`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TESO LT, UAB, METACLUSTER LT,
`UAB, OXYSALES, UAB,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00395-JRG
`
`ORDER LIFTING STAY
`
`Previously, the Court entered a stay in the above-referenced case pending mediation
`
`between Plaintiff Bright Data Ltd. (“Plaintiff” or “Bright Data”) and Defendants Teso Lt, UAB,
`
`Metacluster LT, UAB, and Oxysales, UAB (together, “Defendants”) (Dkt. No. 543), which was
`
`conducted on January 6, 2022. On March 16, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion to Lift the
`
`Stay Order (Dkt. No. 576) and ordered further mediation based on developments following the
`
`January 6, 2022 mediation. (Dkt. No. 580.)
`
`Plaintiff and Defendants (collectively, the “Parties”) conducted further mediation on
`
`August 25, 2022, which ended in an impasse. (Dkt. No. 586.) On August 31, 2022, the Parties
`
`filed a Joint Status Report Regarding Mediation (Dkt. No. 594) informing the Court of their
`
`remaining disputes and proposing schedules for post-verdict briefing. Defendants state that they
`
`have withdrawn their inequitable-conduct defense. (Id. at 2.)
`
`The Court has now determined that the stay should be lifted. Accordingly, the court LIFTS
`
`THE STAY in this case. Further, it is ORDERED that Defendants shall file their response to
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion for Enhanced Damages and Exceptional Case (Dkt. No. 541) within seven (7)
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1027
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 601 Filed 09/21/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 31440
`
`days of this Order. Plaintiff shall file its reply, if any, within seven (7) days thereafter. Defendants
`
`shall file their sur-reply, if any, within seven (7) days thereafter.
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants’ Counterclaim and Defense of
`
`Inequitable Conduct (Dkt. No. 530) is DENIED AS MOOT in light of Defendants’
`
`abandonment of its prior inequitable conduct defense, as evidenced in Dkt. No. 594.
`
`The parties shall also meet and confer within fourteen (14) days of this date and jointly
`
`submit a proposed post-verdict scheduling order setting forth their positions on proposed
`
`deadlines and dates for all post-verdict issues.
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21st day of September, 2022.
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1027
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
