throbber
SS
`Reduction of Disease Activity and
`Disability With High-Dose
`Cyclophosphamidein Patients
`With Aggressive Multiple Sclerosis
`
`ee
`ae
`ARCHIVES EXPRESS
`— —
`
`Chitra Krishnan, MHS; AdamI. Kaplin, MD, PhD; Robert A. Brodsky, MD; Daniel B. Drachman, MD;
`RichardJ. Jones, MD; Dzung L. Pham, PhD; Nancy D. Richert, MD, PhD; Carlos A. Pardo, MD;
`David M. Yousem, MD, MBA; Edward Hammond, MD, MPH; MeganQuigg, BA; Carrilin Trecker, BA;
`Justin C. McArthur, MBBS, MPH; Avindra Nath, MD; Benjamin M. Greenberg, MD, MHS;
`Peter A. Calabresi, MD; Douglas A. Kerr, MD, PhD
`
`Objective: To explore the safety and effectiveness of
`high-dose cyclophosphamide (HiCy) without bone mar-
`row transplantationin patients with aggressive multiple
`sclerosis (MS).
`
`tients with RRMS. Secondary outcome measures in-
`cluded a changein gadolinium-enhancinglesions On mag-
`netic resonance images and a changein disability measures
`(EDSS and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite).
`
`Design: A 2-year open-label trial of patients with ag-
`gressive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)
`given an immunoablative regimen of HiCy (50 mg/kg/d
`for + consecutive days) with no subsequent immuno-
`modulatory’ therapyunless disease activity reappeared that
`required rescue therapy.
`
`Setting: The Johns Hopkins University Multiple Scle-
`tosis Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
`
`Patients: A total of 21 patients with RRMS were screened
`for eligibility and 9 patients were enrolled in thetrial.
`Patients were required to have 2 or more gadolinium-
`enhancinglesions on each of 2 pretreatment magnetic
`resonance imaging Scans,at least ] clinical exacerbation
`in the 12 months prior to HiCytreatment, or a Sus-
`tained increase of 1.0 point or higher on the Expanded
`Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in the preceding year.
`
`Intervention: Patienis received 50 mg/kg/d of cyclo-
`phosphamideintravenously for + conSecutive days,fol-
`lowed by5 j1g/kg/d of granulocyte colony-stimulating
`facior 6 days after completion of HiCy treatment, until
`the absolute neutrophil count exceeded 1.0 X 10° cells/L
`for 2 consecutive days.
`
`Results: Nine patients were treated and followed up for
`a meanperiod of 23 months. Eightpatients had failed con-
`ventional therapy and 1 was treatment naive. The median
`age at time of entrywas 29 years (range, 20-47 years). All
`patients developed transienttotal or near-total pancytope-
`nia as expected, followed by hematopoictic recoveryin 10
`to 17 days, stimulated by granulocyte colony-stimulating
`factor, There were no deaths or unexpected serious ad-
`verse events. There was a statistically significant reduc-
`tion in disability (EDSS) at follow-up (mean [SD] de-
`crease, 2.11 |1.97]; 39.4%; P=.02). The mean (SD) number
`of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on the 2 pretreatment
`scans Were 6.5(2.1) and 1.2(2.3) at follow-up (81.4% re-
`duction; P=.01). Two patients required rescue treatment
`with other immunomodulatorytherapies duringthe study
`owing to MS exacerbations.
`
`Conelusion: Treatment with HiCywas sale and well tol-
`erated in our patients with MS. Patients experienced a
`pronounced reduction in disease activity and disability
`after HiCy treatment. This immunoablative regimen of
`cyclophosphamide for patients with aggressive MS is wor-
`thy of further study and maybe an alternative to bone
`marrow transplantation.
`
`Main Outcome Measures: [he primary Outcome of
`the study was the safety andtolerability of HiCyin pa-
`
`
`Arch Neurol. 2008;65 (8):1044-1051
`
`ULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
`
`(MS) is an infllamma-
`tory demyelinating
`disease of the central
`nervoussystem olpre-
`sumed autoimmune etiology.It is the most
`common nontraumatic cause of neuro-
`logic disability in young adults and af-
`fects between 250000 and 400000 per-
`
`AuthorAffiliations are listed at
`the end of this artick.
`
`sons in the United States.'? Four pathologic
`subtypes of MShave beenidentified, each
`of whichrepresentsa distinct autoimmune
`process. >
`
`wm CMEavailable online at
`sus) www.jamaarchivescme.com
`and questions on page 1016
`
`Merck 2006
`TWi v Merck
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH NEUROL/ VOL65 (NO. 8), AUG 2008
`1044
`
`WWWARCHNEUROL COM
`
`Downloaded from jamanetwork.com by Reprints Desk userSRNRse aaa
`
`IPR2023-00049
`
`Merck 2006
`TWi v Merck
`IPR2023-00049
`
`

`

`SSO
`Reduction of Disease Activity and
`Disability With High-Dose
`Cyclophosphamidein Patients
`With Aggressive Multiple Sclerosis
`
`— ee
`ARCHIVES EXPRESS
`= a
`
`Chitra Krishnan, MHS; AdamI. Kaplin, MD, PhD; Robert A. Brodsky, MD; Daniel B. Drachman, MD;
`RichardJ. Jones, MD; Dzung L. Pham, PhD; Nancy D. Richert, MD, PhD; Carlos A. Pardo, MD;
`David M. Yousem, MD, MBA; Edward Hammond, MD, MPH; MeganQuigg, BA; Carrilin Trecker, BA;
`Justin C. McArthur, MBBS, MPH; Avindra Nath, MD; Benjamin M. Greenberg, MD, MHS;
`Peter A. Calabresi, MD: Douglas A. Kerr, MD, PhD
`
`Objective: To explore the safety and effectiveness of
`high-dose cyclophosphamide (HiCy) without bone mar-
`rowtransplantationin patients with aggressive multiple
`sclerosis (MS).
`
`tients with RRMS. Secondary outcome measures in-
`cluded a changein gadolinium-enhancinglesions On mag-
`netic resonance images and a changein disability measures
`(EDSS and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite).
`
`Design: A 2-year open-label trial of patients with ag-
`gressive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)
`given an immunoablative regimen of HiCy (50 mg/kg/d
`for + consecutive days) with no subsequent immuno-
`modulatorytherapy unless disease activity reappeared that
`required rescue therapy.
`
`Results: Nine patients were treated and followed up for
`a meanperiod of 23 months.Eightpatients had failed con-
`ventional therapy and 1 was treatment naive. The median
`age at time of entrywas 29 years (range, 20-47 years). All
`patients developed transienttotal or near-total pancytope-
`nia as expected, followed by hematopoictic recoveryin 10
`to 17 days, stimulated by granulocyte colony-stimulating
`Setting: The Johns Hopkins University Multiple Scle-
`factor, There were no deaths or unexpected serious ad-
`rosis Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
`verse events. There wasastatistically significant reduc-
`Patients: A total of 21 patients with RRMS were screened
`tion in disability (EDSS) at follow-up (mean [SD] de-
`for eligibility and 9 patients were enrolled in thetrial.
`crease, 2.11 |1.97]: 39.4%; P=.02). The mean (SD) number
`Patients were required to have 2 or more gadolinium-
`of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on the 2 pretreatment
`enhancinglesions on each of 2 pretreatment magnetic
`scans Were 6.5(2.1) and 1.2(2.3) at follow-up (81.4% re-
`resonance imaging Scans,at least 1 clinical exacerbation
`duction; P=.01). Two patients required rescue treatment
`in the 12 months prior to HiCytreatment, or a Sus-
`with other immunomodulatorytherapies during the study
`tained increase of 1.0 point or higher on the Expanded
`owing to MS exacerbations.
`Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in the preceding year.
`
`Intervention: Patic¢nis received 50 mg/kg/d of cyclo-
`phosphamideintravenously for + conSecutive days,fol-
`lowed by5 j1g/kg/d of granulocyte colony-stimulating
`facior 6 days after completion of HiCy treatment, until
`the absolute neutrophil count exceeded 1.0 X 10° cells/L
`for 2 consecutive days.
`
`Conelusion: Treatment with HiCywas sale and well tol-
`erated in our patients with MS. Patients experienced a
`pronounced reduction in disease activity and disability
`after HiCy treatment. This immunoablative regimen of
`cyclophosphamide for patients with aggressive MSis wor-
`thy of further study and maybe an alternative to bone
`marrow transplantation.
`
`Main Outcome Measures: [he primary Outcome of
`the study was the safety and tolerability of HiCy in pa-
`
`
`Arch Neurol. 2008:65 (8): 1044-1051
`
`ULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
`
`(MS) is an inflamma-
`tory demyelinating
`disease of the central
`nervous System ol pre-
`sumed autoimmune etiology. It is the most
`common nontraumatic cause of neuro-
`logic disability in young adults and af-
`fects between 250000 and 400000 per-
`
`sons in the United States.'? Four pathologic
`subtypes of MShave been identified, each
`of whichrepresents a distinct autoimmune
`process."
`
`we CMEavailable online at
`sus) www.jamaarchivescme.com
`and questions on page 1016
`
`AuthorAffiliations are listed at
`the end of this article.
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH NEUROL/ VOL65 (NO. 8). AUG 2008
`1044
`
`WWW. ARCHNEUROL COM
`
`
`
`Ciciinstidield dean k.com by Reprints Desk15B700hHIERGAAMedical Association.All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`tures not previously studied and had a longerfollow-up
`(23 months) than previously published.** We found that
`HiCy treatment induced a significant reduction in dis-
`ease activity and disability in most patients. Some pa-
`tients experienced sustained remission of all detectable
`disease activity despite receiving no subsequent immuno-
`modulatorytherapy.
`
`A total of 21 patients were screenedforeligibility and 9 were
`enrolled between October 2003 and July 2006. Men and women
`betweenthe ages of 18 and 70 years whohadfailed or refused
`conventional therapyand had active disease were enrolled. Ac-
`tive disease was defined as 1 clinical exacerbation between 6
`and 12 months prior to HiCytreatment or a sustained in-
`crease in more than | Expanded DisabilityStatus Scale (EDSS)
`point in the past year and 2 or more gadolinium-enhancingle-
`sions (GELs) on each of2 pretreatment MRIscans. Patients were
`excluded if they had a clinical exacerbation within 3 months
`prior to administration of HiCy. as those patients might not have
`had stable disability. These criteria were designedto identify a
`patient population with ongoing inflammatorydisease activ-
`ity, high risk of continued progression, and loss of function.
`
`STUDY TREATMENT
`
`Becauseofthis clinical and immunopathologic hetero-
`geneity, immunomodulatorystrategies to treat MS have
`been suboptimal. Current Food and Drug Administration-
`approved immunomodulatorytherapies for MSdo notabol-
`ish inflammationordisease progression, and the vast ma-
`jority of patients continue to accrue progressive disability
`despite these therapies.
`Cyclophosphamide (Cy) andits active metabolites
`—_hii”
`diffuse into cells and are converted into the alkylating
`compound phosphoramide mustard through simple
`intracellular decomposition.* Cyclophosphamide is a
`STUDY DESIGN AND INCLUSION CRITERIA
`nonspecific immunosuppressant that affects both T-
`and B-cell function, and in MS may suppress interleu-
`kin (IL)-12 and T-helper type 1 (Th1)-type responses
`and enhance Th2/Th3 responses.’ These changes are
`transient whenCyis given bystandard pulse doses, and
`the immune system returns to baseline within a few
`months to a yearafter cessation.**
`Cyclophosphamide has been used extensivelyin treat-
`ing MS, with mixed results. In several studies, pulse Cy
`alone or in combination with corticotropin (adrenocor-
`ticotropic hormone) or interferon resulted in stabiliza-
`tion or improvement in manypatients, though toxicity
`was a major limitation of these regimens.”'? In oth-
`ers,'*'* standard induction regimensof Cywith or with-
`out pulse boosters did not halt disease progression in pa-
`tients with progressive MS.
`Recently, several groups havetreated patients with MS
`with more aggressive immune system ablation, requir-
`Approval from theJohns Hopkins institutional review board was
`ing autologous hematopoietic progenitor rescue.'*"? In
`obtained. Patients gave consent twice, al screening and prior to
`enrollmentinto the studyif they metall inclusioncriteria, All pa-
`the majority of these studies, there was an apparent im-
`tient case summaries were presented to a Steering committee to
`provementorstabilization of the clinical course. Addi-
`ensure by unanimous approval that they metall inclusion crite-
`tionally, standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mea-
`ria and no exclusioncriteria. Pretreatment studies included elec-
`sures of disease activity have shown dramatic, if not
`trocardiogram,echocardiogram or multiple gated acquisition scan,
`complete, stabilization with such regimens.'**° In sev-
`sinus computed tomography, and extensive blood work.
`eral patients, long-term remission of both inflammation
`Patients received 50 mg/kg/dof Cyintravenouslyfor 4 con-
`and progression was achieved. However, somepatients
`secutive days. The dose of Cy was calculated according to ideal
`developed accelerated brain atrophyasaresult of the con-
`bodyweight. Prophylaxis against Cy-induced hemorrhagic cys-
`ditioning regimen and transplant-related mortality in such
`titis (generally Mesna [Uromitexan; Baxter, Deerfield, Illi-
`nois]) was directed according to established clinical practice
`patients was between 5% and 15%.'°)7'**!
`guidelines. On day 6 (6 days after completion of HiCy treat-
`Despite its immunoablative properties, high doses
`ment) all patients received 5 pg/kg/d of the myeloid growth fac-
`(120-200 mg/kg) of Cy (HiCy) used as conditioningfor
`torfilgrastim (granulocyte colony—stimulating factor) until the
`transplantis well tolerated and spares hematopoietic stem
`absolute neutrophil count exceeded 1.0 X 10° cells/L for 2 con-
`cells, as demonstrated by rapid hematopoietic recovery
`secutive days. Patients also routinely received prophylactic an-
`and immunereconstitution following this treatment in
`tibiotics (norfloxacin, fluconazole, and valacyclovir) while
`patients with severe autoimmunediseases.” The ma-
`granulocytopenic.
`jor mechanism ofCydetoxificationis inactivation ofal-
`dophosphamideby cellular aldehyde dehydrogenase to
`form the inert compound carboxyphosphamide.* Alde-
`hyde dehydrogenase is highly expressed in hematopoi-
`etic stem cells, whereasall mature or maturingcells, in-
`cluding lymphocytes, express relatively low levels of
`aldehyde dehydrogenase and are therefore rapidly elimi-
`nated by HiCy.* Recently, 13 patients with severerefrac-
`tory MS (7 with secondary progressive MS and 6 with
`relapsing-remitting MS) were studied following treat-
`ment with HiCy, and many were found to havestabili-
`zation or improvementofdisability. All reported an im-
`provementin quality-of-life measures.*®
`In our study, HiCytreatment without hematopoietic
`stem cell transplantation was studied in patients with se-
`vere MS. This study examinedradiologic andclinical fea-
`
`OUTCOME MEASURES
`
`Patients were evaluatedat the Johns Hopkins General Clinical
`Research Center every 3 months. Evaluations included stan-
`dard bloodprofile, urinalysis, electrocardiogram, echocardio-
`gram, neurologic examination, and MRI evaluations. Disabil-
`ity was measured using the EDSS and Multiple Sclerosis
`Functional Composite (MSFC),””
`Magnetic resonance imaging scans were performedat 1.5 T
`(General Electric, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with an echo speed
`or twin speed gradients, using the Excite platform (General
`Electric Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom).
`Magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequences included axial
`proton density T2-weighted combined pulse sequence,fluid-
`attenuated inversion recovery sequences, and axial pregado-
`linium and postgadolinium T1-weighted scans (0.2 mmol/kg
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH NEUROL/ VOL 65 (NO. 8), AUG 2008
`1045
`
`WWW.ARCHNEUROL.COM
`
`Downloaded from jamanetwork.com by Reprints Desk useron0173/2024
`
`Medical Association.All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`Table 1. Demographic Characteristics and Disease History
`
`Prior to HiCy Treatment
`iwieaeeeeeT,|
`Pretreatment=Baseline Average No.
`Patient No./Sex/Age,y,
`Disease
`Annualized
`Baseline
`of Enhancing Lesions
`Duration, y
`Relapse Rate
`EDSSScore
`(2 Pretreatment Scans)
`at Entry Into Study
`V/M/47
`15
`7.0
`45
`
`Past Treatments
`
`2/M/46
`
`1.17
`
`7.0
`
`5.5
`8
`10
`
`Steroids, Avonex
`
`Steroids, Avonex,* Rebif,” IVIG,pulse
`cyclophosphamide
`Steroids, Avonex
`Rebif, Avonex, steroids
`Avonex, steroids, glatiramer acetate
`Steroids, Betaseron,° Rebif, glatiramer acetate
`Rebif, glatiramer acetate
`Avonex,steroids, Celicept®
`No past treatment
`
`96
`
`7 63
`
`5
`
`5
`
`Abbreviations: EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; |VIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; HiCy, high-dose cyclophosphamide
`* Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
`DEMD Serono, Rockland, Massachusetts
`“Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, New Jersey.
`SRoche Pharmaceuticals, Nutley, New Jersey.
`
`years) are described in Table 1. There were 3 African
`American patients (patients 5, 7, and 9). The mean dis-
`ease duration was 7.6 years (median, 4 years; range, 1.5-15
`years). This cohort had a baseline annualized relapse rate
`of 1.7 episodes per year (historical data), a mean EDSSscore
`of 5.0, and a mean (SD) of 6.5(2.1) GELs using double-
`dose gadolinium (Table 1). Eight patients had failed con-
`ventional immunomodulatorytherapyand 1 patient was
`treatmentnaive at entry. The meantimeto follow-upafter
`HiCytreatmentin this cohort was 23 months.
`
`HEMATOLOGIC RECOVERY
`
`The total white blood cell count fell to fewer than 80 cells/
`mm?’ inall patients, with recovery measuring more than
`3500 cells/mm’ at a median of 15 (range, 13-30) daysaf-
`ter the last dose of Cy (Figure 1). The median number
`of red blood cell transfusions was 2 (range, 0-4), and the
`median numberofplatelet transfusions was | (range, 0-3).
`
`SAFETY
`
`using Omniscan [General Electric Healthcare]: this is double
`the dose compared with conventional scanning protocols).
`
`STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
`
`Statistical tests were performed using SPSS 15.0 (SPSS, Chicago,
`Illinois). Although 2 patients received other immunomodula-
`torytreatments during follow-up,all patients were followed up
`for safety and included in the effectiveness analysis (intention-
`to-treat analysis). Means, medians, and standard deviations were
`calculated. Nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon rank sumtest) were
`used to evaluate the change at follow-up compared with base-
`line. The MSFC z scores werecalculated using a standardizedref-
`erence population from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society
`Task Force data set.” ** Baseline EDSS and MSFCscores were used
`to calculate the percentage of changein disability scores at follow-
`up. The screening data were used for patient 5, as the baseline
`MSFCvisit was missing.
`
`MRI ANALYSIS
`
`Brain parenchymalfraction (BPF) was computedas theratio of brain
`volumetointracranial volume, as previously described.” The T2
`plaque volumes were semiautomatically obtained usinga fuzzyseg-
`mentation procedure**” applied to the brain-extracted fluid-
`attenuated inversion recovery images by modeling plaqueinten-
`sities as outliers, similar to the approach described by Van Leem-
`putetal,” The resulting segmentation wasinclusiveof the plaques
`butincluded false-positives that were manually removed bya trained
`operatorusing information from both thefluid-attenuated inver-
`sion recovery and T2-weighted scans. Changes in lesion volume
`were measured on T2-weighted images from baseline to the most
`recent follow-upvisit, and annualized changes in BPF were cal-
`culated using the Wilcoxon signed ranktest.
`
`High-dose cyclophosphamide was well tolerated, with no
`serious or unexpected adverse events. Twopatients devel-
`oped febrile neutropenia, and 3 hadself-limited docu-
`mented infections. There was | episode of confusion (pa-
`tient 3) at 15 months that was probablyunrelated to the
`HiCytreatment. The patient was also taking lithium and
`amitriptyline and had not decreased his dose as suggested
`by his physician. There were 4 hospital or emergencyde-
`partment admissions during the study follow-up. Patient
`1 was admitted to the hospital on 2 occasions owing to sus-
`pected MS exacerbation that was not confirmed by MRI.
`—_ki—
`The patient wastreated with rituximab 10 months after
`HiCytreatment and pulse cyclophosphamide at month12.
`The patient's EDSS score was 7,0 at 9 months and 8.0at
`the 12-month follow-up visit. The EDSS score had de-
`creased to 7.5 at 15 months. Although there was no clear
`change in the patient's disability immediatelyafter either
`
`DEMOGRAPHICS
`
`Thebaseline demographiccharacteristics of this study popu-
`lation (6 men, 3 women; mean [SD] age at entry, 35 [3.5]
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH NEUROL/VOL 65 (NO. 8), AUG 2008
`1046
`
`WWW. ARCHNEUROL.COM
`
`Downloaded from jamanetwork.com by Reprints Desk useoeSBE
`
`Medical Association.All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`:: 5 3 F
`
`igure 1. White blood cell (WBC) response to high-dose cyclophosphamide (HiCy). Patients were assessed for peripheral WBC counts, with administration of
`HiCy beginning on day -4. On day 6 (6 days after completion of HiCy treatment) all patients received the myeloid growth factor,filgrastim (granulocyte
`colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF}).
`
`ofthese treatments, he did have an improvement;his symp-
`toms were backto baseline by the completion ofthe study.
`Patient 5 had a clinical exacerbation 4 days prior to
`her scheduled 18-monthvisit and wastreated with ste-
`roids. Her baseline EDSS score was 6.5 and she had an
`average of 9 GELs prior to HiCytreatment. At 18 months,
`her EDSSscore was 3.5. She developed mild truncal ataxia
`and recurrenceoffatigue that had been debilitating prior
`to HiCytreatment. Her MRIrevealed 3 possible lesions
`with weak gadolinium enhancement,andshestarted an
`intravenoussteroid regimen, resulting in some improve-
`ment,followed by ongoing monthlydaclizumabtherapy.
`At her 24-month follow-up, she had an EDSS score of
`3.5 and 1 GEL on her MRI.
`Patient 9 was admitted to the emergencydepartmentat
`12 months,following a motorvehicle crash. She developed
`aurinarytract infection,resulting in an increase in her EDSS
`score at 12 months. Patient 7 had a hospital admission at
`19 months owing to confusion and cognitive changes and
`was diagnosed with bipolaraffective disorder.
`
`DISABILITY (EDSS AND MSFC SCORES)
`
`The mean (SD)baseline EDSS scoreof the cohort was 5,17
`(1.84) (range, 1.5-7.0). Patients 1 and 2 worsened by 0.5
`point on the EDSS betweenscreeningandbaseline: this pro-
`tocol deviation was reported to the institutional review
`
`board. Atthelast evaluation, the mean (SD) EDSSscore
`for all patients in the study was 3.06 (2.36) (range, 0-7;
`P=.02). This represents an aggregate 39.4% reduction in
`disability in an average follow-up of 23 months. Indi-
`vidual EDSSscores at baseline and follow-up are shown
`in Table 2. Fourofthe patients had no changeorless than
`a 1-point change on the EDSSat thelast follow-up from
`baseline, while 5 had a sustained decrease of greater than
`1 point on the EDSSthatpersisted through thelast exami-
`nation. In the subgroupof patients who improved by more
`than 1 EDSS pointat the last follow-up, there was a 65%
`reduction in EDSSscores.
`Patients were administered the MSFC, a multidimen-
`sional clinical outcome measure that measures upper ex-
`tremity, lower extremity, and cognitive functionat screen-
`ing, baseline, and at eachstudyvisit at 3-monthintervals
`understandardized conditions. The baseline scores were
`used to calculate the MSFC zscores,to accountfor prac-
`tice effects. The cohort had a statisticallysignificant im-
`provement in MSFCzscores (average improvement, 87%:
`P=.03). The improvementwas notedin all 3 of the MSFC
`subscores, although a changein the 9-Hole Peg Test score
`did notreachstatistical significance (Table 3). At base-
`line, patient 9 was unable to complete the Timed 25-
`Foot Walk within 3 minutes. By the 3-month follow-up,
`the time to complete the Timed 25-Foot Walk was 6.5
`seconds, and at 12 months it was 4.9 seconds.
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH NEUROL/VOL 65 (NO. 8), AUG 2008
`1047
`
`WWW. ARCHNEUROL.COM
`
`Downloaded from jamanetwork.com by Reprints Desk userONShaeaee
`
`

`

`Table 2. Change in Disability (EDSS Score) at 12-Month Follow-up and Last Follow-up
`
`Abbreviation: EDSS. Expanded Disability Status Scale.
`* Patient 9 has completed 15-month follow-up
`® P= 02 (Wilcoxon rank sum test)
`
`Table 3. Change in Each Component of MSFC (z Score) From Baseline
`
`12-Month
`Cwrnaneoni|F
`-6.25 to 0.71
`
`Baseline
`(n=9)
`
`4,91 (6.77)
`-13.7to 0.45
`
`1.82 (1.86)
`~4.22 10 0.71
`
`~1.38 (1.43)
`-3.73 to 0.33
`
`~2.70 (2.86)
`-7.22 to 0.16
`
`Last Follow-up
`(n=9)
`
`-2.75 (6.21)
`-13.7 to 0.51
`
`-0.97 (1.84)
`-3.91 to 1.05
`
`~0.40 (1.28)
`-2.49 to 1.24
`
`-1.38 (2.76)
`
`Abbreviations: SHPT, 9-Hole Peg Test: MSFC, Multiple Scierosis Functional Composite; PASAT3, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test with 3-secondinterstimulus
`interval; T25FW, Timed 25-Foot Walk.
`#Wilcoxon signed rank test.
`
`RADIOLOGICAL MEASURES
`
`The mean (SD) number of GELs at baseline was 6.5
`(2.1) (range, 2-11 at screening and baseline). At the last
`follow-up, there were a mean (SD) of 1.2(2.3) (range,
`0-7), representing an 81%reduction (P=.01). Figure 2
`graphically depicts each patient's treatment response
`(baselinevisit prior to treatment with HiCyis time 0) as
`the change in EDSS scores and numberof GELs at each
`point assessed during the course ofthe study. Three pa-
`tients had a recurrenceofclinicallysilent radiologicaldis-
`ease activity, as defined by the presence of new GELs al-
`ter achieving complete cessation of GELs following HiCy
`treatment that did not correlate with a clinical exacer-
`bation or worsening of disability (patients 3, 6, and 7).
`Patients 5 and 9 continued to have GELs at and beyond
`6 monthsafter HiCytherapy.
`The T2 lesion burden wasassessed at baseline and at
`—_kia—
`the last follow-up. The changein the total volume of T2
`burden was -0.93%at an average follow-up of 22.1
`months (P>.05). Four patients had a reduction in T2
`plaque burden.
`
`High-dose cyclophosphamidetreatment of patients with
`aggressive MSwas safe and well tolerated and did not lead
`
`Brain parenchymal fraction was measured at base-
`line, 3 months, and from follow-up to 24 monthsin 8
`patients (Table 4). Wefirst measured changes in the
`BPF between baseline and the 3 monthsafter the HiCy
`MRIto determine whether HiCytreatment induced any
`accelerated atrophy(Table 4). There was a -2.4% change
`(annualized change, -9.4%) in BPF betweenbaseline
`(prior to acute therapy) and 3 months after treatment with
`HiCy (median BPF at baseline, 0.807; range, 0.75-0.87
`vs median BPF at 3 months, 0,797; range, 0.70-0.86;
`P=.01). There wasnostatisticallysignificant difference
`at follow-up (mean, 23 months)in the annualized change
`in BPF (-0.23%; P>.05) when compared with the MRI
`3 months after HiCytreatment, This suggeststhat the re-
`duction in BPF associated with HiCytreatment mayre-
`flect the resolution of inflammation (pseudoatrophy).
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH NEUROL/ VOL65 (NO. 8), AUG 2008
`1048
`
`WWW. ARCHNEUROL.COM
`
`Downloaded from jama
`
`k.com by Reprints D
`
`isoO7008MEEy Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`Patient 3
`
`$739J0‘ON
`
`
`
`EDSSScore
`
`~42~-36-30-24-18-12-6 0
`Time, mo
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18 24 30
`
`~42~-36-30-24-18-12-6 0
`Time, mo
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18 24 30
`
`~42-36-30-24-18-12-6 0
`Time, mo
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18 24 30
`
`Patient 4
`
`Patient 5
`
`Patient 6
`
`$73910ON
`
`
`
`EDSSScore
`
`513910‘ON
`
`
`
`EDSSScore
`
`~42-36-30-24-18-12 -6 0
`Time. mo
`
`6
`
`12 18 24 30
`
`~42-36-30-24-18-12-6 0
`Time, mo
`
`6
`
`12 18 24 30
`
`~42-36-30-24-18-12-6 0
`Time, mo
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18 24 30
`
`Patient 7
`
`Patient 8
`
`Patient 9
`
`$73910“ON
`
`Time. mo
`
`2oS
`aoanoa—
`
`
`
`EDSSScore
`
`S73910ON
`
`
`
`EOSSScore
`
`$73910‘ON
`
`
`
`EDSSScore
`
`573910“ON
`
`$1739J0ON
`
`$73910‘ON
`
`~42-36 -30-24-18-12 -6 0
`Time, mo
`
`6
`
`12 18 24 30
`
`-42-36-30-24~-18-12-6 0
`Time, mo
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18 24 30
`
`~42-36-30-24-18-12 -6 0
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18 24 30
`
`Figure 2. Clinical and radiologic response to high-dose cyclophosphamide (HiCy). Data prior to entry into study were obtained by historical assessment.
`Pre-HiCy clinical magnetic resonance images used single-dose gadolinium. EDSS indicates Expanded Disability Status Scale: Cy, cyclophosphamide:
`GELs. gadolinium-enhancing lesions.
`
`0.793 (0.059)
`
`Table 4. Change in Brain Atrophy Measures
`
`3
`
`6
`
`12
`
`0.747°
`0.860
`0.803
`0.801
`0.830
`0.812
`0.870
`0.795
`0.815 (0.039)
`
`0.703
`0.827
`0.781
`0.796
`0.821
`0.798
`0.861
`0.781
`0.796 (0.046)
`
`0.705
`0.825
`0.798
`0.795
`0.816
`0.794
`0.838
`0.787
`0.795 (0.040)
`
`.
`0.849
`0.776
`0.808
`0.820
`0.784
`0.862
`0.787
`0.812(0.033)
`
`Mean (SD)
`
`\
`;
`i
`/
`.
`
`0.838
`0.789
`0.808
`0.800
`0.775
`0.863
`
`0.798(0.053)
`
`* Change atlast available follow-up data.
`> Data unavailable owing to motionartifact
`Only screening measure available for patient 2.
`P= 01.
`© P=.02.
`
`to excess morbidityor accelerated brain atrophy. More-
`over, HiCy induced a functional improvement in most
`of the patients we studied. In manyofthose patients, the
`
`functional improvementwas sustained through the length
`of the study (up to 24 months) despite the absence of
`any immunomodulatorytherapies beyondtheinitial HiCy
`
`eee
`(REPRINTED) ARCH NEUROL/VOL65 (NO. 8), AUG 2008
`WWWARCHNEUROL.COM
`1049
`
`Downloaded
`
`from jama
`
`k.com by Reprints Desk use7008MEERA Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`treatment. Three patients had radiologic reactivation of
`disease at various intervals after treatment with HiCy, and
`1 patient had clinical and radiologic reactivation, sug-
`gesting that disease remission mayonly be transient in
`some patients.
`The complexityof the autoimmuneresponse in MSpre-
`sents a critical strategic problem. Because individual MS
`patients mayhave distinct autoimmuneeffector mecha-
`nisms, highly specific targeted immunotherapies maybe
`effective only for subsets of patients with MS. Theactiv-
`ity of HiCy does not require identifying, targeting, and
`eliminating each individual's unique aberrant immunerep-
`ertoire because ofits activityagainst all arms of an immu-
`nologic response.Ideally, the goal of HiCytherapyis to
`ablate virtuallythe entire mature immunesystem, includ-
`ing the autoimmune component,allowing the individu-
`al's immunesystem to be reconstituted from the undam-
`aged stem cell population. If this is achieved, the new
`immunesystem should recognize and becometolerant of
`the antigens present, including those that previously con-
`tributed to the autoimmuneprocess. *”°
`Westudied HiCytherapyin a cohortof patients with
`aggressive, inflammatory MS for several reasons. First,
`because this wasa pilot study of HiCytreatment in MS,
`we wanted to explore onlythose patients who had wors-
`ening disease while receiving conventional therapies. Sec-
`ond, we reasoned that patients with active inflamma-
`tory disease would be morelikely to respond to HiCy
`therapy than those with later-stage MS and more lim-
`ited inflammation. Finally, we reasoned that such pa-
`tients might have morereversible disability than those
`with later stages of the disease.
`Treatment with HiCynot onlyhalted the accrualofdis-
`ability that occurredprior to HiCytreatment butalso sta-
`bly reduced this disability in manyof the patients, We sug-
`gest that the total disability in these patients is contributed
`by demyelination, axonal injury, and ongoing inflamma-
`tion. Cessation of active inflammation by HiCyablation
`mightfacilitate a permissive environmentfor reparative
`plasticity in the central nervous system that could ac-
`count for someofthe clinical improvement we observed.
`In this context, the 2 patients who had had a high level of
`sustained disability (patients 1 and 2; EDSS score, 7.0) did
`not experience a reduction in disability, although they did
`experience a modest improvement in MSFC score. Per-
`hapsthis is suggestive of a limited windowduring which
`endogenous central nervous system reparationis viable.
`Therefore, it is unclearif patients with this high level of
`disability are the optimal cohortto study further because
`their response to therapy was more modest.
`
`Brodsky), and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer
`Center (Drs Brodsky and Jones), Johns Hopkins
`University, Baltimore, Maryland; and the National Insti-
`tute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National In-
`stitute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Richert).
`Correspondence: Douglas A. Kerr, MD, PhD, Depart-
`ment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of
`Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Path 627 C, Baltimore, MD
`21287-5371 (dkerr@jhmi.edu).
`Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Krishnan,
`Brodsky, Drachman, Jones, Richert, Pardo, Yousem,
`McArthur, Nath, Calabresi, and Kerr. Acquisition of data:
`Krishnan, Brodsky, Pardo, Yousem, Hammond, Quigg,
`Trecker, McArthur, Greenberg, and Kerr. Analysis and
`interpretation of data: Krishnan, Kaplin, Brodsky,
`Drachman, Jones, Pham, Hammond, Greenberg,
`Calabresi, and Kerr. Drafting ofthe manuscript: Krishnan,
`Kaplin, Richert, Hammond, McArthur, and Kerr. Criti-
`cal revision of the manuscriptfor important intellectual con-
`tent: Kaplin, Brodsky, Drachman, Jones, Pham, Pardo,
`Yousem, Hammond, Quigg, Trecker, McArthur, Nath,
`Greenberg, Calabresi, and Kerr. Statistical analysis:
`Krishnan and Hammond. Obtained funding: McArthur,
`Calabresi, and Kerr, Administrative, technical, and mate-
`rial support: Kaplin, Brodsky, Jones, Pham, Pardo,
`Hammond, Quigg, Trecker, McArthur, Nath, and
`Greenberg. Study supervision: Kaplin, Drachman, Yousem,
`Greenberg, Calabresi, and Kerr.
`Financial Disclosure: No conflicts of interest are re-
`portedfor the pilot clinical study. Ms Krishnan and Drs
`Kaplin, Hammond, and Kerr have received consulting
`honoraria from Accentia Biopharmaceuticals for design-
`ing a subsequent independentclinicaltrial involving HiCy,
`which is still i

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket