throbber
Paper No. 8
`Filed: April 5, 2023
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Patent No. 7,825,537
`Filing Date: November 14, 2008
`Issue Date: November 2, 2010
`
`Title: Inductive Power Transfer System and Method
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2022-01559
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,825,537
`Case IPR2022-01559
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Petitioner Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Patent Owner Scramoge
`
`Technology Ltd. have made an agreement that resolves all underlying disputes
`
`between the parties, including this proceeding. In an email dated April 4, 2023, the
`
`Board authorized the parties to file a joint motion to terminate this proceeding and a
`
`joint motion to file their settlement agreement as business confidential information.
`
`As required by the Board, the parties are submitting a true copy of the
`
`settlement agreement as Exhibit 1037, along with this Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`Proceeding and a Joint Motion to File Settlement Agreement as Business
`
`Confidential Information Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). The parties have agreed to
`
`waive service of the agreement.
`
`The parties jointly certify that, aside from the settlement agreement, there are
`
`no collateral agreements or understandings made in connection with or in
`
`contemplation of terminating this proceeding. The settlement agreement filed as
`
`Exhibit 1037 supersedes any other agreements or term sheets that may relate to the
`
`termination of this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`STATUS OF PROCEEDINGS
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,825,537
`Case IPR2022-01559
`
`The following are the only proceedings either between the parties in the
`
`United States or that involve the subject patent:
`
`U.S.PatentNos.|Status
`Scramoge Technology
`7,825,537
`Joint motion to dismiss in
`Limited v. Volkswagen
`view of settlementis
`AG, Case No. 2-22-cv-
`forthcoming.
`10730 (E.D. Mich.)
`
`10,193,392
`
`10,243,400 10,546,685
`
`U.S.PatentNo.|Status
`IPR2022-01559
`7,825,537
`Above-captioned
`
`
`
`pe proceeding;thismotionto
`
`IPR2022-00529
`
`10,193,392
`
`IPR2022-01309
`
`10,193,392
`
`IPR2022-01543
`
`10,243,400
`
`IPR2022-01354
`
`10,546,685
`
`terminateis filed.
`Joint motion to sever
`joinder and terminate
`proceeding withrespect to
`co-petitioner Volkswagen
`filed in IPR2022-01309.
`
`Joint motion to terminate
`being filed same day as
`this joint motion to
`terminate.
`Joint motion to terminate
`being filed same day as
`this joint motionto
`terminate.
`Joint motion to terminate
`being filed same day as
`this joint motionto
`terminate.
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,825,537
`Case IPR2022-01559
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly request that the Board terminate this
`
`proceeding in its entirety in view of the agreement the parties are filing. That
`
`agreement ends all patent disputes between the parties, including this proceeding.
`
`Both Congress and the federal courts have expressed a strong interest in
`
`encouraging settlement in litigation. See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August, 450
`
`U.S. 346, 352 (1981) (“The purpose of [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 68 is to
`
`encourage the settlement of litigation.”); Bergh v. Dept. of Transp., 794 F.2d 1575,
`
`1577 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (“The law favors settlement of cases.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S.
`
`950 (1986). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit also places a
`
`particularly strong emphasis on settlement. See Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. US.,
`
`806 F.2d 1046, 1050 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (noting that the law favors settlement to reduce
`
`antagonism and hostility between parties). Moreover, the Board generally expects
`
`that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement. See, e.g., Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 46,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Maintaining this proceeding after settlement between Patent Owner and
`
`Petitioner would discourage future settlements by removing a primary motivation
`
`for settlement, which is eliminating litigation risk by resolving the parties’ disputes
`
`and ending the pending proceedings between them. For patent owners, litigation
`
`risks include the potential for an invalidity ruling against their patents. If a patent
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,825,537
`Case IPR2022-01559
`owner knows that an inter partes review will likely continue regardless of
`
`settlement, it creates a strong disincentive for the patent owner to settle.
`
`CONCLUSION
`For the forgoing reasons, Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly request that the
`
`Board terminate this proceeding in its entirety.
`
`
`
`Dated: April 5, 2023
`
`Dated: April 5, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /Elliot C. Cook/
`Elliot C. Cook, Reg.# 61,769
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`1875 Explorer Street, Suite 800
`Reston, VA 20190-6023
`Telephone: (571) 203-2738
`Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`By: /Brett Cooper/
`Brett Cooper, Reg.# 55,085
`BC LAW GROUP, P.C.
`200 Madison Avenue, 24th Floor
`New York, NY 10016
`Telephone: (212) 951-0100
`bcooper@bc-lawgroup.com
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,825,537
`Case IPR2022-01559
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I, Lauren K. Young, certify that on April 5,
`
`2023, a copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`PROCEEDING was served via email to counsel of record for Patent Owner at the
`
`following:
`
`Brett Cooper (Reg. No. 55,085)
`E-mail: bcooper@bc-lawgroup.com
` Scramoge_Counsel@ b-clg.com
`
`Robert A. Auchter (Reg. No. 38,069)
`E-mail: robert@auchterlaw.com
`
`
`
`Patent Owner has agreed to electronic service.
`
`Dated: April 5, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Lauren K. Young/
`Lauren K. Young
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket