throbber
Case 2:22-cv-10730-GAD-APP ECF No. 39, PageID.774 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 8
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION


`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No.: 2:22-cv-10730
`Hon. Gershwin A. Drain
`
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY,
`
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF
`AMERICAS, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant,
`
`
`__________________________
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`This is a patent case. Involved are United States Patent Nos. 10,546,685 (the
`

`
`“‘685 Patent”), 10, 193,392 (the “‘392 Patent”), 7,825,537 (the “‘537 Patent”), and
`
`10,243,400 (the “‘400 Patent”). On September 6, 2022, the parties submitted their
`
`Rule 26(f) report. ECF No. 37. The parties appeared for a Scheduling Conference
`
`on September 12, 2022. At the conference, the Court set the following dates in this
`
`matter:
`
`YOU WILL RECEIVE NO FURTHER NOTICE OF THESE DATES
`
`
`Rule 26(a)(i) disclosures due:
`Stipulated Protective Order:
`Defendant’s Motion to Stay due:
`Plaintiff
`serves
`preliminary
`infringement contentions in the form of
`a chart setting forth where in the
`accused product(s) each element of the
`
`September 26, 2022
`September 26, 2022
`October 3, 2022
`October 11, 2022
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`Volkswagen Exhibit 1034
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-10730-GAD-APP ECF No. 39, PageID.775 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 8
`
`October 18, 2022
`
`October 18, 2022
`
`asserted claim(s) are found. Plaintiff
`shall also identify the earliest priority
`date (i.e. the earliest date of invention)
`for each asserted claim and produce:
`(1)
`all
`documents
`evidencing
`conception and reduction to practice
`for each claimed invention, and (2) a
`copy of the file history for each patent
`in suit.
`Parties shall meet and confer regarding
`the number of claim terms to be
`construed no later than:
`Plaintiff’s Response
`to Defendant’s
`Motion to Stay due:
`Defendant’s Reply
`Motion to Stay due:
`Defendant serves invalidity contentions
`in the form of (1) a chart setting forth
`where in the prior art references each
`element of the asserted claim(s) are
`found, and (2) an identification of any
`limitations the Defendant contends are
`indefinite or lack written description
`under section 112. Defendant shall also
`produce (1) all prior art referenced in
`the
`invalidity contentions, and (2)
`technical
`documents,
`including
`software where applicable, sufficient to
`show the operation of the accused
`product(s).
`Amendment of pleadings and joinder
`of additional parties:
`Exchange proposed claim terms to be
`construed:
`claim
`preliminary
`Exchange
`constructions and extrinsic evidence:1

`1 The parties shall disclose any extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any
`expert witness they may rely upon with respect to claim construction or
`indefiniteness. With respect to any expert identified, the parties shall identify the
`
`December 20, 2022
`
`in support of
`
`October 26, 2022
`
`December 6, 2022
`
`December 20, 2022
`
`January 10, 2023
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-10730-GAD-APP ECF No. 39, PageID.776 Filed 09/14/22 Page 3 of 8
`
`claim
`
`claim
`
`Deadline for first meet and confer to
`narrow terms in dispute and exchange
`revised list of terms/constructions:
`Defendant’s
`Opening
`claim
`construction brief due, including any
`arguments that any claim terms are
`indefinite:
`Responsive
`Plaintiff’s
`construction brief due:
`Defendant’s Reply claim construction
`brief due:
`Sur-Reply
`Plaintiff’s
`construction brief:
`Markman hearing:
`Facilitation2:
`Fact Discovery Cutoff:
`Initial Expert Disclosures and Expert
`Reports due:
`Expert Rebuttal Reports due:
`Cutoff for Expert Discovery:
`Dispositive Motion Cutoff (including
`motions
`for
`summary
`judgment,
`Daubert motions, and motions to strike
`expert reports):
`Responses to Dispositive Motions due:
`Replies
`in support of dispositive
`motions due:
`Settlement Conference with Magistrate
`Judge Anthony P. Patti:
`Pretrial filings, including those
`
`January 17, 2023
`
`January 24, 2023
`
`February 14, 2023
`
`February 28, 2023
`
`March 14, 2023
`
`TBD
`No later than April 8, 2024
`October 24, 2023
`November 7, 2023
`
`December 5, 2023
`December 21, 2023
`January 9, 2024
`
`January 30, 2024
`February 6, 2024
`
`July of 2024
`
`May 27, 2024
`
`scope of the topics for the witness’s expected testimony. Any party may utilize a
`rebuttal expert in response to a brief where expert testimony is relied upon by the
`other party. With respect to items of extrinsic evidence, the parties shall identify
`each such item by production number or produce a copy of any such item if not
`previously produced. 
`2 The parties shall submit a proposed order submitting the case to facilitation no
`later than November 1, 2023. The proposed order shall identify the name of the
`facilitator and the date set for the facilitation.   
`

`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-10730-GAD-APP ECF No. 39, PageID.777 Filed 09/14/22 Page 4 of 8
`
`required pursuant to Rule 26(a)(3)(A):
`Witness lists
`Exhibit lists
`Deposition designations
`Proposed voir dire questions
`Proposed jury instructions
`Proposed verdict forms
`Objections, oppositions, and rebuttals
`to pretrial filings
`Objections to rebuttal pretrial filings
`Pre-trial motions, including in limine
`Oppositions
`to pre-trial motions,
`including in limine
`Final Pretrial Order due:
`Final Pretrial Conference:
`Jury Trial:
`Estimated Length of Trial:
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`June 10, 2024
`
`June 17, 2024
`
`June 24, 2024
`
`July 1, 2024
`July 15, 2024 at 2:00 p.m.
`August 13, 2024 at 9:00 a.m.
`5-6 days
`
`
`
`TIME. Computation of time under this order and under any notice of any
`scheduling order or notice in this case shall be in conformity and accordance
`with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a).
`FILING OF PAPERS. The Court requires strict compliance with Local
`II.
`Rule 5.1(a)(3). Therefore, any filings that fail to comply with the font
`
`requirements described in the rule will be immediately stricken. See E.D.
`
`Mich. L.R. 5.1(a)(3) (requiring filings to contain type size for all text and
`
`footnotes to “be no smaller than 10 and ½ characters per inch (non-
`
`proportional) or 14 point (proportional)).
`
`III. DISCOVERY. Discovery shall be completed on or before the date set forth
`in the scheduling order. The court will not order discovery to take place
`subsequent to the discovery cutoff date. The discovery deadline may only
`be extended by filing a timely written motion with the court. Extensions or
`adjournments of all other dates will also only be considered upon the filing
`of a timely written motion for good cause shown. Local Rule 26.2 generally
`prohibits filing discovery materials with the Clerk. Violation of this rule
`may result in sanctions. The parties shall propose a separate order providing
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-10730-GAD-APP ECF No. 39, PageID.778 Filed 09/14/22 Page 5 of 8
`
`stipulations regarding production of ESI, which is not to include email. The
`parties reserve the right, however, to later make a particularized request to
`the Court for email discovery if a unique need for such discovery arises. The
`parties shall work cooperatively on drafting a Stipulated Protective Order,
`which they shall submit pursuant to the schedule above.
`IV. OTHER DISCOVERY ISSUES
`
`Apart from the limits imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
`limits discussed in Sections C and D, and the deadlines listed above, no
`other limits are imposed on discovery at this time.
`
`
`(a) Expert Discovery:
`
`A. The parties agree that testifying experts’ drafts reports, notes, and
`outlines of draft reports shall not be subject to discovery in this case, nor
`shall any such drafts, notes, or outlines of draft reports that the testifying
`expert prepared in other cases be subject to discovery in this case.
`Discovery of materials provided to testifying experts shall be limited to
`those materials, facts, consulting expert opinions, and other matters actually
`relied upon by the testifying expert in forming his or her final report, trial or
`deposition testimony, or any opinion in this case. No conversations or
`communications between counsel and any testifying will be subject to
`discovery unless the conversations or communications are relied upon by
`such experts in formulating opinions that are presented in reports, trial or
`deposition testimony in this case. Materials, communications, and other
`information exempt from discovery under this paragraph shall be treated as
`attorney-work product for the purposes of this litigation. This provision
`does not change the existing protections for expert discovery and exceptions
`thereto set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4).
`(b) Authenticity:
`
`For purposes of this case only, the parties agree that documents and source
`code produced by third-parties pursuant to a subpoena are presumptively
`authentic; to the extent that any party has a good faith basis to believe that a
`document produced by a third party is not authentic, it will give written
`notice to the other side and the parties will promptly meet and confer in an
`attempt to resolve the objection.
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-10730-GAD-APP ECF No. 39, PageID.779 Filed 09/14/22 Page 6 of 8
`
`V.
`
`FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND FINAL PRETRIAL
`ORDER. The Final Pretrial Order must be submitted through the document
`utilities function of the CM/ECF on or before the date set by this order. All
`witnesses must be listed in the Final Pretrial Order. Witnesses may only be
`added to the Final Pretrial Order by stipulation of the parties and leave of
`court. Counsel shall follow the procedure outlined below to prepare for the
`final pretrial conference and the Final Pretrial Order:
`A.
`Counsel for all parties are directed to confer in person (face to face) at
`their earliest convenience in order to (1) reach any possible
`stipulations narrowing the issues of law and fact, (2) deal with non-
`stipulated issues in the manner stated in this paragraph, and (3)
`exchange documents that will be offered in evidence at trial. It shall
`be the duty of counsel for plaintiff to initiate that meeting and the duty
`of opposing counsel to respond to plaintiff’s counsel and to offer full
`cooperation and assistance. If, after reasonable effort, any party
`cannot obtain the cooperation of opposing counsel, it shall be his or
`her duty to communicate with the court. The Final Pretrial Order
`shall fulfill the parties’ disclosure obligations under Federal Rule of
`Civil Procedure 26(a)(3), unless the Judge orders otherwise. All
`objections specified in Rule 26(a)(3) shall be made in this order.
`Counsel for plaintiff shall prepare a draft Final Pretrial Order and
`submit it to opposing counsel, after which all counsel will jointly
`submit the proposed order. The Final Pretrial Order should provide
`for the signature of the court, which, when signed, will become an
`Order of the court. The proposed Final Pretrial Order shall strictly
`comply with the requirements of Local Rule 16.2.
`
`
`
`* Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(b)(9), any objection based on foundation
`
`or authenticity will be deemed waived if not raised before trial.
`
`B. The following persons shall personally attend the final pretrial
`conference:
`1) Trial counsel for each party;
`2) All parties who are natural persons;
`3) A representative on behalf of any other party;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-10730-GAD-APP ECF No. 39, PageID.780 Filed 09/14/22 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`4) A representative of any insurance carrier that has undertaken the
`
`
`prosecution or defense of the case and has contractually reserved to
`
`
`itself the ability to settle the action.
`
`
`Representatives must possess full authority to engage in settlement
`
`discussions and to agree upon a full and final settlement. “Personal attendance” by
`each party is not satisfied by (1) trial counsel professing to have full authority on
`behalf of the client or (2) a party being available by telephone.
`VI. At least ONE WEEK prior to the beginning of trial, counsel shall furnish to
`the court the following:
`A.
`In jury cases, any requests for VOIR DIRE, proposed JOINT JURY
`INSTRUCTIONS and the VERDICT FORM. The parties shall file
`with the court a single set of proposed, stipulated jury instructions and
`a single, proposed verdict form. The instructions are to be typewritten
`and double spaced and shall contain references to authority (e.g.,
`“Devitt and Blackmar, Section 11.08"). Additionally, each party shall
`separately file any additional proposed instructions to which any other
`party objects. Judge’s courtesy copies and disc required. The parties
`must make a concerted, good faith effort to narrow the areas of
`dispute and to discuss each instruction with a view to reaching an
`agreement as to an acceptable form.
`In a non-jury case, proposed FINDINGS OF FACT and
`CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.
`C. A statement of claims or defenses, no longer than two pages, suitable
`to be read to the jury during opening instructions.
`VII. EXHIBITS. Counsel are required to mark all proposed exhibits in advance
`of trial. Plaintiff’s exhibits shall use numbers and Defendant’s exhibits shall
`use letters. A consecutive number and lettering system should be used by
`each party. The parties are required to exchange marked exhibits three days
`prior to the start of trial. Counsel are also required to maintain a record of all
`admitted exhibits during trial. See attached exhibit form. Counsel for each
`party must keep custody of that party’s admitted exhibits during trial. A
`party who objects to this provision must file a written objection prior to jury
`selection.
`
`B.
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-10730-GAD-APP ECF No. 39, PageID.781 Filed 09/14/22 Page 8 of 8
`
`VIII. JUDGE’S COPIES. A paper copy of electronically filed motions, briefs,
`attachments, responses, replies, proposed Final Pretrial Order, and proposed
`Joint Jury Instructions (with disc) MUST be delivered directly to the Judge’s
`chambers and labeled Judge’s copy. If any filing contains more than ten
`exhibits, two Judge’s copies are required.
`IX. The court will not allow counsel not admitted in the Eastern District to
`practice upon a special motion. All inquiries regarding admission to this
`district must be directed to the Clerk’s office at (313) 234-5005.
`LOCAL COUNSEL. An attorney admitted to practice in the Eastern
`District of Michigan who appears as attorney of record and is not an active
`member of the State Bar of Michigan must specify local counsel with an
`office in this district. Local counsel must enter an appearance and otherwise
`comply with Local Rule 83.20(f).
`
`X.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 14, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Gershwin A. Drain
`GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
`September 14, 2022, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
`/s/ Teresa McGovern
`Deputy Clerk
`

`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket