`
`Filed on behalf of: Meta Platforms, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Entered: June 14, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`
`META PLATFORMS, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ANGEL TECHNOLOGIES GROUP LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`__________________
`Case No. IPR2023-00058
`U.S. Patent No. 9,959,291 B2
`__________________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF ERIC E. LANCASTER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00058 (USP 9,959,291)
`
`
`I.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to
`
`Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper No. 3),
`
`Petitioner Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Petitioner’”) respectfully requests the pro hac
`
`vice admission of attorney Eric E. Lancaster, Esq. in this proceeding.
`
`II. LEGAL STANDARD
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c):
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead
`counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the
`Board may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that
`counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`The Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper No. 3) further instructs:
`
`The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of
`counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause. The parties
`are authorized to file motions for pro hac vice admission under 37
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the
`“Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case
`IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00058 (USP 9,959,291)
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`Board Web site under “Representative Orders, Decisions, and
`Notices.”
`
`(Id. at 2.) The above referenced “Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission” further provides:
`
`A motion for pro hac vice admission must:
`
`a.
`
`Contain a statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board
`
`to recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding.
`
`b.
`
`Be accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the individual
`
`seeking to appear attesting to the following:
`
`i. Membership in good standing of the Bar of at least one State or
`
`the District of Columbia;
`
`ii.
`
`No suspensions or disbarments from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body;
`
`iii. No application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body ever denied;
`
`iv. No sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`
`administrative body;
`
`v.
`
`The individual seeking to appear has read and will comply with
`
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and Board’s Rules of
`
`Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00058 (USP 9,959,291)
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`vi.
`
`The individual will be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`
`vii. All other proceedings before the Office for which the individual
`
`has applied to appear pro hac vice in the last (3) years; and
`
`viii. Familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`(IPR2013-00639, Paper No. 7 at 2.) As set forth below, and in the accompanying
`
`Declaration of Eric E. Lancaster (Ex. 1037, “Lancaster Decl.”), each of these
`
`requirements is satisfied here.
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS SHOWING GOOD CAUSE FOR THE
`BOARD TO RECOGNIZE ERIC E. LANCASTER PRO HAC VICE IN
`THE PROCEEDING
`Mr. Lancaster is a member in good standing of the California Bar (Bar No.
`
`244449) and is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the
`
`Central District of California, the United States District Court for the Northern
`
`District of California, the United States District Court for the Southern District of
`
`California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, and the
`
`United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (Lancaster Decl.
`
`¶1.) Mr. Lancaster has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body. (Id. ¶2.) No application of Mr. Lancaster for
`
`admission to practice before any court or administrative body has ever been
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00058 (USP 9,959,291)
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`
`denied. (Id. ¶3.) Nor has any court or administrative body imposed sanctions or
`
`contempt citations against Mr. Lancaster. (Id. ¶4.) Mr. Lancaster has read, fully
`
`understands, and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in Part 42 of Title 37 of the C.F.R.
`
`(Id. ¶5.) Mr. Lancaster acknowledges and agrees that he will be subject to the
`
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). (Id. ¶6.)
`
`Petitioner’s lead counsel in this proceeding, Lisa K. Nguyen, is a
`
`registered practitioner (Reg. No. 58,018). Moreover, as set forth below (and in
`
`his accompanying declaration), Mr. Lancaster is both an experienced and
`
`technically trained litigation attorney with an established familiarity with the
`
`subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`Mr. Lancaster received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and a
`
`Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry from the University of California, Davis
`
`in 2002. (Id. ¶7.) He earned his Juris Doctor degree from Santa Clara University
`
`School of Law in 2006. (Id.)
`
`Mr. Lancaster is a partner in Allen & Overy’s intellectual property practice.
`
`(Id. ¶8.) He joined the group in August 2021. (Id.)
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00058 (USP 9,959,291)
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`Mr. Lancaster has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue,
`
`having been actively involved in analyzing and assisting with the Petitions for
`
`Inter Partes Review submitted in this proceeding. (Id. ¶9.)
`
`Within the past three years, Mr. Lancaster has applied and has been admitted
`
`to appear pro hac vice in ResMed, Inc. v. New York University, Nos. IPR2022-
`
`00988, IPR2022-00989, IPR2022-00990, IPR2022-00991, IPR2022-00992,
`
`IPR2022-00993, and IPR2022-00994. (Id. ¶10.)
`
`In view of Mr. Lancaster’s knowledge of the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding, Petitioner has a substantial need for Mr. Lancaster’s pro hac vice
`
`admission and his involvement in the continued prosecution of this proceeding.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`For all of the reasons set forth above, Petitioner respectfully requests that the
`
`Board admit Eric E. Lancaster pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: June 14, 2023
`
`Respectfully submitted
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Lisa K. Nguyen/
`Lisa K. Nguyen (Reg. No. 58,018)
`lisa.nguyen@allenovery.com
`Allen & Overy LLP
`550 High Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94301
`Telephone: 650.388.1724
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00058 (USP 9,959,291)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Meta Platforms, Inc.
`
`6
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00058 (USP 9,959,291)
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that on this 14 day of June, 2023, a
`
`true and correct copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s Motion For Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Eric E. Lancaster Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C) was served by
`
`electronic mail on Patent Owner’s lead and backup counsel at the following email
`
`addresses:
`
`Scott W. Hejny (Reg. No. 45,882)
`shejny@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Arvind Jairam (Reg. No. 62,759)
`ajairam@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Eliza Beeney (pro hac vice)
`ebeeney@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Kaylee Hoffner (pro hac vice)
`khoffner@mckoolsmith.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`/Lisa K. Nguyen/
`Lisa K. Nguyen (Reg. No. 58,018)
`lisa.nguyen@allenovery.com
`Allen & Overy LLP
`550 High Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94301
`Telephone: 650.388.1724
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Meta Platforms, Inc.
`
`
`
`7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
