throbber
Trials
`Sauer, Joseph M.; Trials
`Rob Brunelli; jvick@sheridanross.com; Pilot-NocoIPR-ServiceSR; Cochran, David B.; Johnson, Matthew W.;
`Karfes, Irene M.A.; Graves, Jack M.
`RE: IPR2023-00167: Motion to Enter Judgement for Petitioner Under Collateral Estoppel and 37 C.F.R. 42.73(d)
`(3)
`Tuesday, January 30, 2024 3:09:02 PM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`
`Counsel,
`
`In response to Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a motion for entry of judgment on the
`basis of collateral estoppel and 37 C.F.R. 42.73(d)(3), and Patent Owner’s non-opposition thereto,
`the Board authorizes Petitioner’s filing of such a motion, not to exceed seven pages, by February 8,
`2024. Patent Owner may file a response, not to exceed seven pages, no later than February 22,
`2024.
`
`Additionally, in view of Patent Owner’s decision not to file a Response to the Petition, the Board is
`inclined to cancel the hearing scheduled for March 19, 2024. We ask that the parties please respond
`by email before the close of business on January 31, 2024 to let us know if this course of action is
`acceptable. If either party needs more time, or would prefer to have a call with the Board to discuss
`this, please indicate that in your email.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Sauer, Joseph M. <jmsauer@JonesDay.com>
`Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 1:48 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Rob Brunelli <rbrunelli@sheridanross.com>; jvick@sheridanross.com; Pilot-NocoIPR-ServiceSR
`<Pilot-NocoIPR-ServiceSR@sheridanross.com>; Cochran, David B. <dcochran@JonesDay.com>;
`Johnson, Matthew W. <mwjohnson@JonesDay.com>; Karfes, Irene M.A.
`<imkarfes@JonesDay.com>; Graves, Jack M. <jgraves@jonesday.com>
`Subject: IPR2023-00167: Motion to Enter Judgement for Petitioner Under Collateral Estoppel and 37
`C.F.R. 42.73(d)(3)
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`Petitioner Noco requests leave to file a motion in the above IPR proceeding for entry of judgement
`in favor of Petitioner on the basis of collateral estoppel and 37 C.F.R. 42.73(d)(3). A Final Written
`Decision was recently issued in related IPR2022-01237 finding all challenged claims of U.S. Patent
`
`Exhibit 3001
`
`

`

`No. 11,124,077 (the “’077 Patent”) unpatentable. Since the claims of the ’077 patent are
`substantially similar (in fact nearly identical) to the claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,235,673 (the “’673
`Patent”) at issue in IPR2023-00167, and because Patent Owner waived it opportunity to appeal the
`FWD by failing to file a response, all arguments and evidence presented by Patent Owner in favor of
`patentability of any claim of the ‘673 Patent are now precluded under the principals of collateral
`estoppel and 37 C.F.R. 42.73(d)(3).
`
`Petitioner has conferred with counsel for Patent Owner, and Patent Owner’s counsel has indicated
`that they will not oppose the motion (see email trail below).
`
`Counsel for Petitioner is available for a phone call with the Board to discuss the proposed motion if it
`would be helpful.
`
`With best regards,
`
`Joseph M. Sauer
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`Office +1.216.586.7506
`Mobile +1.216.496.7849
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`Joseph M. Sauer
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`Office +1.216.586.7506
`Mobile +1.216.496.7849
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`
`From: Rob Brunelli <rbrunelli@sheridanross.com>
`Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 1:32 PM
`To: Sauer, Joseph M. <jmsauer@JonesDay.com>
`Cc: Jason Vick <JVick@sheridanross.com>; Pilot-NocoIPR-ServiceSR <Pilot-NocoIPR-
`ServiceSR@sheridanross.com>; Cochran, David B. <dcochran@JonesDay.com>; Johnson, Matthew
`W. <mwjohnson@JonesDay.com>; Graves, Jack M. <jgraves@jonesday.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2023-00167: Motion to Enter Judgement for Petitioner Under Collateral Estoppel
`and 37 C.F.R. 42.73(d)(3)
`
`Thank you for the email. Pilot will not oppose.
`
`
`Sent from my iPhone
`
`Thank you for the email. Pilot will not oppose. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 29, 2024, at 9: 21 AM, Sauer, Joseph M. <jmsauer@ jonesday. com> wrote:  CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL Dear Counsel, Noco intends to request leave from the Board to file
`
`
`

`

`
`
`On Jan 29, 2024, at 9:21 AM, Sauer, Joseph M. <jmsauer@jonesday.com> wrote:
`
`CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL
`
`Dear Counsel,
`
`Noco intends to request leave from the Board to file a motion in the above IPR matter
`for entry of judgement in favor of Petitioner on the basis of collateral estoppel and 37
`C.F.R. 42.73(d)(3). As you know, a Final Written Decision was recently issued in related
`IPR2022-01237 finding all challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,124,077 (the “’077
`Patent”) unpatentable. Since the claims of the ’077 patent are substantially similar (in
`fact nearly identical) to the claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,235,673 (the “’673 Patent”) at
`issue in IPR2023-00167, and because Patent Owner waived it opportunity to appeal the
`FWD by failing to file a response, all arguments and evidence presented by Patent
`Owner in favor of patentability of any claim of the ‘673 Patent are now precluded
`under the principals of collateral estoppel and 36 C.F.R. 42.73(d)(3).
`
`Please let us know by COB today if Pilot will oppose this motion.
`
`With best regard,
`
`Joseph M. Sauer
`Partner
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide℠
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`Office +1.216.586.7506
`Mobile +1.216.496.7849
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private,
`confidential, or protected by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-
`mail in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by
`reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or
`protected by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it
`from your system without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be
`corrected.***
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket