throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. __
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`SONY GROUP CORPORATION (JAPAN), SONY CORPORATION OF
`AMERICA, SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC,
`SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
`SONY ELECTRONICS INC., and
`VERANCE CORPORATION,
`
`v.
`
`MZ AUDIO SCIENCE, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01544
`Patent No. 7,289,961
`_____________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE SONY PETITIONERS
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`LISTING OF EXHIBITS
`
`1007
`1008
`
`1009
`1010
`1011
`
`Exhibit Description
`1001
`U.S. Patent No. 7,289,961 (“’961 Patent”)
`1002
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 7,289,961
`1003
`Declaration of Michael Scordilis, Ph.D.
`1004
`Curriculum Vitae of Michael Scordilis, Ph.D.
`1005
`U.S. Patent No. 6,272,176 (“Srinivasan”)
`1006
`Richard C. Cabot et al., “Detection of phase shifts in harmonically
`related tones,” in Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 24, no.
`7, pp. 568-571 (Sept. 1976) (“Cabot”) (from pages 8-11 of the Rachel J.
`Watters Declaration, Ex. 1009)
`PCT Publication WO 01/58063 (“Kudumakis”)
`John F. Tilki et al., “Encoding a hidden auxiliary channel onto a digital
`audio signal using psychoacoustic masking,” in Proceedings IEEE
`SOUTHEASTCON ’97. ‘Engineering the New Century,’ pp. 331-333
`(1997) (“Tilki”)
`Declaration of Rachel J. Watters Relating to Exhibit 1006
`U.S. Patent No. 4,546,779
`Christine I. Podilchuk et al., “Digital Watermarking: Algorithms and
`Applications,” in IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp.
`33-46 (July 2001) (“Podilchuk”) (from pages 6-21 of the Rachel J.
`Watters Declaration, Ex. 1034)
`Ingemar J. Cox et al., “Review of Watermarking and the Importance of
`Perceptual Modeling,” in Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3016, pp. 92-99
`(June 1997) (“Cox-1997”)
`Mitchell D. Swanson et al., “Robust Audio Watermarking Using
`Perceptual Masking,” in Signal Processing, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 337-355
`(May 1998) (“Swanson”)
`U.S. Patent No. 3,845,391
`U.S. Patent No. 4,931,871
`U.S. Patent No. 3,004,104
`U.S. Patent No. 5,629,739
`U.S. Patent No. 5,745,604 (“’604 Patent”)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,579,124
`Ingemar J. Cox et al., “Secure Spread Spectrum Watermarking for
`Multimedia,” in NEC Research Institute Technical Report 95-10, pp. 1-
`33 (1995) (“Cox-1995”)
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`1015
`1016
`1017
`1018
`1019
`1020
`
`- i -
`
`

`

`
`
`1021
`
`1022
`1023
`
`1024
`1025
`1026
`1027
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`1035
`
`1036
`1037
`1038
`1039
`
`Chung-Ping Wu et al., “Robust and efficient digital audio watermarking
`using audio content analysis,” in Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3971, pp.
`382-392 (2000) (“Wu”) (from pages 16-26 of the Rachel J. Watters
`Declaration, Ex. 1053)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,151,578
`Qiang Cheng et al., “Spread Spectrum Signaling for Speech
`Watermarking,” in Proceedings of 2001 IEEE International Conference
`on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 3, pp. 1337-1340
`(2001) (from pages 12-15 of the Rachel J. Watters Declaration, Ex.
`1054)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,133,534
`Declaration of Dr. Mary K. Bolin
`Declaration of Gordon MacPherson Relating to Ex. 1008
`U.S. Patent No. 6,996,521
`Jean-Claude Risset, “Exploration of Timbre by Analysis and Synthesis,”
`in The Psychology of Music, pp. 113-169 (2nd ed. 1999)
`Hideo Suzuki et al., “On the Perception of Phase Distortion,” in Journal
`of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 570-574 (1980)
`Declaration of Ziaad Khan Relating to Ex. 1008
`Stanley P. Lipshitz, “On the Audibility of Midrange Phase Distortion in
`Audio Systems,” in Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 30,
`no. 9, pp. 580-595 (Sept. 1982)
`Wen-Nung Lie et al., “Robust and High-Quality Time-Domain Audio
`Watermarking Subject to Psychoacoustic Masking,” in 2001 IEEE
`International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 45-48
`(2001) (“Lie”)
`Kaliappan Gopalan et al., “Data Embedding in Audio Signals,” in 2001
`IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, pp. 2713-2720 (2001)
`Declaration of Rachel J. Watters Relating to Exhibit 1011
`Alessandro Piva et al., “Managing Copyright in Open Networks,” in
`IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 18-26 (2002)
`Reserved- Not Used
`U.S. Patent Application Publication 2003/0028381
`U.S. Patent Application Publication 2003/0076245
`Ingemar Cox et al., “The First 50 Years of Electronic Watermarking,” in
`EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, pp. 126-132
`(2002)
`
`- ii -
`
`

`

`
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`1043
`1044
`1045
`1046
`
`1047
`1048
`1049
`1050
`1051
`
`1052
`
`1053
`1054
`1055
`
`1056
`1057
`
`1058
`
`Changsheng Xu et al., “Content-Based Digital Watermarking for
`Compressed Audio,” in RIAO2000: Content-Based Multimedia
`Information Access, vol. 1, pp. 390-402 (2000)
`Jaap Haitsma et al., “Audio Watermarking for Monitoring and Copy
`Protection,” in ACM Multimedia Workshop, pp. 119-122 (2000)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,633,653 (“Hobson”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,298,322
`U.S. Patent No. 5,450,490 (“Jensen”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,175,627 (“Petrovic”)
`Ingemar Cox et al., “Some General Methods for Tampering with
`Watermarks,” in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,
`vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 587-593 (May 1998)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,949,055
`U.S. Patent No. 6,101,602
`U.S. Patent No. 6,064,737
`U.S. Patent No. 6,141,441
`Frank Hartung, “Multimedia Watermarking Techniques,” in
`Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1079-1107 (July 1999)
`Neil Johnson, “Exploring Steganography: Seeing the Unseen,” in
`Computer, vol. 31, no. 26-34 (Feb. 1998)
`Declaration of Rachel J. Watters Relating to Exhibit 1021
`Declaration of Rachel J. Watters Relating to Exhibit 1023
`Ingemar J. Cox et al., “Secure Spread Spectrum Watermarking for
`Multimedia,” in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 6, no. 12,
`pp. 1673-1687 (Dec. 1997) (“Cox-SSSW”)
`Declaration of Gordon MacPherson Relating to Exhibit 1055
`Sotera Stipulation to be filed on September 23, 2022 in the U.S. District
`Court for the Central District of California
`Settlement Agreement
`
`- iii -
`
`

`

`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, and the Board’s
`
`authorization e-mail of May 4, 2023, Petitioners Sony Group Corporation (Japan),
`
`Sony Corporation of America, Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Sony Pictures
`
`Entertainment Inc., and Sony Electronics Inc. (collectively “the Sony Petitioners”)
`
`and Patent Owner MZ Audio Science, LLC jointly request termination of the
`
`Sony Petitioners from IPR2022-01544 as a result of a settlement. Petitioner
`
`Verance Corporation (“Verance”) will remain as the sole Petitioner in the IPR.
`
`Verance does not oppose this request to terminate the Sony Petitioners.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), a true copy of the
`
`written settlement agreement is being filed herewith as Exhibit 1058. This
`
`agreement resolves the dispute between Patent Owner and the Sony Petitioners
`
`concerning U.S. Patent No. 7,289,961 (“the ‘961 patent”). Patent Owner and the
`
`Sony Petitioners certify that there are no collateral agreements or understandings
`
`made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of this IPR.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), and the Board’s
`
`authorization e-mail, a Joint Request that the Settlement Agreement Be Treated as
`
`Business Confidential Information is being filed concurrently, and the copy of the
`
`agreement (Ex. 1058) is being filed as Board and Parties Only.
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT AND REASONS FOR RELIEF REQUESTED
`35 U.S.C. § 317(a) provides that “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request
`
`of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of
`
`the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`
`In this IPR, a Decision to Institute Trial was entered on April 21, 2023.
`
`Patent Owner has not yet filed its Response to the Petition, Petitioners have not yet
`
`filed their Reply, and the Board has not decided the merits of the proceeding.
`
`Therefore, termination of the Sony Petitioners is appropriate upon this Joint
`
`Request. The proceeding itself will not be terminated, as Verance Corporation will
`
`continue as Petitioner.
`
`III. STATUS OF RELATED PROCEEDINGS
`A. MZ Audio Sciences, LLC v. Sony Group Corporation (Japan), et
`al., Case No. 1:21-cv-0166 (District of Delaware)
`This case was dismissed on February 8, 2022, pursuant to Patent Owner’s
`
`filing a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal.
`
`B. MZ Audio Sciences, LLC v. Sony Group Corporation (Japan), et
`al., Case No. 2:22-cv-00866 (Central District of California)
`Pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, this case was dismissed with
`
`prejudice on January 23, 2023. The settlement agreement filed concurrently as
`
`(business confidential) Exhibit 1058 resolves all disputes involving the ‘961 patent
`
`between Patent Owner and the Sony Petitioners.
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`
`
`This agreement is the only agreement and understanding between Patent
`
`Owner and the Sony Petitioners made in connection with, or in contemplation of,
`
`the termination of the Sony Petitioners from this IPR.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`The Sony Petitioners and Patent Owner respectfully request termination of
`
`the Sony Petitioners from IPR2022-01544, and request that the settlement
`
`agreement (Ex. 1058) be treated as business confidential information, kept separate
`
`from the files of the ‘961 patent and IPR2022-01544.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Steven W. Hartsell/
`Sarah E. Spires, Reg. No: 61,501
`Steven W. Hartsell, Reg. No: 58,788
`SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`1601 Elm Street, Suite 4400
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: (214) 978-6600
`Facsimile: (214) 978-6601
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`MZ Audio Sciences, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`May 10, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`/Michael N. Rader/
`Richard F. Giunta, Reg. No. 36,149
`Thomas A. Franklin, Reg. No. 63,456
`Michael N. Rader, Reg. No. 52,146
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`Telephone: (617) 646-8000
`Facsimile: (617) 646-8646
`
`Counsel for Petitioners
`Sony Group Corporation (Japan),
`Sony Corporation of America,
`Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC,
`Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., and
`Sony Electronics Inc.
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Date: May 10, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/MacAulay Rush/
`MacAulay Rush
`Paralegal
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)
`I certify that on May 10, 2023, I will cause a copy of the foregoing
`
`document, including any exhibits filed therewith, to be served via electronic mail,
`
`as previously consented to by Patent Owner and Petitioner Verance Corporation,
`
`upon the following:
`
`MZAudioSciences_SDTeam@skiermontderby.com
`tehranchi-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`millikan-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket