throbber
4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`W3C Working Draft 18 January 2005
`
`This version:
`http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-di-gloss-20050118/
`Latest version:
`http://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`Previous version:
`http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-di-gloss-20030825/
`Author:
`Rhys Lewis (Volantis Systems) <rhys.lewis@volantis.com>
`Contributors:
`See D Acknowledgements
`
`Copyright ©2003-2005 W3C ® ( MIT , ERCIM , Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark,
`document use rules apply.
`
`Abstract
`
`This document is a glossary of terms used in other documents produced by the
`Device Independence Working Group (DIWG). Details of the entire series of
`documents can be found on the W3C Device Independence Activity home page.
`Status of this Document
`
`This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication.
`Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications
`and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical
`reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
`
`This glossary is published and maintained by DIWG(member only link), part of the
`W3C Device Independence Activity. The DIWG activity statement can be seen at
`http://www.w3.org/2001/di/Activity.
`
`The glossary is maintained as a Working Draft of a future W3C Note. This allows it
`to be revised at appropriate intervals. Updates take place in support of new work
`being carried out by the DIWG. In general, it is inappropriate to use W3C Working
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`1/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 1 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`Drafts as formal reference material or to cite them as other than "work in
`progress". Because this document is subject to change, other authors wishing to
`cite definitions in this glossary should exercise caution. Updates to the glossary
`are made in such a way as to avoid invalidating references, as long as those
`references conform to the mechanisms described in the section Using and
`Maintaining the Glossary. However, in support of its work, DIWG may need to
`modify definitions in newer versions of this document.
`
`A list of current public W3C Working Drafts can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR.
`
`Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C
`Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted
`by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other
`than work in progress.
`
`Comments on this document can be sent to www-di@w3.org, the public forum for
`discussion of the W3C's work on Device Independence. To subscribe, send an
`email to www-di-request@w3.org with the word subscribe in the subject line
`(include the word unsubscribe if you want to unsubscribe). The archive for the list
`is accessible online.
`
`Information on how to use this document and how it is maintained can be found in
`Using and Maintaining the Glossary.
`Table of Contents
`
`Changes to the Glossary
`Changes from the Version Published on 25 August 2003
`Glossary
`A Using and Maintaining the Glossary
`A.1 Using the Glossary
`A.2 Maintaining the Glossary
`B Previous Versions of Definitions
`B.1 Definitions that Have Been Updated
`B.2 Definitions that Have Been Removed
`B.3 Definitions that Have Been Deprecated
`C References
`D Acknowledgements
`
`Verbatim Definitions
`
`Terms whose definitions are taken directly from other sources are marked as
`follows:
`Term taken verbatim from another source
`Definition taken from another source
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`2/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 2 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`
`Changes to the Glossary
`
`Changes from the Version Published on 25 August 2003
`
`The definition of the term decomposition has been modified. The previous
`version of the definition remains available for reference.
`A new definition for the term aggregation has been added
`A new definition for the term aggregated authored unit has been added
`A definition for the term Physical Transducer has been added.
`A new definition for Single Authoring has been added.
`A new definition for Multiple Authoring has been added.
`A new definition for Flexible Authoring has been added.
`The definition of Delivery Context has been updated. The previous version of
`the definition remains available for reference.
`Glossary
`
`Access Mechanism
`A combination of hardware (including one or more devices and network
`connections) and software (including one or more user agents) that allows a
`user to perceive and interact with the Web using one or more modalities.
`(sight, sound, keyboard, voice etc.)
`Active Perceivable Unit
`A perceivable unit that is currently being rendered by the user agent and with
`which interaction may be possible.
`Adaptation
`a process of selection, generation or modification that produces one or more
`perceivable units in response to a requested uniform resource identifier in a
`given delivery context.
`Adaptation Preferences
`A set of preferences, specified by a user, that may affect the adaptation for a
`given delivery context, and so change the resultant user experience.
`Application Personalization
`A set of factors, specified by a user or other aspects of the delivery context,
`that may affect the functionality of an application, independently of its
`adaptation and delivery, and so change the resultant user experience."
`Aggregation
`The act of combining materials in various ways.
`Where the materials being aggregated are authored units, the result of
`aggregation is an aggregated authored unit.
`Aggregated Authored Units
`A set of authored units that have been aggregated in some way.
`Authored Unit
`Some set of material created as a single entity by an author. Examples
`include a collection of markup, a style sheet, and a media resource, such as
`an image or audio clip.
`Browser
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`3/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 3 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`A user agent that allows a user to perceive and interact with information on
`the Web.
`This definition was developed from that in Weaving the Web: Glossary.
`Client
`The role adopted by an application when it is retrieving and/or rendering
`resources or resource manifestations.
`This term was taken verbatim from Web Characterization Terminology &
`Definitions Sheet.
`Content Negotiation
`The mechanism for selecting the appropriate HTTP representation when
`servicing a request. The HTTP representation of entities in any response can
`be negotiated (including error responses).
`This term was developed from that in Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
`HTTP/1.1.
`Decomposition
`The act of dividing up one or more authored units, or an aggregated
`authored unit, during creation of a set of perceivable units appropriate for a
`particular delivery context.
`Delivery Context
`A set of attributes that characterizes the capabilities of the access
`mechanism, the preferences of the user and other aspects of the context into
`which a web page is to be delivered.
`Delivery Unit
`A set of material transferred between two cooperating web programs as the
`response to a single HTTP request. The transfer might, for example, be
`between an origin server and a user agent.
`Users are not normally aware of individual delivery units.
`Device
`An apparatus through which a user can perceive and interact with the Web
`Flexible Authoring
`An authoring style in which an appropriate set of variants of each resource is
`created for use in the user experience for each delivery context.
`Flexible authoring lies within a spectrum of authoring styles bounded at one
`end by single authoring and at the other by multiple authoring.
`Focus of Attention
`The point in an active perceivable unit on which the user's attention is
`currently focused.
`For example, this might be a paragraph of text or an image on which the
`user is concentrating.
`Functional Adaptation
`An adaptation that generates a functional user experience from a particular
`resource.
`Functional User Experience
`A set of one or more perceivable units that enables a user to complete the
`function intended by the author for a given resource via a given access
`mechanism.
`Gateway
`A gateway is an intermediary which acts as a server on behalf of some other
`server with the purpose of supplying resources or resource manifestations
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`4/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 4 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`from that other server. Clients using a gateway know the gateway is present
`but do not know that it is an intermediary.
`This term was taken verbatim from Web Characterization Terminology &
`Definitions Sheet.
`Harmonized Adaptation
`A functional adaptation sufficiently harmonized with the delivery context that
`it generates a harmonized user experience.
`Harmonized User Experience
`A functional user experience that is sufficiently harmonized with the delivery
`context to meet the quality criteria of the author.
`HTTP Client
`A program that establishes connections for the purpose of sending HTTP
`requests.
`This term was developed from the definition of client in Hypertext Transfer
`Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`HTTP Gateway
`An HTTP server which acts as an intermediary for some other HTTP server.
`Unlike an HTTP proxy, an HTTP gateway receives requests as if it were the
`origin server for the requested resource; the requesting HTTP client may not
`be aware that it is communicating with an HTTP gateway.
`This term was developed from the definition of gateway in Hypertext
`Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`HTTP Payload Entity
`The information transferred as the payload of an HTTP request or HTTP
`response.
`An HTTP payload entity consists of meta-information in the form of entity-
`header fields and content in the form of an entity-body.
`This term was developed from the definition of entity in Hypertext Transfer
`Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`HTTP Proxy
`An intermediary program which acts as both an HTTP server and as an
`HTTP client for the purpose of making requests on behalf of other HTTP
`clients.
`HTTP requests are serviced internally or by passing them on, with possible
`translation, to other HTTP servers. An HTTP proxy must implement both the
`client and server requirements of this specification. A "transparent proxy" is a
`proxy that does not modify the HTTP request or the HTTP response beyond
`what is required for proxy authentication and identification. A "non-
`transparent proxy" is a proxy that modifies the HTTP request or HTTP
`response in order to provide some added service to the user agent, such as
`group annotation services, media type transformation, protocol reduction, or
`anonymity filtering. Except where either transparent or non-transparent
`behavior is explicitly stated, the HTTP proxy requirements apply to both
`types of proxies.
`This term was developed from the definition of proxy in Hypertext Transfer
`Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`HTTP Representation
`An HTTP payload entity, included in an HTTP response, that is subject to
`content negotiation. There may exist multiple representations associated
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`5/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 5 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`with a particular HTTP response status.
`This term was developed from the definition for representation in Hypertext
`Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`HTTP Request
`An HTTP message sent by an HTTP client requesting that some operation
`be performed on some resource. Also, the act of sending such a message is
`termed making a request.
`This term was developed from the definition of request in Hypertext Transfer
`Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`HTTP Response
`An HTTP message sent back to an HTTP client in response to a previous
`HTTP request.
`This term was developed from the definition of response in Hypertext
`Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`HTTP Server
`An application program that accepts connections in order to service HTTP
`requests by sending back HTTP responses.
`Any given program may be capable of being both an HTTP client and an
`HTTP server; our use of these terms refers only to the role being performed
`by the program for a particular connection, rather than to the program's
`capabilities in general. Likewise, any HTTP server may act as an origin
`server, HTTP proxy, HTTP gateway, or tunnel, switching behavior based on
`the nature of each request.
`This term was developed from the definition of server in Hypertext Transfer
`Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`Interaction
`An activity by which a user can influence the data and processing of an
`application by modifying the information associated with an active
`perceivable unit.
`A common form of this kind of activity is the entry of data into an active
`perceivable unit that contains a form.
`Modality
`The type of communication channel used for interaction . This might be, for
`example, visual, gestural or based on speech. It also covers the way an idea
`is expressed or perceived, or the manner in which an action is performed.
`This definition is based on unpublished work of the Multimodal Interaction
`group.
`Multiple Authoring
`An authoring style in which a different variant of each resource is created for
`use in the user experience for each delivery context without adaptation.
`Multiple authoring represents one end of a spectrum of authoring styles that
`include single authoring and flexible authoring. It represents a theoretical
`extreme that is rarely achieved in practice. Though it offers authors complete
`control over the user experience on each device, the associated
`development and maintenance costs are usually considered prohibitive.
`Navigation
`An activity, based on a mechanism provided by an active perceivable unit, by
`which a user can alter their focus of attention. If the new focus of attention is
`in a different perceivable unit, that unit becomes an active perceivable unit.
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`6/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 6 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`One common form of this kind of mechanism is the link, a region within an
`active perceivable unit which can be activated by a suitable user action.
`Origin Server
`The server on which a given resource resides or is to be created.
`This term was taken verbatim from Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`Physical Transducer
`An entity by which a user interacts physically with a device.
`Perceivable Unit
`A set of material which, when rendered by a user agent, may be perceived
`by a user and with which interaction may be possible.
`User agents may choose to render some or all of the material they receive in
`a delivery unit as a single perceivable unit or as multiple perceivable units.
`Most perceivable units provide both presentation and the means for
`interaction. However, on some types of device, such as printers, perceivable
`units might contain only presentation.
`Proxy
`A proxy is an intermediary which acts as both a server and a client for the
`purpose of retrieving resources or resource manifestations on behalf of other
`clients. Clients using a proxy know the proxy is present and that it is an
`intermediary.
`This term was taken verbatim from Web Characterization Terminology &
`Definitions Sheet.
`Rendering
`The act of converting perceivable units into physical effects that can be
`perceivable by a user and with which a user may be able to interact.
`Rendering Preferences
`A set of preferences, specified by a user, that may affect the way the user
`agent renders a perceivable unit, and so change the resultant user
`experience.
`Request
`A message describing an atomic operation to be carried out in the context of
`a specified resource.
`This term was taken verbatim from Web Characterization Terminology &
`Definitions Sheet.
`Resource
`A network data object or service that can be identified by a URI. Resources
`may be available in multiple representations (e.g. multiple languages, data
`formats, size, resolutions) or vary in other ways.
`This term was taken verbatim from Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1
`Resource Manifestation
`One specific rendition of a resource at a specific point in time and space.
`A conceptual mapping exists between a resource and a resource
`manifestation (or set of manifestations), in the sense that the resource has
`certain properties - e.g., its URI, its intended purpose, etc. - which are
`inherited by each manifestation, although the specific structure, form, and
`content of the manifestation may vary according to factors such as the
`environment in which it is displayed, the time it is accessed, etc. Regardless
`of the form the manifestation's rendering ultimately takes, the conceptual
`mapping to the resource is preserved.
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`7/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 7 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`User
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`This term was taken verbatim from Web Characterization Terminology &
`Definitions Sheet
`Response
`A message containing the result of an executed request.
`This term was taken verbatim from Web Characterization Terminology &
`Definitions Sheet.
`Server
`The role adopted by an application when it is supplying resources or
`resource manifestations.
`This term was taken verbatim from Web Characterization Terminology &
`Definitions Sheet.
`Single Authoring
`An authoring style in which a single variant of each resource is created and
`is automatically adapted to produce the user experience for each delivery
`context. .
`Single authoring represents one end of a spectrum of authoring styles that
`include multiple authoring and flexible authoring. It represents a theoretical
`extreme that is rarely achieved in practice. Though, theoretically, it offers the
`minimum development cost, limitations in practical adaptation systems mean
`that compromises are necessary in the final user experiences. These
`compromises are often considered unacceptable.
`Uniform Resource Identifier
`A short string that uniquely identifies a resource such as an HTML
`document, an image, a down-loadable file, a service, or an electronic
`mailbox.
`
`A human who perceives and interacts with the web
`User Agent
`A client within a device that performs rendering.
`Browsers are examples of user agents, as are web robots that automatically
`traverse the web collecting information.
`User Experience
`A set of material rendered by a user agent which may be perceived by a user
`and with which interaction may be possible.
`Variant
`A resource may have one, or more than one, representation(s) associated
`with it at any given instant. Each of these representations is termed a
``variant.' Use of the term `variant' does not necessarily imply that the
`resource is subject to content negotiation.
`This term is taken verbatim from Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.
`Web Page
`A collection of information, consisting of one or more resources, intended to
`be rendered simultaneously, and identified by a single Uniform Resource
`Identifier.
`More specifically, a web page consists of a resource with zero, one, or more
`embedded resources intended to be rendered as a single unit, and referred
`to by the URI of the one resource which is not embedded.
`This term was developed from the definition of web page in Web
`Characterization Terminology & Definitions Sheet.
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`8/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 8 of 13
`
`

`

`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`
`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`Web Page Identifier
`A Uniform Resource Identifier intended to be recognized by a user as
`representing the identity of a specific Web Page (resource).
`It may need to be entered explicitly by a user.
`A Using and Maintaining the Glossary
`
`This section documents the way in which the glossary should be used from other
`DIWG documents. It also documents how changes are to be made to the glossary
`itself in a way that will not invalidate links to the definitions.
`
`A.1 Using the Glossary
`
`Every definition in the glossary has an associated anchor. As a consequence
`every definition can be directly referenced externally from other documents. Such
`references should use the public URL associated with the DIWG glossary. For the
`latest version of the glossary, this has been established as
`
`http://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`Dated versions of the glossary will appear at URLs in the form of the following
`
`http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-di-gloss-20030825/
`
`To refer to a particular definition, a document should create a URL based on the
`appropriately dated, public URL and the fragment identifier for the definition.
`Fragment identifiers consist of the definition name, in lowercase, with words
`separated by dashes and prefixed by def. For example, the fragment identifier for
`the definition of User Agent is def-user-agent, and for Navigation is def-
`navigation. The URL to use for the definition of Navigation for the dated version
`mentioned above would be:
`
`http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-di-gloss-20030825/#def-navigation
`
`One important guarantee for documents that reference the glossary is that the
`fragment identifier for a given definition never changes. If, for example, a new
`version of a particular definition is needed, the older version will be retained within
`the glossary with its fragment identifier. The new version will be given a new
`identifier. The process used to maintain the glossary and to retain this uniqueness
`of definition identifiers is described in the following section.
`
`In addition to referring directly to individual definitions in the glossary, documents
`that use it should include a reference to the dated version in use in their
`References section. The following is an example of such a reference:
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence (version used for definitions)
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence, Rhys Lewis, 2003. W3C
`Working Draft available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-di-gloss-
`20030825/
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`9/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 9 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`A.2 Maintaining the Glossary
`
`The DIWG glossary will remain a public working draft. This reflects the need to
`update it as new work is carried out in DIWG. The need to revise the glossary, and
`in particular the potential requirement to revise definitions, leads to a need for a
`mechanism that can allow older documents to refer unambiguously to older
`revisions of particular definitions.
`
`Once a version of the glossary has been published, the definitions it contains have
`fragment identifiers that must not be changed. As new definitions are added they
`are given new identifiers. This poses no issues for documents authored before the
`new definitions were published. However, when a definition is revised, it is vital
`that older documents that used the old version are still valid. They are protected by
`the use of version identification within the fragment identifiers. In addition, the old
`versions of definitions are maintained in Appendix B of the glossary.
`
`To revise a glossary definition, the following steps must be carried out:
`
`1. The existing definition, complete with fragment identifier, must be copied to
`Appendix B.
`2. The definition must be updated within the main part of the glossary.
`3. The revised definition must be given an updated fragment identifier
`constructed by adding a version number where none exists, or incrementing
`it if one already exists. For example, if the fragment identifier before revision
`were #def-navigation it would become #def-navigation-v2. Alternatively, if
`the fragment identifier before revision were #def-navigation-v7 it would
`become #def-navigation-v8.
`4. All references to the definition within the glossary itself must be updated to
`refer to this new fragment identifier. In addition, all definitions that refer to the
`revised definition must be reviewed to see whether they need modification
`because of the change. If so, this same procedure must be applied those
`definitions and new versions must be created.
`5. The old definition that has been moved to Appendix B must have a reference
`added that refers to the newer definition in the body of the glossary. As an
`example, the reference for an old version of the definition of Navigation might
`include the reference:
`
`"This definition has been superseded. There is a newer definition of
`Navigation".
`
`Notice that these links should not be updated when a new version of a
`definition is added. By not changing them, they form a chain through the
`versions of the definition from the one referenced by the external document
`up to the latest version.
`B Previous Versions of Definitions
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`10/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 10 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`This section contains definitions that have been superseded within the existing
`glossary. The first section holds definitions that have been updated. The second
`section holds definitions that have been removed.
`
`B.1 Definitions that Have Been Updated
`
`Delivery Context
`A set of attributes that characterizes the capabilities of the access
`mechanism, and the preferences of the user. This definition has been
`superseded. There is a new definition of Delivery Context.
`Decomposition
`The act of dividing up one or more authored units during creation of a set of
`perceivable units appropriate for a particular delivery context. This definition
`has been superseded. There is a new definition of decomposition.
`
`B.2 Definitions that Have Been Removed
`
`User Experience Preferences
`A set of preferences, specified by a user, that affect the user experience that
`results from adaptation for a given delivery context
`Fragmentation
`The act of dividing up one or more authored units to create a set of
`perceivable units appropriate for a particular delivery context. This term has
`been replaced by the new term decomposition
`
`B.3 Definitions that Have Been Deprecated
`
`No definitions have yet been deprecated.
`C References
`
`Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1.1
`Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1, June 1999. IETF RFC-2616
`available at http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616.html
`Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax
`Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax, June 1998. IETF RFC-
`2396 available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
`Naming and Addressing: URIs, URLs, ...
`Naming and Addressing: URIs, URLs, ... available at
`http://www.w3.org/Addressing/
`Web Characterization Terminology & Definitions Sheet
`Web Characterization Terminology & Definitions Sheet, May 1999. W3C
`Working Draft available at http://www.w3.org/1999/05/WCA-terms/
`Weaving the Web: Glossary
`Weaving the Web: Glossary, 1999, Tim Berners-Lee. Available at
`http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/Weaving/glossary.html
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`11/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 11 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`D Acknowledgments
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`
`Members of the W3C Device Independence Working Group have helped develop
`this Working Draft through their comments, proposals and discussions at
`teleconferences, face-to-face meetings and via the group discussion list.
`
`At the time of publication, the principal and active members of the group were as
`follows:
`
`Stephane Boyera (W3C)
`Roger Gimson (HP)
`Mark Butler (HP)
`Rotan Hanrahan (MobileAware Ltd)
`Kazuhiro Kitagawa (W3C)
`Augusto Aguilera (Boeing)
`Cedric Ulmer (SAP)
`Rhys Lewis (Volantis Systems Ltd)
`Roland Merrick (IBM)
`Andreas Schade (IBM)
`Gabriel Guillaume (France Telecom)
`Fabio Paterno (CNR--Instituto Elaborazione dell'Informazione)
`
`The following were members of the group at earlier stages of its drafting:
`
`Shahid Shoaib (NTT DoCoMo)
`Ryuji Tamagawa (Sky Co. Ltd.)
`Greg Ziebold (Sun Microsystems)
`Yoshihisa Gonno (Sony Corp)
`Luu Tran (Sun Microsystems)
`Michael Wasmund (IBM)
`Jason White (University of Melbourne)
`Masashi Morioka (NTT DoCoMo)Tayeb Lemlouma (INRIA)
`Guido Grassel (Nokia)
`Amy Yu (SAP AG)
`Candy Wong (NTT DoCoMo)
`Stan Wiechers (Merkwelt)
`Franklin Reynolds (Nokia)
`Markus Lauff (SAP AG)
`Steve Farowich (Boeing)
`Yasser AlSafadi (Philips Research)
`Abbie Barbir (Nortel Networks)
`Einar Breen (Adaptive Media)
`Shlomit Ritz Finkelstein (invited expert)
`Vidhya Golkar (Argogroup)
`Luo Haiping (Comverse)
`Eric Hsi (Philips Research)
`Lynda Jones (SHARE)
`William Loughborough (Smith-Kettlewell Institute)
`Stephane Maes (IBM)
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`12/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 12 of 13
`
`

`

`4/16/22, 9:54 AM
`
`Glossary of Terms for Device Independence
`Kaori Nakai (NTT DoCoMo)
`Hidetaka Ohto (W3C/Panasonic)
`Garland Phillips (Motorola)
`Lalitha Suryanarayana (SBC Technology Resources)
`Yoshifumi Yonemoto (NTT DoCoMo)
`
`https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/
`
`13/13
`
`Code200 Exhibit 1018
`Page 13 of 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket