`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A/ VERIZON WIRELESS,
`Petitioner,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Patent No. 8,213,970
`Filing Date: November 26, 2008
`Issue Date: July 3, 2012
`
`Inventor: Malcolm K. Beyer
`Title: METHOD OF UTILIZING FORCED ALERTS FOR
`INTERACTIVE REMOTE COMMUNICATIONS
`
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDINGS
`
`Case No. IPR2023-00056
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`IPR2023-00056
`PATENT NO. 8,213,970
`
`Exhibit No. Description of Document
`2001
`Confidential Settlement Agreement
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00056
`PATENT NO. 8,213,970
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Cellco Partnership, d/b/a
`
`Verizon Wireless (“Petitioner”) and Patent Owner AGIS Software Development
`
`LLC (“Patent Owner”) (collectively, “the Parties”) jointly request termination of this
`
`proceeding. The Parties have entered into a written confidential settlement
`
`agreement that settles all disputes between them, including those relating to this
`
`proceeding and the related district court action, which was dismissed with prejudice
`
`on January 13, 2023. AGIS Software Development LLC v. Cellco Partnership, d/b/a
`
`Verizon Wireless, Case No. 2-22-cv-00185, Dkt. 50 (E.D. Tex., Jan. 13, 2023).
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, a true copy of the Parties’ settlement agreement
`
`(including any other related agreement) has been filed as Exhibit 2001. This Joint
`
`Motion was authorized by the Board pursuant to e-mail correspondence on January
`
`19, 2023.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5 and 42.72, the Board may terminate a trial
`
`without rendering a final written decision, where appropriate, including pursuant to
`
`a joint request under 35 U.S.C. §§ 317(a) or 327(a). See Winplus N. Am., Inc. v.
`
`Pilot, Inc., IPR2018-00488, Paper 12 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 24, 2018). Under section
`
`317(a), an inter partes review shall be terminated upon such joint request “unless
`
`the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination
`
`is filed.” There are no other preconditions recited in 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). “There are
`
`strong public policy reasons to favor settlement between the parties to a proceeding.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00056
`PATENT NO. 8,213,970
`
`
`. . . The Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement
`
`agreement, unless the Board has already decided the merits of the proceeding.”
`
`PTAB Consolidated Trial Practice Guide at 86 (November 2019).
`
`This proceeding is in a preliminary stage because trial has not been instituted
`
`and the Board has not finally decided the merits. Accordingly, it is appropriate for
`
`the Board to exercise its authority pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.71 to terminate this
`
`proceeding in view of the settlement entered into between Petitioner and Patent
`
`Owner. By granting the present Motion, the Board and the Parties can conserve
`
`resources. Additionally, maintaining the proceeding would discourage further
`
`settlements, as patent owners in similar situations would have a strong disincentive
`
`to settle if they perceived that an inter partes review would continue regardless of a
`
`settlement.
`
`As required by statute and as directed by the Board, the Parties are filing
`
`concurrently herewith, as a separate submission, a Joint Motion to Treat Settlement
`
`Agreement as Business Confidential and to Keep Separate, pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b), along with the true copy of the written settlement agreement, which
`
`includes all agreements between the Parties related to this proceeding. See Exhibit
`
`2001. The Parties request that the settlement agreement be treated as business
`
`confidential information and be kept separate from the files of the involved patent.
`
`The Parties certify that there are no other collateral agreements or understandings,
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00056
`PATENT NO. 8,213,970
`
`
`oral or written, between the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of,
`
`the termination of this proceeding.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner and Patent Owner respectfully request
`
`termination of this inter partes review.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: January 20, 2023
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 20, 2023
`
`By:
`
` /
`
`/Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Vincent. J. Rubino, III (Reg. No. 68,594)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
`Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Tel. 212-257-5797
`Fax. 212-257-5796
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner,
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /
`
`
`/Justin J. Oliver
`Justin J. Oliver (Reg. No. 44,986)
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`VENABLE LLP
`600 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Phone: 202-721-5423
`Fax: 202-344-8300
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Cellco Partnership,
`d/b/a Verizon Wireless
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00056
`PATENT NO. 8,213,970
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(4), the undersigned certifies that on January 20,
`
`2023, a complete and entire copy of this Joint Motion to Terminate and its supporting
`
`exhibits were provided by email, to the Petitioner by serving the email
`
`correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`Justin J. Oliver
`Email: joliver@venable.com
`Stephen K. Yam
`Email: syam@venable.com
`VENABLE LLP
`600 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Phone: 202-721-5423
`Fax: 202-344-8300
`
`Attorneys for Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
`
`
`
`January 20, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`/Vincent J. Rubino, III /
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (Reg. No. 68,594)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
`Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Tel. 212-257-5797
`Fax. 212-257-5796
`
`
`
`
`
`
`