throbber
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 56, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2007
`
`3469
`
`Synchronization and Cell-Search Technique Using
`Preamble for OFDM Cellular Systems
`
`Kwang Soon Kim, Senior Member, IEEE, Sung Woong Kim, Student Member, IEEE,
`Yong Soo Cho, Senior Member, IEEE, and Jae Young Ahn, Member, IEEE
`
`Abstract—In this paper, a novel preamble structure, including
`a synchronization field (S-field) and a cell-search field (C-field),
`is proposed for orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing-based
`cellular systems. An efficient algorithm for downlink synchro-
`nization and cell search using the preamble is also proposed.
`The synchronization and cell-search process includes the initial
`symbol-timing estimation using continuously or, at least, period-
`ically transmitted downlink signal, the frame detection, the fine
`symbol-timing estimation, the frequency-offset estimation using
`the preamble S-field, and the cell identification using the preamble
`C-field. Performance of each synchronization and cell-search step
`is analyzed and verified by computer simulation. The overall
`performance of the synchronization and cell search is then ana-
`lyzed in terms of the mean acquisition time. It is shown that the
`proposed preamble with the corresponding synchronization and
`cell-search algorithm can provide a very robust synchronization
`and cell-search capability, even in bad cellular environments.
`
`search, cellular, orthogonal-frequency-
`Index Terms—Cell
`division multiplexing (OFDM), preamble, synchronization.
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`R ECENTLY, orthogonal-frequency-division multiplexing
`
`(OFDM) has been widely accepted as the most promising
`radio transmission technology for the next-generation wireless
`systems due to its advantages such as robustness to multi-
`path fading, granular resource allocation capability, and no
`intracell interference. Among the conventional OFDM-based
`wireless systems, digital audio broadcasting, IEEE 802.11a,
`and Hiperlan/2 are well known [1]–[5]. For cellular systems,
`it is one of the most important requirements to provide ro-
`bust synchronization and cell-search capability. For example,
`the wideband code-division multiple-access (WCDMA) system
`provides a hierarchical three-step cell search using the primary
`
`Manuscript received April 19, 2005; revised April 5, 2006, November 30,
`2006, and January 17, 2007. This work was supported in part by the MIC,
`Korea, under the ITRC support program supervised by the IITA under Grant
`IITA-2006-(C1090-0602-0011) and in part by the Ubiquitous Computing and
`Network (UCN) Project, MIC 21st Century Frontier R&D Program in Korea.
`The review of this paper was coordinated by Dr. E. Larsson.
`K. S. Kim is with the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
`Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea (e-mail: ks.kim@yonsei.ac.kr).
`S. W. Kim is with the Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Suwon 442-742,
`Korea.
`Y. S. Cho is with the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
`Chung-Ang University, Seoul 156-756, Korea.
`J. Y. Ahn is with the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute,
`Daejeon 305-350, Korea.
`Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TVT.2007.901053
`
`synchronization code and the secondary synchronization code
`in the synchronization channel (SCH) and the common pilot
`channel (CPICH) [6]. However, the synchronization schemes
`used in such conventional OFDM schemes are not appropriate
`for a cellular system since they cannot discriminate signals
`from different cells unless their carrier frequencies are different.
`Thus, devising a new synchronization and cell-search technique
`for OFDM-based cellular systems is required.
`Recently, synchronization and cell-search techniques have
`been proposed for
`asynchronous OFDM–code-division-
`multiplexing cellular systems having a channel structure
`similar to the WCDMA [7], [8]. The differentially encoded
`SCH uses equally spaced subcarriers in every OFDM symbol
`and is common for every cell, while CPICH is spread by a
`cell-specific code in both the time and the frequency domains.
`However, asynchronous cellular systems generally suffer
`from longer cell-search time, particularly for a neighbor-cell
`search. Thus, synchronous cellular systems using the global
`positioning system (GPS) are considered to be more attractive
`for the next-generation cellular systems. In this paper, a novel
`preamble-based synchronization and cell-search technique
`for synchronous OFDM-based cellular systems using a novel
`preamble structure, which is comprised of a synchronization
`field (S-field) and a cell-search field (C-field), is proposed.
`The initial result of this work has been presented in [9]. The
`proposed preamble-based synchronization and cell search is
`fully analyzed, and the performance of the proposed algorithm
`is then verified by computer simulations in this paper. In
`addition, the overall performance of the proposed cell search is
`analyzed in terms of the mean acquisition time (MAT).
`
`II. PROPOSED PREAMBLE STRUCTURE
`
`A. Design Motivation
`
`In conventional OFDM-based wireless systems, such as
`IEEE 802.11a or Hiperlan/2, the functionality required for an
`initial synchronization includes signal detection, frame-timing
`estimation, and frequency-offset estimation. In order to achieve
`the above functionality, the most commonly used preamble
`structure in conventional OFDM-based wireless systems is to
`repeat a pattern, which is a sequence with a good autocorrela-
`tion property (autocorrelation function is close to the Kronecker
`delta function), a few times in a preamble symbol. Such a struc-
`ture can provide a good time and frequency synchronization
`capability and has been successfully used in many commer-
`cial systems (see [5] and [11] for more detailed discussion).
`
`0018-9545/$25.00 © 2007 IEEE
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox. Downloaded on July 13,2023 at 21:05:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`VWGoA EX1038
`VWGoA V. Neo Wireless
`IPR2022-01539
`
`

`

`3470
`
`IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 56, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2007
`
`However, for a cellular system (in a single-frequency network
`as in commercial cellular systems), neighboring cells should
`use different preambles so that a mobile station can discriminate
`signals from different cells. Thus, the functionality required
`for the synchronization and cell search includes frame-timing
`estimation, frequency-offset estimation, and cell identification.
`Note that the signal detection is not required since a cellular
`system is not a burst transmission system. Once the cell number
`is obtained, a receiver can receive the broadcasting channel
`of the cell, and the whole cell information can be retrieved.
`A straightforward way to obtain the above functionality in an
`OFDM-based cellular system is to use different sequences, as
`many as the number of different cells, as the repetitive patterns
`of the preambles. Unfortunately, such a preamble design results
`in a formidable complexity of the synchronization and cell
`search (the number of candidates is the number of samples in
`a frame times the number of different cells). Thus, a preamble
`structure for a cellular system should not only provide robust
`capability of synchronization and cell search but also enable
`us to use a low-complexity hierarchical synchronization and
`cell-search algorithm. Thus, the motivation of the proposed
`preamble design is as follows.
`1) It should provide an acceptable acquisition time even in a
`very bad cellular environment where the mobile speed is
`quite fast and the average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is
`very low.
`2) It should allow a low-complexity hierarchical algorithm.
`
`3) A natural way to perform a low-complexity hierarchical
`estimation is as follows:
`a) estimating a rough symbol timing;
`b) determining the location of the S-field symbol;
`c) estimating the exact frame timing.
`4) Step a) above can easily be done using the cyclic prefix
`(CP). In addition, Step c) can be done using the autocor-
`relation property of the S-field. Thus, the remaining task
`is to give the S-field a unique structure that differentiates
`the S-field from other ordinary OFDM symbols. This can
`be fulfilled by using the inverted postfix structure of the
`S-field.
`
`The preamble C-field is used for the cell-number identi-
`fication, and each cell with a different cell number uses a
`different preamble C-field. Then, the detailed requirements and
`the design approach of the preamble C-field are as follows.
`
`1) The best way to make OFDM signals is to use different
`subcarriers. Thus, the C-fields of adjacent cells should use
`different sets of subcarriers.
`2) To increase the number of different cells, the different
`cells (not adjacent) may use the same set of subcarriers
`with different sequences (with a good cross-correlation
`property) on these subcarriers.
`3) Even to accommodate a higher number of different cells,
`the C-field can be comprised of more than one OFDM
`symbol.
`
`The detailed preamble design from the above design strategy
`is as follows. The downlink frame structure considered in this
`paper and the proposed preamble structure (both in the time
`and the frequency domains) are shown in Fig. 1. A preamble,
`with length Tp, is located at the beginning of the frame and
`is followed by a number of data slots, where pilot symbols
`are well spread both in the time and the frequency domains.
`The length of the S-field is Tps, which is equal to the OFDM
`symbol duration Ts. The S-field signal is composed of one S
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`symbol. The IS
`symbol is the first TCP-
`symbol and one IS
`length part of the π-phase-rotated version of the S symbol, and
`the S symbol is comprised of NSsym repetitive Sa symbols.
`Here, TCP is the length of the CP. As shown in Fig. 1, one good
`example of the preamble S-field signal PS(t) is
`
`(cid:4)
`−(cid:4)
`0 ≤ t < Td
`NF −1
`k=0 g(k)ϕk(t),
`k=0 g(k)ϕk(t − Td), Td ≤ t < Tps
`NF −1
`otherwise
`
`0,
`
`(1)
`
`
`
`
`PS(t) =
`
`B. Preamble Design
`
`The rough structure of the proposed preamble to obtain
`the functionality and to meet
`the design motivation de-
`scribed in Section II-A can be determined from the following
`observations.
`1) In a synchronous system, base stations can transmit a
`common preamble for the timing-estimation stage, and
`the received signal is equivalent to the signal from a single
`transmitter through a multipath channel.
`2) We can ignore the relative frequency offset between dif-
`ferent base stations in a GPS-aided synchronous system.
`3) In order to identify the cell number, the signals from
`different base stations should be as different as possible.
`Based on the above observations, we determine to use two dif-
`ferent components, which are denoted as the preamble S-field
`and the preamble C-field, for the proposed preamble structure.
`The preamble S-field is common for all base stations and is
`used for the frame-timing estimation and the frequency-offset
`estimation. The detailed requirements and the design approach
`of the preamble S-field are as follows.
`
`where NF is the size of the fast Fourier transform (FFT),
`ϕk(t) = exp(−j2π(k− NF /2)t/Td)), Td = Ts− TCP, g(k) =
`µ(i)δK(k − iNSsym), µ(i) is a pseudorandom sequence such
`as the m-sequence, and δK(·) is the Kronecker delta function.
`1) To reduce the complexity of the cell identification, the
`Since nonzero symbol values are assigned at every NSsym
`integral part of the frequency offset should be estimated.
`subcarrier in (1), the S symbol has NSsym repetitive patterns
`This requirement can be fulfilled by using a repetitive
`(each is denoted as the Sa symbol). Among the many possible
`pattern in the preamble S-field.
`S-field signals given by (1), the signal with a low peak-to-
`2) A reliable frame-timing estimation can be fulfilled by
`average power ratio and a good correlation property can be
`designing the above repetitive pattern in the preamble
`selected as the preamble S-field.
`S-field to have a good autocorrelation property.
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox. Downloaded on July 13,2023 at 21:05:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`

`

`KIM et al.: SYNCHRONIZATION AND CELL-SEARCH TECHNIQUE USING PREAMBLE FOR OFDM SYSTEMS
`
`3471
`
`Fig. 1. Abstract downlink frame structure and the proposed preamble structure.
`
`The length of the C-field is equal to NcTs. The C-field signal
`C (t) is defined as
`of the mth cell P m
`
`n (k) is defined as
`5) Finally, cm
`
`
`(cid:4)NF
`(cid:4)NF
`
`
`C (t)
`P m
`
`=
`
`0,
`
`−1
`k=0
`−1
`k=0
`
`n (k)ϕk(t+Td−TCP), 0≤ t−nTs < TCP
`cm
`TCP ≤ t−nTs < Ts
`n (k)ϕk(t−TCP),
`cm
`otherwise
`
`n (k) =
`cm
`
`
` ψpn,qn(j), k = spn,c(j)
`
`(4)
`
`¯ψ(j),
`k = spn,p(j)
`0,
`otherwise
`where ψpn,qn(j), ¯ψ(j), spn,p(j), and spn,c(j) denote the
`jth elements of ψpn,qn, ¯ψ, spn,p, and spn,c, respectively.
`Here, we can see that, with the proposed C-field, M Nc
`different cells can be discriminated. As an example, let Nc = 2,
`P = 8, and G = 8. Then, the number of cells that can be
`discriminated is M Nc = 642 = 4096, which is large enough for
`a cellular system.
`
`C. Comparison With the IEEE802.16e Preamble Structure
`
`(2)
`n (k), 0 ≤ n ≤ Nc − 1, is the frequency-domain signal
`where cm
`at the kth subcarrier of the nth symbol of the C-field of the mth
`n (k) is as follows.
`cell. The construction of cm
`1) Let S = {s0, s1, . . . , sP−1} be a set of partitions of all
`used subcarriers. Furthermore, the ith partition si is di-
`vided into si,p and si,c.
`2) Let ψi,j, i = 0, . . . , P − 1, j = 0, . . . , G − 1, be the se-
`quences with good correlation properties and ¯ψ be a
`sequence used for known pilot-symbol pattern.
`3) For each symbol of the C-field, there are P different
`partitions and G different sequences. Thus, M = P G
`different symbols are prepared.
`4) Let pn and qn be the partition number and the sequence
`number for the nth symbol of the C-field, respectively.
`Then, the cell number m is determined by the combina-
`tion of the Nc partition numbers (p0, . . . , pNc−1) and the
`Nc sequence numbers (q0, . . . , qNc−1) as
`
`Among the recently developed OFDM-based wireless sys-
`tems, IEEE802.16e [10] OFDMA physical layer adopted 114
`different preamble patterns by using cell-specific sequences
`transmitted over one of the three frequency partitions called
`segments. In addition, an optional common synchronization
`preamble can be used at the end of the downlink frame structure
`for simpler timing estimation in which a pseudorandom code
`is transmitted on even-numbered subcarriers (two repetitive
`patterns in the time domain) with an ordinary CP. The advan-
`tage of the proposed preamble structure can be summarized as
`follows.
`1) The inverted postfix structure of the proposed preamble
`(cid:1)
`symbols) is a very unique structure that enables us
`(IS
`to find the beginning point of a frame without a fine
`timing estimation. With the proposed preamble structure,
`n=0
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox. Downloaded on July 13,2023 at 21:05:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`m =
`
`(pnG + qn)M n.
`
`(3)
`
`Nc−1(cid:5)
`
`

`

`3472
`
`IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 56, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2007
`
`mate the frame timing using the novel structure of the preamble
`S-field. As will be seen later, we evaluate a metric for the frame-
`timing estimation at the sample point obtained from the initial
`symbol-timing estimation for each OFDM symbol. Thus, the
`number of candidates in the frame-timing estimation is at most
`the number of OFDM symbols in a frame. Thus, the proposed
`hierarchical synchronization scheme has much lower com-
`plexity than the conventional synchronization schemes [11],
`[14]–[16]. Although the fine timing estimation is not an es-
`sential task required for a cell search, it is eventually required
`for successful data reception. Thus, a fine timing estimation is
`performed using the preamble S-field after the frame timing is
`obtained. In this paper, a cross-correlation-based method [11],
`[17] is adopted with a timing back-off for better performance
`[18]. Finally, frequency-offset estimation is performed by ap-
`plying an autocorrelation-based method, such as in [11] and
`[19], to the repetitive structure of the preamble S-field.
`
`A. Initial Symbol Timing and Frequency-Offset Estimation
`Let the sampled received signal be y(n) and z(k) be
`
`NCP−1(cid:5)
`
`r=0
`
`z(k) =
`
`1
`NCP
`
`∗
`
`y
`
`(k + r)y(k + r + NF )
`
`(5)
`
`where NCP is the number of samples in the CP. Then, the initial
`symbol timing τinit is obtained using the CP correlation as [12]
`
`(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)Ninit−1(cid:5)
`
`j=0
`
`τinit = arg max
`n
`
`(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)
`
`z(n + jNs)
`
`(6)
`
`Fig. 2. Proposed synchronization process.
`
`a low-complexity hierarchical synchronization algorithm
`similar to that in WCDMA [6] can be applied.
`2) The main preamble structure of IEEE802.16e can be
`considered as a special case of the proposed C-field.
`3) Additional advantages of the proposed C-field are as
`follows.
`a) Many more different cells can be implemented by al-
`lowing more than one OFDM symbol for the preamble
`C-field if necessary.
`b) The proposed C-field allows a flexible form of
`partitions.
`c) Performance can be improved by coherently combin-
`ing whole symbols with the aid of the known pilot
`sequence in the proposed C-field, provided that chan-
`nel estimation is reliable. In addition, when the pro-
`posed C-field uses a partition comprised of distributed
`clusters (adjacent subcarriers in a cluster), as shown in
`Fig. 1, the symbols within a cluster can be coherently
`combined without channel estimation.
`Thus, it is apparent that we can easily reduce the complexity
`of the synchronization and cell search, which is critical for
`a mobile station. In addition, we can expect that the cell-
`identification performance of the proposed preamble is better
`when both preambles use the same number of subcarriers since
`the proposed preamble allows coherent combining.
`
`III. SYNCHRONIZATION
`
`where Ns and Ninit are the number of samples in an OFDM
`symbol and the number of OFDM symbols used in the initial
`symbol-timing estimation, respectively. In addition, we can
`estimate the initial frequency offset init as [12]
`
`In Fig. 2, the synchronization process proposed in this paper
`is shown. In the conventional OFDM-based systems such as
`wireless LAN, all of the initial synchronization processes,
`including signal detection, are performed using the preamble
`[11]. However, in an OFDM-based cellular system employing
`frequency-division multiplexing (FDD), signals are transmit-
`ted continuously or, at least, periodically due to the common
`pilot symbols and common channels used for broadcasting.
`By taking these into account, we can devise a more efficient
`hierarchical synchronization and cell-search algorithm. First,
`the signal-detection step is not required in the synchroniza-
`tion of OFDM-based cellular systems using FDD. In addition,
`a symbol-timing acquisition within a certain range (roughly
`speaking, 10%–20% of the length of the CP, which corresponds
`to 1 dB–2 dB SNR loss) is enough for the cell search. Thus,
`as the first step of the synchronization and cell search, an initial
`symbol timing and an initial frequency offset are obtained using
`a simple CP-based methods such as in [12] and [13]. Note
`that the required length of the searching window in the initial
`τf (ι) = ιNs + τinit,
`symbol-timing estimation is at most over an OFDM-symbol
`τframe = τf (ι),
`period. After achieving the initial synchronization, we can esti-
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox. Downloaded on July 13,2023 at 21:05:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`
`Ninit−1(cid:5)
`
`j=0
`
` init =
`
`1
`2π
`
`arg
`
`
` .
`
`z(τinit + jNs)
`
`(7)
`
`Note that (7) can estimate only the fractional part of the
`frequency offset (normalized by the subcarrier spacing). The
`estimation of the integral part of the frequency offset will be
`taken care of using the preamble S-field.
`
`B. Frame-Timing Estimation
`
`synchronization, we have
`After obtaining the initial
`Nf (= Tframe/Ts) candidates for the frame timing. Here, we
`utilize the property of the preamble S-field where every OFDM
`symbol, except the preamble S-field, has a positive value of
`autocorrelation due to the CP, while the preamble S-field has
`a negative value of autocorrelation due to the inverted postfix
`structure. By exploiting the unique structure of the preamble
`S-field, the frame timing is estimated as
`0 ≤ ι < Nf
`if (cid:8) {zc (τf (ι))} < 0
`
`(8)
`
`

`

`KIM et al.: SYNCHRONIZATION AND CELL-SEARCH TECHNIQUE USING PREAMBLE FOR OFDM SYSTEMS
`
`3473
`
`τ0 = 0 and k = 0 represent the frame boundary without loss
`of generality. The complex channel gain of the lth path hl is
`assumed to be a complex Gaussian process with mean zero and
`variance βl (i.e., Rayleigh fading channel). Moreover, n(k) is
`assumed to be a complex Gaussian process with mean zero and
`variance 2σ2
`n. Define
`
`∗
`x
`
`(r)y(k + r).
`
`(12)
`
`R−1(cid:5)
`
`r=0
`
`1 R
`
`ζ(k) =
`
`In the case where NCP is sufficiently large, which is true for
`most OFDM cellular systems due to the large delay spread of
`outdoor environments, we can assume that z(k) and ζ(k) are
`Gaussian random processes with means mz(k) and mζ(k) and
`
`z(k) and 2σ2ζ (k), respectively, using the central
`variances 2σ2
`limit theorem (CLT). The statistics can be summarized as
`
`NF
`
`mz(k) ∼= (−1)δK((cid:10)k/Ns(cid:11)) Pxq(k)κ
`z(k) ∼=
`2σ4
`2σ2
`nPxκ
`n
`NCPNF
`NCP
`hlδK(k − τl)
`
`σ2
`
`mζ(k) = Px
`NF
`
`+
`
`L−1(cid:5)
`
`l=0
`
`σ2
`
`(13)
`
`(14)
`
`ζ (k) ∼=
`P 2
`+ σ2
`x κ
`nPx
`(cid:4)
`2RN 2
`RNF
`F
`|hl|2, and (cid:10)x(cid:11) is the greatest integer not
`L−1
`where κ =
`exceeding x. Here, q(k) = max(0, 1 − (u(k)/NCP)) denotes
`l=0
`the loss due to the initial timing-estimation error, where u(k) =
`|k − Ns · (cid:10)k/Ns + 1/2(cid:11)| represents the distance to the nearest
`OFDM-symbol starting point from k. Derivations are given in
`Appendix A.
`1) Initial Synchronization: The outage probability of the
`initial symbol timing Pr{|τinit| > τth} can be calculated from
`the statistic of z(k) by using a numerical method for a given
`threshold τth. In addition, the outage probability of the initial
`symbol-timing estimation can be reduced by increasing Ninit.
`In the sequel, we assume that the initial timing estimation is
`successful with the initial timing error equals to τinit. Further-
`more, we assume that the frequency offset is well estimated so
`that the effect of the remaining frequency offset in the following
`synchronization and cell-search procedure can be ignored.
`2) Frame-Timing Estimation: If the transmitted symbol is
`not the preamble S-field, i.e., ι (cid:13)= 0, it can be easily seen from
`(8) and the statistic of z(k) that the false-alarm probability of
`frame detection conditioned on the combined fading channel
`gain (κ) Pfa,frame(κ) is given by
`(cid:12)(cid:13)
`(cid:14)
`Pfa,frame(κ) = Pr {(cid:8) {z(ιNs + τinit) < 0}
`∼= Q
`2gγ2κ2
`2γκ + 1
`
`where (cid:8){x} is the real part of x, and zc(·) in (8) is the same
`as (5), except that the received samples after frequency-offset
`compensation with the initial frequency-offset estimate ob-
`tained in (7) yc(·) is used instead of y(·). For better
`frame-timing estimation performance, one may use τframe =
`minι (cid:8){zc(τf (ι))} instead of using (8), particularly when SNR
`is low. However, this will cause additional delay since the
`observation window should be at least one frame, which may
`degrade the performance of the whole cell-search process in
`terms of the MAT.
`
`C. Fine Symbol-Timing Estimation
`
`In the case where the frequency offset have both the inte-
`gral and the fractional parts, the frequency offset f can be
`estimated using the repetitive property of the preamble S-field
`as [11], [19]
`
`(cid:11)
`
` f = NSsym
`2π
`
`arg
`
`∗
`
`y
`
`(τs+r)y(τs+r+NF /NSsym)
`
`.
`
`r=0
`
`(9)
`
`(cid:10)
`NCP−1(cid:5)
`
`Note that (9) can estimate the normalized frequency offset in
`the range of [−NSsym/2, NSsym/2].
`After obtaining the frame timing, we can assume that the
`starting point of the preamble S-field is around the estimated
`frame timing τframe. Then, we can estimate the fine symbol
`timing τs with the timing backoff by taking the cross correlation
`between the frequency-offset compensated signal yc(·) with
`the result obtained in (9) and the preamble S-field signal as
`[11], [17]
`
`(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6) − NB
`
`(10)
`
`(r + Rs)yc(n + r + Rs)
`
`∗ S
`
`P
`
`(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:6)R−1(cid:5)
`
`r=0
`
`τs = arg max
`n
`
`where PS(r) is the sampled signal of the preamble S-field,
`R is the number of samples used for the fine symbol-timing
`estimation, Rs is the starting point for accumulation, and NB
`is the number of samples for the timing back-off. In OFDM
`systems, a negative timing error (estimated timing is greater
`than true timing) causes intersymbol-interference (ISI) and
`interchannel-interference (ICI) effects, while a small positive
`timing error (less than the CP length minus the channel delay)
`does not. Thus, we can reduce the ISI and the ICI effects by
`introducing an appropriate timing backoff.
`
`(cid:4)
`D. Performance Analysis
`l=0 hlδ(t − τ c
`L−1
`l ) be the channel impulse re-
`Let h(t) =
`sponse and x(k) be the sampled transmitted signal with average
`power Px/NF . Assuming that the frequency-offset estimation
`is perfect, the received signal after sampling with sampling
`period T and frequency-offset compensation is given by
`
`L−1(cid:5)
`
`l=0
`
`y(k) =
`
`hlx(k − τl) +n( k)
`
`(11)
`
`(cid:15) ∞
`√
`where γ = Px/(2σ2
`nNF ), g = q2(τinit)NCP, and Q(x) =
`x exp(−t2/2)dt. On the other hand, if the trans-
`2π)
`(1/
`where τl, which is defined by τ c
`l /T , is assumed to be an integer.
`ι = 0,
`For notational simplicity, we use y instead of yc. In addition,
`mitted symbol
`is the preamble S-field,
`i.e.,
`the
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox. Downloaded on July 13,2023 at 21:05:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`

`

`3474
`
`IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 56, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2007
`
`detection-failure probability conditioned on the combined fad-
`ing channel gain (κ) Pdf,frame(κ) is given by
`(cid:12)(cid:13)
`(cid:14)
`Pdf,frame(κ) = Pr {(cid:8) {z(τinit) > 0}
`∼= Q
`2gγ2κ2
`2γκ + 1
`
`(15)
`
`.
`
`IV. CELL IDENTIFICATION
`
`For the cell identification, we need to estimate the parti-
`tion numbers pn, n = 1, . . . , Nc and the sequence numbers
`qn, n = 1, . . . , Nc, which are used to generate the preamble
`C-field.
`In this paper, we consider a hierarchical cell-
`identification algorithm for low computational complexity. For
`each OFDM symbol in the preamble C-field, the partition
`number is estimated by calculating the received signal power
`contained in each partition and choosing the partition with the
`largest power. Then, the sequence number is estimated by com-
`paring cross-correlation values between candidate sequences
`and the received frequency symbols on the selected partition.
`Finally, we obtain the cell number from the estimated partition
`numbers and the estimated sequence numbers of the Nc OFDM
`symbols in the preamble C-field.
`
`A. Cell-Identification Algorithm
`Let Yn(k) be the received frequency-domain symbol at the
`kth subcarrier in the nth OFDM symbol. Then, for the nth
`symbol of the preamble C-field, the subcarrier partition number
`pn can be estimated as
`
`(cid:5) k
`
`ˆpn = arg max
`p
`
`|Yn(k)|2 .
`
`(18)
`
`(cid:4)
`∈sp
`l=0 hl exp(−j2πτlk/NF ) be the complex
`L−1
`Let H(k) =
`channel at
`the kth subcarrier. Then,
`from the received
`frequency-domain symbols Yn(k), k ∈ s ˆpn,p, and the known
`pilot sequence ¯Ψ, the estimated channel gain ˆH(k) can be
`obtained by applying an appropriate channel-estimation scheme
`such as the modified least-squares estimator [21]. Let χp,q be
`the cross correlation between the channel-compensated sym-
`bols in the subcarrier set sp and the sequence ψp,q, which is
`defined by
`
`|sp,c|−1(cid:5)
`
`j=0
`
`(19)
`
`∗ p
`
`(sp,c(j)) ψ
`
`,q(j)
`
`Yn (sp,c(j)) ˆH
`
`∗
`
`χp,q =
`
`|ζ(k)|2
`
`where |A| denotes the cardinality of a set A. Then, the sequence
`number of the nth symbol of the preamble C-field qn can be
`(cid:16)
`estimated as
`
`ˆqn =
`
`arg maxq (cid:8){χ ˆpn,q}, χ ˆpn,ˆqn > χth
`Detection fails,
`otherwise
`
`(20)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:17)
`|hl|
`
`n=1
`
`(−1)n+1
`
`vT w
`Rγ + vT w
`
`(cid:19)
`
`Nc−1(cid:5)
`
`where χth is the threshold for the cell identification. Finally, the
`cell number is estimated as
`
`ˆm =
`
`(ˆpnG + ˆqn)M n.
`
`(21)
`
`n=0
`
`B. Performance Analysis of the Partition Estimation
`
`Although the proposed algorithm can be applied for any
`value of Nc, any partition set S, and any sequence sets ψi,j,
`i = 0, . . . , P − 1, j = 0, . . . , G − 1, we consider a simple but
`
`v∈Vn
`Nw − NB + 1,
`× B
`vT w
`(17)
`Rγ + vT w
`where v is the L(NB) × 1 column vector whose ele-
`ments are either zero or one. In addition, w is defined by
`· · · β
`−1
`−1
`−1
`L(NB )−1]T, Vn is the collection of all v’s con-
`[β
`0 β1
`
`sisting of n elements of “one,” and B(x, y) is the beta
`function [20].
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox. Downloaded on July 13,2023 at 21:05:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`to (14) because mz(τinit) =
`Note that
`(15)
`is identical
`z(ιNs + τinit) for ι (cid:13)= 0.z(τinit) =σ 2
`−mz(ιNs + τinit), and σ2
`
`3) Fine Symbol-Timing Estimation: Although the fine
`symbol-timing estimation is not an essential part for the cell
`search, it is required for the good quality of data reception.
`In addition, it is not only required for the initial cell search
`but also required for the time tracking in an OFDM cellular
`system. Thus, it is required to analyze the performance of the
`fine symbol-timing estimation separately from the cell search in
`fading channels. In previous literature such as [15] and [18], the
`mean-square error has been used for a performance measure.
`In this paper, however, the probability that the ISI and the ICI
`occur due to the falsely estimated symbol timing is used as
`a performance measure for the fine symbol-timing estimation.
`Since the ISI and the ICI occur when a nonnegligible path exists
`before the start point of the FFT window at the receiver, we can
`define the timing-error probability Pe,timing as
`|ζ(k)|2 < max
`|ζ(k)|2
`max
`Pe,timing = Pr
`(16)
`k∈Kf
`k∈Ks
`where Ks ={k|0≤ k < NB}, Kf ={k|−N w/2≤ k < Nw/2,
`k /∈ Ks}, and Nw is the search window size of the fine
`symbol-timing estimation. Here, we assume that −(Nw/2) ≤
`τinit < (Nw/2) and that the frame-timing estimation is suc-
`cessful. Let Us be the set given by {τ0, . . . , τL(NB )−1}. Here,
`L(NB) denotes the largest integer such that τL(NB )−1 < NB.
`If we set NB to be sufficiently large so that βl (cid:17) β0 for
`l ≥ L(NB), we can further approximate |ζ(k)|2, k ∈ Kf as an
`independent and identical central chi-square random process
`|ζ(k)|2 ∼= maxk∈Ks
`|ζ(k)|2. Then, as derived in
`and maxk∈Us
`Appendix B, the timing-error probability is given by
`(cid:17)
`
`(cid:16)
`
`(cid:17)
`
`Pe,timing
`
`Pr
`
`|ζ(k)|2 < max
`max
`k∈Kf
`k∈Us
`|ζ(k)|2 |l =arg max
`|ζ(τl)|2 < max
`k∈Kf
`0≤l<L(NB )
`(cid:5)
`
`(cid:16)
`∼= Pr
`(cid:16)
`(cid:16)
`∼= E
`= 1 − L(NB )(cid:5)
`(cid:18)
`
`

`

`3475
`
`(cid:19)
`
`− τl2)
`
`(cid:18)
`− j2π(pD + d)(τl1
`(cid:19)
`NF
`
`L−1(cid:5)
`(cid:18)
`− τl2)r
`− j2π(τl1
`Nf n
`
`∗ l
`
`2 exp
`
`hl1 h
`
`l2=0
`
`exp
`
`L−1(cid:5)
`× Nf n−1(cid:5)
`
`= PxP
`NF
`
`l1=0
`
`r=0
`
`= PxP
`NF
`
`Nf nκ
`
`(25)
`
`KIM et al.: SYNCHRONIZATION AND CELL-SEARCH TECHNIQUE USING PREAMBLE FOR OFDM SYSTEMS
`
`is the signal power contained in the dth comb set. Here, the last
`equality in (25) comes from the assumption for simplicity that
`τi − τj is not an integer multiple of Nf n for 0 ≤ i (cid:13)= j < L.
`Then, using the results in [22], we obtain an upper bound on
`the partition estimation error Pe,part(κ) as
`(cid:18)
`Pe,part(κ) = Pr{ˆpn (cid:13)= pn|κ}
`≤ P − 1
`− NF γκ
`(cid:18)
`exp
`× NF /P−1(cid:5)
`22NF /P−1
`2
`(cid:4)
`
`where C(w, r) = (1/r!)
`
`r=0
`w−r−1
`k=0
`
`C (NF /P, r)
`
`(cid:21)
`
`(cid:22)
`
`.
`
`2w−1
`k
`
`(cid:19)
`
`(cid:19)
`
`r
`
`NF γκ
`2
`
`(26)
`
`useful example for the performance analysis of the partition
`estimation and the sequence estimation shown in this and the
`next sections as follows.
`1) Assume that we use all of
`the subcarriers
`for
`simplicity.
`2) Let λ(Nf s, d), 0 ≤ d < Nf s be the dth comb set of
`subcarriers with spacing Nf s (the set of equally spaced
`subcarriers starting from the dth subcarrier with spacing
`Nf s) defined as
`λ(Nf s, d) = {k|k mod Nf s = d, 0 ≤ k < NF − 1}.
`so that D = Nf s/P and
`3) Here, we choose Nf s
`Nf n = NF /Nf s are integers.
`4) The ith partition si is composed of D consecutive comb
`sets, i.e., si = ∪D−1
`d=0 λ(Nf s, iD + d).
`located at
`5) In every partition, one comb set
`center
`is used for
`transmitting pilot sequence,
`si,p = λ(Nf s, iD + (cid:10)D/2(cid:11)).
`6) The magnitude of each element in any sequence is one,
`i.e., |ψp,q(j)| = 1, ∀j.
`Then, for the nth OFDM symbol of the preamble C-field, the
`partition number is estimated as
`
`the
`i.e.,
`
`(cid:5) k
`
`|Yn(k)|2
`
`∈sp
`Z(p)
`
`ˆpn = arg max
`p
`
`= arg max
`p
`
`where
`
`Nf n−1(cid:5)
`
`D−1(cid:5)
`
`r=0
`
`d=0
`
`Z(p) =
`
`|Yn(rNf s + pD + d)|2 .
`
`(23)
`
`Let the cell number and the corresponding partition number in
`the nth pream

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket