throbber
invitrogen
`
`Two data sets. One step. Zero doubt.
`
`Confidently confirm your cell profiles with a new flow cytometerthat
`delivers flow cytometryand imaging data simultaneously. Now, you
`oan acquire cual deta quickly and easiyy. The new Invitrogen” Attune™ CytPix
`Fow Cytorneter delivers both brightfield images and flowcytomatry data sets
`simultaneously, so you canconfirm cellular characteristicsa ample quality
`confidertly without changing your protocols
`
`
`
`Enhance analysis and confidence at thermofisher.com/cytpix
`For Research Use OnlyNotforuse in dieanostic prosedures.© 2021 Thermo FisherScenic Inc. Al rans ese'ved, Al racemarksare
`te propery0 Therma FaneSeikiandis suteiiaies unlessoteraise speciiec, GOL2S211 0621
`
`SCIENTIFIC
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1029
`Apotex Exhibit 1029
`Page 1 of 9
`Page 1 of 9
`
`

`

`JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY 195:241–248 (2003)
`
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 Suppresses Choroidal
`Neovascularization and VEGF-Induced Breakdown
`of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
`
`YOSHITSUGU SAISHIN,1 YUMIKO SAISHIN,1 KYOICHI TAKAHASHI,1 RAQUEL LIMA E SILVA,1
`DONNA HYLTON,2 JOHN S. RUDGE,2 STANLEY J. WIEGAND,2
`AND PETER A. CAMPOCHIARO1*
`1The Departments of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience,
`The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Maumenee, Baltimore, Maryland
`2Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, New York
`
`Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a central role in the development
`of retinal neovascularization and diabetic macular edema. There is also evidence
`suggesting that VEGF is an important stimulator for choroidal neovascularization.
`In this study, we investigated the effect of a specific inhibitor of VEGF, VEGF-
`TRAPR1R2, in models for these disease processes. VEGF-TRAPR1R2 is a fusion
`protein, which combines ligand binding elements taken from the extracellular
`domains of VEGF receptors 1 and 2 fused to the Fc portion of IgG1. Subcutaneous
`injections or a single intravitreous injection of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 strongly suppressed
`choroidal neovascularization in mice with laser-induced rupture of Bruch’s
`membrane. Subcutaneous injection of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 also significantly inhibited
`subretinal neovascularization in transgenic mice that express VEGF in photo-
`receptors. In two models of VEGF-induced breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier
`(BRB), one in which recombinant VEGF is injected into the vitreous cavity and
`one in which VEGF expression is induced in the retina in transgenic mice, VEGF-
`TRAPR1R2 significantly reduced breakdown of the BRB. These data confirm that
`VEGF is a critical stimulus for the development of choroidal neovascularization and
`indicate that VEGF-TRAPR1R2 may provide a new agent for consideration for
`treatment of patients with choroidal neovascularization and diabetic macular
`J. Cell. Physiol. 195: 241–248, 2003. ß 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`edema.
`
`Ocular neovascularization, consisting of retinal and
`choroidal neovascularization, is an enormous public
`health problem. Retinal neovascularization occurs in
`ischemic retinopathies, the most prevalent of which is
`diabetic retinopathy, the most common cause of severe
`vision loss in young people in developed countries (Klein
`et al., 1984). Choroidal neovascularization complicates
`several diseases in which there are abnormalities of the
`Bruch’s membrane/retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE)
`cell complex, such as age-related macular degeneration
`(AMD), the most common cause of severe vision loss
`in the elderly (The Macular Photocoagulation Study
`Group, 1991). While retinal and choroidal neovascular-
`ization are responsible for the vast majority of severe
`vision loss in Americans, diabetic macular edema is the
`major cause of moderate vision loss (Klein et al., 1984).
`Multiple stimulatory factors may contribute to the
`development of retinal neovascularization, but vascular
`endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a critical role.
`Signaling through VEGF receptors is both necessary
`and sufficient for development of retinal neovascular-
`ization (Okamoto et al., 1997; Seo et al., 1999; Ozaki
`et al., 2000). VEGF also causes breakdown of the blood–
`retinal barrier (BRB) (Ozaki et al., 1997), and has been
`implicated in the early breakdown of the BRB that
`occurs in diabetes (Qaum et al., 2001). In addition,
`
`ß 2003 WILEY-LISS, INC.
`
`VEGF is also an important stimulus for choroidal
`neovascularization (Kwak et al., 2000). Therefore,
`antagonizing VEGF is a potentially useful strategy for
`several ocular diseases.
`Many approaches for antagonizing VEGF are being
`considered. One strategy is to inject relatively large
`inhibitors, such as aptamers or FAb fragments of anti-
`VEGF antibodies directly into the eye. Phase I clinical
`
`PAC is the George S. and Dolores Dore Eccles Professor of
`Ophthalmology and Neuroscience.
`
`Contract grant sponsor: Public Health Service; Contract grant
`numbers: EY05951, EY12609, P30EY1765; Contract grant
`sponsor: Foundation Fighting Blindness; Contract grant sponsor:
`Research to Prevent Blindness (Lew R. Wasserman Merit Awards
`and unrestricted grant); Contract grant sponsor: Dr. and Mrs.
`William Lake.
`
`*Correspondence to: Peter A. Campochiaro, Maumenee 719,
`The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe
`Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-9277. E-mail: pcampo@jhmi.edu
`
`Received 30 August 2002; Accepted 20 November 2002
`
`DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10246
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1029
`Page 2 of 9
`
`

`

`242
`
`SAISHIN ET AL.
`
`trials testing the safety and tolerability of this approach
`have been completed and phase II and III trials are
`planned or in progress. Preliminary reports suggest
`that inflammation may occur following intraocular
`injection of antibodies or aptamers, but this has not
`been a severe enough problem to discontinue evaluation
`of these approaches (Guyer et al., 2001; Schwartz et al.,
`2001). This approach has some concerns, because
`repeated intraocular injections carry risks of retinal
`detachment and endophthalmitis, and may not be feasi-
`ble depending upon the frequency of injections required.
`Another strategy is to avoid repeated intraocular
`injections by systemic administration of small molecule
`VEGF antagonists (Seo et al., 1999; Kwak et al., 2000;
`Ozaki et al., 2000). There is a theoretical concern that
`some beneficial types of angiogenesis, such as collateral
`formation in ischemic myocardium, may be inhibited.
`But there are no data to support this concern and it is
`equally plausible that systemic inhibition of VEGF could
`have many additional benefits, since angiogenesis has
`been implicated in tumor growth, atherosclerosis, and
`arthritis (for review, see Folkman, 1995). Oral admin-
`istration of VEGF receptor kinase inhibitors results in
`dramatic suppression of retinal and choroidal neovas-
`cularization and is a very promising approach (Seo et al.,
`1999; Kwak et al., 2000; Ozaki et al., 2000). These agents
`are selective, but not specific VEGF antagonists, be-
`cause it is difficult to inhibit VEGF receptor kinases
`without inhibiting homologous kinases such as platelet-
`derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor kinase and c-kit,
`the receptor for stem cell factor (Fabbro et al., 1999; Bold
`et al., 2000; Drevs et al., 2000; Wood et al., 2000). The
`effects of these additional activities are unknown and
`while they are being investigated, it is prudent to con-
`sider and test more selective VEGF inhibitors.
`Soluble VEGF receptors provide a very specific way to
`antagonize VEGF, and several studies have demon-
`strated that the extracellular domain of VEGF receptor
`1 (VEGF-R1) has antiangiogenic activity (Goldman
`et al., 1998; Kong et al., 1998; Honda et al., 2000; Shiose
`et al., 2000; Takayama et al., 2000; Lai et al., 2001;
`Mahasreshti et al., 2001; Bainbridge et al., 2002; Lai
`et al., 2002). A disadvantage of soluble VEGF-R1 is that
`it is cleared fairly rapidly. Pharmacokinetic properties
`can be improved by linking the ligand binding domains
`of VEGF receptors to the Fc portion of IgG, which slows
`clearance by conferring the long circulating half-life of
`an antibody to the chimeric molecule. A potential trade
`off is that the relatively large size of such constructs
`could limit tissue penetration from the systemic circula-
`tion, which is a particularly important consideration
`for treatment of ocular diseases. In this study, we have
`evaluated both local and systemic administration of a
`novel chimeric molecule, VEGF-TRAPR1R2, which com-
`prises portions of the extracellular domain of VEGFR-1
`(flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (KDR), in models of ocular neo-
`vascularization and breakdown of the BRB.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2
`Pharmaceuticals,
`(Regeneron
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2
`Tarrytown, NY) is a recombinant fusion protein that
`contains Ig domain 2 of VEGF-R1 and Ig domain 3
`of VEGF-R2 fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1
`
`(Wulff et al., 2002). VEGF-TRAPR1R2 binds VEGF with
`high affinity (kD & 1 pM) and subcutaneous injection
`of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 has been shown to
`effectively neutralize VEGF in mice with VEGF-secret-
`ing tumors (Wong et al., 2001). Recombinant human Fc
`was used as a control protein.
`
`Treatment of mice with laser-induced
`choroidal neovascularization
`Choroidal neovascularization was generated by
`modification of a previously described technique (Tobe
`et al., 1998b). Briefly, 4–5-week-old female C57BL/6J
`mice were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride
`(100 mg/kg body weight) and the pupils were dilated
`with 1% tropicamide. Three burns of 532 nm diode laser
`photocoagulation (75 mm spot size, 0.1 sec duration,
`120 mW) were delivered to each retina using the slit
`lamp delivery system of an OcuLight GL Photocoagu-
`lator (Iridex, Mountain View, CA) and a hand held cover
`slide as a contact lens. Burns were performed in the 9, 12,
`and 3 o’clock positions of the posterior pole of the retina.
`Production of a bubble at the time of laser, which
`indicates rupture of Bruch’s membrane, is an important
`factor in obtaining CNV (Tobe et al., 1998b), so only
`burns in which a bubble was produced were included in
`the study. Mice were treated with subcutaneous injec-
`tions of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment
`1 day prior to laser and on days 2, 5, 8, and 11 after laser.
`At 14 days after laser, the mice were euthanized, serum
`was collected and stored, and eyes were rapidly
`dissected for choroidal flat mounts or frozen in optimum
`cutting temperature embedding compound (OCT; Miles
`Diagnostics, Elkhart, IN).
`Some mice were given intraocular injection of 4.92 mg
`of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 in one eye and 4.92 mg Fc fragment
`in the other eye. Two weeks later, mice were perfused
`with fluorescein-labeled dextran and choroidal neovas-
`cularization was measured.
`
`Quantitative analysis of the amount
`of choroidal neovascularization
`The sizes of CNV lesions were measured in choroidal
`flat mounts (Edelman and Castro, 2000) by an investi-
`gator masked with respect to treatment group. Mice
`used for the flat mount technique were anesthetized and
`perfused with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline contain-
`ing 50 mg/ml of fluorescein-labeled dextran (2 106
`average mw, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) as previously des-
`cribed (Tobe et al., 1998a). The eyes were removed and
`fixed for 1 h in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin. The
`cornea and lens were removed and the entire retina was
`carefully dissected from the eyecup. Radial cuts (4–7,
`average 5) were made from the edge to the equator and
`the eyecup was flat mounted in Aquamount with the
`sclera facing down. Flat mounts were examined by
`fluorescence microscopy on an Axioskop microscope
`(Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) and images were digitized using
`a 3 color CCD video camera (IK-TU40A, Toshiba, Tokyo,
`Japan) and a frame grabber. Image-Pro Plus software
`(Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) was used to
`measure the total area of choroidal neovascularization
`associated with each burn with the operator masked
`with respect to treatment group. Statistical compari-
`sons were made between the size of lesions in mice
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1029
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`

`VEGF-TRAP AND OCULAR NV
`
`243
`
`treated with VEGF-TRAPR1R2 versus those in mice
`treated with Fc fragment by two-tailed t-test. In
`addition, the average size of choroidal neovasculariza-
`tion in each mouse was calculated and plotted against
`the serum level of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 obtained by ELISA.
`In some mice, the eyes were rapidly removed and
`frozen in optimum cutting temperature embedding
`compound (OCT; Miles Diagnostics). Ten mm frozen
`sections were cut through entire lesions and the sections
`were histochemically stained with biotinylated Griffo-
`nia simplicifolia lectin B4 (GSA, Vector Laboratories,
`Burlingame, CA), which selectively binds to vascular
`cells. Slides were incubated in methanol/H2O2 for 10 min
`at 48C, washed with 0.05 M Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.6
`(TBS), and incubated for 30 min in 10% normal porcine
`serum. Slides were incubated 2 h at room temperature
`with biotinylated GSA and after rinsing with 0.05 M
`TBS, they were incubated with avidin coupled to
`peroxidase (Vector Laboratories) for 45 min at room
`temperature. The slides were developed with Histo-
`Mark Red (Kirkegaard and Perry, Cabin John, MD) to
`give a red reaction product and counter stained with
`Contrast Blue (Kirkegaard and Perry).
`
`Transgenic mice with increased expression
`of VEGF in photoreceptors
`Transgenic mice with VEGF driven by the rhodopsin
`promoter develop subretinal neovascularization due to
`expression of VEGF in photoreceptors beginning at
`about P7 (Okamoto et al., 1997). Hemizygous transgene-
`positive mice were given a subcutaneous injection of
`25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment at P7, P10,
`P13, P16, and P19. At P21, the mice were sacrificed
`and the amount of subretinal neovascularization was
`quantified as previously described (Tobe et al., 1998a).
`Briefly, mice were anesthetized and perfused with 1 ml
`of phosphate-buffered saline containing 50 mg/ml of flu-
`orescein-labeled dextran (2  106 average mw, Sigma).
`The eyes were removed and fixed for 1 h in 10%
`phosphate-buffered formalin. The cornea and lens were
`removed and the entire retina was carefully dissected
`from the eyecup, radially cut from the edge of the retina
`to the equator in all 4 quadrants, and flat-mounted in
`Aquamount with photoreceptors facing upward. The
`retinas were examined by fluorescence microscopy at
`200x magnification, which provides a narrow depth of
`field so that when focusing on neovascularization on
`the outer surface of the retina, the remainder of the
`retinal vessels are out-of-focus allowing easy delineation
`of the neovascularization. The outer edge of the retina,
`which corresponds to the subretinal space in vivo, is
`easily identified and therefore there is standardization
`of focal plane from slide to slide. Images were digitized
`using a 3 CCD color video camera and a frame grabber.
`Using Image-Pro Plus software, an investigator masked
`with respect to treatment group delineated each of the
`lesions and calculated the total area of neovasculariza-
`tion per retina as previously described (Tobe et al.,
`1998a).
`
`VEGF-induced breakdown of the BRB
`Adult C57BL/6 mice were given a subcutaneous
`injection of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc and on
`the following day VEGF-induced breakdown of the BRB
`
`was quantified as previously reported (Derevjanik et al.,
`2002). Mice were anesthetized with 25 mg/kg of
`ketamine and 4 mg/kg of xylazine, pupils were dilated
`with 1% tropicamide. Intraocular injections were per-
`formed with a Harvard pump microinjection apparatus
`and pulled glass micropipets (Mori et al., 2001). Each
`micropipet was calibrated to deliver 1 ml of fluid upon
`depression of a foot switch. Under a dissecting micro-
`scope, the sharpened tip of a micropipet was passed
`through the sclera just behind the limbus into the
`vitreous cavity, and the foot switch was depressed
`6 M human vascular endothelial
`injecting 1 ml of 10
`growth factor (VEGF; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).
`Six hours later, retinal vascular permeability was
`measured using [3H]mannitol as a tracer.
`Double transgenic rho/rtTA-TRE/VEGF mice with
`doxycycline-inducible expression of VEGF in photo-
`receptors (Ohno-Matsui et al., 2002) were also used.
`Double transgenics were given a subcutaneous injection
`of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment of IgG
`and on the following day they were started on 2 mg/ml of
`doxycycline in their drinking water. The next day they
`were given a second subcutaneous injection of 25 mg/kg
`of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment and after two days,
`retinal vascular permeability was measured.
`
`Measurement of BRB breakdown
`using [3H]mannitol as tracer
`Six hours after intraocular injection of VEGF in wild
`type mice or 2 days after rho/rtTA-TRE/VEGF were
`started on doxycycline, mice were given an intraper-
`itoneal injection of 1 mCi/gram body weight of [3H]man-
`nitol (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA). After 1 h,
`mice were sacrificed and eyes were removed. The cornea
`and lens were removed and the entire retina was
`carefully dissected from the eyecup and placed within
`pre-weighed scintillation vials. The thoracic cavity was
`opened and the left superior lobe of the lung was
`removed and placed in another pre-weighed scintilla-
`tion vial. All liquid was removed from the vials and
`remaining droplets were allowed to evaporate over
`20 min. The vials were weighed and the tissue weights
`were recorded. One ml of NCSII solubilizing solution
`(Amersham, Chicago, IL) was added to each vial and the
`vials were incubated overnight in a 508C water bath.
`The solubilized tissue was brought to room temperature
`and decolorized with 20% benzoyl peroxide in toluene in
`a 508C water bath. The vials were brought to room
`temperature and 5 ml of Cytoscint ES (ICN, Aurora,
`OH) and 30 ml of glacial acetic acid were added. The vials
`were stored for several hours in darkness at 48C to
`eliminate chemoluminescence. Radioactivity was count-
`ed with a Wallac 1409 Liquid Scintillation Counter
`(Gaithersburg, MD).
`
`RESULTS
`Subcutaneous injection of VEGF-TRAPR1R2
`inhibits choroidal neovascularization
`Bruch’s membrane was ruptured at 3 locations in each
`eye by laser photocoagulation in C57BL/6 mice. One day
`prior to laser and on days 2, 5, 8, and 11 after laser, mice
`received subcutaneous injection of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-
`TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment. Retinal whole mounts from
`fluorescein dextran-perfused mice treated with VEGF-
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1029
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`

`244
`
`SAISHIN ET AL.
`
`TRAPR1R2 (Fig. 1A,B) had areas of neovascularization
`that were much smaller than those seen in mice treated
`with Fc fragment (Fig. 1C,D). Sections through Bruch’s
`membrane rupture sites in other mice treated with
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 showed complete or near-complete in-
`hibition of choroidal neovascularization (Fig. 1E,F).
`Mice treated with Fc fragment (Fig. 1G,H) had choroidal
`neovascularization similar to that seen in mice treated
`with vehicle in several other studies (Seo et al., 1999;
`Kwak et al., 2000). Measurement of the area of choroidal
`neovascularization by image analysis confirmed that
`there was significantly less neovascularization in eyes
`treated with VEGF-TRAPR1R2 compared to those trea-
`ted with Fc fragment (Fig. 1I). The level of VEGF-
`
`TRAPR1R2 was measured in plasma obtained from each
`of the mice at the time of sacrifice. Each of the mice that
`had been injected with Fc fragment had no detectable
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 in its plasma, while mice that had
`been injected with VEGF-TRAPR1R2 had plasma levels
`ranging from 57 to 205 mg/ml. All of the plasma levels of
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 between 57 and 205 mg/ml were
`associated with strong inhibition of choroidal neovascu-
`larization (Fig. 1J).
`Immediately after laser, some mice were given
`intraocular injection of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment
`of IgG. Two weeks later, mice were perfused with
`fluorescein-labeled dextran and choroidal neovascular-
`ization was measured. Mice that received intraocular
`
`Fig. 1. Subcutaneous VEGF-TRAPR1R2 suppresses choroidal neovas-
`cularization at sites of rupture of Bruch’s membrane. Adult C57BL/6
`mice were had rupture of Bruch’s membrane by laser photocoagula-
`tion in 3 locations in each eye. Prior to laser and on days 2, 5, 8, and
`11 after laser, mice received subcutaneous injection of 25 mg/kg of
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment of IgG. Parts A and B show small
`areas of neovascularization (surrounded by arrows) in retinal whole
`mounts from two fluorescein dextran-perfused mice treated with
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2. Griffonia simplicifolia (GSA) lectin-stained sections
`in two other mice treated with VEGF-TRAPR1R2 show minimal
`choroidal neovascularization (E- none visible and F- between arrows).
`Parts C and D show large areas of neovascularization (surrounded by
`
`arrows) in choroidal flat mounts from two Fc fragment-treated mice
`and GSA-stained sections from two other mice treated with Fc
`fragment show prominent areas of neovascularization (G and H,
`between arrows). Measurement by image analysis of the area of
`neovascularization on choroidal flat mounts (I) showed an average
`area that was significantly smaller ( P < 0.0001 by Student’s two-tailed
`t-test) in VEGF-TRAPR1R2-treated mice (20 eyes, 52 rupture sites)
`compared to Fc-treated mice (20 eyes, 57 rupture sites). Plasma levels
`of VEGF at the time of sacrifice determined by ELISA plotted against
`the average area of choroidal neovascularization per mouse showed
`marked suppression of neovascularization at all plasma levels
`between 50 and 200 mg/ml (J). Bar ¼ 100 mm.
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1029
`Page 5 of 9
`
`

`

`VEGF-TRAP AND OCULAR NV
`
`245
`
`Fig. 2. A single intravitreous injection of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 sup-
`presses choroidal neovascularization at Bruch’s membrane rupture
`sites. Immediately after laser, C57BL/6 mice were given intraocular
`injection of 4.92 mg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 in one eye and 4.92 mg of Fc
`fragment in the other eye. Two weeks later, mice were perfused with
`fluorescein-labeled dextran and choroidal neovascularization was
`measured. A and B: Large areas of neovascularization (surrounded
`by arrows) are seen in flat mounts from two separate mice treated with
`
`intravitreous injection of Fc fragment. C and D: Small areas of
`neovascularization (surrounded by arrows) are seen in two sepa-
`rate mice given a single intravitreous injection of VEGF-TRAPR1R2.
`E: The area of choroidal neovascularization measured by image
`analysis was significantly less (P < 0.0001; Student’s two-tailed t-test)
`in VEGF-TRAPR1R2-treated eyes (19 eyes, 54 rupture sites) compared
`to Fc-treated eyes (19 eyes, 44 rupture sites). Bar ¼ 100 mm
`
`injection of Fc fragment had larger areas of choroidal
`neovascularization (Fig. 2A,B) than those seen in
`mice that received a single intraocular injection of
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 (Fig. 2C,D). There was a statistically
`significant reduction in the mean area of neovascular-
`ization in VEGF-TRAPR1R2-injected eyes compared to
`Fc fragment-injected eyes (Fig. 2E).
`
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 inhibits subretinal
`neovascularization in Rho/VEGF
`transgenic mice
`
`Rho/VEGF transgenic mice express VEGF in photo-
`receptors starting about postnatal day (P) 7 resulting
`in extensive subretinal neovascularization by P21
`
`Fig. 3. Subcutaneous VEGF-TRAPR1R2 inhibits subretinal neovas-
`cularization in rho/VEGF transgenic mice. Rho/VEGF transgenic mice
`begin to express VEGF in photoreceptors about postnatal day (P) 7.
`At P7, mice were divided into two groups and treated with 25 mg/kg of
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 (9 mice, 17 eyes) or Fc fragment (10 mice, 19 eyes) on
`P7, P10, P13, P16, and P19, and on P21, the mice were anesthetized
`and perfused with fluorescein-labeled dextran. Retinal whole mounts
`
`from mice treated with VEGF-TRAPR1R2 showed few areas of
`neovascularization (A and B, arrows), while there were numerous
`clumps of new vessels in the subretinal space of mice that had been
`treated with Fc fragment (C and D, arrows). Measurement of the total
`area of neovascularization per retina by image analysis showed
`significantly less neovascularization in VEGF-TRAPR1R2-treated
`mice, compared to those treated with Fc fragment (E). Bar ¼ 100 mm.
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1029
`Page 6 of 9
`
`

`

`246
`
`SAISHIN ET AL.
`
`(Okamoto et al., 1997; Tobe et al., 1998a). Rho/VEGF
`mice received subcutaneous injection of 25 mg/kg of
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment of IgG on P7, P10, P13,
`P16, and P19, and on P21, they were perfused with
`fluorescein-labeled dextran. Mice treated with VEGF-
`TRAPR1R2 had very few clumps of neovascularization
`(Fig. 3A,B, arrows), while there were numerous clumps
`of new vessels in the subretinal space of mice that had
`been treated with Fc fragment of IgG (Fig. 3C,D,
`arrows). Image analysis showed that mice treated with
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 had an average area of neovascular-
`ization per retina that was significantly smaller total
`area than mice treated with Fc fragment (Fig. 3E).
`
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 inhibits VEGF-induced
`breakdown of the BRB
`Adult C57BL/6 mice were given a subcutaneous
`injection of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment
`and on the following day received an intravitreous
`6 M VEGF. Six hours later, retinal
`injection of 1 mg of 10
`vascular permeability was measured using [3H]manni-
`tol as a tracer. Mice treated with VEGF-TRAPR1R2 had a
`significantly smaller retina to lung leakage ratio than
`mice treated with Fc fragment of IgG indicating less
`breakdown of the BRB (Fig. 4A).
`We have previously produced and characterized
`double transgenic mice with doxycycline-inducible
`expression of VEGF in the retina (Ohno-Matsui et al.,
`2002). Double transgenics were given a subcutaneous
`injection of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment
`and on the following day they were started on 2 mg/ml of
`doxycycline in their drinking water. Two days later, they
`were given a second subcutaneous injection of 25 mg/kg
`of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment and then the next
`day retinal vascular permeability was measured with
`[3H]mannitol. Double transgenic mice treated with
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 had a significant reduction in the
`retina to lung leakage ratio compared to mice treated
`with Fc fragment (Fig. 4B).
`
`DISCUSSION
`Retinal ischemia is the underlying cause of retinal
`neovascularization. Since VEGF and VEGFR1 are
`upregulated in ischemic tissue (Forsythe et al., 1996;
`Gerber et al., 1997; Iyer et al., 1998), it is not surprising
`that VEGF plays a central role in the pathogenesis of
`retinal neovascularization. The pathogenesis of chor-
`oidal neovascularization is poorly understood. Choroi-
`dal blood flow is decreased in patients with AMD
`(Grunwald et al., 1998; Ross and Barofsky, 1998), but
`it is not known if this is sufficient to cause hypoxia. Also,
`it is unlikely that hypoxia is present in other disease
`processes, such as ocular histoplasmosis or degenerative
`myopia, in which choroidal neovascularization occurs in
`young patients. Since ischemia has not been implicated
`in the pathogenesis of choroidal neovascularization,
`this piece of evidence that made VEGF a prime suspect
`for retinal neovascularization is lacking for choroidal
`neovascularization. On the other hand, surgically re-
`moved choroidal neovascular membranes show im-
`munohistochemical staining for VEGF (Amin et al.,
`1994; Frank et al., 1996; Kvanta et al., 1996; Lopez et al.,
`1996) and there is increased VEGF mRNA in experi-
`mentally induced choroidal neovascularization (Ogata
`
`Fig. 4. Subcutaneous injections of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 suppress VEGF-
`induced breakdown of the BRB. Adult C57BL/6 mice were given a
`subcutaneous injection of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment
`and on the following day received an intravitreous injection of 1 mg of
`6 M VEGF. Six hours later, retinal vascular permeability was
`10
`measured using [3H]mannitol as a tracer. Mice treated with VEGF-
`TRAPR1R2 (9 mice, 18 eyes) had a significantly smaller retina to lung
`leakage ratio (RLLR) than mice treated with Fc fragment (9 mice,
`18 eyes) indicating less breakdown of the BRB (A). Double transgenic
`rtTA/rho-TRE/VEGF mice with doxycycline-inducible expression of
`VEGF in the retina were given a subcutaneous injection of 25 mg/kg of
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 (10 mice, 20 eyes) or Fc fragment (10 mice, 20 eyes)
`and on the following day they were started on 2 mg/ml of doxycycline
`in their drinking water. Two days later, they were given a second
`subcutaneous injection of 25 mg/kg of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 or Fc fragment
`and then the next day retinal vascular permeability was measured
`with [3H]mannitol as described in Materials and Methods. Double
`transgenic mice treated with VEGF-TRAPR1R2 had a significant
`reduction in the retina to lung leakage ratio compared to mice treated
`with Fc fragment (B).
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1029
`Page 7 of 9
`
`

`

`VEGF-TRAP AND OCULAR NV
`
`247
`
`et al., 1996; Yi et al., 1997). Using a combination of
`kinase inhibitors, we previously demonstrated that
`VEGF signaling is necessary for development of chor-
`oidal neovascularization after laser-induced rupture of
`Bruch’s membrane (Kwak et al., 2000). In the present
`study, using VEGF-TRAPR1R2, a completely different
`type of VEGF inhibitor that is highly specific, we have
`confirmed that VEGF plays a prominent role in the
`development of choroidal neovascularization.
`Systemic administration of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 also
`markedly decreased neovascularization in rho/VEGF
`transgenic mice and reduced VEGF-induced breakdown
`of the BRB. Systemic administration of an earlier
`version of the VEGF-Trap also has been shown to reduce
`elevated ICAM-1 and eNOS levels, inhibit leukostasis,
`and normalize vascular permeability in the retinas of
`diabetic rodents (Qaum et al., 2001; Joussen et al., 2002;
`Poulaki et al., 2002). Thus, in model disease settings
`similar to diabetic retinopathy in humans, circulating
`VEGF-Traps penetrate into the retina and exert a
`strong therapeutic effect. The angiogenic stimulus is
`sustained in rho/VEGF mice, and subcutaneous injec-
`tions of VEGF-TRAPR1R2 every third day provided
`intraocular levels sufficient to neutralize this sustained
`stimulus. These data suggest that VEGF-TRAPR1R2
`deserves consideration as a potential treatment for two
`complications of diabetic retinopathy, retinal neovascu-
`larization and macular edema.
`The effects of long-term systemic inhibition of VEGF
`are unknown. While there are theoretical reasons why
`this could be problematic, VEGF inhibitors have been
`tested as adjuncts to chemotherapy in cancer trials, and
`there have not been reports of severe problems clearly
`linked to blockade of VEGF. Should systemic inhibi-
`tion of VEGF prove problematic, there is an alter-
`native, because we have shown that, as is the case for
`other anti-VEGF approaches (EyeTech Study Group,
`2002; Kryzstolik et al., 2002), local administration of
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 by intravitreous injection is a viable
`alternative. A single intravitreous injection of VEGF-
`TRAPR1R2 markedly suppressed the development of
`choroidal neovascularization over the course of two
`weeks.
`This study suggests that VEGF-TRAPR1R2 has poten-
`tial as a therapeutic agent for several VEGF-related
`retinal and choroidal diseases. Clinical trials are ne-
`eded to assess the effect of subcutaneously administered
`VEGF-TRAPR1R2 in patients with retinal neovascular-
`ization and/or macular edema due to ischemic retino-
`pathies including diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein
`occlusions, and in patients with choroidal neovascular-
`ization. Concurrently, additional preclinical studies
`should explore modes of local delivery to the eye that
`can be used adjunctively or as an alternative to systemic
`administration.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`The Research to Prevent Blindness grant was
`awarded to P.A.C. as Lew R. Wasserman Merit Awards.
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`Amin R, Pulkin JE, Frank RN. 1994. Growth factor localization in
`choroidal neovascular membranes of age-related macular degen-
`eration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:3178–3188.
`
`Bainbridge J, Mistry A, Alwis MD, Paleolog E, Baker A, Thrasher AJ,
`Ali RR. 2002. Inhibition of retinal neovascularization by gene tra-
`nsfer of soluble VEGF receptor sFlt-1. Gene Ther 9:320–326.
`Bold G, Altmann K-H, Bruggen J, Frei J, Lang M, Manley PW,
`Traxler P, Wietfeld B, Buchdunger E, Cozens R, Ferrari S, Furet P,
`Hofmann F, Martiny-Baron G, Mestan J, Rosel J, Sills M, Stover D,
`Acemonglu F, Boss E, Emmengger R, Lasser L, Masso E, Roth R,
`Schlachter C, Vetterli W, Wyss D, Wood JM. 2000. New anilino-
`phthalazines as potent and orally well absorbed inhibitors of the
`VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases useful as antagonists of tumor
`driven angiogenesis. J Med Chem 43:2310–2323.
`Derevjanik NL, Vinores SA, Xiao W-H, Mori K, Turon T, Hudish T,
`Dong S, Campochiaro PA. 2002. Quantitative assessment of the
`integrity of the blood–retinal barrier in mice. Invest Ophthalmol
`Vis Sci 43:2462–2467.
`Drevs J, Hofmann I, Hugenschmidt H, Wittig C, Madjar H, Muller M,
`Wood J, Martiny-Baron G, Unger C, Marme D. 2000. Effects of
`PTK787/ZK 222584, a specific inhibitor of vascular endothelial
`growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, on primary tumor,
`metastasis, vessel density, and blood flow in a murine renal cell
`carcinoma model.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket