throbber
T h e n e w e n g l a n d j o u r n a l o f m e d i c i n e
`
`original article
`
`Natalizumab plus Interferon Beta-1a
`for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Richard A. Rudick, M.D., William H. Stuart, M.D., Peter A. Calabresi, M.D.,
`Christian Confavreux, M.D., Steven L. Galetta, M.D., Ernst-Wilhelm Radue, M.D.,
`Fred D. Lublin, M.D., Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, M.D., Daniel R. Wynn, M.D.,
`Frances Lynn, M.Sc., Michael A. Panzara, M.D., M.P.H.,
`and Alfred W. Sandrock, M.D., Ph.D., for the SENTINEL Investigators*
`
`A bs tr ac t
`
`Background
`Interferon beta is used to modify the course of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Despite
`interferon beta therapy, many patients have relapses. Natalizumab, an α4 integrin
`antagonist, appeared to be safe and effective alone and when added to interferon
`beta-1a in preliminary studies.
`
`Methods
`We randomly assigned 1171 patients who, despite interferon beta-1a therapy, had
`had at least one relapse during the 12-month period before randomization to receive
`continued interferon beta-1a in combination with 300 mg of natalizumab (589
`patients) or placebo (582 patients) intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 116 weeks.
`The primary end points were the rate of clinical relapse at 1 year and the cumulative
`probability of disability progression sustained for 12 weeks, as measured by the
`Expanded Disability Status Scale, at 2 years.
`
`Results
`Combination therapy resulted in a 24 percent reduction in the relative risk of sus-
`tained disability progression (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61
`to 0.96; P = 0.02). Kaplan–Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of progres-
`sion at two years were 23 percent with combination therapy and 29 percent with
`interferon beta-1a alone. Combination therapy was associated with a lower annual-
`ized rate of relapse over a two-year period than was interferon beta-1a alone (0.34
`vs. 0.75, P<0.001) and with fewer new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted magnetic
`resonance imaging (0.9 vs. 5.4, P<0.001). Adverse events associated with combina-
`tion therapy were anxiety, pharyngitis, sinus congestion, and peripheral edema.
`Two cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, one of which was fatal,
`were diagnosed in natalizumab-treated patients.
`
`Conclusions
`Natalizumab added to interferon beta-1a was significantly more effective than inter-
`feron beta-1a alone in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Additional re-
`search is needed to elucidate the benefits and risks of this combination treatment.
`(ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00030966.)
`
`From the Mellen Center for Multiple
`Sclerosis Treatment and Research,
`Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland
`(R.A.R.); the MS Center of Atlanta, Atlanta
`(W.H.S.); the Johns Hopkins Multiple
`Sclerosis Center, Baltimore (P.A.C.);
`Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France (C.C.);
`University of Pennsylvania School of
`Medicine, Philadelphia (S.L.G.); Univer-
`sity Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
`(E.-W.R.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine,
`New York (F.D.L.); Baird Multiple Sclerosis
`Center, State University of New York at
`Buffalo, Buffalo (B.W.-G.); Consultants in
`Neurology Multiple Sclerosis Center,
`Northbrook, Ill. (D.R.W.); and Biogen Idec,
`Cambridge, Mass. (F.L., M.A.P., A.W.S.).
`Address reprint requests to Dr. Rudick at
`the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis
`Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic
`Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland,
`OH 44195, or at rudickr@ccf.org.
`
`*The Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab in
`Combination with Interferon Beta-1a in
`Patients with Relapsing Remitting Multi-
`ple Sclerosis (SENTINEL) Investigators
`are listed in the Supplementary Appendix,
`available with the full text of this article at
`www.nejm.org.
`
`N Engl J Med 2006;354:911-23.
`Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
`
`n engl j med 354;9 www.nejm.org march 2, 2006
`
`911
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 22, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Merck 2058
`TWi v Merck
`IPR2023-00049
`
`

`

`T h e n e w e n g l a n d j o u r n a l o f m e d i c i n e
`
`The adhesion molecule α4 β1 integrin
`
`is a key initiator of the inflammatory cas-
`cade involved in the pathogenesis of multi-
`ple sclerosis.1-4 Natalizumab (Tysabri, Biogen Idec
`and Elan Pharmaceuticals) is the first α4 integrin
`antagonist in a new class of selective adhesion-
`molecule inhibitors for the treatment of multiple
`sclerosis. Natalizumab binds to α4 integrin on
`the surface of leukocytes, inhibiting their migra-
`tion into the brain and thereby reducing inflam-
`mation.
`Current disease-modifying therapies for relaps-
`ing–remitting multiple sclerosis (interferon beta
`and glatiramer acetate) are only partially effec-
`tive,5-8 and most patients with multiple sclerosis
`have breakthrough disease activity despite ther-
`apy with these agents. Hence, there is a need for
`additional treatment options in multiple sclero-
`sis. Natalizumab is an attractive therapy to add to
`current disease-modifying therapies in patients
`with breakthrough disease because preliminary
`efficacy9 and safety10 data have been favorable
`and because the mechanism of action of natali-
`zumab may complement those of other disease-
`modifying therapies.11-17
`The Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab in
`Combination with Interferon Beta-1a in Patients
`with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
`(SENTINEL) study was a two-year, phase 3 clinical
`trial designed to determine whether natalizumab,
`when added to interferon beta-1a, has efficacy in
`addition to that associated with interferon beta-1a
`alone. The trial was also designed to confirm the
`safety of natalizumab when added to interferon
`beta-1a.
`
`Me thods
`
`Patients
`One hundred twenty-four clinical centers in Eu-
`rope and the United States enrolled 1196 patients
`beginning on January 14, 2002. All patients gave
`written informed consent. The study protocol was
`developed by the investigator advisory committee
`and the sponsors and was approved by central
`and local ethics committees, and the study was
`overseen by an independent safety-monitoring
`committee. Data were collected by the investiga-
`tors and an independent organization (PPD Inter-
`national) and were held and analyzed by Biogen
`Idec and Elan Pharmaceuticals. During the study,
`the investigator advisory committee and repre-
`
`sentatives of Biogen Idec met at least monthly to
`review and manage the study. The manuscript was
`written by Drs. Rudick and Panzara, with input
`from each of the other authors; all the authors
`vouch for the veracity and completeness of the
`data and analyses.
`Eligible patients were 18 to 55 years of age;
`had a diagnosis of relapsing–remitting multiple
`sclerosis,18 a score on the Expanded Disability
`Status Scale (EDSS) (possible scores range from
`0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe
`disease) between 0 and 5.0,19 and a magnetic
`resonance imaging (MRI) scan revealing lesions
`consistent with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis;
`had received treatment with interferon beta-1a for
`at least 12 months before randomization; and
`had had at least one relapse during the 12-month
`period before randomization. Patients were in-
`eligible if they had primary progressive, second-
`ary progressive, or progressive relapsing multiple
`sclerosis20; if they had had a relapse within 50
`days before randomization; or if they had been
`treated with an approved disease-modifying ther-
`apy other than interferon beta-1a intramuscularly
`once weekly within the 12-month period before
`randomization.
`
`Study Design and Randomization
`This study was a randomized, double-blind, place-
`bo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial.
`Data from 1171 of the 1196 patients enrolled were
`analyzed, because a single center with 25 patients
`was excluded before unblinding owing to irregu-
`larities in data. Patients were randomly assigned, in
`a 1:1 ratio, to receive 300 mg of natalizumab (589
`patients) or placebo (582 patients) intravenously ev-
`ery 4 weeks in addition to interferon beta-1a (Avon-
`ex, Biogen Idec) at a dose of 30 μg intramuscularly
`once weekly for up to 116 weeks. Randomization
`was stratified according to study site in blocks of
`four (two active and two placebo) with the use of a
`computer-generated schedule and a multidigit iden-
`tification number, implemented by way of an inter-
`active voice-response system. All study personnel,
`patients, sponsor personnel involved in the conduct
`of the study, and members of the investigator advi-
`sory committee were blinded to the treatment as-
`signments throughout the study.
`
`Study Procedure and End Points
`Each site designated primary and backup exam-
`ining neurologists and treating neurologists. The
`
`912
`
`n engl j med 354;9 www.nejm.org march 2, 2006
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 22, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`natalizumab and interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis
`
`examining neurologists performed the EDSS and
`neurologic examinations but were otherwise not
`involved in the patients’ medical care. The treat-
`ing neurologists were responsible for all patient
`care, including the management of adverse events
`and relapses of multiple sclerosis.
`Clinical visits every 12 weeks included assess-
`ment of relapses, EDSS evaluation, blood chemi-
`cal and hematologic tests, assessment of any ad-
`verse events, and immunogenicity studies. Patients
`were also seen by a treating neurologist during
`unscheduled visits within 72 hours after the de-
`velopment of new symptoms so that they could be
`assessed for possible relapses or adverse events.
`If a relapse was suspected, the patient was evalu-
`ated by the examining neurologist. Relapses were
`defined as the development of new or recurrent
`neurologic symptoms not associated with fever
`or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accom-
`panied by new, objective neurologic findings. At
`the discretion of the treating neurologist, relapses
`were treated with intravenous methylprednisolone
`at a dose of 1000 mg per day for three or five days.
`Patients who had disability progression that was
`sustained for 12 weeks were asked to provide con-
`sent to continue study participation and were giv-
`en the option of adding an available multiple scle-
`rosis treatment as rescue medication, according to
`protocol, while continuing to receive the study
`drug. Patients who discontinued the study drug
`were strongly encouraged to remain in the study
`for follow-up assessments, and all patients who
`continued to participate in the study were evalu-
`ated (according to the intention-to-treat principle).
`Proton-density, T2-weighted MRI scans and
`gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI scans of
`the brain were obtained at baseline and at weeks
`52 and 104. Forty contiguous, 3-mm-thick axial
`slices were acquired. MRI analyses were per-
`formed centrally at the MS-MRI Evaluation Cen-
`ter (Basel, Switzerland) by blinded raters. The
`scans were checked for artifacts, compliance with
`scanning requirements, and repositioning.
`The primary efficacy end point was the rate of
`clinical relapse at one year. Secondary end points
`at one year were the number of new or enlarging
`T2-hyperintense lesions, the number of gadolin-
`ium-enhancing lesions, and the proportion of pa-
`tients free of relapse. The primary efficacy end
`point at two years was the cumulative probabil-
`ity of sustained disability progression, defined as
`an increase by at least 1.0 point in the EDSS score
`
`from a baseline score of at least 1.0 or an increase
`by at least 1.5 points in the EDSS score from a
`baseline score of 0, sustained for 12 weeks; pro-
`gression could not be confirmed during a relapse.
`Secondary end points at two years were the rate
`of clinical relapse, the volume of T2-hyperintense
`lesions, the number of new T1-hypointense le-
`sions, and disability as measured by the Multiple
`Sclerosis Functional Composite.21 This report
`presents data pertaining to primary end points
`and key secondary efficacy end points, as well as
`safety data. Results pertaining to additional sec-
`ondary end points and tertiary end points are not
`included in this report.
`Binding antibodies against natalizumab were
`assessed with use of an enzyme-linked immuno-
`sorbent assay. Positive samples (0.5 μg per mil-
`liliter) were further tested in a flow-cytometry
`assay to determine whether these antibodies inter-
`fered with the binding of natalizumab to α4 in-
`tegrin.
`
`Statistical Analysis
`The sample size was estimated, on the basis of
`data from previous trials of natalizumab9 and
`interferon beta-1a,6 with the use of two-sided
`tests with an experiment-wise alpha of 0.05. The
`annualized rate of relapse among patients receiv-
`ing combination therapy at one year was predict-
`ed to be 0.6, as compared with 0.9 among pa-
`tients receiving interferon beta-1a alone. For the
`annualized relapse rate, the likelihood-ratio test
`was used to determine the sample size with half
`the patients receiving active drug and half receiv-
`ing placebo. With an assumed dropout rate of 17
`percent, rounding, a type I error rate of 2.5 per-
`cent, and a type II error rate of 90 percent, the
`number of patients needed was estimated to be
`1200. To power the study for the two-year end
`point of disability progression, we assumed a
`progression rate of 34.9 percent at the end of two
`years in the group assigned to interferon beta-1a
`alone and a progression rate of 22.7 percent at
`the end of two years (a 35 percent improvement)
`in the combination-therapy group. Simulations
`of the log-rank test were run with 60 percent of
`the accrual in the first 24 weeks and the remain-
`der in the next 24 weeks. With an assumed drop-
`out rate of 20 percent, the sample size of 1200
`provided at least 92 percent power with a Bonfer-
`roni adjustment for multiple end points and with
`the type I error rate maintained at 5 percent.
`
`n engl j med 354;9 www.nejm.org march 2, 2006
`
`913
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 22, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`T h e n e w e n g l a n d j o u r n a l o f m e d i c i n e
`
`The baseline characteristics of the patients
`were analyzed with the use of a t-test, with the
`exceptions of sex, race, and diagnosis of multi-
`ple sclerosis (based on the McDonald criteria18),
`which were analyzed with the use of a chi-
`square test. The time to the onset of disability
`progression sustained for 12 weeks was used to
`determine the cumulative probability of disabil-
`ity progression estimated by the Kaplan–Meier
`method. The Cox proportional-hazards model,
`adjusted for the baseline EDSS score, was used
`to compare the Kaplan–Meier curves. The an-
`nualized relapse rate was calculated by Poisson
`regression and adjusted for the number of re-
`lapses in the year before randomization; data
`pertaining to relapses that occurred after rescue
`treatment was initiated (per protocol) were cen-
`sored. Additional baseline factors were tested for
`inclusion in each of the models: EDSS score (≤3.5
`or >3.5), gadolinium-enhancing lesions (present
`or absent), the number of T2-hyperintense lesions
`(<9 or ≥9), and age (<40 or ≥40 years).22-24
`Each covariate was tested in the model for sta-
`tistical significance by a backward-selection pro-
`cedure, and only statistically significant covari-
`ates (P≤0.10) were included in the final models.
`No additional covariates were included in the
`analysis of disability progression. Three addi-
`tional covariates (baseline EDSS score, the pres-
`ence or absence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions
`at baseline, and age) were included in the analy-
`sis of relapse rate.
`A sensitivity analysis of disability progression
`(based on the change in EDSS score) sustained for
`24 weeks was also conducted. For the annualized
`rate of relapse, sensitivity analyses were performed
`with and without censoring, as well as with and
`without adjustment for significant covariates.
`The unadjusted rate of relapse was calculated as
`the total number of relapses divided by the total
`number of subject-years of follow-up in each
`treatment group. The Hochberg procedure25 for
`multiple comparisons was used in the analysis
`of the two primary end points; hence, the sig-
`nificance level was set such that if the higher of
`the P values for the analyses of these end points
`was less than or equal to 0.05, then both end
`points were considered to be statistically signifi-
`cant; otherwise, the lower of the P values was
`tested at a significance level of 0.025.
`Secondary efficacy end points were rank-
`
`ordered, and a closed testing procedure was used
`such that if statistical significance was not achieved
`for a given end point, then end points of a lower
`rank were considered not statistically significant.
`Secondary efficacy end points were analyzed by
`logistic regression with a term for treatment group
`and with their respective baseline values as covari-
`ates; missing values were imputed by using the
`mean in the study population.
`Adverse events were analyzed with use of the
`chi-square test, and serious adverse events were
`analyzed with use of Fisher’s exact test. Poisson
`regression was used to calculate the difference
`between the rates of infection in each treatment
`group.
`All analyses followed the intention-to-treat prin-
`ciple. All reported P values are two-tailed. The date
`on which the database was locked for the two-year
`analyses was May 31, 2005, and as a result there
`were 2528 patient-years of observation and 1222
`patient-years of exposure to natalizumab.
`
`R esults
`
`Patients
`SENTINEL was stopped approximately one month
`early, on February 28, 2005, because of two re-
`ports of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopa-
`thy (PML). Of the 1171 patients, a total of 1003
`(86 percent) completed the 120-week study; 168
`patients (14 percent overall; 12 percent of the
`group assigned to interferon beta-1a plus natali-
`zumab and 16 percent of the group assigned to
`interferon beta-1a alone) withdrew from the study
`(Fig. 1). Sixty-four patients discontinued the study
`drug but completed follow-up (5 percent overall;
`5 percent of the combination-therapy group and
`6 percent of the group assigned to interferon
`beta-1a alone). There were no significant differ-
`ences in demographic or disease-related charac-
`teristics at baseline between the two treatment
`groups, with the exception of the duration of dis-
`ease (median, seven years in the combination-ther-
`apy group and eight years in the group assigned
`to interferon beta-1a alone; P = 0.02) (Table 1).
`The SENTINEL data represent 28 percent of
`the placebo-controlled experience with natalizu-
`mab (in terms of patient-years of exposure) in
`both multiple sclerosis and Crohn’s disease and
`44 percent of the overall experience in multiple
`sclerosis.
`
`914
`
`n engl j med 354;9 www.nejm.org march 2, 2006
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 22, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`natalizumab and interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis
`
`Randomly assigned
`(N=1196)
`
`Excluded because of irregularities in data at one center
`(N=25)
`
`Interferon beta-1a plus natalizumab
`(N=589)
`
`Interferon beta-1a alone
`(N=582)
`
`Withdrew from study
`(N=73)
`Patient’s request
`(N=25 [4%])
`Adverse event
`(N=17 [3%])
`Noncompliance
`(N=6 [1%])
`Loss to follow-up
`(N=4 [<1%])
`Death
`(N=0 [0%])
`Other
`(N=21 [4%])
`
`Discontinued study drug
`but completed follow-up
`(N=29)
`
`Withdrew from study
`(N=95)
`Patient’s request
`(N=45 [8%])
`Adverse event
`(N=14 [2%])
`Noncompliance
`(N=5 [<1%])
`Loss to follow-up
`(N=5 [<1%])
`Death
`(N=2 [<1%])
`Other
`(N=24 [4%])
`
`Discontinued study drug
`but completed follow-up
`(N=35)
`
`Completed 2 yr of follow-up
`(N=516)
`
`Completed 2 yr of follow-up
`(N=487)
`
`Figure 1. Disposition of Patients during the Two-Year SENTINEL Study.
`
`Efficacy
`
`Kaplan–Meier estimates of the cumulative proba-
`bility of sustained disability progression at 2 years
`were 23 percent with combination therapy and 29
`percent with interferon beta-1a alone (Fig. 2 and
`Table 2). Combination therapy resulted in a 24 per-
`cent decrease in the risk of sustained disability
`progression (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95 percent confi-
`dence interval, 0.61 to 0.96; P = 0.02). In the sen-
`sitivity analysis of the risk of disability progres-
`sion sustained for 24 weeks, estimates of the
`cumulative probability of progression by 2 years
`were 15 percent for combination therapy and 18
`percent for interferon beta-1a alone (representing
`an 18 percent re duction with combination thera-
`py); however, this difference was not statistically
`significant (P = 0.17).
`Combination therapy reduced the annualized
`rate of relapse at one year, which was 0.82 with
`interferon beta-1a alone, to 0.38 (P<0.001) — a
`
`54 percent reduction (Table 2). This difference
`was maintained at two years, at which time the
`rate was 0.75 with interferon beta-1a alone and
`0.34 with combination therapy (a 55 percent re-
`duction with combination therapy, P<0.001). Sub-
`group analyses (according to relapse history,
`EDSS score, age, sex, the presence or absence of
`gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and the number
`of T2-hyperintense lesions) and a sensitivity analy-
`sis of relapse rate showed consistent results. The
`proportion of patients who were relapse-free at
`two years was 54 percent in the combination-
`therapy group, as compared with 32 percent in
`the group assigned to interferon beta-1a alone
`(P<0.001). The risk of relapse was 50 percent
`lower with combination therapy (hazard ratio,
`0.50; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.59;
`P<0.001).
`The number of new or enlarging T2-hyperin-
`tense lesions over the two-year period was re-
`
`n engl j med 354;9 www.nejm.org march 2, 2006
`
`915
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 22, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`T h e n e w e n g l a n d j o u r n a l o f m e d i c i n e
`
`Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Patients.*
`
`Characteristic
`
`Age — yr
`
`Mean ±SD
`
`Range
`
`Sex — no. of patients (%)
`
`Male
`
`Female
`
`Race — no. of patients (%)†
`
`White
`
`Other
`
`Duration of disease — yr
`
`Median
`
`Range
`
`No. of relapses in previous 1 yr — no. of patients (%)
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Interferon Beta-1a
` plus Natalizumab
`(N = 589)
`
`Interferon
`Beta-1a Alone
`(N = 582)
`
`Total
`(N = 1171)
`
`38.8±7.7
`
`18–55
`
`147 (25)
`
`442 (75)
`
`550 (93)
`
`39 (7)
`
`7.0‡
`
`1–34
`
`0
`
`390 (66)
`
`153 (26)
`
`44 (7)
`
`39.1±7.6
`
`19–55
`
`38.9±7.7
`
`18–55
`
`162 (28)
`
`420 (72)
`
`542 (93)
`
`40 (7)
`
`8.0
`
`1–34
`
`1 (<1)
`
`357 (61)
`
`174 (30)
`
`50 (9)
`
`309 (26)
`
`862 (74)
`
`1092 (93)
`
`79 (7)
`
`7.0
`
`1–34
`
`1 (<1)
`
`747 (64)
`
`327 (28)
`
`94 (8)
`
`≥3
`
`Missing data
`
`No. of relapses in previous 1 yr
`
`Mean ±SD
`
`Range
`
`EDSS score — no. of patients (%)§
`
`0
`
`1.0–1.5
`
`2.0–2.5
`
`3.0–3.5
`
`4.0–4.5
`
`5.0
`
`≥5.5
`
`EDSS score
`
`Mean ±SD
`
`Range
`
`duced from 5.4 with interferon beta-1a alone to
`0.9 with combination therapy (P<0.001), repre-
`senting an 83 percent reduction with combina-
`tion therapy (Table 2). The mean number of
`gadolinium-enhancing lesions at two years was
`0.9 with interferon beta-1a alone and 0.1 with
`combination therapy, representing an 89 percent
`reduction (P<0.001).
`
`2 (<1)
`
`0
`
`2 (<1)
`
`1.44±0.75
`
`1–7
`
`1.49±0.72
`
`1.47±0.73
`
`0–5
`
`0–7
`
`24 (4)
`
`145 (25)
`
`214 (36)
`
`125 (21)
`
`68 (12)
`
`12 (2)
`
`1 (<1)
`
`2.4±1.1
`
`0–6.0
`
`Safety
`
`19 (3)
`
`143 (25)
`
`203 (35)
`
`126 (22)
`
`72 (12)
`
`16 (3)
`
`3 (<1)
`
`2.5±1.1
`
`0–5.5
`
`43 (4)
`
`288 (25)
`
`417 (36)
`
`251 (21)
`
`140 (12)
`
`28 (2)
`
`4 (<1)
`
`2.4±1.1
`
` 0–6.0
`
`At least one adverse event was reported by 584
`patients assigned to receive interferon beta-1a plus
`natalizumab (>99 percent) and 578 assigned to re-
`ceive interferon beta-1a alone (>99 percent). Ad-
`verse events significantly associated with combi-
`nation therapy were anxiety, pharyngitis, sinus
`congestion, and peripheral edema (Table 3). The
`
`916
`
`n engl j med 354;9 www.nejm.org march 2, 2006
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 22, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`natalizumab and interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis
`
`Table 1. (Continued.)
`
`Characteristic
`
`Interferon Beta-1a
`plus Natalizumab
`(N = 589)
`
`Interferon
`Beta-1a Alone
`(N = 582)
`
`Total
`(N = 1171)
`
`No. of gadolinium-enhancing lesions — no. of patients (%)
`0
`1
`2
`
`3
`≥4
`
`Missing data
`No. of gadolinium-enhancing lesions
`Mean ±SD
`
`Range
`No. of T2-hyperintense lesions — no. (%)
`<9
`≥9
`Missing data
`Duration of interferon beta-1a therapy before study — mo
`Mean ±SE
`Median
`
`Range
`
`392 (67)
`98 (17)
`31 (5)
`
`20 (3)
`43 (7)
`
`5 (<1)
`
`0.9±2.5
`
`0–24
`
`67 (11)
`519 (88)
`3 (<1)
`
`33.6±0.7
`29.0
`
`10–88
`
`374 (64)
`105 (18)
`32 (5)
`
`26 (4)
`42 (7)
`
`3 (<1)
`
`0.9±1.9
`
`0–16
`
`52 (9)
`528 (91)
`2 (<1)
`
`35.4±0.7
`32.0
`
`11–99
`
`766 (65)
`203 (17)
`63 (5)
`
`46 (4)
`85 (7)
`
`8 (<1)
`
`0.9±2.2
`
`0–24
`
`119 (10)
`1047 (89)
`5 (<1)
`
`34.5±0.5
`31.0
`
`10–99
`
`* Percentages may not total 100, because of rounding.
`† Race was determined at the time of enrollment by the treating investigator.
`‡ P≤0.02 for the comparison with the group assigned to interferon beta-1a alone.
`§ EDSS denotes the Expanded Disability Status Scale (possible scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating
`more severe disease).
`
`worst adverse events associated with combination
`therapy were mild in 10 percent of the patients,
`moderate in 54 percent, and severe in 35 percent;
`the respective percentages for interferon beta-1a
`alone were 5 percent, 57 percent, and 37 percent.
`Serious adverse events were observed in 18 per-
`cent of the patients assigned to combination ther-
`apy and 21 percent of those assigned to interferon
`beta-1a alone (P = 0.23). The most common seri-
`ous adverse event was a relapse of multiple scle-
`rosis, which occurred in 5 percent of the patients
`in the combination-therapy group and 9 percent of
`those in the interferon beta-1a group (P = 0.002).
`One of the serious adverse events reported was
`PML, which occurred in a patient who had received
`29 doses of natalizumab. A second patient received
`a diagnosis of PML after her completion of the
`two-year study and after she had received 37 doses
`of natalizumab. The details of these cases of PML
`have been reported previously.26,27 Two of the pa-
`tients assigned to interferon beta-1a alone died:
`
`one was a 47-year-old woman with a history of
`sinus arrhythmia and heart murmur, and the
`other was a 23-year-old woman with a history of
`headache, pain, and use of prescribed methadone
`who died during sleep.
`Depression was assessed every six months with
`use of the Beck Depression Inventory II.28
`There were no differences between the treatment
`groups in Beck Depression Inventory II scores
`during the study (data not shown).
`The incidence of infection was 83 percent in
`the combination-therapy group and 81 percent in
`the group assigned to interferon beta-1a alone;
`infections occurred at a rate of 1 per patient-year
`in each group. When the data pertaining to infec-
`tion were reanalyzed to include multiple occur-
`rences, the rate increased in each group, as ex-
`pected. However, there remained no significant
`difference between the groups, with infection
`rates of 1.54 per patient-year with combination
`therapy and 1.53 per patient-year with interferon
`
`n engl j med 354;9 www.nejm.org march 2, 2006
`
`917
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 22, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`T h e n e w e n g l a n d j o u r n a l o f m e d i c i n e
`
`P=0.02
`
`Interferon beta-1a
`alone (29%)
`
`Interferon beta-1a plus
`natalizumab (23%)
`
`0
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`48
`
`60
`Weeks
`
`72
`
`84
`
`96
`
`108
`
`120
`
`0.5
`
`0.4
`
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`0.0
`
`Sustained Progression
`
`Proportion of Patients with
`
`No. at Risk
`Interferon beta-1a alone
`Interferon beta-1a plus natalizumab
`
`582
`589
`
`550
`569
`
`517
`543
`
`493
`520
`
`461
`494
`
`441
`479
`
`415
`459
`
`396
`438
`
`367
`421
`
`347
`399
`
`343
`395
`
`Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Plots of the Time to Sustained Disability Progression.
`The hazard ratio for sustained progression in the combination-therapy group as compared with the group given
`interferon beta-1a alone was 0.76 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.96).
`
`beta-1a alone (P = 0.95). Common infections were
`nasopharyngitis (39 percent vs. 35 percent); uri-
`nary tract infection, not otherwise specified (18
`percent vs. 19 percent); sinusitis, not otherwise
`specified (18 percent vs. 15 percent); upper respi-
`ratory tract infection, not otherwise specified (17
`percent vs. 18 percent); and influenza (17 percent
`vs. 15 percent). Serious infections occurred in 2.7
`percent and 2.9 percent of the patients assigned
`to combination therapy and interferon beta-1a
`alone, respectively. There were no cases of tuber-
`culosis. The incidence of cancer was 1 percent in
`the combination-therapy group and 2 percent in
`the group assigned to interferon beta-1a alone.
`Infusion reactions, defined as any event occur-
`ring within two hours after the start of an infu-
`sion, occurred in 24 percent of the patients in the
`combination-therapy group and 20 percent of
`those in the group assigned to interferon beta-1a
`alone (P = 0.11). The most common infusion reac-
`tion was headache. Most reactions were treated
`symptomatically and did not result in discontin-
`uation of the study drug. Hypersensitivity reac-
`tions included all events reported on the basis of
`clinical judgment as hypersensitivity, an allergic
`reaction, an anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reac-
`tion, urticaria, or hives by the investigator and
`were categorized according to severity. Eleven
`
`patients assigned to combination therapy (1.9
`percent) had a hypersensitivity reaction; 8 of the
`11 hypersensitivity reactions were isolated cases
`of urticaria (2 of which were severe). In addition,
`two patients assigned to interferon beta-1a alone
`(0.3 percent) had hypersensitivity reactions asso-
`ciated with the infusion of placebo; both were
`cases of mild urticaria. There was no cardiopul-
`monary compromise associated with any event.
`Natalizumab was discontinued, and the episodes
`resolved without sequelae.
`Eight percent of the patients in the combina-
`tion-therapy group and 7 percent of those in the
`group assigned to interferon beta-1a alone discon-
`tinued the study drug because of an adverse event.
`Three percent and 2 percent, respectively, with-
`drew from the study because of an adverse event.
`Natalizumab-treated patients had increases in
`lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and baso-
`phils — changes consistent with the drug’s known
`pharmacodynamic effects and the presence of
`α4 integrins on these cell types. Increases in nu-
`cleated red cells also were seen transiently in a
`small number of patients. These laboratory chang-
`es were not associated with any clinical manifes-
`tations and were reversible, with values returning
`to baseline within 16 weeks after the last dose.
`Elevations in neutrophils were not observed. No
`
`918
`
`n engl j med 354;9 www.nejm.org march 2, 2006
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 22, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
` Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`natalizumab and interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis
`
`0.001
`
`0.001
`
`0.001
`0.001
`0.001
`
`0, 43
`
`0
`
`0.9±3.2
`
`47 (8)
`33 (6)
`67 (12)
`435 (75)
`
`0, 64
`
`3
`
`5.4±8.7
`
`292 (50)
`59 (10)
`55 (9)
`176 (30)
`
`0, 12
`
`0
`
`0.1±0.6
`
`4 (<1)
`4 (<1)
`13 (2)
`568 (96)
`
`0, 27
`
`0
`
`0.9±2.1
`
`80 (14)
`39 (7)
`76 (13)
`394 (67)
`
`0.75
`0.70
`0.75 (0.67–0.84)
`
`0.33
`0.31
`0.34 (0.29–0.39)
`
`96 (16)
`105 (18)
`164 (28)
`217 (37)
`
`31 (5)
`41 (7)
`158 (27)
`359 (61)
`
`0.001
`
`0.75 (0.67–0.84)
`
`0.34 (0.29–0.39)
`
`0.02‡
`
` Value
`
`P
`
`29
`
`23
`
`Beta-1a Alone
`Interferon
`
`(N = 582)
`
`2 Yr
`
`plus Natalizumab
`Interferon Beta-1a
`
`(N = 589)
`
`<0.001
`
`<0.001
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
` Value
`
`P
`
`0, 43
`
`0
`
`0.8±2.5
`
`0, 28
`1.0
`2.4±4.1
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`(N = 582)
`
`Interferon
`
`† Sustained disability progression was defined as an increase by at least 1.0 point in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score from a baseline sco

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket