throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00077-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 6 PagelD #: 277
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`IMAGE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`V.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC. and LG
`ELECTRONICS USA, INC.,
`
`Defendants
`





`§Case No. 2:22-CV-00077-JRG-RSP




`
`DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`In accordance with the scheduling conference held in this case, it is hereby ORDERED
`
`that the following schedule of deadlines is in effect until fmi her order of this Comi:
`
`October 30, 2023
`
`*Jmy Selection- 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas
`
`October 3, 2023
`
`* If a juror questionnaire is to be used, an editable (in Microsoft Word
`fonnat) questionnaire shall be jointly submitted to the Deputy Clerk
`in Charge by this date. 1
`
`October 3, 2023
`
`*Preti·ial Conference - 9 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before Judge Roy
`Payne
`
`September 18, 2023
`
`*Notify Comi of Agreements Reached During Meet and Confer
`
`September 18, 2023
`
`The pa1iies are ordered to meet and confer on any outstanding
`objections or motions in limine. The pa1iies shall advise the Comi of
`any agreements reached no later than 1 :00 p.m. three (3) business
`days before the preu-ial conference.
`
`*File Joint Preu-ial Order, Joint Proposed Jmy Insti11ctions, Joint
`Proposed Verdict Fonn, Responses to Motions in Limine, Updated
`Exhibit Lists, Updated Witness Lists, and Updated Deposition
`Designations
`
`1 The Pa1iies are refeITed to the Comi 's Standing Order Regarding Use of Juror Questionnaires in
`Advance of Voir Dire.
`
`Petitioner LG Ex-1013, 0001
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00077-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 08/09/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 278
`
`September 11, 2023
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is
`requested for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file
`a notice with the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Shawn
`McRoberts, at shawn mcroberts@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`September 8, 2023
`
`File Motions in Limine
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine to issues that if
`improperly introduced at trial would be so prejudicial that the Court
`could not alleviate the prejudice by giving appropriate instructions to
`the jury.
`
`September 8, 2023
`
`Serve Objections to Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`August 28, 2023
`
`August 14, 2023
`
`August 7, 2023
`
`Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and Serve Rebuttal Pretrial
`Disclosures
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (Witness List, Deposition Designations,
`and Exhibit List) by the Party with the Burden of Proof
`
`*Response to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert Motions).
`Responses to dispositive motions that were filed prior to the
`dispositive motion deadline, including Daubert Motions, shall be due
`in accordance with Local Rule CV-7(e), not to exceed the deadline
`as set forth in this Docket Control Order.2 Motions for Summary
`Judgment shall comply with Local Rule CV-56.
`
`July 24, 2023
`
`*File Motions to Strike Expert Testimony (including Daubert
`Motions)
`
`No motion to strike expert testimony (including a Daubert motion)
`may be filed after this date without leave of the Court.
`
`2 The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in part that “[a] party’s failure to
`oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein creates a presumption that the party does not
`controvert the facts set out by movant and has no evidence to offer in opposition to the motion.”
`If the deadline under Local Rule CV 7(e) exceeds the deadline for Response to Dispositive
`Motions, the deadline for Response to Dispositive Motions controls.
`
`- 2 -
`
`Petitioner LG Ex-1013, 0002
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00077-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 08/09/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 279
`
`July 24, 2023
`
`*File Dispositive Motions
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date without leave of
`the Court.
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and Local Rule CV-7.
`Motions to extend page limits will only be granted in exceptional
`circumstances. Exceptional circumstances require more than
`agreement among the parties.
`
`Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery
`
`Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File Motions to Compel
`Discovery
`
`Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the Party with the Burden
`of Proof
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7 (Opinion of Counsel Defenses)
`
`*Claim Construction Hearing – 9 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before
`Judge Roy Payne
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(d) (Joint Claim Construction Chart)
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(c) (Reply Claim Construction Brief)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(b) (Responsive Claim Construction Brief)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(a) (Opening Claim Construction Brief) and
`Submit Technical Tutorials (if any)
`
`Good cause must be shown to submit technical tutorials after the
`deadline to comply with P.R. 4-5(a).
`
`July 17, 2023
`
`June 30, 2023
`
`June 9, 2023
`
`June 9, 2023
`
`May 16, 2023
`
`April 25, 2023
`
`April 11, 2023
`
`April 4, 2023
`
`March 28, 2023
`
`March 14, 2023
`
`March 14, 2023
`
`Deadline to Substantially Complete Document Production and
`Exchange Privilege Logs
`
`Counsel are expected to make good faith efforts to produce all
`required documents as soon as they are available and not wait until
`the substantial completion deadline.
`
`February 28, 2023
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-4 (Deadline to Complete Claim Construction
`Discovery)
`
`- 3 -
`
`Petitioner LG Ex-1013, 0003
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00077-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 08/09/22 Page 4 of 6 PagelD #: 280
`
`Febrnaiy 21, 2023
`
`File Response to Amended Pleadings
`
`Febrnaiy 7, 2023
`
`*File Amended Pleadings
`
`It is not necessaiy to seek leave of Comi to amend pleadings prior to
`this deadline unless the amendment seeks to asse1i additional patents.
`
`Januaiy 31, 2023
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-3 (Joint Claim Construction Statement)
`
`Januaiy 10, 2023
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-2 (Exchange Preliminaiy Claim Constructions)
`
`December 20, 2022
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-1 (Exchange Proposed Claim Ten ns)
`
`August 30, 2022
`
`Comply with Standing Order Regai·ding Subject-Matter
`Eligibility Contentions
`
`August 30, 2022
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 (Invalidity Contentions)
`
`August 9, 2022
`
`*File Proposed Protective Order and Comply with Paragraphs 1 & 3
`of the Discove1y Order (Initial and Additional Disclosures)
`
`The Proposed Protective Order shall be filed as a separate motion
`with the caption indicating whether or not the proposed order is
`opposed in any pa1i.
`
`August 2, 2022
`
`*File Proposed Docket Conu-ol Order and Proposed Discove1y Order
`
`The Proposed Docket Contr·ol Order and Proposed Discove1y Order
`shall be filed as sepai·ate motions with the caption indicating whether
`or not the proposed order is opposed in any paii.
`
`July 26, 2022
`
`Join Additional Paiiies
`
`July 5, 2022
`(*) indicates a deadline that cannot be changed without showing good cause. Good cause is
`not shown merely by indicating that the parties agree that the deadline should be changed.
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement Contentions)
`
`ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`
`Mediation: While ce1iain cases may benefit from mediation, such may not be appropriate
`for eve1y case. The Court finds that the Paiiies ai·e best suited to evaluate whether mediation will
`benefit the case after the issuance of the Comi's claim constr11ction order. Accordingly, the Court
`
`- 4 -
`
`Petitioner LG Ex-1013, 0004
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00077-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 08/09/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 281
`
`ORDERS the Parties to file a Joint Notice indicating whether the case should be referred for
`mediation within fourteen days of the issuance of the Court’s claim construction order. As a
`part of such Joint Notice, the Parties should indicate whether they have a mutually agreeable
`mediator for the Court to consider. If the Parties disagree about whether mediation is appropriate,
`the Parties should set forth a brief statement of their competing positions in the Joint Notice.
`
`Summary Judgment Motions, Motions to Strike Expert Testimony, and Daubert
`Motions: For each motion, the moving party shall provide the Court with two (2) hard copies of
`the completed briefing (opening motion, response, reply, and if applicable, sur-reply), excluding
`exhibits, in D-three-ring binders, appropriately tabbed. All documents shall be single-sided and
`must include the CM/ECF header. These copies shall be delivered to the Court within three (3)
`business days after briefing has completed. For expert-related motions, complete digital copies of
`the relevant expert report(s) and accompanying exhibits shall be submitted on a single flash drive
`to the Court. Complete digital copies of the expert report(s) shall be delivered to the Court no later
`than the dispositive motion deadline.
`
`Indefiniteness: In lieu of early motions for summary judgment, the parties are directed to
`include any arguments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their Markman briefing, subject to
`the local rules’ normal page limits.
`
`Lead Counsel: The Parties are directed to Local Rule CV-11(a)(1), which provides that
`
`“[o]n the first appearance through counsel, each party shall designate a lead attorney on the
`pleadings or otherwise.” Additionally, once designated, a party’s lead attorney may only be
`changed by the filing of a Motion to Change Lead Counsel and thereafter obtaining from the Court
`an Order granting leave to designate different lead counsel.
`
`Motions for Continuance: The following excuses will not warrant a continuance nor
`justify a failure to comply with the discovery deadline:
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;
`
`The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day,
`unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special
`provision for the parties in the other case;
`
`The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it
`was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.
`
`Amendments to the Docket Control Order (“DCO”): Any motion to alter any date on
`the DCO shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion to amend the DCO shall
`include a proposed order that lists all of the remaining dates in one column (as above) and the
`proposed changes to each date in an additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a date
`the proposed date column should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). In other words,
`the DCO in the proposed order should be complete such that one can clearly see all the remaining
`deadlines and the changes, if any, to those deadlines, rather than needing to also refer to an earlier
`version of the DCO.
`
`- 5 -
`
`Petitioner LG Ex-1013, 0005
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00077-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 08/09/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 282
`
`Proposed DCO: The Parties’ Proposed DCO should also follow the format described
`above under “Amendments to the Docket Control Order (‘DCO’).”
`
`Joint Pretrial Order: In the contentions of the Parties included in the Joint Pretrial Order,
`the Plaintiff shall specify all allegedly infringed claims that will be asserted at trial. The Plaintiff
`shall also specify the nature of each theory of infringement, including under which subsections of
`35 U.S.C. § 271 it alleges infringement, and whether the Plaintiff alleges divided infringement or
`infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. Each Defendant shall indicate the nature of each
`theory of invalidity, including invalidity for anticipation, obviousness, subject-matter eligibility,
`written description, enablement, or any other basis for invalidity. The Defendant shall also specify
`each prior art reference or combination of references upon which the Defendant shall rely at trial,
`with respect to each theory of invalidity. The contentions of the Parties may not be amended,
`supplemented, or dropped without leave of the Court based upon a showing of good cause.
`
`- 6 -
`
`Petitioner LG Ex-1013, 0006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket