throbber
US005359030A
`ts
`United States Patent
`5,359,030
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`[45] Date of Patent: Oct. 25, 1994
`Ekwuribe
`
`-
`
`*
`
`[54] CONJUGATION-STABILIZED
`POLYPEPTIDE COMPOSITIONS,
`THERAPEUTIC DELIVERY AND
`DIAGNOSTIC FORMULATIONS
`COMPRISING SAME, AND METHOD OF
`MAKING AND USING THE SAME
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor: Nnochiri N. Ekwuribe, Southfield, .
`Mich.
`
`[73] Assignee:
`
`Protein Delivery, Inc., Durham, N.C.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 59,701
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`May10, 1993
`
`[SU]
`
`Int. C15 oc cceeeesesssecseeee CO7K 7/40; CO7K. 7/36;
`CO7K. 17/08; CO8E 1/00
`[SZ] US. CDs cesccccsscsscccsscssesesececcceeeee 530/303; 530/307;
`530/309; 530/322; 530/345; 530/402; 530/351;
`530/409; 530/410; 530/411; 435/188; 424/85.1,
`424/85.4; 424/94.3
`[58] Field of Search ................. 435/188; 514/3, 4, 12;
`530/303, 307, 324, 309, 345, 322, 402, 326, 409,
`410, 411, 325, 351; 424/85.1, 85.2, 85.4, 85.5,
`85.6, 85.9, 94.3
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,003,792
`1/1977 Mill et ab. wc sseeenee 530/303
`4,094,196
`8/1977 Hiiperet al. wee 526/271
`
`4,179,337 12/1979 Davis etal. .....
`. 435/181
`
`4,585,754 4/1986 Meisneretal. .
`wes 5314/8
`wee 3514/3
`7/1989 Ecanow......
`4,849,405
`
`424/485
`4,963,367 10/1990 Ecanow......
`
`5/1991 Woodle et alo ow. ee 424/450
`5,013,556
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`ethylene Glycol Derivatized Superoxide Dismutase,”
`Pharm. Res. Comm., 1982 14: 11-120.
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`Primary Examiner—Seffrey E. Russel
`Assistant Examiner—Nancy J. Gromet
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Steven J. Hultquist; Fran S.
`Wasserman
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`A stabilized conjugated peptide complex comprising a
`peptide conjugatively coupled to a polymer including
`lipophilic and hydrophilic moieties, wherein the peptide
`may for example be selected from the group consisting
`of insulin, calcitonin, ACTH, glucagon, somatostatin,
`somatotropin,
`somatomedin, parathyroid hormone,
`erythropoietin, hypothalamic releasing factors, prolac-
`tin,
`thyroid stimulating hormones, endorphins, enke-
`phalins, vasopressin, non-naturally occurring opioids,
`superoxide dismutase,
`interferon, asparaginase, argi-
`nase, arginine deaminease, adenosine deaminase, ribo-
`nuclease, trypsin, chymotrypsin, and papain.In a partic-
`ular aspect, the invention comprises an insulin composi-
`tion suitable for parenteral as well as non-parenteral
`administration, preferably oral or parenteral administra-
`tion, comprising insulin covalently coupled with a poly-
`mer including (i) a linear polyalkylene glycol moiety
`and Gi) a lipophilic moiety, wherein the insulin,
`the
`linear polyalkylene glycol moiety and the lipophilic
`moiety are conformationally arrangedin relation to one
`another such that the insulin in the composition has an
`enhanced in vivo resistance to enzymatic degradation,
`Telative to insulin alone. One, two, or three polymer
`constituents may be covalently attached to the insulin
`molecule, with one polymer constituent being pre-
`ferred. The conjugates of the invention are usefully
`employed in therapeutic as well as non-therapeutic,e.g.,
`diagnostic, applications, and the peptide and polymer
`"may be covalently coupled to one another, or alterna-
`tively may be associatively coupled to one another,e.g.,
`by hydrogen bonding or other associative bondingrela-
`~tionship.
`
`Nucci, et al. “The Therapeutic Value of Poly(ethylen
`Glycol)—Modified Proteins” Ac. Drug. Del. Rev. 6:
`133-151 1991.
`‘ Conradi, R. A., et al., “The Influence of Peptide Struc-
`ture on Transport Across Caco-2 Cells,” Pharm. Res.,
`1991, 8 (12): 1453-1459.
`Abuchowski, A. and F. F. Davis, “Soluble Polymer--
`’ Enzyme Adducts,” pp. 368-383, Enzymes as Drugs, J.
`S. Holcenberg, John Wiley, 1981.
`Boccu,E.et al., “Pharmacokinetic Properties of Poly-
`33 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`|
`© BSELNE
`‘
`|
`© GLUCOSE ONLY (5 g/kg} P.O.
`700 :
`|
` HNSUUN (100zg/kq) S.C: GLUCOSE (5 9/'1g) P.O.
`i
`!
`y INSUUN (1.5 mg/ig) 7.0; GLUCOSE (5 g/kg) 20.
`600 |
`=>
`© INSULIN COMPLEX (100 pg/kg)S.C; GLUCOSE (5 g/kg) °.0.
`:
`
`Sey| w TKSUUN COMPLEX (250 jo/kq) S.C; GLUCOSE (5 a/éq) P20.
`= 50 >
`SUN COMPLEX (1.5 mg/kg)P.O: GLOCOSE(5 g/t) PO.
`
`|
`
`!
`|
`:
`
`:
`
`J
`
`
`
`# 10 L
`
`NN 4 INSUUNCOMPLEX(100juq/kg)P.O;GLUGOSE(5g/kg)P.O.
`
`=m)
`=
`
`200 =
`
`100 |
`
`ou
`0
`
`:
`30
`
`60
`TIME (MINUTES)
`
`:
`90
`
`120
`
`MSN Exhibit 1009 - Page 1 of 22
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`5,359,030
`
`Page 2
`
`a O
`
`THER PUBLICATIONS
`Igarashi, R.et al, “Biologically Active Peptides Conju-
`gated with Lecithin for DDS” Proceed. Intern. Symp.
`Cont. Rel. Bioactiv. Mater. 1990, 17 367-368.
`Taniguchi, T. et al, “Synthesis of Acyloyl Lysozyme
`and Improvementof its Lymphatic Transport Follow-
`ing Small Intestinal Administration in Rats” Proceed.
`Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioactiv. Mater., 1992, 19:
`(104-105.
`Russell-Jones, G. J. “Vitamin B12 Drug Delivery”,
`Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioactive. Mater.,
`1992, 19: 102-103.
`Baudys, M.etal, “Synthesis and Characteristics of Dif-
`ferent Glycosylated Derivatives of Insulin” Proceed.
`Intern. Symp. Cont. Rel. Bioactive. Mater., 1992, 19:
`210-211.
`Chien, Y. W., Novel Drug Delivery Systems, pp.
`‘678-679, Marcell Deffer, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1992.
`Santiago, N. et al, “Oral Immunization of Rats with
`Influenza Virus M Protein (M1) Microspheres,” Pro-
`.ceed, Intern. Symp. Cont. Rel. Bioactive. Mater., 1992,
`19: 116~117.
`Banting, R. G., et al, “Pancreatic Extracts in the Treat-
`ment of Diabetes Mellitus,” The Canadian Med. Assoc.
`J. 1922, 12: 141-146.
`
`Brange, J. et al, “Chemical Stability of Insulin. 1. Hy- |
`drolytic Degradation During Storage of Pharmaceuti-
`cal Preparations,” Pharm. Res., 1992, 9 (6): 715-726.
`Brange, J. et al, “Chemical Stability of Insulin. 2. For-
`mation of Higher Molecular Weight Transformation
`Products During Storage of Pharmaceutical Prepara-
`tions,” Pharm. Res., 1992, 9 (6) 727-734.
`Robbins, D.C. et al, “Antibodies to Covalent Aggre-
`gates of Insulin in Blood of Insulin-Using Diabetic
`’ Patients” Diabetes, 1987, 36: 838-841.
`M.Maislosetal, “The Source ofthe Circulating Aggre-
`gate of Insulin in Type I Diabetic Patientsis Therapeu-
`tic Insulin” J. Clin. Invest., 1986, 77: 717-723
`Ratner, R. E. et al, “Persistent Cutaneous Insulin Al-
`lergy Resulting from High-Molecular Weight Insulin
`Aggregates,” Diabetes, 1990, 39: 728-733.
`Oka, K. et al, “Enhanced Intestinal Absorption of a
`Hydrophobic Polymer-conjugated Protein Drug,
`Smancs, in an Oily Formulation” Pharm. Res., 1990, 7
`(8): 852-855.
`Saffran, M.et al, “A New Approachto the Oral Admin-
`istration of Insulin and Other Peptide Drugs,” Science,
`1986, 233: 1081-1084.
`
`MSNExhibit 1009 - Page 2 of 22
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 25, 1994
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,359,030
`
`““0'dby/LdNOUd
`“O'S
`4/6OOLNMNSNI
`wC'LNIINSNI
`
`SUNOH
`
`Old
`
`“SAL OO!|SVOSNPNOD¢dN0Ud
`NSdnoud(NFINSNIN¥dN0U¥d
`
`-0'd5y/69091L3LVONPNODZdNON9
`-9'S
`
`94by/6g3s09N19
`
`
`
`7p/bw 3s09m19
`
`MSN Exhibit 1009 - Page 3 of 22
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 25, 1994
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,359,030
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTSva0
`
`e
`
`QO
`
`A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Od(61/6¢)as00019“od(64/6uG1)xTdNOONTISZNAS
`
`‘O'd(64/6¢)a50am9‘a°S(64/6710¢z)X71dHODNIINSNINNAe{if
`‘O'd(64/6¢)asoonta“2's(64/571001)XF1dHODNITINSNINOY
`
`
`
`
`
`‘0'd(64/6¢)3soamea's(64/671001)NIINSNI.
`
`
`‘Od(64/6¢)asoam9“ord(64/6uC1)NINSNNS/
`
`
`
`
`‘Q'd(64/6¢)AND3S00M19
`a+0teeseoteeteeeneeyoewee
`
`
`Oeeeseae,alate
`
`(SANNA)SAUL
`
`weeeees~.
`wonvees,SM.ygucececeasree
`
`Oe.cecececeete”
`
`
`
`‘O'd(64/5¢)3sooma“0'd(64/57001)xFTdHODNINSN¥
`
`Cold
`
`0210609of
`
`wae
`
`
`
`AASeeeaecere
`
`
`
`002
`
`009
`
`00+
`00S
`00¢
`(1p/6w) 3soomd Wnyss
`
`002
`
`001
`
`MSNExhibit 1009 - Page 4 of 22
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`5,359,030
`
`CONJUGATION-STABILIZED POLYPEPTIDE
`COMPOSITIONS, THERAPEUTIC DELIVERY
`AND DIAGNOSTIC FORMULATIONS
`COMPRISING SAME, AND METHOD OF MAKING
`AND USING THE SAME
`
`BACKGROUNDOF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`The present invention relates to conjugation-stabil-
`ized (poly)peptide and protein compositions and formu-
`lations, and to methods of making and using same.
`2. Description of the Related Art
`The use of polypeptides and proteins for the systemic
`treatment of certain diseases is now well accepted in
`medical practice. The role that the peptides play in
`replacement therapy is so important that many research
`activities are being directed towards the synthesis of
`large quantities by recombinant DNA technology.
`Manyof these polypeptides are endogenous molecules
`which are very potent and specific in eliciting their
`biological actions.
`A major factor limiting the usefulness of these sub-
`stances for their intended application is that they are
`easily metabolized by plasma proteases when given
`parenterally. The oral route of administration of these
`substancesis even more problematic because in addition
`to proteolysis in the stomach, the high acidity of the
`stomach destroys them before they reach their intended
`target tissue. Polypeptides and protein fragments, pro-
`duced by the action of gastric and pancreatic enzymes,
`are cleaved by exo and endopeptidases in the intestinal
`brush border membraneto yield di- and tripeptides, and
`even if proteolysis by pancreatic enzymes is avoided,
`polypeptides are subject to degradation by brush border
`peptidases. Any of the given peptides that survive pas-
`sage through the stomach are further subjected to me-
`tabolism in the intestinal mucosa where a penetration
`barrier prevents entry into the cells.
`In spite of these obstacles, there is substantial evi-
`dence in the literature to suggest that nutritional and
`pharmaceutical proteins are absorbed through the intes-
`tinal mucosa. On the other hand, nutritional and drug
`(poly)peptides are absorbed by specific peptide trans-
`porters in the intestinal mucosa cells. These findings
`indicate that properly formulated (poly)peptides and
`proteins.may be administered by the oral route, with
`retention of sufficient biological activity for their in-
`tended use. If, however,
`it were possible to modify
`these peptides so that their physiological activities were
`maintained totally, or at least to a significant degree,
`and at the same time stabilize them against proteolytic
`enzymes and enhance their penetration capability
`through the intestinal mucosa, then it would be possible
`to utilize them properly for their intended purpose. The
`product so obtained would offer advantages in that
`more efficient absorption would result, with the con-
`comitant ability to use lower dosesto elicit the optimum
`therapeutic effect.
`The problems associated with oral or parenteral ad-
`ministration of proteins are well known in the pharma-
`ceutical industry, and various strategies are being used
`in attempts to solve them. These strategies include in-
`corporation of penetration enhancers, such as the salic-
`ylates,
`lipid-bile salt-mixed micelles, glycerides, and
`acylcarnitines, but these frequently are found to cause
`serious local toxicity problems, such as local irritation
`and toxicity, complete abrasion of the epithelial layer
`
`ho 5
`
`20
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`and inflammation of tissue. These problems arise be-
`cause enhancers are usually coadministered with the
`peptide product and leakages from the dosage form
`often occur. Other strategies to improve oral delivery
`include mixing the peptides with protease inhibitors,
`such as aprotinin, soybean trypsin inhibitor, and amasta-
`tin, in an attempt to limit degradation of the adminis-
`tered therapeutic agent. Unfortunately these protease
`inhibitorsare not selective, and endogenousproteins are
`also inhibited. This effect is undesirable.
`Enhanced penetration of peptides across mucosal
`membranes has also been pursued by modifying the
`physicochemical properties of candidate drugs. Results
`indicate that simply raising lipophilicity is not sufficient
`to increase paracellular transport. Indeed it has been
`suggested that cleaving the peptide-water hydrogen
`bondsis the main energy barrier to overcomein obtain-
`ing peptidediffusion across membranes (Conradi, R. A.,
`Hilgers, A. R., Ho, N. F. H., and Burton, P. S., “The
`influence ofpeptide structure on transport across Caco-
`2 cells”, Pharm. Res., 8, 1453-1460, (1991)). Protein
`stabilization has been described by several authors.
`Abuchowski and Davis (“Soluble polymers-Enzyme
`adducts”, In: Enzymes as Drugs, Eds. Holcenberg and
`Roberts, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., (1981))
`disclosed various methodsof derivatization of enzymes
`to provide water soluble, non-immunogenic,
`in vivo
`stabilized products.
`A great deal of work dealing with protein stabiliza-
`tion has been published. Abuchowski and Davis dis-
`close various ways of conjugating enzymes with poly-
`meric materials (Ibid). More specifically, these poly-
`mers are dextrans, polyvinyl pyrrolidones, glycopep-
`tides, polyethylene glycol and polyamino acids. The
`resulting conjugated polypeptides are reported to-retain
`their biological activities and solubility in water for
`parenteral applications. The same authors, in U.S. Pat.
`No. 4,179,337, disclose that polyethylene glycol ren-
`dered proteins soluble and non-immunogenic when
`coupled to such proteins. These polymeric materials,
`however, did not contain fragmentssuited forintestinal
`mucosa binding, nor did they contain any moieties that
`would facilitate or enhance membrane penetration.
`While these conjugates were water-soluble, they were
`not intended for oral administration.
`Meisneret al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,585,754, teaches that
`proteins may be stabilized by conjugating them with
`chondroitin sulfates. Products of this combination are
`usually polyanionic, very hydrophilic, and lack cell
`penetration capability. They are usually not intended
`for oral administration.
`Mill et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,003,792, teachesthat cer-
`tain acidic polysaccharides, such as pectin, algesic acid,
`hyaluronic ‘acid and carrageenan, can be coupled to
`proteins to produce both soluble andinsoluble products.
`Such polysaccharides are polyanionic, derived from
`food plants. They lack cell penetration capability and
`are usually not intended for oral administration.
`In Pharmacological Research Communication 14,
`11-120 (1982), Boccuet al. disclosed that polyethylene
`glycol could be linked to a protein such as superoxide
`dismutase (“SOD”). The resulting conjugated product
`showed increased stability against denaturation and
`enzymatic digestion. The polymers did not contain
`moieties that are necessary for membrane interaction
`and thus suffer from the same problems as noted above
`in that they are not suitable for oral administration.
`MSN Exhibit 1009 - Page 5 of 22
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`3
`Other techniques of stabilizing peptide and protein
`drugs in which proteinaceous drug substances are con-
`jugated with relatively low molecular weight com-
`poundssuch as aminolethicin, fatty acids, vitamin Bj,
`and glycosides, are revealed in the followingarticles: R.
`Igarishi et al., “Proceed. Intern. Syrup. Control. Rel.
`Bioact. Materials’, 17, 366, (1990); T. Taniguchi et al.
`Ibid 19, 104, (1992); G. J. Russel-Jones, Ibid, 19, 102,
`(1992); M. Baudysetal., Ibid, 19, 210, (1992). The modi-
`fying compoundsare not polymers and accordingly do
`not contain moieties necessary to impart both the solu-
`bility and membraneaffinity necessary for bioavailabil-
`ity following oral as well as parenteral administration.
`Manyofthese preparations lack oral bioavailability.
`Another approach which has been taken to lengthen
`the in vivo duration of action of proteinaceous sub-
`stances is the technique of encapsulation. M. Safran et
`al., in Science, 223, 1081, (1986) teaches the encapsula-
`tion of proteinaceous drugs in an azopolymerfilm for
`oral administration. The film is reported to survive
`digestion in the stomach but is degraded by microflora
`in the large intestine, where the encapsulated proteinis
`released. The technique utilizes a physical mixture and
`does not facilitate the absorption of released protein
`across the membrane.
`Ecanow, U.S. Pat. No. 4,963,367, teaches that physio-
`logically active compounds, including proteins, can be
`encapsulated by a coacervative-derived film and the
`finished product can be suitable for transmucosal ad-
`ministration. Other formulations of the same invention
`may be administered by inhalation, oral, parenteral and
`transdermal routes. These approaches do not provide
`intact stability against acidity and proteolytic enzymes
`of the gastrointestinal tract, the property as desired for
`oral delivery.
`Another approach takento stabilize protein drugs for
`oral as well as parenteral administration involves en-
`trapment of the therapeutic agent in liposomes. A re-
`view of this technique is found in Y. W. Chien, “New
`Drug Delivery Systems”, Marcel Dekker, New York,
`N.Y., 1992. Liposome-protein complexes are physical
`mixtures; their administration gives erratic and unpre-
`dictable results. Undesirable accumulation of the pro-
`tein componentin certain organs has been reported, in
`the use of such liposome-protein complexes. In addition
`to these factors, there are additional drawbacksassoci-
`ated with the use of liposomes, such as cost, difficult
`manufacturing processes requiring complex lypophili-
`zation cycles, and solvent incompatibilities. Moreover,
`altered biodistribution and antigenicity issues have been
`raised as limiting factors in the developmentof clini-
`cally useful liposomal formulations.
`Theuse of “‘proteinoids” has been described recently
`(Santiago, N., Milstein, S. J., Rivera, T., Garcia, E.,
`Chang,, T. C., Baughman, R. A., and Bucher, D., “Oral
`Immunization of Rats with Influenza Virus M Protein
`(M1) Microspheres”, Abstract #A 221, Proc. Int. Symp.
`Control Rel. Bicac. Mater., 19, 116 (1992)). Oral delivery
`of several classes of therapeutics has been reported
`using this system, which encapsulates the drugofinter-
`est in a polymeric sheath composed of highly branched
`aminoacids. As is the case with liposomes, the drugs are
`not chemically bound to the proteinoid sphere, and
`leakage of drug out of the dosage form componentsis
`possible.
`A peptide which has been the focus of much synthesis
`work, and efforts to improve its administration and
`bioassimilation, is insulin.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`30
`
`35
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,359,030
`
`4
`The use of insulin as a treatment for diabetes dates
`back to 1922, when Bantingetal. (“Pancreatic Extracts
`in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus,” Can. Med.
`Assoc. J., 12, 141-146 (1922)) showed that the active
`extract from the pancreas had therapeutic effects in
`diabetic dogs. Treatment of a diabetic patient in that
`same year with pancreatic extracts resulted in a dra-
`matic,
`life-saving clinical improvement. A course of
`daily injections of insulin is required for extended re-
`covery.
`The insulin molecule consists of two chains of amino
`acidslinked by disulfide bonds; the molecular weight of
`insulin is around 6,000. The B-cells of the pancreatic
`islets secrete a single chain precursor ofinsulin, known
`as proinsulin. Proteolysis of proinsulin results in re-
`moval of four basic amino acids (numbers31, 32, 64 and
`65 in the proinsulin chain: Arg, Arg, Lys, Arg respec-
`tively) and the connecting (“‘C”) peptide. In the result-
`ing two-chain insulin molecule, the A chain has glycine
`at the amino terminus, and the B chain has phenylala-
`nine at the amino terminus.
`Insulin may exist as a monomer, dimer or a hexamer
`formed from three of the dimers. The hexameris coor-
`dinated with two Zn2+ atoms. Biological activity re-
`sides in the monomer. Although until recently bovine
`and porcine msulin were used almost exclusively to
`treat diabetes in humans, numerousvariations in insulin
`between species are known. Porcine insulin is most
`similar to human insulin, from which it differs only in
`having an alanine rather than threonine residue at the
`B-chain C-terminus. Despite these differences most
`mammalian insulin has comparable specific activity.
`Until recently animal extracts provided all insulin used
`for treatmentof the disease. The advent of recombinant
`technology allows commercial scale manufacture of
`human insulin (e.g., HumulintTM0 insulin, commer-
`cially available from Eli Lilly and Company, Indianap-
`olis, Ind.).
`Although insulin has now been used for more than 70
`years as a treatment for diabetes, few studies ofits for-
`mulation stability appeared until two recent publica-
`tions (Brange, J., Langkjaer, L., Havelund, S., and Vo-
`lund, A., “Chemical stability of insulin. I. Degradation
`during storage of pharmaceutical preparations,” Pharm.
`Res., 9, 715-726, (1992); and Brange, J. Havelund,S.,
`and Hougaard, P., “Chemical stability of insulin. 2.
`Formulation of higher molecular weight transformation
`products during storage of pharmaceutical prepara-
`tions,” Pharm. Res., 9, 727-734, (1992)). In these publi-
`cations,
`the authors exhaustively describe chemical
`stability of several
`insulin preparations under varied
`temperature and pH conditions. Earlier reports focused
`almost entirely on biological potency as a measure of
`insulin formulation stability. However the advent of
`several new and powerful analytical techniques—disc
`electrophoresis, size exclusion chromatography, and
`HPLC—allows a detailed examination of insulin’s
`chemical stability profile. Early chemical studies on
`insulin stability were difficult because the recrystallized
`insulin under examination was found to be no morethan
`80-90% pure. More recently monocomponent, high-
`purity insulin has become available. This monocompo-
`nentinsulin contains impurities at levels undetectable by
`current analysis techniques.
`Formulated insulin is prone to numerous types of
`degradation. Nonenzymatic deamidiation occurs when
`a side-chain amide group from a glutaminy]or asparagi-
`nyl residue is hydrolyzed to a free carboxylic acid.
`MSN Exhibit 1009 - Page 6 of 22
`MSNv. Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`5
`There are six possible sites for such deamidiation in
`insulin: Gln45, Gin4!5, Asn418, Asn421, Asn3, and
`Gln54. Published reports suggest that the three Asn
`residues are most susceptible to such reactions.
`Brangeetal. (ibid) reported that in acidic conditions
`insulin is rapidly degraded by extensive deamidation at
`Asn4?1, In contrast, in neutral formulations deamidation
`takes place at Asn? at a much slowerrate, independent
`of insulin concentration and species of origin of the
`insulin. However,
`temperature and formulation type
`play an importantrole in determining the rate of hydro-
`lysis at B3. For example, hydrolysis at B3 is minimal if
`the insulin is crystalline as opposed to amorphous. Ap-
`parently the reduced flexibility (tertiary structure) in
`the crystalline form slows the reaction rate. Stabilizing
`the tertiary structure by incorporating phenol into neu-
`tral formulations results in reduced rates of deamida-
`tion.
`In addition to hydrolytic degradation products in
`insulin formulations, high molecular weight transforma-
`tion products are also formed. Brange et al. showed by
`size exclusion chromatography that the main products
`formed on storage of insulin formulations between 4°
`and 45° C. are covalent insulin dimers. In formulations
`containing protamine, covalent insulin protamine prod-
`ucts are also formed. The rate of formulation of insulin-
`dimerand insulin-protamine productsis affected signifi-
`cantly by temperature. For human or porcine insulin,
`(regular N1 preparation) time to formation of 1% high
`molecular weight products is decreased from 154
`months to 1.7 months at 37° C. compared to 4° C. For
`zinc suspension preparations of porcine insulin,
`the
`same transformation would require 357 monthsat 4° C.
`but only 0.6 months at 37° C.
`These types of degradation in insulin may be of great
`significance to diabetic subjects. Although the forma-
`tion of high molecular weight products is generally
`slower than the formation of hydrolytic (chemical)
`degradation products described earlier, the implications
`may be moreserious. Thereis significant evidence that
`the incidence of immunological responses to insulin
`may result from the presence of covalent aggregates of
`insulin (Robbins, D. C. Cooper, S. M. Fineberg, S. E.,
`and Mead,P. M., “Antibodies to covalent aggregates of
`insulin in biood of insulin-using diabetic patients”, Dia-
`betes, 36, 838-841, (1987); Maislos, M., Mead, P. M.,
`Gaynor, D. H., and Robbins, D. C., “The source of the
`circulating aggregate of insulin in type I diabetic pa-
`tients is
`therapeutic insulin”,
`J. Clin.
`Invest,
`77,
`717-723. (1986); and Ratner R. E., Phillips, T. M., and
`Steiner, M., “Persistent cutaneousinsulin allergy result-
`ing from high molecular weight insulin aggregates”,
`Diabetes, 39, 728-733, (1990)). As many as 30% of dia-
`betic subjects receiving insulin show specific antibodies
`to covalent insulin dimers. At a level as low as 2% it
`was reported that the presence of covalent insulin di-
`mers generated a highly significant response in lympho-
`cyte stimulation in allergic patients. Responses were not
`significant when dimer content was in the range
`0.3-0.6%. As a result it is recommendedthat the level of
`covalent insulin dimers present in formulation be kept
`below 1% to avoid clinical manifestations.
`Several insulin formulations are commercially avail-
`able; although stability has been improved to the extent
`that it is no longer necessary to refrigerate all formula-
`tions, there remains a need for insulin formulations with
`enhanced stability. A modified insulin which is not
`prone to formation of high molecular weight products
`
`_0)
`
`— 5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`60
`
`5,359,030
`
`6
`would be a substantial advance in the pharmaceutical
`and medicalarts, and modifications providing this sta-
`bility (and in addition providing the possibility of oral
`availability of insulin) would makea significant contri-
`bution to the managementof diabetes.
`In addition to the in vivo usage of polypeptides and
`proteins as therapeutic agents, polypeptides and prote-
`ins also find substantial and increasing use in diagnostic
`reagent applications. In many such applications, poly-
`peptides and proteins are utilized in solution environ-
`ments wherein they are susceptible to thermal and en-
`zymic degradationof (poly)peptides and proteins such a
`enzymes, peptide and protein hormones, antibodies,
`enzyme-protein conjugates used for immunoassay,anti-
`body-hapten conjugates, viral proteins such as those
`used in a large number of assay methodologies for the
`diagnosis or screening of diseases such as AIDS,hepati-
`tis, and rubella, peptide and protein growth factors used
`for example in tissue culture, enzymes used in clinical
`chemistry, and insoluble enzymes such as those used in
`the food industry. As a further specific example, alka-
`line phosphatase is widely utilized as a reagent in kits
`used for the colorimetric detection of antibody or anti-
`gen in biological fluids. Although such enzymeis com-
`mercially available in various forms,
`including free
`enzyme and antibody conjugates, its storage stability
`and solution often is limited. As a result, alkaline phos-
`phatase conjugates are frequently freeze-dried, and
`additives such as bovine serum albumin and Tween 20
`are used to extend the stability of the enzyme prepara-
`tions. Such approaches, while advantageous in some
`instances to enhancetheresistance to degradation ofthe
`polypeptide and protein agents, have various shortcom-
`ings which limit their general applicability.
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates generally to conjuga-
`tion-stabilized (poly)peptide and protein compositions
`and formulations, and to methods of making and using
`same.
`
`More particularly, the present invention relates in
`one broad compositional aspect to covalently conju-
`gated peptide complexes wherein the peptide is cova-
`lently bonded to one or more molecules of a polymer
`incorporating as an integral part thereof a hydrophilic
`moiety, e.g., a linear polyalkylene glycol, and wherein
`said polymer incorporates a lipophilic moiety as an
`integral part thereof.
`In one particular aspect, the present invention relates
`to a physiologically active peptide composition com-
`prising a physiologically active peptide covalently cou-
`pled with a polymer comprising(i) a linear polyalkylene
`glycol moiety and(ii) a lipophilic moiety, wherein the
`peptide,
`linear polyalkylene glycol moiety, and the
`lipophilic moiety are conformationally arrangedin rela-
`tion to one another such that the physiologically active
`peptide in the physiologically active peptide composi-
`tion has an enhanced in vivo resistance to enzymatic
`degradation, relative to the physiologically active pep-
`tide alone (i.e., in an unconjugated form devoid of the
`polymer coupled thereto).
`In another aspect, the invention relates to a physio-
`logically active peptide composition of three-dimen-
`sional conformation comprising a physiologically active
`peptide covalently coupled with a polysorbate complex
`comprising (i) a linear polyalkylene glycol moiety and
`(i) a lipophilic moiety, wherein the physiologically
`active peptide, the linear polyalkylene glycol moiety
`MSNExhibit 1009 - Page 7 of 22
`MSNv.Bausch - IPR2023-00016
`
`

`

`7
`and the lipophilic moiety are conformationally arranged
`in relation to one another such that (a) the lipophilic
`moiety is exteriorly available in the three-dimensional
`conformation, and (b) the physiologically active pep-
`tide in the physiologically active peptide composition
`has an enhanced in vivo resistance to enzymatic degra-
`dation, relative to the physiologically active peptide
`alone.
`In a further aspect, the invention relates to a multili-
`gand conjugated peptide complex.comprising a triglyc-
`eride backbone moiety, having:
`a bioactive peptide covalently coupled with thetri-
`glyceride backbone moiety through a polyalkylene
`glycol spacer group bonded at a carbon atom of the
`triglyceride backbone moiety; and
`at least one fatty acid moiety covalently attached
`either directly to a carbon atom of the triglyceride
`backbone moiety or covalently joined through a polyal-
`kylene glycol spacer moiety.
`In such multiligand conjugated peptide complex, the
`a’ and B carbon atoms of the triglyceride bioactive
`moiety may have fatty acid moieties attached by cova-
`lently bonding either directly thereto, or indirectly
`covalently bonded thereto through polyalkylene glycol
`spacer moieties. Alternatively, a fatty acid moiety may
`be covalently attached either directly or through a
`polyalkylene glycol spacer moiety to the a and a’ car-
`bons of the triglyceride backbone moiety, with the bi-
`oactive peptide being covalently coupled with the B-
`carbon of the triglyceride backbone moiety, either
`being directly covalently bonded thereto or indirectly
`bonded thereto through a polyalkylene spacer moiety.
`It will be recognized that a wide variety of structural,
`compositional, and conformational forms are possible
`for the multiligand conjugated peptide complex com-
`prising the triglyceride backbone moiety, within the
`scope of the foregoing discussion.
`In such a multiligand conjugated peptide complex,
`the bioactive peptide may advantageously be covalently
`coupled with the triglyceride modified backbone moi-
`ety through alkyl spacer groups, or alternatively other
`acceptable spacer groups, within the broad scopeofthe
`invention. As used in such context, acceptability of the
`spacer grouprefers to steric, compositional, and end use
`application specific acceptability characteristics.
`In yet another aspect, the invention relates to a poly-
`sorbate complex comprising a polysorbate moiety in-
`cluding a triglyceride backbone having covalently cou-
`pled to a,a’ and 8 carbon atoms thereof functionalizing
`groups including:
`(i) a fatty acid group; and
`Gi) a polyethylene glycol group having a physiologi-
`cally active moiety covalently bonded thereto, e.g., a
`physiologically active moiety is covalently bonded to
`an appropriate functionality of the polyethylene glycol
`group.
`Such covalent bonding maybeeitherdirect, e.g., toa
`hydroxy terminal functionality of the polyethylene gly-
`col group, oralternatively, the covalent bonding may
`be indirect, e.g., by reactively capping the hydroxy
`terminus of the polyethylene glycol group with a termi-
`nal carboxy functionality spacer group, so that the re-
`sulting capped polyethylene glycol group hasa terminal
`carboxy functionality to which the physiologically ac-
`tive moiety may be covalently bonded.
`The invention relates to a further aspect to a stable,
`aqueously soluble, conjugated peptide complex com-
`prising a physiologically active peptide covalently cou-
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`.
`
`5,359,030
`
`8
`pled to a physiologically compatible polyethylene gly-
`col modified glycolipid moiety. In such complex, the
`physiologically active peptide may be covalently cou-
`pled to the physiologically compatible polyethylene
`glycol modified glycolipid moiety by a labile covalent
`bond at a free amino acid group of the polypeptide,
`wherein the liable covalent bondis scissionable in vivo
`by bioche

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket