`50
`50
`40
`40
`
`40
`
`40
`100
`100
`60
`60
`
`283
`433
`1763
`695
`1002
`872
`563
`687
`
`676
`
`588
`716
`728
`485
`408
`
`416
`
`630
`50
`125
`754
`400
`
`3.5 | Snacks
`
`In addition to potato chips, different kinds of snacks have emerged
`in the market, such as tortilla chips in Mexico and the US, pretzels in
`Italy and Germany, and popcorn, hazelnuts, nuts and seeds, and meat
`products, such as jerky in the US. Among Brazilian commercial snacks,
`other than potatoes, tortillas and extruded snacks, there are some
`nuts, such as peanuts and Brazil nuts.
`TACO (2011) provided the sodium content of some snacks. In
`salted roasted almonds only traces were found; concentrations at
`167 mg/100 g were verified in roasted and salty cashew nuts, whereas
`16 mg/100 g were reported in Brazil nuts. ANVISA (2012) reported
`levels of 1,092 mg/100 g in salty cassava flour biscuits, 779 mg/100 g
`in corn- extruded snacks, 741 mg/100 g
`in salty crackers and
`624 mg/100 g in potato chips.
`Brazilian customers are beginning to look for healthy snacks, such
`as those made with vegetables and with reduced sodium and fat con-
`tent (Barbosa, Madi, Toledo, & Rego, 2010). Consequently, the food
`industry has been trying to differentiate their products in this com-
`petitive market. Thus, flavor enhancers, as MSG, have been applied
`
`    |  1043
`
`in snacks to reduce sodium content. However, the total substitution
`of NaCl by flavor enhancers is not possible. Nevertheless, these sub-
`stances are used to harmonize the salty taste during taste perception.
`MSG stimulates the salivation and intensifies other flavors, such as
`aromas from certain herbs used in these products (Ainsworth &
`Plunkett, 2007).
`To reduce NaCl in snacks, the technological recommendation of
`MSG is up to 0.5 g/100 g. This is mainly due to the interactions with
`the salty taste and its property of covering- up the residual bitter taste
`promoted by NaCl substitutes, such as potassium chloride (Yamaguchi
`& Kimizuka, 1979).
`Attempts to use MSG in potato chips were made to reduce oil up-
`take and salt content. A solution containing NaCl (0.5 g/100 g) and
`MSG (0.03–0.3 g/100 g) was used in six different tests in vacuum con-
`ditions. Consequently, a transfer mass phenomenon was produced by
`the impregnation of the solutes into the potato and the loss of water
`from the pores. The entrance of the two solutes into the pores, par-
`tially substituting the water lost in the process, reduced the evapo-
`rated water bubbles inside the tissue. The fried potatoes, with 19%
`less water, consumed less heat flow (160–165°C) to change the vapor
`state, whereas a larger amount of sensitive heat was required to act
`in the dry matter, which favors the decrease in the oil flow into the
`pores. This could also lead to the decrease in acrylamide formation,
`which is desirable from a health and safety point of view and to the
`formation of a crunchy layer, which is desirable from a sensorial point
`of view. Furthermore, NaCl and MSG were used in low concentrations
`when compared to the usual conditions, reducing the sodium content
`(Silvera, 2013).
`
`3.6 | Milk products
`
`The direct addition of MSG is generally not applied in cheeses
`(ANVISA, 2015). Nevertheless, some researchers performed specific
`sensorial analyses to test flavor enhancer applications in mozzarella
`and cream cheese (Rodrigues, Gonçalves, Pereira, de Deus Souza
`Carneiro, & Pinheiro, 2014; Silva, de Souza, Pinheiro, Nunes, & Freire,
`2013).
`Three formulations of brines used for the preparation of Mozzarella
`cheese were evaluated: A (without reduced NaCl – 300 g/L); B (25%
`reduced NaCl – 225 g/L + 64.6 g/L of KCl + 40.2 g/L of MSG); C (50%
`reduced NaCl – 150 g/L + 43 g/L of KCl + 160.8 g/L of MSG). The
`formulations B and C resulted in a 30 and 54% sodium reduction, re-
`spectively. These reductions were obtained due to the diffusion coef-
`ficients of the salts in brines. After Time- Intensity (TI) evaluation of the
`salty taste and Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS) tests, it was
`possible to verify that the modifications of the sodium content did not
`affect the palatability significantly; however, a lower salty taste sen-
`sation was reported. The reduced sodium formulations were widely
`accepted, and the authors discussed that the use of MSG and other
`flavor enhancers in formulations containing KCl are crucial for avoiding
`bitter or metallic residues (Rodrigues, Gonçalves, et al., 2014).
`Cream cheese was investigated by Silva et al. (2013). Different
`types of NaCl substitutes were tested including KCl, magnesium and
`
`MALULY et AL.
`
` 20487177, 2017, 6, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.499 by Iowa State University Library, Wiley Online Library on [06/12/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
`
`Ex. 1187
`
`

`

`1044  |    
`
`calcium chloride, calcium and potassium lactate, and potassium phos-
`phate. The authors found that KCl provided the highest salting equiva-
`lence when compared to NaCl, while MSG had a lower equivalence of
`salt. The partial substitution of NaCl by MSG intensified the salty taste
`according to the TDS test, giving the continuity of the sensation for
`8 min. Beyreuther et al. (2007) reported that flavor enhancers impart
`the umami taste and boost other flavors. Thus, researchers need to
`pay attention to their self- limiting addition of those food additives.
`
`4 |  SAFETY ASPECTS OF MONOSODIUM
`GLUTAMATE
`
`The available scientific data on the potential toxicity of MSG included
`studies on acute, subchronic and chronic, toxicity, as well as studies
`on teratogenicity and reproductive toxicity, in different animal species
`such as rats, mice, dogs, and rabbits. A detailed discussion on the re-
`sults of those studies was reported by Reyes, Areas, and Maluly (2013).
`
`4.1 | Toxicological aspects
`
`4.1.1 | Metabolism and pharmacokinetics
`
`After ingestion, glutamate is absorbed by the cells of the gastrointes-
`tinal tract and is catabolized in the cytosol and mitochondria by the
`transamination reaction under the action of various enzymes present
`in the stomach, intestines, and colon. One of the products of this ca-
`tabolism, α- ketoglutarate, can enter the tricarboxylic acid cycle, re-
`leasing energy (ATP) and carbon dioxide. Other metabolic products
`include lactate, glutathione, glutamine, alanine, and various other
`amino acids (Burrin & Stoll, 2009).
`Most of the glutamate present in foods (up to 95%) is metabo-
`lized by the first- pass effect and is used as an energy source by the
`enterocytes of the intestinal mucosa, whether it was added as a food
`additive or was naturally present in food (Reeds, Burrin, Stoll, & Jahoor,
`2000). Therefore, even after the ingestion of large amounts of protein
`in the diet, the glutamate levels in plasma are low due to its rapid me-
`tabolism in the intestinal mucosa cells. The ingested glutamate that is
`not metabolized in the gastrointestinal tract enters the hepatic portal
`circulation and is metabolized in the liver, generating energy via the
`Krebs cycle or being converted into urea for excretion in urine (Burrin
`& Stoll, 2009).
`The food components may also reduce the plasma concentration
`of glutamate when compared to the oral administration of the sub-
`stance in water, especially if the food is rich in metabolizable carbo-
`hydrates. These carbohydrates provide pyruvate as a substrate for
`glutamate in the mucosal cells, so more alanine is formed and less
`glutamate reaches the portal circulation (Stegink, Filer, & Baker, 1987).
`
`4.1.2 | Toxicity
`
`In tests performed with rats and mice, very low acute toxicity was
`verified after the oral administration of glutamate, with an LD50 (lethal
`
`dose that kills 50% of the animals studied) ranging from 10 to 22.8 g/
`kg bw (JECFA 1988; Walker & Lupien, 2000).
`JECFA (1988) evaluated subchronic and chronic toxicity studies
`conducted in rats and mice and that included the reproductive phase.
`Data showed that long- term exposure to MSG, when administered in
`the diet at up to 4.0%, did not elic

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket