throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
`TWI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., :
` Petitioner : Case IPR2023-00049
`v. : (Patent 7,713,947 B2)
`MERCK SERONO S.A., : Case IPR2023-00050
` Patent Owner. : (Patent 8,377,903 B2)
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
`
` *** CONFIDENTIAL ***
`
` DEPOSITION OF
` YOGESH DANDIKER, Ph.D.
` Minneapolis, MN
` Friday, May 24, 2024
` 9:30 a.m.
`
`Reported Stenographically By:
`Amy L. Larson, RPR, CCR, CSR
`Job No. 538879
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21 22
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`2
`
`Deposition of YOGESH DANDIKER, Ph.D., held at the
`office of:
`
` Fabyanske, Westra, Hart & Thomson, P.A.,
` 80 South Eighth Street
` Suite 1900
` Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
` Pursuant to Notice, before Amy L. Larson,
`Registered Professional Reporter, Certified
`Court Reporter, Certified Shorthand Reporter, and
`Notary Public in and for the States of Minnesota
`and Wisconsin.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER:
` PHILIP SEGREST, ESQUIRE
` HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP
` 120 South Riverside Plaza
` Suite 2200
` Chicago, IL 60606
`
`ON BEHALF OF YOGESH DANDIKER, PH.D., AND THE
`PATENT OWNER:
` MARY PHENG, ESQUIRE
` ASHER MCGUFFIN, ESQUIRE (Boston) (via Zoom)
` WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR, LLP
` 7 World Trade Center
` 250 Greenwich Street
` New York, NY 10007
`
`ALSO PRESENT:
` Malcolm Cooke, Technician
` Rachel Carrick, Technician (via Zoom)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`4
`
`INDEX:
`EXAMINATION BY: PAGE
`Mr. Segrest 5, 142
`Ms. Pheng 127
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`5
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`
` YOGESH DANDIKER, Ph.D.,
` after having been first duly sworn to
` tell the truth, the whole truth and
` nothing but the truth, was examined and
` testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Good morning, Dr. Dandiker. My name is
` Philip Segrest. I'll be asking you some
` questions this morning.
` You've been deposed previously,
` right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. So it's the same type of setup. I'll ask
` questions, you'll answer questions. If for
` some reason your attorney objects to a
` question, which they may need to do, you
` should still answer unless you're
` specifically instructed by your attorney not
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`6
`
` to answer.
` If at any point you need to take a
` break, then let me know --
`A. Okay.
`Q. -- we can take a break. I'll probably ask
` you to answer any pending question --
`A. Sure.
`Q. -- before a break, but it's not meant to be
` an endurance test.
`A. Yeah.
`Q. We've got the court reporter here, who is
` taking down everything I say, everything you
` say. We need to try to not to speak over
` each other.
`A. Okay.
`Q. You need to give verbal answers, "yes" or
` "no," not nodding or shaking your head.
`A. Sure.
`Q. Do you have any questions about the
` deposition process?
`A. Not -- not at this stage, no.
`Q. Is there any reason you could not testify
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`7
`
` fully and accurately today?
`A. No.
`Q. You're not on any kind of medication that
` could affect your testimony or anything like
` that?
`A. No.
`Q. Okay. Now, are you familiar with the IPR
` cases in which you submitted a declaration,
` the reason we're here today?
`A. Yes. To some extent, yes.
`Q. And how many times have you been deposed
` before overall?
`A. Before this, twice before.
`Q. Okay. Once of those was in another IPR on
` these same patents, right?
`A. Sorry, let me just qualify that. So that is
` twice before any -- any cases related to this
` particular issue.
`Q. Okay.
`A. So they were on different products.
`Q. And have you ever testified at trial?
`A. I have not.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`8
`
`Q. What was the first time you were deposed?
`A. You mean in terms of time?
`Q. Yeah. When was it?
`A. It must have been about five years ago, I
` guess.
`Q. And what was that about?
`A. It was about a product I developed.
`Q. Is that product public at this point?
`A. Yeah, it was -- it was a deposition related
` to venlafaxine.
`Q. And when was the next time you were deposed?
`A. So I think it was after -- about a year after
` that.
`Q. And what was that deposition about?
`A. It was similar. I can't really recall the
` product, but venlafaxine was part of that
` deposition.
`Q. And then were you also deposed in February of
` this year by Hopewell about these same
` patents?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And that's another proceeding, but you also
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`9
`
` submitted a declaration in that proceeding,
` right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Have you been deposed in any district court
` litigations about cladribine or about these
` patents?
`A. No. The only thing -- again, it's only the
` depositions which are related to these IPR
` cases. So when you say district court,
` I'm -- it was two depositions.
`Q. Okay. But these IPR proceedings are in front
` of the United States Patent and Trademark
` Office. You can also have lawsuits about
` patents, and there are some lawsuits pending
` in various courts about these patents.
` But you haven't been deposed in those
` lawsuits, right?
`A. No, I've just had two depositions so far, and
` this is the third one.
`Q. Have you been asked to collect any documents
` or have you turned over any documents to
` attorneys that you may have related to these
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`10
`
` patents?
` MS. PHENG: Objection. I just
` want to caution the witness to not reveal the
` substance of any attorney/client
` communications, but you may answer.
` MR. SEGREST: And just for the
` record, I'll point out this is a third-party
` witness. And there may be some issues
` about -- about privilege, but I think you can
` answer this question without --
` THE WITNESS: Yeah, no, I don't
` have any documents.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Okay. What did you do to prepare for your
` testimony today?
`A. So I had -- you know, I had, you know, some
` practice sessions with my counsel.
`Q. When were those practice sessions?
`A. It was yesterday.
`Q. And how long did that take?
`A. Oh, that was about, I don't know, four hours.
`Q. With whom did you meet?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`11
`
`A. Sorry?
`Q. With whom, the names of the people that you
` were doing a practice session with?
`A. The attorney sitting here, and online with
` Asher McGuffin, who is connected.
`Q. And did you review any documents during that
` preparation time?
`A. Only what we had reviewed before.
`Q. And so does that include the declaration you
` submitted in this IPR?
`A. The focus really much more was on, you know,
` some of the other documents which had been
` provided to me previously by counsel.
`Q. Okay. Did you review any documents that are
` not cited in your declaration that you
` submitted?
`A. I did not, no.
`Q. I'm handing you what's been previously marked
` as Merck 20 --
` THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry,
` 2025?
` MR. SEGREST: 2055.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`12
`
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. And let me direct you to the page labeled
` number 13 at the bottom.
` So is this your signature on page 13?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And then turning back to the cover, is this
` declaration you signed one that was filed in
` IPR 2023-00049?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Okay. And if I call this Exhibit 2055, or
` 2055, you'll know what I'm referring to,
` right?
`A. Yeah.
`Q. And do you understand that IPR 2023-00049
` concerns U.S. Patent Number 7,713,947?
`A. Yeah.
`Q. Now, if I call those the '049 IPR and
` the '947 patent, will you understand what I'm
` referring to?
`A. Yeah.
`Q. Okay. Now, you see in the middle on the
` cover here that it also lists IPR 2023-00050?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`13
`
`A. Yes.
`Q. Okay. And did you sign just this one
` declaration that was filed in both of the
` IPRs?
`A. I would say that I signed two declarations,
` and there are some changes, be it minor, in
` this one.
`Q. Okay. So the two declarations, was one of
` those for the IPRs for which you were deposed
` back in February?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Okay. And then the IPR that you're being
` deposed on today, that was the second
` declaration?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And that's this Exhibit 2055 that we're
` looking at here?
`A. Yeah.
`Q. Okay. And that's the -- that same
` declaration was filed both in IPR 2023-00049
` and IPR 2023-00050; is that correct?
` MS. PHENG: Objection to form.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`14
`
` THE WITNESS: For this particular
` event, yes.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Okay. And you understand IPR 2023-00050
` concerns U.S. Patent Number 8,377,903?
`A. Yes.
`Q. So if I call that the '050 IPR and the '903
` patent, will you understand what I'm talking
` about?
`A. Yeah.
` MR. SEGREST: Are you able to hear
` the witness okay?
` THE COURT REPORTER: (Nods head.)
` MR. SEGREST: Okay.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Let's turn to page 13 again in Exhibit 2055.
` And let me direct you to paragraph 31 right
` above your signature there.
` Do you see that?
`A. Right.
`Q. Now, does the first clause in that sentence
` say that, "The statements made herein of my
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`15
`
` knowledge are true"?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Okay. And then there's the second clause
` here, right, that says, "Statements made on
` information and belief are believed to be
` true," right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. So does that mean that some of the statements
` in this declaration are based on information
` believed and not your personal knowledge?
` MS. PHENG: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, I would say
` that.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Okay. Let's go back to paragraph 4 on
` page 1.
` You're being paid $800 an hour --
`A. Right.
`Q. -- on this case, right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And how much have you been paid so far?
`A. Oh, I would say -- I don't know. It must be
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`16
`
` 10, 15,000, something like that. I really
` don't know.
`Q. Okay. And is that just for this case or is
` that for this and the other two IPRs?
`A. Oh, it is for everything.
`Q. Okay. About how many hours did you spend on
` this declaration that is Exhibit 2055 before
` it was filed?
`A. Well, this was a little easier, because I had
` already done one declaration. So it is
` really going through the previous one and
` seeing whether, you know, changes need to be
` made. So I would say three, four hours.
`Q. And how long did you spend on the previous
` one?
`A. It was several days, because there were a
` number of iterations.
`Q. Do you have an idea how many hours you spent
` on it?
`A. By "several days," I mean over several days.
` How many hours? I'd say three, four hours.
`Q. Okay. And were you also paid for your time
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`17
`
` preparing for and testifying for that
` previous deposition?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And you'll be paid for your time preparing
` for and testifying today, right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. About how much time did you spend on the
` preparation and testimony for that last
` deposition?
`A. Sorry, for the last deposition?
`Q. Yeah.
`A. So I just want to be clear, so this -- the
` first one was related to IPR, then there was
` a district court one, and then there is this
` one.
`Q. Okay.
`A. So are you referring to a district court one
` or --
`Q. No, I'm referring to the IPR one.
`A. Yeah, that was actually, I would say, I don't
` know, maybe 15 hours or so.
`Q. Okay. Were you also deposed in the district
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`18
`
` court matter?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Okay. And when was that deposition?
`A. That was -- I can't remember the exact date,
` but I would say, I don't know, a couple of
` months ago.
`Q. Okay. And were you paid at this same $800 an
` hour for that?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And about how many hours did you spend in
` your preparation for and testimony for that
` district court deposition?
`A. That was fairly short, I would say, and it
` was remote. So it was -- wasn't as much
` time, really. So there was five, six hours
` really, so less.
`Q. Were you asked about any documents during
` that deposition?
` MS. PHENG: Objection. I just
` want to caution the witness not to reveal the
` substance of any attorney/client
` communications.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`19
`
` THE WITNESS: May I answer or --
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Yes.
`A. Yes, we did -- well, let me just again
` clarify --
` MS. PHENG: And, Dr. Dandiker, as
` well, that proceeding was sealed. So you may
` answer whether you were asked about
` documents, but please don't reveal the
` contents of any documents.
` THE WITNESS: Okay.
` Documents were referred to.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Okay. So and without telling me the
` contents, what documents were you asked
` about?
`A. I think they were the same as the IPR.
`Q. Were you asked in that district court
` deposition about any documents that are not
` cited in your IPR declarations?
`A. No.
`Q. Other than the time relating to your
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`20
`
` declarations and the district court matter,
` have you been compensated for any other
` consulting work in relation to the
` litigations concerning these patents?
`A. No.
`Q. Have you been paid by Merck Serono for any
` other sort of consulting or other work that
` you've done for them?
`A. No.
`Q. Let's turn to paragraph 9 in your deposition
` just for reference, 9 and 10 on page 3.
` MS. PHENG: Sorry, Counsel, did
` you mean declaration?
` MR. SEGREST: Yes. I'm sorry.
` What did I say?
` MS. PHENG: I heard "deposition."
` MR. SEGREST: I definitely meant
` declaration, if I misspoke.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. So paragraphs 9 and 10 of your declaration,
` page 3.
`A. Thank you.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`21
`
`Q. So did you work at IVAX from 2001 to 2004?
`A. Yes, I did.
`Q. And was your job at IVAX director of research
` and development?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Now, in paragraph -- let's turn to
` paragraph 14. Here you refer to a joint
` development agreement, right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Okay. And it's called a product development
` and license agreement, right?
`A. Yeah.
`Q. Now, in paragraph 14 you don't cite to a copy
` of that agreement, do you?
`A. I don't.
`Q. Okay. Were you asked to review a copy of
` that agreement?
`A. No.
`Q. Do you have a copy of that agreement?
`A. I have seen it, but I -- I wasn't a party to
` any discussions regarding that document
` when -- when the agreement was made.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`22
`
`Q. When have you seen that agreement?
`A. I may have seen it certainly through my time
` at IVAX, but also more recently, you know,
` during preparation with counsel.
`Q. Okay. So you did see that agreement during
` your preparation with counsel?
`A. I think I may have seen it.
`Q. Okay. That agreement is not cited anywhere
` in your declaration, is it?
`A. No.
`Q. Okay. Are there any other documents that you
` have seen in connection with this matter that
` are not cited in your declaration?
` MS. PHENG: Objection. I caution
` the witness not to reveal the substance of
` any attorney/client communication, and I'm
` going to instruct you not to answer.
` THE WITNESS: I have to go by what
` my counsel says.
` MR. SEGREST: So you're
` instructing him not to tell me whether he's
` seen any other documents that weren't cited?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`23
`
` MS. PHENG: I'm instructing him
` not to provide any privileged communications
` and reveal any attorney/client
` communications, so, yes.
` MR. SEGREST: Okay. And the
` question didn't ask for him to identify the
` documents. You just -- you consider whether
` he's reviewed documents to be privileged?
` MS. PHENG: If you want to reask
` your question, then we can reevaluate it.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Did you communicate any confidential
` information to any attorneys about those
` other documents you may have reviewed?
` MS. PHENG: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Can you rephrase the
` question?
` MR. SEGREST: No.
` THE WITNESS: Can you repeat it?
` MR. SEGREST: Yes.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Did you reveal any confidential information
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`24
`
` to attorneys about any of those other
` documents you might have reviewed?
` MS. PHENG: Objection to form.
` And same caution, please don't reveal
` the substance of any communications with
` counsel.
` THE WITNESS: I don't have any
` confidential information.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Okay. Did you request any legal advice from
` attorneys about any of those other documents
` that you may have reviewed?
` MS. PHENG: Objection to form.
` Objection; privileged.
` Please don't reveal the substance of
` any communications with counsel. And I will
` instruct you not to answer.
` MR. SEGREST: So you understand
` this is the foundation for privilege? If he
` hasn't communicated confidential information
` or received a legal opinion, there is no
` privilege.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`25
`
` MS. PHENG: Counsel, I --
` MR. SEGREST: I'm entitled to ask
` about that.
` MS. PHENG: Counsel, I think that
` you're pushing the boundaries here, and I
` think you're aware of our privilege
` objections in this case, and I'm going to
` instruct him not to answer.
` MR. SEGREST: Okay. I think we've
` got a call scheduled with the Board on
` Tuesday, so we'll probably want to get an
` expedited transcript and we'll raise it with
` them then.
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`Q. Getting back to that product development and
` license agreement, you didn't sign that on
` behalf of IVAX, right?
`A. No.
`Q. Do you know who did sign it?
`A. No.
`Q. And none of your testimony in this
` declaration, Exhibit 2055, cites to any
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`26
`
`term -- or quotes any terms from that
`
`document, right?
`
`I mean, again,
`
`to be clear,
`
`that is a
`
`business transaction, and I was aware of the
`
`transaction, but the substance or the content
`
`is really, you know, not my area.
`
`Okay.
`
`So it's not your area. And with
`
`reference to your declaration, Exhibit 2055,
`
`none of your testimony in this quotes from
`
`that document, right?
`
`Yes.
`
`Right.
`
`And you don't specify any clauses in that
`
`document that identify particular roles for
`
`IVAX and Serono at that time, right?
`
`I -- yes,
`
`that is correct,
`
`I don't reference
`
`to that document for any roles.
`
`Now,
`
`in paragraph 14,
`
`the last sentence --
`
`Right.
`
`-- you say Serono's role was to design and
`
`develop a dosing regimen for treating MS with
`
`cladribine, right?
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`27
`
`Now, did you supervise the people at Serono
`
`who were developing that dosing regimen?
`
`No,
`
`they're a different company.
`
`So do you have any personal knowledge of what
`
`specific individual contributed what to the
`
`development of any dosing regimen at Serono?
`
`I would -- I would hesitate to answer that.
`
`It's -- Serono is a large company. And,
`
`again,
`
`just to clarify things,
`
`IVAX
`
`predominantly was a -- company --
`
`THE COURT REPORTER:
`
`A generic
`
`company?
`
`expertise in that area, and Serono was -- was
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`A generic company,
`
`and so they developed generic products. And
`
`my responsibility was largely developing
`
`generic products.
`
`Cladribine is -- you know, was really
`
`a one-off. And IVAX had the expertise to
`
`develop generic products, but really did not
`
`have the capability to develop cladribine.
`
`As a result,
`
`IVAX searched for partners with
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`28
`
`deemed to be that partner.
`
`Serono had a
`
`product already in multiple sclerosis on the
`
`market and, you know,
`
`they were the experts.
`
`So when it came to responsibilities,
`
`our responsibilities were more -- certainly,
`
`mine was to develop a formulation. And for
`
`IVAX as a whole is to, you know, conduct some
`
`of the early pharmacokinetic studies to prove
`
`that our formulation worked or formulations
`
`worked. And so we looked at a number of
`
`options.
`
`formulation, but also to see whether it could
`
`But when it came to developing the
`
`clinical protocols,
`
`the clinical regimen,
`
`the -- you know, doing, let's say, phase II,
`
`phase III trials,
`
`that was not our
`
`responsibility,
`
`that was Serono's, as well as
`
`the other aspects, which is, you know,
`
`regulatory, marketing, commercialization.
`
`And, you know,
`
`so that -- that is how
`
`the project came into being. And my
`
`particular role was really to develop a
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`29
`
`even be developed as an -- product.
`
`THE COURT REPORTER:
`
`A what
`
`product?
`
`THE WITNESS: Oral.
`
`THE COURT REPORTER: Oral?
`
`THE WITNESS: Yeah.
`
`So, effectively, that's how
`
`this is how it is, and the
`
`responsibilities were divided.
`
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`
`Q. Okay.
`
`Thank you for that background and
`
`explanation.
`
`Does that mean that,
`
`in answer to my
`
`question that I asked,
`
`that you don't know
`
`what particular individuals over at Serono
`
`contributed what particular details to any
`
`given dosing regimen?
`
`MS. PHENG: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS: Yeah,
`
`I would agree
`
`to that to some extent, but I would qualify
`
`that by saying that drug development is a
`
`team sport. Often,
`
`there's no one individual
`
`who says, Look,
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`30
`
`whole company -- and this is a company of,
`
`you know, several thousand people -- who
`
`would say, Yes, sir. Right? There's a lot
`
`of back and forth and a lot of discussion
`
`before something is arrived at.
`
`So when you ask the question, you
`
`know, who is that person responsible for, it
`
`is usually not a person, it is a team anda
`
`team of experts. And I think it's rightly so
`
`that people have different views and express
`
`differing opinions before we come with a
`
`better solution.
`
`Some are clinical and some are also not
`
`So when you ask the question, you
`
`know, was there one single individual,
`
`I
`
`would say there was a team at Serono who came
`
`up with -- you know, with a dosing regimen,
`
`as with other things, you know.
`
`For instance,
`
`the dosing regimen is
`
`only one part of a clinical protocol, and
`
`that takes a lot of work and a lot of time
`
`and a lot of input from a lot of people.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`31
`
`clinical.
`
`So that does not mean that it's
`
`come from one person.
`
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`
`this is the kind of
`
`Q. Okay. And on the whole team that's working
`
`on that dosing regimen over at Serono, you
`
`wouldn't know what individuals contributed
`
`what information to that, right?
`
`MS. PHENG: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I did interact with
`
`people at Serono and -- you know, and
`
`particularly a couple of people. And most of
`
`those interactions were about, you know, our
`
`work. And it was important for both
`
`organizations to know exactly what was
`
`happening, because one company's work
`
`determined, you know,
`
`the outcome for the
`
`other company.
`
`So, yeah, for instance, when we were
`
`developing the formulations,
`
`I had a number
`
`of calls with Serono, you know,
`
`this -- I was
`
`calling, This is working,
`
`this is not
`
`working, you know,
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`32
`
`timeline we are looking for,
`
`looking at.
`
`And, you know, and they were saying, Look,
`
`this is -- these are our needs.
`
`So those kind of discussions, you
`
`know, were occurring all the time.
`
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`
`Q. Okay. And so are those kinds of discussions
`
`both Serono and IVAX keeping each other
`
`abreast of their project -- of their progress
`
`on the project?
`
`Yeah.
`
`Okay. But that doesn't include necessarily
`
`knowing what particular individual came up
`
`with some particular idea that's included,
`
`my experience, you don't say -- point the
`
`right?
`
`It's --
`
`MS. PHENG: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS: Sorry.
`
`It's -- in normal course of work, and
`
`particularly, you know,
`
`I'm a scientist, and
`
`within companies you never -- certainly,
`
`in
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`33
`
`finger to one person and say, Look,
`
`this is
`
`all one person's work, because then you
`
`wouldn't need anybody, right, you just say,
`
`Look,
`
`that person develop it so nobody needs
`
`to get involved. That is really not the
`
`case.
`
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`
`Yes.
`
`I want to circle back to the --
`
`Sure.
`
`-- explanation you gave earlier.
`
`You said that IVAX was mainly a
`
`generic company?
`
`Yes.
`
`Do you mean that they mainly worked on
`
`developing generic pharmaceuticals?
`
`Yes.
`
`And so just to understand, generic
`
`pharmaceuticals, does that mean developing a
`
`generic version of something that some other
`
`company had previously developed and brought
`
`to market?
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`EXHIBIT 1043, TWi
`IPR2023-00049, -00050
`
`

`

`CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Yogesh Dandiker, Ph.D.
`Conducted on May 24, 2024
`
`34
`
`And so we can -- can we call that earlier
`
`version the brand version?
`
`Yes.
`
`So when you're developing a generic version,
`
`you don't have to do all of these same
`
`phase I, phase II, phase III trials, right?
`
`Yes.
`
`So the -- what you have to do is you
`
`have to have a bioequivalent product, which
`
`the context of a -- product is --
`
`THE COURT REPORTER: Did you say
`
`brown product?
`
`THE WITNESS: Brand.
`
`THE COURT REPORTER: Brand?
`
`THE WITNESS: Yeah. And in the
`
`is that why they didn't
`
`context of a brand product, it is -- you
`
`know, it's construed as phase I for a brand.
`
`For a generic, you know, often that
`
`is the only study you have to do to show your
`
`product is bioequivalent.
`
`BY MR. SEGREST:
`
`Q. And is -- so the fact that

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket