throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper 19
`Entered: October 2, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`MEDIVIS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARAD CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2023-00042 (Patent 11,004,271 B2)
`IPR2023-00045 (Patent 10,945,807 B2)1
`
`
`
`
`Before MIRIAM L. QUINN, PATRICK M. BOUCHER, and
`SCOTT RAEVSKY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`RAEVSKY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Erik Paul Belt
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all identified cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00042 (Patent 11,004,271 B2)
`IPR2023-00045 (Patent 10,945,807 B2)
`
`
`
`Medivis, Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed a motion for pro hac vice admission
`of Erik Paul Belt in each of the above-listed proceedings (“Motions”).
`Paper 18. 2 Petitioner also filed a supporting declaration from Mr. Belt.
`Paper 18, 4–6. 3 Patent Owner did not oppose the Motions.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires a
`statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize
`counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking
`to appear in this proceeding. See Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC,
`IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (representative “Order –
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission”).
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) have been met, and that there is good
`cause to admit Mr. Belt pro hac vice.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that the Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Erik Paul
`Belt is granted and Mr. Belt is authorized to represent Petitioner only as
`back-up counsel in the above-listed proceedings;
`
`
`2 All citations are to IPR2023-00042 with the understanding that the other
`proceeding includes papers having substantially the same content.
`3 Petitioner filed the declarations as part of the Motions. We excuse this
`mistake on this occasion, but remind the parties that affidavits and
`declarations must be filed as exhibits. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(a) (“Evidence
`consists of affidavits, transcripts of depositions, documents, and things. All
`evidence must be filed in the form of an exhibit.”).
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00042 (Patent 11,004,271 B2)
`IPR2023-00045 (Patent 10,945,807 B2)
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that a registered practitioner will continue to
`represent Petitioner as lead counsel in the above-listed proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Belt shall comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the Consolidated Office Patent
`Trial Practice Guide4 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)) and the Board’s
`Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of
`Federal Regulations;5 and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Belt is subject to the USPTO’s Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and to the
`USPTO’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).6
`
`
`
`
`4 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`5 The Declaration incorrectly states that “I have read and will comply with
`the Office’s Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice
`for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.” Paper 18, 5. The Office Patent
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials are set forth
`in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations.
`6 In the Declaration, Mr. Belt indicates he will comply with 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 10.20 et seq., as opposed to attesting that he shall be subject to the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq. See Paper 18, 5. We excuse this mistake on this occasion, noting that
`Mr. Belt will be subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00042 (Patent 11,004,271 B2)
`IPR2023-00045 (Patent 10,945,807 B2)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Kia L. Freeman
`John Curran
`MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP
`kfreeman@mccarter.com
`jcurran@mccarter.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Joseph Harmer
`Jed H. Hansen
`THORPE NORTH & WESTERN LLP
`joseph.harmer@tnw.com
`hansen@tnw.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket