throbber
Filed: February 28, 2024
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`TWI PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`MERCK SERONO SA,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2023-00049 (Patent 7,713,947 B2)
`IPR2023-00050 (Patent 8,377,903 B2)1
`
`Before ULRIKE W. JENKS, ZHENYU YANG and TINA HULSE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`JENKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION OF DON J. MIZERK UNDER 37 C.F.R. 42.10(c)
`
`1 The identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in the caption.
`
`

`

`
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`EXHIBIT
`Ex. 1001
`
`DESCRIPTION
`US 7,713,947 B2.
`
`Ex. 1002
`
`Ex. 1003
`
`Ex. 1004
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`US 8,377,903 B2.
`File History for Ser. No. 11/722,018, which
`issued as the ’947 patent.
`File History Ser. No. 12/766,173, which issued
`as the ’903 patent.
`Declaration of Dr. Benjamin M. Greenberg,
`M.D.
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Benjamin M.
`Greenberg, M.D.
`Ex. 1007 WO 2004/087101 A2.
`Ex. 1008
`Rice, George P.A., Massimo Filippi, and
`Giancarlo Comi. “Cladribine and progressive
`MS: clinical and MRI outcomes of a multicenter
`controlled trial.” Neurology Vol. 54, no. 5 (2000)
`pp. 1145–1155.
`Liliemark, Jan. “The clinical pharmacokinetics of
`cladribine.” Clinical pharmacokinetics Vol. 32,
`no. 2 (1997) pp. 120–131.
`Ex. 1010 Merck KGaA et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et
`al 1-22-cv-00974 (DDE) Complaint.
`EMD Serano Inc., Mavenclad® (Cladribine)
`Package Insert, Mar. 2019
`Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical
`course of multiple sclerosis: results of an
`international survey. Neurology 1996;46:907–
`911.
`National Multiple Sclerosis Society, What is MS,
`Types of MS,
`https://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-
`MS/Types-of-MS, retrieved Sept. 20, 2022.
`National Multiple Sclerosis Society, What is MS,
`Types of MS, Secondary Progressive MS,
`https://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-
`
`Ex. 1009
`
`Ex. 1011
`
`Ex. 1012
`
`Ex. 1013
`
`Ex. 1014
`
`SHORT FORM
`’947 Patent
`
`’903 Patent
`’018 File
`Wrapper
`’173 File
`Wrapper
`Greenberg
`Decl.
`Greenberg CV
`
`Bodor ‘WO 101
`
`Rice 2000 or
`Rice
`
`Liliemark 1997
`
`Merck
`Complaint
`Mavenclad
`Package Insert
`
`Lublin 1996
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`Ex. 1015
`
`Ex. 1016
`
`Ex. 1017
`
`Ex. 1018
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Ex. 1022
`
`Ex. 1023
`
`Ex. 1024
`
`Ex. 1025
`
`DESCRIPTION
`MS/Types-of-MS/Secondary-progressive-MS.
`Casanova, B., et al. “High clinical inflammatory
`activity prior to the development of secondary
`progression: a prospective 5-year follow-up
`study,” Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Feb. 2002,
`pp. 59-63, vol. 8.
`Romine, J. et al. “A Double-Blind, Placebo-
`Controlled, Randomized Trial of Cladribine in
`Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis,”
`Proceedings of the Association of American
`Physicians, Jan./Feb. 1999, pp. 35-44, vol. 111,
`No. 1.
`Immunex Corporation, Novantrone®
`(Mixantrone) Package Insert, Oct. 13, 2000
`(“Novantrone® Package Insert”).
`Langtry, H. et al. “Cladribine: A Review of its
`Use in Multiple Sclerosis,” Biodrugs, May 1998,
`pp. 419-433, vol. 9, No. 3.
`Biogen Idec Inc., Tysarbi® (natazlizumab)
`Package Insert, Nov. 2004.
`Chiron Corporation, Betaseron® (Interferon
`beta- lb) Package Insert, 1993.
`Biogen, Inc., Avonex™ (Interferon Beta-1a)
`Package Insert, Nov. 1996.
`Teva Pharms USA, Copaxone® (glatiramer
`acetate for injection) Package Insert, 2001.
`Serano, Inc., Rebif® (Interferon Beta-1a)
`Package Insert, May 2003.
`Cursiefen, Simone, et al. “Escalating
`immunotherapy with mitoxantrone in patients
`with very active relapsing-remitting or
`progressive multiple sclerosis,” European
`neurology, Apr. 2000, pp. 186–187, vol. 43, No.
`3.
`Burt, Richard K., et al. “Treatment of
`autoimmune disease by intense
`immunosuppressive conditioning and autologous
`hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Blood,
`The Journal of the American Society of
`Hematology, Nov. 1998, pp. 3505–3514, vol.
`92, No. 10.
`
`SHORT FORM
`
`Casanova 2002
`
`Romine 1999
`
`Novantrone
`Package Insert
`
`Langtry 1998
`
`Tysabri Package
`Insert
`Betaseron
`Package Insert
`Avonex
`Package Insert
`Copaxone
`Package Insert
`Rebif Package
`Insert
`
`Cursiefen 2000
`
`Burt 1998
`
`
`
`

`

`DESCRIPTION
`Tortorella, Carla, et al. “Cladribine. Ortho
`Biotech Inc.” Current Opinion in Investigational
`Drugs, Dec. 2001, pp. 1751–1756, vol. 2, no. 12.
`Beutler, E. et al. “The treatment of chronic
`progressive multiple sclerosis with cladribine,”
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Feb. 1996, pp.
`1716–1720, vol. 93.
`Coles, Alasdair, et al. “Campath-1H treatment of
`multiple sclerosis: lessons from the bedside for
`the bench,” Clinical neurology and
`neurosurgery, June 2004, pp. 270–274, vol. 106,
`no. 3.
`U.S. Patent No. 7,888,328
`Center for Disease Control, Office of Enterprise
`Communication, Press Release, Oct. 27, 2004,
`https://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/r041027.ht
`m.
`Selby, R. et al. “Safety and Tolerability of
`Subcutaneous Cladribine Therapy in Progressive
`Multiple Sclerosis,” Can. J. Neurol. Sci., 1998,
`pp. 295-299, vol. 25.
`Docket Navigator Printout of Case Activity for
`Merck KGaA et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et
`al
`Food and Drug Administration, Orange Book:
`Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic
`Equivalence Evaluations, Patent and Exclusivity
`for: N022561,
`https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/p
`atent_info.cfm?Product_No=001&Appl_No=02
`2561&Appl_type=N, retrieved Oct. 5, 2022.
`Ex. 1034 Merck KGaA et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et
`al 1-22-cv-00974 (DDE) Answer.
`Declaration of A. Lauren Hitchens
`(exhibit not filed)
`Declaration of Don J. Mizerk
`
`Ex. 1029
`Ex. 1030
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`Ex. 1033
`
`Ex. 1035
`
`Ex. 1036
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT
`Ex. 1026
`
`Ex. 1027
`
`Ex. 1028
`
`SHORT FORM
`
`Tortorella 2001
`
`Beutler 1996
`
`Coles 2004
`
`Bodor ’328
`
`CDC Press
`Release
`
`Selby 1998
`
`
`
`
`
`Accord
`Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Petitioner TWi Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner”) respectfully requests that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board admit Don
`
`J. Mizerk pro hac vice in this proceeding. Petitioner has conferred with Patent Owner
`
`Merck Serono SA (“Patent Owner”) and Patent Owner does not object to Petitioner’s
`
`request.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c),
`
`[t]he Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel
`be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board
`may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a
`registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that counsel is an
`experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with
`the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`Good cause exists for the Board to recognize Don J. Mizerk pro hac vice in
`
`this proceeding. Petitioner’s lead counsel in this proceeding, Philip D. Segrest, Jr.,
`
`is a registered patent practitioner (Reg. No. 39,021). Accompanying the instant
`
`motion is the Declaration of Don J. Mizerk (Ex. 1036) attesting to the information
`
`required by “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Unified
`
`Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case No. IPR2013-00639, Paper No. 7 (October
`
`15, 2013). Mr. Mizerk is an experienced litigation attorney (Ex. 1036 at ¶¶ 1-3),
`
`– 1 –
`
`

`

`including 26 years of predominantly patent infringement litigation experience, and
`
`has established familiarity with the subject matter in this proceeding. Id. at ¶¶ 2, 10,
`
`11.
`
`Mr. Mizerk attests to the remaining matters set forth in Paper No. 7 of Unified
`
`Patents in paragraphs 3 to 11 of his Declaration. Id. at ¶¶ 3-11.
`
`Additional facts constitute good cause to grant the instant motion. Lead
`
`counsel and backup counsel, Nathan P. Sportel and Steven R. Howe, have conflicting
`
`litigation obligations that may present themselves during the pendency of the
`
`proceeding. Mr. Mizerk will support lead and backup counsel as scheduling conflicts
`
`arise in this proceeding.
`
`DECLARATION OF INDIVIDUAL SEEKING TO APPEAR
`
`This Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by the
`
`required Declaration of Don J. Mizerk (Ex. 1036).
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests the Patent Trial
`
`and Appeal Board admit Don J. Mizerk pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`– 2 –
`
`

`

`February 28, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Philip D. Segrest, Jr./
`Philip D. Segrest ,Jr. (Reg. No. 39,021)
`philip.segrest@huschblackwell.com
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`Nathan P. Sportel
`Steven R. Howe
`Backup Counsel for Petitioner
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`120 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 2200
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel. 312-655-1500
`Fax. 312-644-1501
`
`– 3 –
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.105, Petitioner certifies that the foregoing
`
`document was served via electronic mail to the attorneys of record in this proceeding
`
`at the following:
`
`Emily R. Whelan (Reg. No. 50,391)
`Emily.Whelan@wilmerhale.com
`Deric X. Geng, Ph.D. (Reg. No. 73,434)
`Deric.Geng@wilmerhale.com
`Cindy Kan (Reg. No. 76,385)
`Cindy.Kan@wilmerhale.com
`
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`February 28, 2024
`
`/Philip D. Segrest, Jr./
`Philip D. Segrest, Jr. (Reg. No. 39,021)
`philip.segrest@huschblackwell.com
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`Nathan P. Sportel
`
`Steven R. Howe
`Backup Counsel for Petitioner
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`120 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 2200
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel. 312-655-1500
`Fax. 312-644-1501
`
`– 4 –
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket