`Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 5:56 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Matthew Smith <smith@smithbaluch.com>; Andrew Baluch <baluch@smithbaluch.com>; #ValtrusIPR [Int]
`<ValtrusIPR@irell.com>
`Subject: |PR2022-01497 and -01545 - Request for Schedule Change
`
`isopmscentONSomeTOMASCOSTHESOURCESevonon
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Oral argument for IPR2022-01497 and -01545 is currently scheduled for February 7 following a change from
`the initially-scheduled date of January 24, 2024. On Friday December15, counsel for Patent Ownerreceived
`notice from the Federal Circuit that oral argument has been scheduled on February 7 for an appeal on which
`Jason Sheasby hasbeen identified as arguing counsel. Mr. Sheasby has extensive experience and knowledge in
`IPR matters generally, and the issues presented in these IPRs in particular, and thus Patent Ownerrespectfully
`requests a schedule change for Due Date 8 so that Mr. Sheasby can participate in the oral argument for
`IPR2022-01497 and -01545.
`
`Currently, both parties are available on 2/8 and 2/9, and Google does not oppose rescheduling the 2/7 hearings
`to either 2/8 or 2/9.
`
`Jonathan Lindsay
`(for Patent Owner Valtrus)
`
`Jonathan M. Lindsay
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`
`840 Newport CenterDrive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Direct: 949.760.5220
`
`PLEASE NOTE:This message,including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information.
`Anydistribution or use of this communication by anyone otherthan the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and
`may be unlawful. If you are not the intendedrecipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then
`delete it from your system. Thank you.
`
`EX 3004
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
