throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 8
`Date: January 24, 2022
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2023-00056
`Patent 8,213,970 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, KEVIN C. TROCK, and
`IFTIKHAR AHMED, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`AHMED, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00056
`Patent 8,213,970 B2
`
`
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`With the Board’s authorization, Petitioner Cellco Partnership d/b/a
`Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) and Patent Owner AGIS Software
`Development LLC (“AGIS”) filed (1) a Joint Motion to Terminate
`Proceedings (Paper 6 (“Mot.”)) based on a settlement agreement between
`them, (2) a true copy of their written settlement agreement (Ex. 2001), and
`(3) a Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential
`Information and Keep Separate, Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) (Paper 7).
`Verizon and AGIS indicate that they have entered into a written
`settlement agreement that settles all disputes between them, including those
`relating to this proceeding and the related district court action, which has
`now been dismissed with prejudice. Mot. 1. The parties filed what they
`represent is a true and correct copy of their written settlement agreement. Id.
`The parties certify that there are no collateral agreements or understandings,
`oral or written, made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the
`termination of these proceeding. Id. at 2–3. The parties state that
`termination is appropriate because the proceeding is in a preliminary stage
`and trial has not been instituted. Id. at 2.
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate with
`respect to a petitioner after the filing of a settlement agreement. See Patent
`Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide at 86 (Nov.
`2019)1 (“The Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing
`of a settlement agreement, unless the Board has already decided the merits
`of the proceeding.”). Here, this proceeding is in the preliminary stage and
`
`
`1 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00056
`Patent 8,213,970 B2
`
`trial has not yet been instituted. Accordingly, we are persuaded that, under
`these circumstances, termination of this proceeding is appropriate.
`In their Joint Request to Keep Separate, the parties ask that the
`settlement agreement (Ex. 2001) be treated as business confidential
`information and be kept separate from the file of the challenged patent.
`Paper 7, 1. After reviewing the settlement agreement, we find that the
`settlement agreement contains confidential business information regarding
`the terms of settlement. Accordingly, we grant the Joint Request to Keep
`Separate. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (“A party to a settlement may request
`that the settlement be treated as business confidential information and be
`kept separate from the files of an involved patent or application.”).
`This Decision does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate (Paper 6) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request to Keep Separate
`(Paper 7) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the settlement agreement (Ex. 2001) be
`treated as business confidential information, kept separate from the file of
`the challenged patent, and made available only to Federal Government
`agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause,
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that this proceeding is terminated.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00056
`Patent 8,213,970 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Justin J. Oliver
`Stephen K. Yam
`VENABLE LLP
`joliver@venable.com
`syam@venable.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Peter Lambrianakos
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`FABRICANT LLP
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket