`
`Filed on behalf of: Meta Platforms, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Entered: June 14, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`
`META PLATFORMS, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ANGEL TECHNOLOGIES GROUP LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`__________________
`Case No. IPR2023-00057
`U.S. Patent No. 8,954,432
`__________________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF ERIC E. LANCASTER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00057 (USP 8,954,432)
`
`
`I.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to
`
`Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper No. 3),
`
`Petitioner Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Petitioner’”) respectfully requests the pro hac
`
`vice admission of attorney Eric E. Lancaster, Esq. in this proceeding.
`
`II. LEGAL STANDARD
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c):
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead
`counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the
`Board may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that
`counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`The Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper No. 3) further instructs:
`
`The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of
`counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause. The parties
`are authorized to file motions for pro hac vice admission under 37
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the
`“Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case
`IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00057 (USP 8,954,432)
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`Board Web site under “Representative Orders, Decisions, and
`Notices.”
`
`(Id. at 2.) The above referenced “Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission” further provides:
`
`A motion for pro hac vice admission must:
`
`a.
`
`Contain a statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board
`
`to recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding.
`
`b.
`
`Be accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the individual
`
`seeking to appear attesting to the following:
`
`i. Membership in good standing of the Bar of at least one State or
`
`the District of Columbia;
`
`ii.
`
`No suspensions or disbarments from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body;
`
`iii. No application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body ever denied;
`
`iv. No sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`
`administrative body;
`
`v.
`
`The individual seeking to appear has read and will comply with
`
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and Board’s Rules of
`
`Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00057 (USP 8,954,432)
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`vi.
`
`The individual will be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`
`vii. All other proceedings before the Office for which the individual
`
`has applied to appear pro hac vice in the last (3) years; and
`
`viii. Familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`(IPR2013-00639, Paper No. 7 at 2.) As set forth below, and in the accompanying
`
`Declaration of Eric E. Lancaster (Ex. 1037, “Lancaster Decl.”), each of these
`
`requirements is satisfied here.
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS SHOWING GOOD CAUSE FOR THE
`BOARD TO RECOGNIZE ERIC E. LANCASTER PRO HAC VICE IN
`THE PROCEEDING
`Mr. Lancaster is a member in good standing of the California Bar (Bar No.
`
`244449) and is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the
`
`Central District of California, the United States District Court for the Northern
`
`District of California, the United States District Court for the Southern District of
`
`California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, and the
`
`United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (Lancaster Decl.
`
`¶1.) Mr. Lancaster has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body. (Id. ¶2.) No application of Mr. Lancaster for
`
`admission to practice before any court or administrative body has ever been
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00057 (USP 8,954,432)
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`
`denied. (Id. ¶3.) Nor has any court or administrative body imposed sanctions or
`
`contempt citations against Mr. Lancaster. (Id. ¶4.) Mr. Lancaster has read, fully
`
`understands, and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in Part 42 of Title 37 of the C.F.R.
`
`(Id. ¶5.) Mr. Lancaster acknowledges and agrees that he will be subject to the
`
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). (Id. ¶6.)
`
`Petitioner’s lead counsel in this proceeding, Lisa K. Nguyen, is a
`
`registered practitioner (Reg. No. 58,018). Moreover, as set forth below (and in
`
`his accompanying declaration), Mr. Lancaster is both an experienced and
`
`technically trained litigation attorney with an established familiarity with the
`
`subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`Mr. Lancaster received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and a
`
`Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry from the University of California, Davis
`
`in 2002. (Id. ¶7.) He earned his Juris Doctor degree from Santa Clara University
`
`School of Law in 2006. (Id.)
`
`Mr. Lancaster is a partner in Allen & Overy’s intellectual property practice.
`
`(Id. ¶8.) He joined the group in August 2021. (Id.)
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00057 (USP 8,954,432)
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`Mr. Lancaster has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue,
`
`having been actively involved in analyzing and assisting with the Petitions for
`
`Inter Partes Review submitted in this proceeding. (Id. ¶9.)
`
`Within the past three years, Mr. Lancaster has applied and has been admitted
`
`to appear pro hac vice in ResMed, Inc. v. New York University, Nos. IPR2022-
`
`00988, IPR2022-00989, IPR2022-00990, IPR2022-00991, IPR2022-00992,
`
`IPR2022-00993, and IPR2022-00994. (Id. ¶10.)
`
`In view of Mr. Lancaster’s knowledge of the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding, Petitioner has a substantial need for Mr. Lancaster’s pro hac vice
`
`admission and his involvement in the continued prosecution of this proceeding.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`For all of the reasons set forth above, Petitioner respectfully requests that the
`
`Board admit Eric E. Lancaster pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: June 14, 2023
`
`Respectfully submitted
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Lisa K. Nguyen/
`Lisa K. Nguyen (Reg. No. 58,018)
`lisa.nguyen@allenovery.com
`Allen & Overy LLP
`550 High Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94301
`Telephone: 650.388.1724
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00057 (USP 8,954,432)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Meta Platforms, Inc.
`
`6
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00057 (USP 8,954,432)
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for
`PHV Admission
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that on this 14th day of June, 2023,
`
`a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s Motion For Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Eric E. Lancaster Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C) was served by
`
`electronic mail on Patent Owner’s lead and backup counsel at the following email
`
`addresses:
`
`Scott W. Hejny (Reg. No. 45,882)
`shejny@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Arvind Jairam (Reg. No. 62,759)
`ajairam@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Eliza Beeney (pro hac vice)
`ebeeney@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Kaylee Hoffner (pro hac vice)
`khoffner@mckoolsmith.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`/Lisa K. Nguyen/
`Lisa K. Nguyen (Reg. No. 58,018)
`lisa.nguyen@allenovery.com
`Allen & Overy LLP
`550 High Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94301
`Telephone: 650.388.1724
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Meta Platforms, Inc.
`
`
`
`7
`
`