`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Lisa Larson <llarson@jcrew.com>
`Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:37 PM
`Mark Frigon
`Re: Your DailyCandy -- Naming Names
`
`Categories:
`
`frigon@sacko, Personal
`
`ok, did you just want me to put my phone number, birthdate and salary in there? done. i looked around a little bit but it
`takes a while....my connection must stink! so you like the sock idea but what about the sweater? eh?
`-----Original Message-----
`From: Mark Frigon <frigon@sacko.com>
`To: Lisa Larson <llarson@jcrew.com>
`Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 10:28 AM
`Subject: RE: Your DailyCandy -- Naming Names
`
`
`>that should work pretty good... nothing beats sock... especially guy socks.
`>if you want to update your address information that'd be great... you
`should
`>be able to just go www.sacko.com that should work for a little bit...
`thanks
`>again see you later aligator.
`>
`>-----Original Message-----
`>From: Lisa Larson [mailto:llarson@jcrew.com]
`>Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 3:16 PM
`>To: Mark Frigon
`>Subject: Re: Your DailyCandy -- Naming Names
`>
`>
`>honestly, I was pretty much joking! thanks for the concern but it
`>really isn't my business what you are doing on your weekends! thanks though baby!
`>i got malone a navy guy looking wool, crew neck sweater and a pair or
`>cool socks...what do you think?
`>-----Original Message-----
`>From: Mark Frigon <frigon@sacko.com>
`>To: Lisa Larson <llarson@jcrew.com>
`>Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:14 AM
`>Subject: RE: Your DailyCandy -- Naming Names
`>
`>
`>>hey, thanks for looking at the website... sorry about the picture of
`>>those girl, i swear i just threw random numbers into the database so
`>>that you'd have something to look at and those happened to be the
`>>pictures... and it was brian's girlfriend and steph's roomate. sorry
`>>to sound paranoid but i don't want you thinking that it was either
`>>intentional or even that
`>anything
`
`1
`
`Angel Tech Exhibit 2015
`Meta v. Angel Tech
`IPR2023-00059
`
`
`
`>>happened with anyone last weekend okay?
`>>
`>>-----Original Message-----
`>>From: Lisa Larson [mailto:llarson@jcrew.com]
`>>Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 12:21 PM
`>>To: Mark Frigon
`>>Subject: Fw: Your DailyCandy -- Naming Names
`>>
`>>
`>>Kaleigh made the list w/ a different spelling....scroll down!
`>>-----Original Message-----
`>>From: today@dailycandy.com <today@dailycandy.com>
`>>To: llarson@jcrew.com <llarson@jcrew.com>
`>>Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:01 AM
`>>Subject: Your DailyCandy -- Naming Names
`>>
`>>
`>>>This is the text-version of DailyCandy. To see the accompanying
`>>>visuals, go to: http://www.dailycandy.com and click on "Today's Candy."
`>>>
`>>>
`>>>Naming Names
`>>>09.28.00
`>>>
`>>>So you've found the mate (finally!)
`>>>
`>>>You've decided it's time.
`>>>
`>>>You've done due diligence: You're propagating.
`>>>
`>>>Now, what to name the darn thing?
`>>>
`>>>Some fun facts: The most popular names of 1999? For boys--Jacob (the
`first
`>>time since the 1970s that it wasn't Michael). For girls--Emily.
`>>>
`>>>Interestingly, the name Kato has more than doubled in popularity in
`>America
`>>since the O.J. trial. Diana has tripled since the tragic death of Di
`>>Spencer.
`>>>
`>>>What's the hottest name of 1999?
`>>>
`>>>Chelsea, at No.94. (We're a sentimental country, folks!)
`>>>
`>>>The mere fact that Monica was No.85 seems to be more than a coincidence.
`>>>
`>>>
`>>>So. . .long gone are the 1940s staples of Eugene and Herbert, now we
`>>>have
`>>Jake (Melrose Place) at No.1, Brandon (90210) at No.9, Dylan (90210)
`>>at No.16, David (90210) No.17, Bailey (Party of Five) No.66, and Luke
`
`2
`
`
`
`>>at
`>No.69.
`>>>
`>>>Other notables on the list were Madison, Makayla, Chloe, and Kaylee.
`>>>
`>>>Tell that to the class of 2020 packed full of Giseles, Gwyneths, and
`>>Leonardos.
`>>>
`>>>
`>>>Check out other trendy names at
`>>http://www.babycenter.com/babyname/popnames.html
`>>>
`>>>
`>>>Buy a top rated book on baby naming on Amazon:
`>>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0671521276/dailycandy"
`>>>
`>>>
`>>>
`>>>**********************************
`>>>
`>>>Thursdays are for thinking luxury!
`>>>Think Moschino!
`>>>Luxloook.com offers the latest designer accessories Fall 2000
`>>>collections from Moschino, Dolce & Gabbana, Versace, Valentino,
`>>>Missoni, Paul Smith, ...
`>>>http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;1739966;4720593;w?http://www.luxlook.co
`>>>m/De
`t
`>e
`>>rmineSite.process
`>>>
`>>>
`>>>*********************************
`>>>
`>>>
`>>>Visit the DailyCandy web site at http://www.dailycandy.com To
`>>>subscribe to DailyCandy, go to
`>>>http://www.dailycandy.com/subscribe.asp
`>>>To unsubscribe, go to http://www.dailycandy.com/settings.asp
`>>>Read our Privacy Policy at http://www.dailycandy.com/privacy.htm
`>>
`>
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
