throbber
GASTROENTEROLOGY 1997;113:1000  1006
`
`RAPID COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Uroguanylin and Guanylin: Distinct But Overlapping Patterns
`of Messenger RNA Expression in Mouse Intestine
`
`TERESA L. WHITAKER,* DAVID P. WITTE,‘ M. CATHERINE SCOTT,* and MITCHELL B. COHEN*
`Divisions of *Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition and ‘Pediatric Pathology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati,
`Cincinnati, Ohio
`
`See editorial on page 1036.
`
`Background & Aims: Uroguanylin and guanylin, endoge-
`nous ligands of the guanylate cyclase C receptor, are
`presumed to mediate Žuid and electrolyte secretion in
`the intestine. The aim of this study was to characterize
`the expression patterns of uroguanylin and guanylin
`messenger RNA (mRNA) in the mouse intestine. Meth-
`ods: A mouse uroguanylin complementary DNA was am-
`plied from a partial genomic clone, and Northern analy-
`ses and in situ hybridization were performed to localize
`guanylin and uroguanylin mRNA along the duodenal-
`colonic and crypt-villus axes. Results: Uroguanylin
`mRNA was expressed throughout the mouse intestine
`and also in the kidney. Signal intensity was greatest
`in the small intestine for uroguanylin and in the distal
`small intestine and colon for guanylin. In situ hybridiza-
`tion showed uroguanylin mRNA localized predominantly
`in intestinal villi and the corticomedullary junction of
`the kidney, whereas guanylin mRNA was localized in
`both crypts and villi in the small intestine and to super-
`cial epithelial cells in the colon. Conclusions: Mouse
`uroguanylin mRNA expression is discrete from guanylin
`expression in the intestine. The patterns of distribution
`in the intestine and the known pH optima of these
`ligands suggest a complementary role for these secre-
`tagogues.
`
`eat-stable enterotoxin (STa) is a peptide ligand
`!
`elaborated by Escherichia coli and other bacteria.1
`Binding of this ligand to the intestinal receptor guanylate
`cyclase C (GC-C) results in increased intracellular levels
`of guanosine 3!,5!-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP).2 This,
`in turn, activates a cGMP-dependent protein kinase
`(cGKII),3 which phosphorylates the cystic brosis trans-
`membrane conductance regulator (CFTR), resulting in
`net chloride (Cl") and water secretion.4,5 Infection with
`STa-producing E. coli results in secretory diarrhea.1 Two
`endogenous ligands, guanylin and uroguanylin, which
`are structurally related to STa, activate the same signal
`
`transduction pathway, causing net Cl" secretion.4  7
`However, guanylin and uroguanylin are less potent acti-
`vators of GC-C than STa.6,8,9 Guanylin and STa have also
`")
`been shown to stimulate duodenal bicarbonate (HCO3
`secretion.10
`Guanylin was originally isolated from the rat jeju-
`num.7 Although uroguanylin was originally identied in
`opossum and human urine,6,9 similar to guanylin, uro-
`guanylin messenger RNA (mRNA) is predominantly ex-
`pressed in the intestine.11,12 However, the precise location
`of uroguanylin mRNA in the intestine, along the longi-
`tudinal (duodenal-colonic) and crypt-villus axes, has been
`less well studied.11 Uroguanylin mRNA expression has
`also been reported in opossum kidney and heart13 and in
`rat lung, pancreas, and kidney.11
`To determine the functions of these endogenous li-
`gands within the intestine, it is important to localize
`their sites of expression. In this study, we describe clon-
`ing of the mouse uroguanylin complementary DNA
`(cDNA) and characterization of the tissue and cellular
`location of uroguanylin and guanylin mRNA in the
`mouse. We show a distinct, yet overlapping pattern of
`expression for guanylin and uroguanylin in the mouse
`intestine as well as extraintestinal expression of urogua-
`nylin in the kidney.
`
`"$0'.*$+/ $,& "'0)-&/
`
`cDNA Cloning
`
`A single 4-kilobase (kb) Xho1-Xho1 fragment from
`a genomic clone (accession no. U95182) was subcloned into
`pBluescript II SK! (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Overlapping
`oligonucleotide primers were used to sequence the ends until
`sequences homologous to the human uroguanylin cDNA14
`
`Abbreviations used in this paper: CFTR, cystic brosis transmem-
`brane conductance regulator; cGKII, guanosine 3!,5!-cyclic mono-
`phosphate  dependent protein kinase II; GC-C, guanylate cyclase C;
`RT-PCR, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction; STa, heat-
`stable enterotoxin.
`# 1997 by the American Gastroenterological Association
`0016-5085/97/$3.00
`
`MSN Exhibit 1051 - Page 1 of 7
`MSN v. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`September 1997
`
`UROGUANYLIN AND GUANYLIN mRNA LOCALIZATION 1001
`
`were observed. Two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers
`were then designed for the cDNA ends (5! primer, AGGTGG-
`ACAGCAGAAGGAAG; 3! primer, TGGTGCCTAAGT-
`ATGGAC) and used to amplify a partial 450-nucleotide cDNA
`from strain FVB/NJ mouse intestinal total RNA using reverse-
`transcription (RT)-PCR as described previously.15 Sequencing
`conrmed the delity of the fragment subcloned into PCR
`2.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Sequences were analyzed using
`MacVector sequence analysis software (Eastman Kodak, Roch-
`ester, NY).
`
`Northern Blot Analysis
`
`Total RNA was isolated from a panel of strain FVB/NJ
`mouse tissues using acid guanidine isothiocyanate  phenol 
`chloroform extraction.16 Mouse tissues were harvested under a
`protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use
`Committee. For intestinal tissues, segments were divided into
`the following: duodenum (rst 3 cm distal to stomach), proxi-
`mal jejunum (proximal one third of small intestine), distal
`jejunum (central one third of small intestine), ileum (distal
`one third of small intestine), cecum, proximal colon (proximal
`two fths of large intestine), and distal colon (distal three fths
`of large intestine). Total RNA (20 !g) was electrophoresed
`through a 1.0% agarose/1.9% formaldehyde denaturing gel,
`transferred to a nylon membrane (MagnaGraph; MSI, Westbor-
`ough, MA), and cross-linked to the membrane using UV light
`(Stratalinker; Stratagene) as described previously.17 Blots were
`hybridized with cDNA fragments generated by PCR encom-
`passing nucleotides 288  386 of mouse uroguanylin and nucle-
`otides 118  307 of mouse guanylin.18 Each PCR product was
`subcloned into PCR 2.1, and the resultant plasmids were called
`PCR 2.1 m.uro 98 and PCR 2.1 mgg exon 2. An end-labeled
`oligonucleotide complementary to 18S ribosomal RNA was
`used for quantitation of relative amounts of total RNA loaded
`and normalization of signal intensities.19 Northern blots were
`hybridized overnight at 60"C and were washed under high-
`stringency conditions as described previously.19 Image analysis
`and mRNA quantitation were performed on a surface emission
`scanner (Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager; Molecular Dy-
`namics, Sunnyvale, CA) using ImageQuant software (Molecu-
`lar Dynamics).
`
`In Situ Hybridization
`
`Tissues were processed for in situ hybridization as de-
`scribed previously.20,21 BrieŽy, fresh tissue was xed in 4%
`paraformaldehyde and then saturated in 30% sucrose before
`being embedded in M1 embedding matrix (Lipshaw, Pitts-
`burgh, PA) and snap-frozen. Cryostat sections were cut at
`10  12 !m, air-dried on slides coated by Vectabond (Vector
`Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), and xed with paraformalde-
`hyde. Prehybridization and hybridization were performed as
`described previously.20,21 [35S]uridine 5! triphosphate  labeled
`sense and antisense riboprobes were prepared from linearized
`PCR 2.1 m.uro 98 and PCR 2.1 mgg exon 2 plasmids (de-
`scribed above). Tissue sections were photographed under dark-
`eld and bright-eld illumination.
`
`/ 5E20$$0026
`
`08-08-97 18:40:09
`
`gasa
`
`) Sequence of mouse uroguanylin cDNA. The start site
`Figure 1. (
`and the stop codon are underlined. The poly(A)! signal is
`(
`) Deduced amino acid sequence of mouse uroguanylin
`cDNA. The sequence of the 15 amino acid mature peptide is high-
`lighted (- - -).
`
`#'/1+0/
`
`Cloning of Mouse Uroguanylin cDNA
`
`A single 4-kb genomic fragment was identied,
`which strongly hybridized with a 32P-labeled human uro-
`guanylin cDNA probe (gift of O. Hill14). This fragment
`was subcloned into pBluescript II SK! and further ana-
`lyzed by restriction mapping and direct dideoxynucleo-
`tide sequencing. We were able to identify the 5! and 3!
`ends of the coding sequence from the sequence informa-
`tion. Using primers designed for each, we used RT-PCR
`to amplify 450 nucleotides of mouse uroguanylin cDNA
`from total RNA extracted from mouse jejunum. This
`amplied product was then subcloned into the PCR 2.1
`vector. From direct sequencing of the genomic fragment,
`we predicted the cDNA start site near a TATAA se-
`quence upstream of the coding sequence. The location
`of the poly(A)! signal sequence predicted a full-length
`cDNA of 590 nucleotides.
`The sequence of the full-length mouse uroguanylin
`cDNA (accession no. U90727) and the predicted amino
`acid sequence are shown in Figure 1. The mouse urogua-
`nylin cDNA shares 82% homology with human urogua-
`nylin,14 90% homology with rat uroguanylin,11 and 51%
`homology with mouse guanylin.18 In addition, the uro-
`guanylin cDNA is 99% identical to an unpublished ex-
`pressed sequence tag cloned from mouse kidney.22 Trans-
`lation of the mouse uroguanylin cDNA predicts a 106 
`amino acid peptide. The deduced amino acid sequence
`
`WBS-GastroMSN Exhibit 1051 - Page 2 of 7
`MSN v. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`1002 WHITAKER ET AL.
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 113, No. 3
`
`of the mature carboxy-terminal 15  amino acid peptide
`is 80% identical to the predicted human sequence14 and
`93% identical to the rat peptide.11
`
`Northern Analysis
`
`A 98  base pair (bp) fragment extending from
`nucleotides 288  386 was used as a probe for Northern
`blot analysis to localize mouse uroguanylin mRNA. A
`single predominant mRNA species of approximately 600
`bp was recognized with this probe. Signal was present
`in all intestinal tissues examined, with highest concentra-
`tions observed in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum
`(Figure 2). Extraintestinal expression was also found in
`the kidney (Figure 2). No signal was detected in the
`liver, spleen, heart, lung, brain (Figure 2), stomach, or
`thymus (not shown). As shown in Figure 2, this expres-
`sion pattern is distinct from that observed when the
`same blot was probed with a guanylin cDNA; guanylin
`message was also present in all intestinal tissues but was
`most prevalent in the distal jejunum, ileum, cecum, and
`colon; no extraintestinal expression of guanylin was found
`by Northern analysis. Quantitation of relative signal in-
`tensities for both uroguanylin and guanylin is shown in
`Figure 3.
`
`In Situ Hybridization
`
`To further delineate the crypt-villous and extrain-
`testinal expression pattern of mouse uroguanylin and
`
`guanylin, we performed in situ hybridization of a panel
`of mouse tissues using 35S-labeled sense and antisense
`riboprobes. Both antisense probes showed highly re-
`stricted patterns of expression. In the duodenum, urogua-
`nylin signal was primarily in midvillous epithelial cells
`(Figure 4A, arrow). Signal in isolated crypt cells (arrow-
`heads) was detected by dark-eld illumination with both
`sense (Figure 4B ) and antisense probes (Figure 4A ) and
`is caused by autoŽuorescence of Paneth cell granules.23
`Absence of bona de signal was conrmed by bright-
`eld microscopy (data not shown). Intense uroguanylin
`signal in the proximal jejunum was primarily seen in
`villous epithelium, although a uniform narrow band of
`autoradiographic grains was also present at the base of
`the crypts (Figure 4C ). In distal jejunum and ileum, the
`uroguanylin signal appeared to be restricted to villous
`epithelium (Figure 4D  F ). As with the duodenal crypt
`cell expression, the signal in isolated crypt cells in distal
`jejunum and ileum results from Paneth cell autoŽuores-
`cence rather than autoradiographic grains (Figure 4D and
`E ). At the ileocecal boundary, uroguanylin signal was
`only detected in epithelial cells overlying a lymphoid
`aggregate (Figure 4F, arrow). No uroguanylin signal was
`detected in the colon (Figure 4G ), raising the possibility
`that the level of expression of uroguanylin mRNA in
`the colon is below the level of detection of our in situ
`
`Figure 2. Representative Northern analysis of guanylin and urogua-
`nylin message. Total RNA was separated and the blot was probed as
`described in Materials and Methods. The positions of 28S and 18S
`rRNA are indicated along the side of each blot. Both guanylin and
`uroguanylin mRNA were present throughout the intestine. Unlike gua-
`nylin mRNA, which was highest in distal small intestine and colon,
`uroguanylin signal was highest in small intestine with very little signal
`in the cecum and colon. Uroguanylin signal was also found in the
`kidney but not in liver, spleen, heart, lung, or brain. No extraintestinal
`expression of guanylin was detected. For quantitation purposes, the
`blot was reprobed with an oligonucleotide that recognizes 18S rRNA19;
`the results are shown in the lower panel.
`
`/ 5E20$$0026
`
`08-08-97 18:40:09
`
`gasa
`
`)
`Figure 3. Quantitation of relative signal intensities for guanylin (
`and uroguanylin (
`) mRNA in mouse intestine. All quantitation was
`performed with ImageQuant software. Relative signal intensities were
`normalized to 18S ribosomal RNA signal intensity.19 Guanylin values
`are shown as a percentage of cecum signal intensity with cecum set
`at 100%. Uroguanylin values are shown as a percentage of proximal
`jejunal expression with this value set at 100%. Data are mean # SE
`of three separate determinations.
`
`WBS-GastroMSN Exhibit 1051 - Page 3 of 7
`MSN v. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`September 1997
`
`UROGUANYLIN AND GUANYLIN mRNA LOCALIZATION 1003
`
`hybridization experiments or that the signal found by
`Northern analysis represents weak cross-hybridization
`with guanylin mRNA. We also found a discrete band of
`uroguanylin message in the kidney, in cells localized to
`the corticomedullary junction (Figure 4H ), using the
`antisense probe; no signal was seen with the sense probe
`(Figure 4I ).
`In contrast to uroguanylin, authentic and robust gua-
`nylin message was detected in crypt cells in the proximal
`and distal jejunum and ileum (Figure 4J, L, and M).
`Guanylin mRNA was also present in many but not all
`villous cells in the proximal jejunum (Figure 4J ) and in
`all villous cells in the distal jejunum (Figure 4L ) and
`ileum (Figure 4M ). The most intense signal was observed
`in the supercial epithelium of the cecum and colon
`(Figures 4N, O, and P ). Interestingly, guanylin mRNA
`was limited to the supercial epithelium in distal colon
`(Figure 4P ) but was present in the neck and deeper
`colonic glands in proximal colon (Figure 4O ). The
`broader distribution of signal in proximal than in distal
`colon correlated with the increased expression detected
`by Northern analysis (Figures 2 and 3). No signal was
`seen using the sense probe in proximal jejunum (Figure
`4K ) and colon (Figure 4Q ). No guanylin signal was de-
`tected in mouse kidney (data not shown).
`
`!*/%1//*-,
`
`We have cloned a mouse uroguanylin cDNA and
`showed a discrete yet overlapping pattern of expression
`for mouse uroguanylin and guanylin. Although guanylin
`and uroguanylin mRNA are found throughout the mouse
`intestine, their levels of expression vary in different seg-
`ments, and they seem to be expressed by different cell
`types. The highest level of uroguanylin mRNA expres-
`sion occurs in the proximal small intestine; the highest
`level of guanylin mRNA expression occurs in the distal
`small intestine, cecum, and proximal colon. Mouse uro-
`guanylin mRNA is primarily restricted to the villi,
`whereas guanylin mRNA is localized to both crypts and
`villi throughout the small intestine.
`Our observations are consistent with the reported dis-
`tribution of uroguanylin mRNA in rat intestine and
`kidney,11 although the tissue-specic pattern of urogua-
`nylin mRNA expression in the mouse is more restricted
`than previously reported for rats11 and opossums.13 Uro-
`guanylin mRNA was found in human colon; no signal
`was found in the kidney, and the small intestine was not
`investigated.14 The cellular localization of uroguanylin
`has not been previously reported for any species.11,13,14
`We have also shown that guanylin mRNA is expressed
`throughout the mouse intestine, as has been shown in
`rats21 and humans.24 Localization of guanylin mRNA to
`
`/ 5E20$$0026
`
`08-08-97 18:40:09
`
`gasa
`
`both crypt and villous cells in the mouse intestine corre-
`lates with the distribution of guanylin mRNA we have
`observed in human intestine25 but not with the villous
`pattern we observed in the rat.21 This species-specic
`pattern of guanylin mRNA expression parallels the pat-
`tern of GC-C mRNA expression, which is primarily re-
`stricted to villous cells in the rat small intestine19 but
`includes both crypt and villous epithelium in the
`mouse.26
`On the basis of the localization data in this study for
`guanylin and uroguanylin mRNA and previously docu-
`mented distribution patterns for GC-C,26 CFTR,27 and
`cGKII,28 the entire guanylin/uroguanylin-mediated sig-
`nal transduction pathway is probably localized to some
`of the same epithelial cells. Mouse GC-C mRNA is ex-
`pressed in both crypts and villi in the small intestine
`and in the deep crypts and supercial epithelium of the
`large intestine.26 cGKII mRNA expression has not been
`examined in mice, but in rats, cGKII mRNA expression
`extends from the crypts to the upper villous, with the
`highest level of expression in midvillous cells in the small
`intestine. Expression of cGKII mRNA is also found in
`the crypts of the cecum and proximal colon28; no cGKII
`expression is found in the distal colon.28 Mouse CFTR
`mRNA is present in the small intestine and colon. In
`the small intestine, it is predominantly expressed in the
`crypts with a decreasing gradient along the villi, with
`no expression at the villous tips.27 Thus, in the small
`intestine, there is probably colocalization of guanylin
`and/or uroguanylin, GC-C, cGKII, and CFTR mRNA
`within the same cells in the crypts and bottom one third
`of the villi. The entire secretory pathway is also likely
`to be present in guanylin mRNA-expressing cells in the
`cecum and proximal colon. The observation of urogua-
`nylin mRNA expression in epithelial cells overlying
`lymphoid aggregates parallels the distinctive pattern of
`CFTR mRNA expression in epithelial cells in close con-
`tact with lymphoid tissue in human intestine.29 How-
`ever, guanylin, uroguanylin, and GC-C mRNA are also
`present in high concentrations in villous cells where
`CFTR is poorly or not at all expressed,26,27 and guanylin
`and GC-C are present in the distal colon where cGKII
`may not be expressed.28 Therefore, it is possible that
`there are other downstream targets or intermediaries of
`this endogenous receptor-ligand interaction.
`Guanylin and uroguanylin have different pH optima
`of activity, with uroguanylin functional at pH $5.5 and
`guanylin at pH $8.0.30 Also, a pH microclimate exists
`along the villi of the jejunum; in rats, the pH gradient
`changes from pH 6.6 at the villous tip to pH 8.15 in
`the crypts31; it is likely that a similar microclimate exists
`in villi in the mouse. Given this microclimate, urogua-
`MSN Exhibit 1051 - Page 4 of 7
`WBS-Gastro
`MSN v. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`1004 WHITAKER ET AL.
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 113, No. 3
`
`/ 5E20$$0026
`
`08-08-97 18:40:09
`
`gasa
`
`MSN Exhibit 1051 - Page 5 of 7
`MSN v. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`WBS-Gastro
`
`

`

`September 1997
`
`UROGUANYLIN AND GUANYLIN mRNA LOCALIZATION 1005
`
`and ) proximal jejunum,
`Figure 4. In situ hybridization of guanylin and uroguanylin riboprobes. Sections of ( and ) mouse duodenum, (
`and
`) ileum, (
`) cecum, (
`) proximal colon, (
`and
`) distal colon, and ( and ) kidney were prepared
`( and ) distal jejunum, (
`as described in Materials and Methods.
`were hybridized with a uroguanylin riboprobe;
`were hybridized with a guanylin riboprobe.
`Uroguanylin:
`shows uroguanylin signal primarily in duodenal midvillous epithelial cells (
`). Signal in isolated crypt cells (
`) was
`detected by dark-eld illumination with both (
`) sense and ( and
`) antisense probes and is a result of autoŽuorescence of Paneth cell
`granules. Absence of bona de signal was conrmed by bright-eld microscopy (not shown). Uroguanylin signal in the (
`) proximal jejunum was
`primarily found in villous epithelium with a thin band of true signal in the crypts; in the (D) distal jejunum and (E) ileum, uroguanylin signal was
`restricted to villous epithelium. ( ) At the ileocecal boundary, true uroguanylin signal was only detected in epithelial cells overlying a lymphoid
`aggregate (
`). As with the duodenal crypt cell expression, the signal in isolated crypt cells in distal jejunum and ileum results from Paneth
`cell autoŽuorescence. No uroguanylin signal was detected in (
`) colon or cecum (not shown). Using the antisense probe, a discrete band of
`uroguanylin message was also observed in the (
`) kidney in cells localized to the corticomedullary junction. ( ) No signal was seen with the
`sense probe. Guanylin: In contrast to uroguanylin, authentic guanylin message was detected in crypt cells in ( ) proximal and (
`) distal jejunum
`and (
`) ileum. Guanylin mRNA was also present in most, but not all, villous cells in ( ) the proximal jejunum and in all villous cells in the distal
`( ) jejunum and (
`) ileum. The most intense signal was observed in the supercial epithelium of the (
`) cecum and ( and ) colon. Guanylin
`) distal colon but was present in the neck and deeper colonic glands in (
`) proximal colon.
`mRNA was limited to the supercial epithelium in (
`No signal is seen in the (
`) proximal jejunum or (
`) colon with a sense, control riboprobe.
`
`nylin activity would be greatest nearer the villous tip,
`whereas guanylin activity would be greatest nearer to
`the crypts. Interestingly, uroguanylin mRNA expression
`occurs primarily in the villi in small intestine where the
`pH microclimate is more likely to be acidic and closer to
`its pH optimum.30 Unlike uroguanylin, guanylin mRNA
`expression is also prominent in the crypts of the small
`intestine, where guanylin is more likely to bind to GC-
`C in a less acidic milieu.
`Guanylin and STa can elicit bicarbonate secretion in
`vitro from rat duodenum.10 Because of the inŽux of acid
`from the stomach, luminal pH as well as the villous pH
`microclimate in the duodenum are likely to be acidic.
`Although both guanylin and uroguanylin could partici-
`", on the basis of their
`pate in the secretion of HCO3
`relative patterns of expression and pH optima, urogua-
`nylin is probably the predominant ligand for this role.
`The expression of uroguanylin mRNA but not GC-C
`mRNA in mouse kidney26 raises the possibility that this
`ligand also functions as a natriuretic peptide in an endo-
`crine pathway to maintain Žuid and electrolyte balance
`in an intestinal-renal axis.12 This possibility is supported
`by a demonstration of circulating uroguanylin13 and by
`the pattern of uroguanylin mRNA expression in the
`mouse kidney. This pattern resembles that of erythropoi-
`etin, another circulating hormone, which is expressed at
`the corticomedullary junction.32 However, there are other
`explanations for the presence of uroguanylin mRNA in
`the kidney in the absence of GC-C expression. There
`may be a paracrine signaling mechanism with a receptor
`other than GC-C located in the kidney. Alternatively,
`uroguanylin mRNA expression in the kidney may be a
`vestige of a signaling pathway that is present in other
`mammals33,34 but is no longer functional in the mouse.
`In summary, we examined localization of both urogua-
`nylin and guanylin in the mouse intestine and localiza-
`tion of uroguanylin in the mouse kidney. The overlap-
`
`/ 5E20$$0026
`
`08-08-97 18:40:09
`
`gasa
`
`ping pattern of uroguanylin and guanylin mRNA
`distribution with that of GC-C mRNA26 is consistent
`with these ligands cooperatively regulating salt and water
`metabolism in the intestine via an autocrine or paracrine
`GC-C  mediated pathway. It is possible that differences
`in the expression patterns of uroguanylin and guanylin
`correlate with their predominant physiological functions.
`In addition, based on the discrete patterns of mRNA
`expression and different pH optima of activity, guanylin
`and uroguanylin may have different spatially restricted
`functions along the crypt-villus and duodenal-colonic
`axes.
`
`#'('.',%'/
`
`In:
`1. Cohen MB, Giannella RA. Enterotoxigenic
`Blaser MJ, Smith PD, Ravdin JI, Greenberg HB, eds. Infections
`of the gastrointestinal tract. New York, Raven, 1995:691  708.
`2. Schulz S, Green CK, Yuen PST, Garbers DL. Guanylyl cyclase is
`a heat-stable enterotoxin receptor. Cell 1990; 63:941  948.
`3. Pfeifer A, Aszodi A, Seidler U, Ruth P, Hofmann F, Fassler R.
`Intestinal secretory defects and dwarsm in mice lacking cGMP-
`dependent protein kinase II. Science 1996; 274:2082  2086.
`4. Cuthbert AW, Hickman ME, MacVinish LJ, Evans MJ, Colledge
`WH, Ratcliff R, Seale PW, Humphrey PPA. Chloride secretion in
`response to guanylin in colonic epithelia from normal and
`transgenic cystic brosis mice. Br J Pharmacol 1994; 112:31 
`36.
`5. Chao AC, de Sauvage FJ, Dong YJ, Wagner JA, Goeddel DV, Gard-
`ner P. Activation of intestinal CFTR Cl" channel by heat-stable
`enterotoxin and guanylin via cAMP-dependent protein kinase.
`EMBO J 1994; 13:1065  1072.
`6. Hamra FK, Forte LR, Eber SL, Pidhorodeckyj NV, Krause WJ, Free-
`man RH, Chin DT, Tompkins JA, Fok KF, Smith CE, Dufn KL,
`Siegel NR, Currie MG. Uroguanylin: structure and activity of a
`second endogenous peptide that stimulates intestinal guanylate
`cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:10464  10468.
`7. Currie MG, Fok KF, Kato J, Moore RJ, Hamra FK, Dufn KL, Smith
`CE. Guanylin: an endogenous activator of intestinal guanylate
`cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:947  951.
`8. Freeman RH, Forte LR, Hamra FK, Currie MG, Krause WJ. Urogua-
`nylin: a potential natriuretic peptide hormone produced by the
`intestine (abstr). FASEB J 1996; 8:A552.
`9. Kita T, Smith CE, Fok KF, Dufn KL, Moore WM, Karabatsos PJ,
`
`WBS-GastroMSN Exhibit 1051 - Page 6 of 7
`MSN v. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`1006 WHITAKER ET AL.
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 113, No. 3
`
`Kachur JF, Hamra FK, Pidhorodeckyj NV, Forte LR, Currie MG.
`Characterization of human uroguanylin: a member of the guanylin
`peptide family. Am J Physiol 1994; 266:F342  F348.
`10. Guba M, Kuhn M, Forssmann WG, Classen M, Gregor M, Seidler
`" secretion:
`U. Guanylin strongly stimulates rat duodenal HCO3
`proposed mechanism and comparison with other secretagogues.
`Gastroenterology 1996; 111:1558  1568.
`11. Miyazato M, Nakazato M, Matsukura S, Kangawa K, Matsuo H.
`Uroguanylin gene expression in the alimentary tract and extra-
`gastrointestinal tissues. FEBS Lett 1996; 398:170  174.
`12. Forte LR, Fan X, Hamra FK. Salt and water homeostasis: urogua-
`nylin is a circulating peptide hormone with natriuretic activity. Am
`J Kidney Dis 1996; 28:296  304.
`13. Fan X, Hamra FK, Freeman RH, Eber SL, Krause WJ, Lim RW,
`Pace VM, Currie MG, Forte LR. Uroguanylin: cloning of preprouro-
`guanylin cDNA, mRNA expression in the intestine and heart and
`isolation of uroguanylin from plasma. Biochem Biophys Res Com-
`mun 1996; 219:457 462.
`14. Hill O, Cetin Y, Cieslak A, Magert HJ, Forssmann WG. A new
`human guanylate cyclase  activating peptide (GCAP-II, urogua-
`nylin): precursor cDNA and colonic expression. Biochem Biophys
`Acta 1995; 12853:146  149.
`15. Mann EA, Cohen MB, Giannella RA. Comparison of receptors for
`heat-stable enterotoxin: novel receptor present
`in IEC-6 cells. Am J Physiol 1993; 264:G172  G178.
`16. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by
`acid guanidium thiocyanate  phenol  chloroform extraction. Anal
`Biochem 1987; 162:156  159.
`17. Laney DW Jr, Mann EA, Dellon SC, Perkins DR, Giannella RA,
`Cohen MB. Novel sites for expression of an
`heat-
`stable enterotoxin receptor in the developing rat. Am J Physiol
`1992; 263:G816  G821.
`18. Sciaky D, Kosiba JL, Cohen MB. Genomic sequence of the murine
`guanylin gene. Genomics 1994; 24:583  587.
`19. Cohen MB, Mann E, Lau C, Henning SJ, Giannella R. A gradient
`heat-stable enterotoxin re-
`in expression of the
`ceptor exists along the villus-to-crypt axis of rat small intestine.
`Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 186:483 490.
`20. Witte DP, Wiginton DA, Hutton JJ, Aronow BJ. Coordinate develop-
`mental regulation of purine catabolic enzyme expression in gas-
`trointestinal and postimplantation reproductive tracts. J Cell Biol
`1991; 115:179  190.
`21. Lewis LG, Witte DP, Laney DW, Currie MG, Cohen MB. Guanylin
`mRNA is expressed in villous enterocytes of the rat small intes-
`tine and supercial epithelia of the rat colon. Biochem Biophys
`Res Commun 1993; 196:553  560.
`22. Marra M, Hillier L, Allen M, Bowles M, Dietrich N, Dubuque T,
`Geisel S, Kucaba T, Lacy M, Le M, Martin J, Morris M, Schellen-
`burg K, Steptoe M, Tan F, Underwood K, Moore B, Theising B,
`Wylie T, Lennon G, Soares B, Wilson R, Waterston R. The WashU-
`
`accession
`
`project. 1996, Genbank
`
`HHMI mouse EST
`#AA139503.
`23. Garrett KL, Grounds MD, Beilharz MW. Nonspecic binding of
`nucleic acid probes to Paneth cells in the gastrointestinal tract
`with in situ hybridization. J Histochem Cytochem 1992; 40:
`1613  1618.
`24. Wiegand RC, Kato J, Huang MD, Fok KF, Kachur JF, Currie MG.
`Human guanylin: cDNA isolation, structure, and activity. FEBS
`Lett 1992; 311:150  154.
`25. Hochman JA, Sciaky D, Witte D, Whitaker T, Cohen MB. The
`guanylin promoter confers intestinal epithelial cell-specic ex-
`pression (abstr). Gastroenterology 1996; 110:A805.
`26. Swenson ES, Mann EA, Jump ML, Witte DP, Giannella RA. The
`guanylin/STa receptor is expressed in crypts and apical epithe-
`lium throughout the mouse intestine. Biochem Biophys Res Com-
`mun 1996; 225:1009 1014.
`27. Zhou L, Dey CR, Wert SE, DuVall MD, Frizzell RA, Whitsett JA.
`Correction of lethal intestinal defect in a mouse model of cystic
`brosis by human CFTR. Science 1994; 266:1705  1708.
`28. Markert T, Vaandrager AB, Gambaryan S, Pohler D, Hausler C,
`Walter U, De Jonge HR, Jarchau T, Lohmann SM. Endogenous
`expression of type II cGMP-dependent protein kinase mRNA and
`protein in rat intestine. J Clin Invest 1995; 96:822  830.
`29. Strong TV, Boehm K, Collins FS. Localization of cystic brosis trans-
`membrane conductance regulator mRNA in the human gastrointesti-
`nal tract by in situ hybridization. J Clin Invest 1994;93:347354.
`30. Hamra K, Fan X, Krause WJ, Freeman RH, Chin DT, Smith CE,
`Currie MG, Forte LR. Prouroguanylin and proguanylin: purication
`from colon, structure, and modulation of bioactivity by proteases.
`Endocrinology 1996; 137:257  265.
`31. Daniel H, Neugebauer B, Kratz A, Rehner G. Localization of acid
`microclimate along intestinal villi of rat jejunum. Am J Physiol
`1985; 248:G293  G298.
`32. Lacombe C, Da Silva JL, Bruneval P, Fournier JG, Wendling F,
`Casadevall N, Camilleri JP, Bariety J, Varet B, Tambourin P. Peritu-
`bular cells are the site of erythropoietin synthesis in the murine
`hypoxic kidney. J Clin Invest 1988; 81:620  623.
`33. Forte LR, Krause WJ, Freeman RH. Receptors and cGMP signal-
`enterotoxin in opossum kidney. Am J
`ling mechanism for
`Physiol 1988; 255:F1040  F1046.
`enterotoxin
`34. Forte LR, Krause WJ, Freeman RH.
`receptors: localization in opossum kidney, intestine, and testes.
`Am J Physiol 1989; 257:F874  F881.
`
`Received March 31, 1997. Accepted May 20, 1997.
`Address requests for reprints to: Mitchell B. Cohen, M.D., Division
`of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 3333 Burnet Avenue,
`Cincinnati, Ohio 45229. e-mail: mitchell.cohen@chmcc.org;
`fax:
`(513) 636-7805.
`Supported in part by grant DK 47318 from the National Institutes
`of Health.
`
`/ 5E20$$0026
`
`08-08-97 18:40:09
`
`gasa
`
`MSN Exhibit 1051 - Page 7 of 7
`MSN v. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`WBS-Gastro
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket