throbber
Journal of Physiology (1991), 437, pp. 341-350
`With 6 figures
`Printed in Great Britain
`
`341
`
`NEUROKININ A INCREASES SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT ACROSS
`
`RAT COLONIC MUCOSA: A ROLE FOR VASOACTIVE
`
`INTESTINAL POLYPEPTIDE
`
`By XIAO-YING TIEN*, LANE J. WALLACE, JAMES F. KACHUR,
`SUZANNE WON-KIM anp TIMOTHYS. GAGINELLAT
`From the Division of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University,
`Columbus, OH 43210 and Searle Research and Development, Skokie, IL 60077, USA
`
`(Received 4 October 1990)
`
`SUMMARY
`
`1. Neurokinin A (NKA)is a mammalian tachykinin distributed principally in the
`nervous system, including the myenteric innervation of the gut.
`2. NKA maybeinvolved in neurogenic inflammation and as a modulatory factor
`in the diarrhoea associated with mucosal
`inflammation of inflammatory bowel
`disease (ulcerative colitis).
`3. We evaluated the effect of NKA on the short-circuit current J,,, assumed to
`reflect electrogenic chloride secretion, across muscle-stripped rat colonic mucosa
`mounted in Ussing chambers.
`4. Serosal addition of NKA produced a concentration-dependent (0-1-100 nm)
`increase in J,, with an EC,, (half-maximal effective concentration) value of 7:5 nM.
`The maximum (mean+s.£.M.) increase in J,, (wA/cm?) for NKA was 111+10.
`5. Tetrodotoxin (0°5 wm) and bumetanide (10 4m), but not atropine (1:0 “M),
`hexamethonium (100m) or pyrilamine (10 um), significantly inhibited NKA-
`induced increasesin J,,.
`6. The response to NKA was attenuated by 45 min pre-treatment with antisera
`raised against vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP). Moreover, prior desen-
`sitization to VIP attenuated the effect of NKA.
`7. These studies suggest that NKA increases J,, in rat colon, in part, through a
`non-cholinergic neural mechanism involving VIP.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Neurokinin A (NKA, substance k, neuromedin L) is a mammalian tachykinin
`(Kangawa, Minamino, Fukuda & Matsuo, 1983; Kimura, Okada, Sugita, Kanagawa
`& Manekata, 1983), derived from £-preprotachykinin A and y-preprotachykinin A
`(Maggio, 1988). It shares a common C-terminusand co-exists with other tachykinins
`
`* Present address: Department of Physiology/Biophysiology, College of Medicine, Case Western
`Reserve University, 2119 Abington Road, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
`+ To whom reprint requests should be sent at the Department of Gastrointestinal Disease
`Research, Searle Research and Development, 4901 Searle Parkway, Skokie, IL 60077, USA.
`MS 8841
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 1 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`342
`
`X.-Y. TIEN AND OTHERS
`
`in the same subpopulation of neurons, and therefore may also act as a
`neurotransmitter
`(Minamino, Kangawa, Fukuda & Matsuo, 1984; Dalsgaard,
`Haegerstrand, Theodorsson-Norheim, Brodin & Hokfelt, 1985; Dockray, 1987).
`Neurogenic inflammation, characterized by vasodilatation, plasma extravasation
`and smooth muscle contraction initiated by release of proinflammatory mediators
`from sensory unmyelinated afferent nerve endings, may be a contributing factor in
`the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease (Mayer, Raybould & Koelbel,
`1988). Neurokinin A is a candidate mediator in neurogenic inflammation. It is
`localized in sensory neurons (Hua, Theodorsson-Norheim, Brodin, Lundberg &
`Hokfelt, 1985), increases vascular permeability and is a vasodilator (Foreman, 1987).
`Receptor binding sites for neurokinin A are expressed by cells mediating
`inflammatory and immune responses (Mantyh, Mantyh, Gates, Virna & Maggio,
`1988). Tachykinins may affect
`inflammation by increasing mast cell secretion,
`promoting monocyte chemotaxis and stimulating phagocytosis and lysosomal
`enzymerelease by neutrophils (Shanahan & Anton, 1988).
`Recently, NKA was shown undershort-circuit conditions to cause net electrolyte
`secretion in the canine tracheal epithelium (Rangachari, McWade & Donoff, 1987;
`Tamaoki, Ueki, Widdicombe & Nadel, 1988) and the guinea-pig jejunum (Mathison
`& Davidson, 1989). Since the colonic mucosal secretory response to NKA has not
`been reported, and secretory diarrhoea is associated with ulcerative colitis, we
`investigated the effects and mechanism of action of NKA on rat colonic mucosa in
`vitro.
`Part of this work has been presented in abstract form (Tien, Wallace & Gaginella,
`1988).
`
`METHODS
`
`Tissue preparation
`Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-400 g) were killed by cervical dislocation, and the distal colon
`was excised. The colon was opened and rinsed with ice-cold saline solution (0°9% w/v NaCl). The
`circular and longitudinal muscle layers were stripped off with a pair of fine forceps. Pieces of
`muscle-stripped mucosa were mounted as flat sheets in Ussing chambers (0-64 cm?) and bathed
`with buffered physiological saline solution composed of (mm): NaCl, 120-2; KCl, 5:9; CaCl,, 2:5;
`MgCl,, 1:2; NaH,PO,, 1:2; NaHCO,, 25; glucose, 11:1 (pH 7:4, 37 °C), gassed with 95% O, and
`5% CO,.
`
`Electrical measurements
`
`Electrical potential difference (PD) was monitored at the beginning of each experiment with a
`pair of saturated KCl-agar (3%) bridges placed on each side of the tissue. The circuit was
`completed with calomel half-cell electrodes connected to a DVC 1000 voltage clamp (WPI
`Instruments, New Haven, CT, USA). Short-circuit current (/,,) was applied through silver—silver
`chloride electrodes to the tissue to clamp open-circuit PD (potential difference) at zero, and
`compensation was madefor fluid resistance. Initial tissue conductance (G,) was calculated from the
`values of I,, and PD according to Ohm’s law. The reciprocal of G, (mS/cm?) times 1000 equals the
`tissue resistance (R, Q cm?).
`
`Concentration—response curves
`After mounting, the tissues were allowed to equilibrate for at least 30-60 min; effects on
`presumedelectrogenic chloride secretion were monitored as changes in J,,. The concentration
`required to increase I,, by 50% (EC,,) was calculated from the curves by non-linear least-squares
`regression,
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 2 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`NEUROKININ A INCREASES SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT
`
`343
`
`Effects of antagonists
`Antagonists were added to the serosal side of the tissue for various times (see individual drugs
`below) prior to agonist addition. If blockade was observed, bethanechol (0-4 mM) or aminophylline
`(20 mm) was added after the agonist response to ensure that antagonism, rather than poortissue
`viability, was responsible for the lack of response. Antagonist controls were conducted on a
`“ separate tissue from the same animals.
`
`A
`
`B
`
`0.05
`
`Y
`
`0-01
`'
`
`5
`<
`OooO
`“ye
`
`5 min
`
`TOHM-NKA
`01
`tat
`
`Fig. 1. Representative effect of NKA (um) on J/,, after a single concentration (A) and
`following cumulative addition (B).
`
`VIP antisera studies
`
`VIP antisera was used to assess a role for VIP in the response to NKA. The VIP antiserum was
`used at a final dilution of 1: 200. Each tissue preparation treated with VIP antiserum was compared
`with a control tissue from the same animal. Basal /,, values and conductance were comparable in
`VIP-antisera treated and control tissues.
`
`Materials
`
`NKA, VIP, TTX, hexamethonium and pyrilamine were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO,
`USA), and bumetanide was obtained from Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA. Agents not
`soluble in distilled water or saline were dissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO). Equivalent
`amounts of DMSO (without drug) added to the serosal side did not affect J,,. VIP antisera (Ras
`71651-N, rabbit) was purchased from Penninsula Laboratories, San Carlos, CA, USA.
`
`Statistical analysis
`All values are expressed as the means+s.E.M. The Student’s paired or unpaired ¢ test was used
`for testing statistical significance.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Effect of NKA on I,,
`NKAevokeda rapid but transient increase in J,, upon serosal addition (Fig. 1).
`The responses were concentration dependent over a range of 0:5-100 nm (Fig. 2); the
`EC,, value was determined to be 75nm. The maximum response to NKA was
`111+10 wA/cm? (n = 26 tissues from thirteen animals).
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 3 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`344
`
`X.-Y. TIEN AND OTHERS
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`IncreaseinIke(uA/cm2)
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`~log [NKA] (mM)
`
`Fig. 2. Concentration—-response curve (serosal addition) for NKA-induced increases [,,
`across rat colonic mucosa. Results are expressed as the change in J,, (uA/cm?) above
`baseline vs. log concentration of NKA. Symbols and bars represent the means+s.E.M. of
`determinations for at least twelve animals. The maximalincrease in J,, was achieved at
`10-7-10-° M.
`
`150
`
`100
`
`00
`
`0
`
`*
`
`
`
`oa
`¢c
`6Qano
`
`2 S
`
`2 @ £x@ E 6@
`
`DOo
`
`< 8o
`
`a
`
`TTX
`(0-5 uM)
`
`Hexamethonium
`(100 um)
`
`Atropine
`(1 uM)
`
`Fig. 3. Effects of tetrodotoxin (TTX), atropine and hexamethonium against NKA
`(50 nm).
`Inhibitors were added 10min before NKA. Results are expressed as
`means+s.z.M. of three to eight animals. *P < 0-05.
`
`Effects of inhibitors
`To substantiate that the NKA-evokedincreasein J,, was due to active chloride ion
`secretion, tissues were incubated with bumetanide (10 wm, 30 min) before adding
`NKAto the tissue bath. Responses to a maximally effective concentration (50 nm)
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 4 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`NEUROKININ A INCREASES SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT
`
`345
`
`of NKA weresignificantly (P < 0-001) reduced by serosal addition of bumetanide to
`14+4% of control. Unidirectional flux measurements with **Cl” could not be
`conducted due to the transient nature of the response.
`TTX (0-5 um) inhibited by 93% the /,, response to 50 nM-NKA(Fig. 3). Atropine
`‘(1 wm, 10 min), which completely inhibited the response to 0-4 mm-bethanechol, had
`
`(uA/em2)
`
`NKA
`
`NKA~
`pyrilamine
`
`IncreaseinIs,
`
`Hist
`
`Hist
`pyrilamine
`
`Fig. 4. Effects of the H, receptor antagonist pyrilamine (10 uM) against 1 mm-histamine
`and NKA (50 nm). The antagonist was added 10 min prior to agonists. All drugs were
`added to the serosal side. Data are expressed as means+s.£E.M. for determinations from
`at least six animals. *P < 0-001.
`
`the ganglionic blocker,
`no significant effect on responses elicited by NKA;
`hexamethonium, also failed to inhibit the response to NKA (Fig. 1).
`Because other neurokinins are reported to release histamine from mast cells
`(Erjavec, Lembeck, Florjanc-Irman, Skofttsch, Donnerer, Saria & Holzer, 1981;
`Foreman, 1987),
`the histamine receptor H, antagonist, pyrilamine, was used to
`determineif it would block the NKA-induced response. Pyrilamine (10 “Mm, 15 min)
`significantly blocked the histamine (1 mm) but not
`the NKA (50 nm) response
`(Fig. 4).
`The effect of VIP antisera on the J,, response to NKA was examined. A dilution
`of 1:200 attenuated both the NKA response (Fig. 5A) and the response to VIP
`(Fig. 5B). However, pre-treatment with non-specific rabbit serum (1:200) or pre-
`neutralized VIP antiserum did not affect the response to NKA.
`
`Desensitization studies
`
`After stimulation of the tissues with NKA, subsequent additions of the same
`concentration of the peptide failed to produce a response, indicating homologous
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 5 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`346
`
`X.-Y. TIEN AND OTHERS
`
`desensitization. The desensitized tissues were responsive to subsequent application of
`bethanechol
`(04mm) and aminophylline (20mm, data not shown). We also
`investigated whether desensitization to VIP could block the effect of NKA. After the
`response to 0-5 um-VIP had returned to baseline, the response to a second addition
`
`A
`
`120
`
`s+----- Control
`—m— + VIP Ab (1: 200)
`
`<
`
`x8&o
`
`Oa
`@&@
`
`S£
`
`
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`-log [NKA] (mM)
`
`B
`
`200
`
`150
`
`s------ Control
`——m— + VIP Ab (1: 200)
`
`
`
`—
`
`<3& 3o 2o
`
`O£
`
`Fig. 5. Effect of pre-treatmentof rat colon with VIP antisera (VIP Ab) (1:200) on NKA-
`induced (A) and VIP-induced (B) increases in J,,. Symbols and bars are means+S8.E.M.,
`n = 4 animals. *P < 0:05.
`
`-log [VIP] (mM)
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 6 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`NEUROKININ A INCREASES SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT
`
`347
`
`of 0-5 wm-VIP was reduced by 50% or greater. The subsequent addition of NKA
`after desensitization to VIP was also attenuated (Fig. 6).
`
`100
`
`se-Q--- Control
`—ws— Desensitized to0-5 uM-VIP
`
`(uA/em?)
`Increasein[gc
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`Fig. 6. Effect of desensitization to VIP on the response to NKA-inducedincreasesin J,,.
`Symbols and bars are means+s.E.M., n = 4 animals. *P < 0:05.
`
`-log [NKA] (mM)
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The present study demonstrates that NKA stimulatesJ,, in rat colonic mucosa, in
`part through a non-cholinergic mechanism. VIP is a candidate mediator for the
`neural-associated component of NKA action as a secretagoguein this tissue. Because
`the transient nature of the J,, response elicited by NKA precluded measurement of
`ion fluxes, we examinedtheionic basis of action of NKA with bumetanide,a chloride
`transport
`inhibitor. Bumetanide inhibited the NKA-induced increase in [,,,
`suggesting that electrogenic chloride secretion is a major contributor to the J,,
`response. NKA wasineffective when added to the mucosal solution, suggesting that
`its receptors are located on the basolateral side of the cell membrane. Furthermore,
`pre-incubation of the tissues with TTX completely blocked the NKA-induced
`increases in J,, (about 95%). This suggests that the majority of the NKA-induced
`secretion is due to stimulation of neurotransmitter release from enteric neurons.
`Others have noted that NKA may act via a neural mechanism to stimulate J,, in
`rabbit ileum (Mandel & Eichold, 1988).
`The muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine was used to determine whether the
`TTX-sensitive portion of the NKA response was dueto the release of acetylcholine.
`At a concentration sufficient
`to completely block the increase in J,, due to
`bethanechol, atropine failed to prevent the J,, response to NKA. This suggests that
`acetylcholineis not likely to be responsible for the TTX-sensitive component of NKA
`action.
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 7 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`348
`
`X.-Y. TIEN AND OTHERS
`
`Tachykinins can release histamine from peritoneal mast cells (Johnson & Erdos,
`1973; Erjavec et al. 1981; Keast, Furness & Costa, 1985), and histamine stimulates
`intestinal electrolyte secretion through activation of H, receptors from different
`species (Fromm & Halpern, 1979; Linaker, McCay, Higgs & Turnberg, 1981; Cooks,
`Nemeth & Wood, 1984; McCabe & Smith, 1984; Hardcastle & Hardcastle, 1988;
`Kachur, Allbee & Gaginella, 1988). However, based on the fact that pyrilamine (an
`H,receptor antagonist) did not prevent the NKA response, histamine is not likely
`to be responsible for the effects of NKAin the rat colon. Other investigators (Kachur,
`Miller, Field & Rivier, 1982; Keast et al. 1985) also reported that H, blockers failed
`to inhibit increases in J,, elicited by another tachykinin, substance P.
`Our studies implicate VIP in the response to NKA. VIP-like immunoreactivity is
`present in submucousneurons(Ferri, Adriah, Ghatei, O'Shaughnessy, Probert, Lee,
`Buchan, Polak & Bloom, 1983) and VIP is well known to stimulate intestinal
`epithelial chloride secretion both in vivo and in vitro. Electrical field stimulation has
`been demonstrated to release VIP into the serosalfluid from segmentsof rabbit ileum
`mounted in Ussing chambers (Gaginella, O’Dorisio & Hubel, 1981) and NKA may
`evoke the neural release of VIP from the cat jejunum in response to noxious stimuli
`(Brunsson, Fahrenkrug, Jodal, Sjoqvist, Theodorsson & Lundgren, 1990). The effect
`of VIP on J,, is similar to NKA in our study and VIP antiserum blocked theeffect
`of NKA. VIPis also suggested to be involved in neurokinin inhibition of cholinergic
`myenteric neurons in the canine antrum (Mayer, Koelbel, Snape, Vandeventer &
`Leduc, 1990). Since NKA, depending on concentration, may affect both substance P
`and NKAreceptors (Maggio, 1988), we do not knowif VIP release from submucous
`neurons is physiologically regulated by NKA, substance P or both peptides.
`The argumentfor neuronal release of VIP by NKAis strengthened by results from
`the VIP-NKA cross-desensitization studies, which demonstrated that prior
`desensitization of epithelial VIP receptors by VIP decreased the sensitivity of the
`tissue to NKA.
`Ourstudies do not rule out the possibility that other mediators are involved in the
`NKAresponse. Pre-treatment with indomethacin also attenuates the NKA response
`in our preparation (data not shown). This is consistent with previous observations
`that NKAreleases prostacyclin from cultured endothelial cells (Marceau, Tremblay,
`Couture & Regoli, 1989). The role of prostanoids in mediating the effects of
`tachykinins certainly deserves future study.
`
`Weare grateful to Mary Lasquety for expert secretarial assistance and to Dr Jack Grider for
`helpful advice on the use of the VIP antibody.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Brunsson, I., FAHRENKRUG, J., JODAL, M., Ss6qvist, A., THEOoDoRsson, E. & LunpeREN, O.
`(1990). On the role of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and tachykinins in the secretory reflex
`elicited by chemical peritonitis in the cat small intestine. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 139,
`63-75.
`Cooke,H. J., Nemetu, P. R. & Woop, J. D. (1984). Histamine action on guineapig ileal mucosa.
`American Journal of Physiology 246, G372-377.
`DALSGAARD, C. J., HAEGERSTRAND, A., THEODORSSON-NORHEIM, E., Bropin, E. & HoxKFEtt, T.
`(1985). Neurokinin A-like immunoreactivity in rat primary sensory neurons: coexistence with
`substance P. Histochemistry 83, 37-39.
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 8 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`NEUROKININ A INCREASES SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT—349
`
`(1987). Peptides and neurogenic inflammation. British Medical Bulletin 43,
`
`Dockray, G. J. (1987). Physiology of enteric neuropeptides. In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal
`Tract, vol. 1, ed. Jounson, L. R., pp. 41-66. Raven, New York.
`Ersavec, F., Lempeck, F., Furorsanc-IrMan, T., Skortscu, G., DoNNERER, J., SaRta, A. &
`Houzsr, P. (1981). Release of histamine by substance P. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of
`Pharmacology 317, 67-70.
`. Ferri, T. L., Aprian, T. E., Goater, M. A., O’SHauaunsssy, D. J., Propert, L., Les, Y.C.,
`Bucuan, A.M.J., Potax, J.M. & Bioom, S8.R.
`(1983). Tissue localization and relative
`distribution of regulatory peptides in separated layers from the human bowel. Gastroenterology
`84, 777-786.
`Foreman, J.C.
`386-400.
`Fromm, D. & Hatpsrn,N. (1979). Effects of histamine receptor antagonists on ion transport by
`isolated ileum of the rabbit. Gastroenterology 77, 1034-1038.
`Gaa@inELLA, T.S., O’Dorisio, T. M. & Hupet, K. A. (1981). Release of vasoactive intestinal
`polypeptide by electrical field stimulation of rabbit ileum. Regulatory peptides 2, 165-174.
`Harpcastie, J. & Harpcastie, P. T. (1988). Involvementof prostaglandins in histamine-induced
`fluid and electrolyte secretion by rat colon. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 40, 106-110.
`Hua, X. Y., THEopoRsson-NoRHEIM, E., Broptin, E., Lunppere, J. M. & Hoxrstt, T. (1985). Co-
`existence of multiple tachykinins (neurokinin A, neurokinin K and substance P) in capsaicin-
`sensitive sensory neuronsin the guinea pig. Regulatory Peptides 13, 1-9.
`Jounson, A.R. & Erpos, E.G. (1973). Release of histamine from mast cells by vasoactive
`peptides. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 142, 1252-1256.
`Kacuvr, J. F., Attpen, W. E. & Gaatnetia, T.S. (1988). Antihistaminic and antimuscarinic
`effects of amitriptyline on guineapig ileal electrolyte transport and muscle contractility in vitro.
`Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 245, 455-459.
`Kacuur, J. F., Mruuer, R. J., Frenp, M. & Rivisr, J. (1982). Neurohumoral control ofileal
`electrolyte transport.
`II. Neurotensin and substance P. Journal of Pharmacology and
`Experimental Therapeutics 220, 456-463.
`Kanoeawa, K., Mrnamino, N., Fuxupa, A. & Matsuo, H. (1983). Neuromedin, K: A novel
`mammalian tachykinin identified in porcine spinal chord. Biochemical and Biophysical Research
`Communications 114, 553-540.
`Keast, J. R., Furnuss, J. B. & Costa, M. (1985). Different substance P receptors are found on
`mucosal epithelial cells and submucous neurons of the guinea-pig small intestine. Naunyn-
`Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 329, 382-387.
`Kimura, 8., Oxapa, M., Suara, Y., Kanagawa, I. & Manexata, E. (1983). Novel neuropeptides,
`neurokinin alpha and beta,
`isolated from porcine spinal cord. Proceedings of the Japanese
`Academy 59, series B, 101-104.
`(1981). Mechanisms of
`LinakEr, B.D., McKay, J.S., Hicas, M.D. & Turnpere, L. A.
`histamine stimulated secretion in rabbit ileal mucosa. Gut 22, 964-970.
`McCasz, R. D. & Smiru,P. L. (1984). Effects of histamine and histamine receptor antagonists on
`ion transport in rabbit descending colon. American Journal of Physiology 247, G411-418.
`Magero, J. E. (1988). Tachykinins. Annual Review of Neuroscience 11, 13-28.
`ManpveL, K.G. & ErcHHoLp, M. K. (1988). Neurokinin-stimulated electrolyte transport across
`isolated rabbit ileal mucosa is a neurally mediated process. Gastroenterology 94, A 281.
`Mantyu,P. W., Mantyu, C. R., Gatss, T., Virna, S. R. & Maaato, J. E. (1988). Receptor binding
`sites for substance P and substance K in the canine gastrointestinal tract and their possible role
`in the inflammatory bowel diseases. Neuroscience 25, 817-837.
`Marcgau, F., TREMBLAY, B., Couturg, R. & Re@ott, D. (1989). Prostacyclin release induced by
`neurokinins in cultured human endothelial cells. Canadian Journal of Physiology and
`Pharmacology 67, 159-162.
`Martuison, R. & Davison, J. 8. (1989). Regulation of epithelial transport in the jejunal mucosa of
`the guinea pig by neurokinins. Life Sciences 45, 1057-1064.
`Mayer, E. A., Kor.sen, C. B. M., Snaps, W. J. JR, VANDEVENTER, G. & Lepuc, L. (1990).
`Neurokinin inhibition of cholinergic myenteric neurons in canine antrum. American Journal of
`Physiology 258, G122-128.
`Mayer, E. A., RayBoutp, H. & KoxELBEL, C. (1988). Neuropeptides, inflammation and motility.
`Digestive Diseases and Sciences 33, 715-775.
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 9 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`350
`
`X.-Y. TIEN AND OTHERS
`
`Minamino, N., Kancawa, K., Fukupa, A. & Matsvo, H. (1984). A novel mammalian tachykinin
`identified in porcine spinal cord. Neuropeptides 4, 157-166.
`Rancacuari, P. K., McWape, D. & Donorr, B. (1987). Luminal tachykinin receptors on canine
`tracheal epithelium: functional subtyping. Regulatory Peptides 18, 101-108.
`SHANAHAN, F. & Anton, P. (1988). Neuroendocrine modulation of the immune system. Possible
`implications for inflammatory bowel disease. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 33, 41-498.
`TaMAOKI, J., UEKI, I. F., Wippicomse, J. H. & NADEL, J. A. (1988). Stimulation of Cl secretion
`by neurokinin A and neurokinin B in canine tracheal epithelium. American Review of Respiratory
`Diseases 136, 899-902.
`Tien, X.-Y., Wauuace, L. J. & GaGineia, T. S. (1988). Effects of neurokinin A, substance P and
`bradykinin on ion transport byisolated rat colonic mucosa. Gastroenterology 94, A 460.
`
`MSN Exhibit 1040 - Page 10 of 10
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket