throbber
APPENDIX 2: Eligibility Criteria
`
`Inclusion Criteria
`x
`Men and women ≥50 years of age.
`x
`
`Active primary subfoveal CNV lesions secondary to AMD, including juxtafoveal
`
`lesions that affect the fovea as evidenced by FA in the study eye
`
`CNV must be at least 50% of total lesion size
`
`ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity of: 20/40 to 20/320 (letter score of 73 to 25) in
`
`x
`x
`
`the study eye.
`x Willing, committed, and able to return for ALL clinic visits and complete all study-
`
`related procedures.
`
`Able to read, (or, if unable to read due to visual impairment, be read to verbatim by
`
`the person administering the informed consent or a family member) understand and
`
`willing to sign the informed consent form.
`
`Signed informed consent form
`
`x
`
`x
`
`Exclusion Criteria:
`x
`
`Any prior ocular (in the study eye) or systemic treatment or surgery for neovascular
`
`x
`
`x
`
`
`
`AMD except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`
`Any prior or concomitant therapy with another investigational agent to treat
`
`neovascular AMD in the study eye, except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`
`Prior treatment with anti-VEGF agents as follows:
`o
`o
`
`Prior treatment with anti VEGF therapy in the fellow eye with an
`
`Prior treatment with anti VEGF therapy in the study eye is not allowed.
`
`investigational agent (not FDA approved, e.g. bevacizumab) is allowed up
`
`to 3 months prior to first dose in the study, and such treatment will not be
`
`allowed during the study. Prior treatment with an FDA/Health Canada
`
`approved anti VEGF therapy in the fellow eye is allowed.
`
`1
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`Page 1 of 34
`
`

`

`o
`
`Prior systemic anti VEGF therapy, investigational or FDA/Health Canada
`
`approved, is only allowed up to 3 months prior to first dose, and will not
`
`be allowed during the study.
`
`Total lesion size > 12 disc areas (30.5 mm2), including blood, scars and
`
`neovascularization) as assessed by FA in the study eye.
`
`Subretinal hemorrhage that is either 50% or more of the total lesion area, or if the
`
`blood is under the fovea and is 1 or more disc areas in size in the study eye. (If the
`
`blood is under the fovea, then the fovea must be surrounded 270 degrees by visible
`
`CNV.)
`
`Scar or fibrosis, making up > 50% of total lesion in the study eye.
`
`Scar, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the center of the fovea in the study eye.
`
`Presence of retinal pigment epithelial tears or rips involving the macula in the study
`
`eye.
`
`History of any vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 in the study eye.
`
`Presence of other causes of CNV, including pathologic myopia (spherical
`equivalent of –8 diopters or more negative, or axial length of 25 mm or more),
`
`ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, choroidal rupture, or multifocal
`
`choroiditis in the study eye.
`
`History or clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema or any
`
`other vascular disease affecting the retina, other than AMD, in either eye.
`
`Prior vitrectomy in the study eye.
`
`History of retinal detachment or treatment or surgery for retinal detachment in the
`
`study eye.
`
`Any history of macular hole of stage 2 and above in the study eye.
`
`Any intraocular or periocular surgery within 3 months of Day 1 on the study eye,
`
`except lid surgery, which may not have taken place within 1 month of day 1, as
`
`long as its unlikely to interfere with the injection.
`
`Prior trabeculectomy or other filtration surgery in the study eye.
`Uncontrolled glaucoma (defined as intraocular pressure ≥ 25 mmHg despite
`
`treatment with antiglaucoma medication) in the study eye.
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`x
`x
`
`x
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`x
`
`x
`x
`
`x
`x
`
`
`
`2
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`Page 2 of 34
`
`

`

`x
`x
`x
`
`x
`x
`x
`
`x
`x
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`Active intraocular inflammation in either eye.
`
`Active ocular or periocular infection in either eye.
`
`Any ocular or periocular infection within the last 2 weeks prior to Screening in
`
`either eye.
`
`Any history of uveitis in either eye.
`
`Presence or history of scleromalacia in either eye.
`
`Aphakia or pseudophakia with absence of posterior capsule (unless it occurred as a
`
`result of a yttrium aluminum garnet [YAG] posterior capsulotomy) in the study eye.
`
`Previous therapeutic radiation in the region of the study eye.
`
`History of corneal transplant or corneal dystrophy in the study eye.
`
`Significant media opacities, including cataract, in the study eye that might interfere
`
`with visual acuity, assessment of safety, or fundus photography.
`
`Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye (e.g. cataract) that, in the
`
`opinion of the investigator, could require either medical or surgical intervention
`
`during the 96 week study period.
`
`Any concurrent ocular condition in the study eye which, in the opinion of the
`
`investigator, could either increase the risk to the patient beyond what is to be
`
`expected from standard procedures of intraocular injection, or which otherwise may
`
`interfere with the injection procedure or with evaluation of efficacy or safety.
`
`History of other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or
`
`clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that
`
`contraindicates the use of an investigational drug or that might affect interpretation
`
`of the results of the study or render the patient at high risk for treatment
`
`complications.
`
`Participation as a patient in any clinical study within the 12 weeks prior to Day 1.
`
`Any systemic or ocular treatment with an investigational agent in the past 12 weeks
`
`prior to Day 1.
`
`The use of long acting steroids, either systemically or intraocularly, in the 6 months
`
`prior to day 1.
`
`Any history of allergy to povidone iodine.
`
`
`
`3
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`Page 3 of 34
`
`

`

`x
`x
`
`x
`
`Known serious allergy to the fluorescein sodium for injection in angiography.
`
`Presence of any contraindications indicated in the FDA Approved label for
`
`ranibizumab (Lucentis®; Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA).
`
`Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or of childbearing potential, unwilling to
`
`practice adequate contraception throughout the study. Adequate contraceptive
`
`measures include oral contraceptives (stable use for 2 or more cycles prior to
`
`screening); IUD; Depo-Provera® (Pfizer, Inc. New York); Norplant® System
`
`(Pfizer, Inc. New York) implants; bilateral tubal ligation; vasectomy; condom or
`
`diaphragm plus either contraceptive sponge, foam or jelly.
`
`
`
`4
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`Page 4 of 34
`
`

`

`APPENDIX 3: Summary of Statistical Analysis
`
`The primary endpoint analysis was chosen to preserve constancy with the ranibizumab pivotal
`
`trials7,8 and was non-inferiority of the intravitreal aflibercept treatment regimens to ranibizumab
`
`in the proportion of patients maintaining vision at week 52 (losing <15 ETDRS letters, per
`
`protocol data). Prespecified secondary efficacy variables compared baseline and 52-week data
`regarding: mean change in BCVA; gaining ≥15 letters; change in total National Eye Institute 25-
`
`Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) score; and change in CNV area on FA.
`
`Anatomic measures included retinal thickness and persistent fluid as assessed by OCT. Mean
`
`change in BCVA was also assessed in data pooled between the studies.
`
`
`
`The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received any study
`
`medication and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline BCVA assessment. The per protocol
`
`set (PPS) includes all patients in the FAS who:
`
`1. Received at least 9 doses of study drug and attended at least 9 scheduled visits
`
`during the first year;
`
`2. Had not missed two consecutive injections before administration of the 9th
`
`injection (per patient); and
`
`3. Did not have major protocol violations.
`
`
`
`Sham injections were counted as doses administered for the purpose of defining the PPS.
`
`The PPS included patients who discontinued the study because of treatment failure, without a
`
`major protocol deviation, at any time during the first 52 weeks (even if they met points 1 and 2
`
`above). These patients were considered non-responders for the primary endpoint analysis.
`
`
`
`A non-inferiority margin of 10% was chosen to preserve ~61% of the ranibizumab effect
`
`for prevention of moderate vision loss (loss of <15 letters) demonstrated in MARINA study,7
`
`using the two confidence interval approach. The non-inferiority for the primary endpoint was
`
`assessed by a pre-specified hierarchical testing sequence to control the overall type I error with
`
`the sequence of intravitreal aflibercept 2q4, 0.5q4, and then 2q8 as compared with ranibizumab.
`
`If all intravitreal aflibercept groups demonstrated non-inferiority to ranibizumab for the primary
`
`endpoint, additional comparisons to ranibizumab were prespecified regarding the secondary
`
`endpoints, also using a hierarchical testing sequence in which each secondary endpoint was
`
`tested for superiority of intravitreal aflibercept over ranibizumab. For the primary endpoint
`
`
`
`5
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`Page 5 of 34
`
`

`

`analysis, a margin of 5% was used to determine clinical equivalence. To control the 5% (4.9%
`
`for VIEW 1) overall type I error for all these assessments while maintaining a 5% significance
`
`level (4.9% for VIEW1) for the primary comparisons, the hierarchical testing procedure was
`
`used. The order of testing was pre-specified in the study protocols. It was also agreed to by the
`
`U.S. regulatory agency that, for the primary endpoint analysis, a margin of 5% could be used to
`
`determine clinical equivalence.
`
`Sample sizes were determined assuming that 90% of patients treated with 0.5 mg
`
`ranibizumab or with intravitreal aflibercept would maintain vision, and defining the non-
`
`inferiority margin to be 10%. In VIEW 1, 191 patients per group per study were estimated to
`
`provide a 90% power to demonstrate non-inferiority assuming a two-sided alpha level = 0.049.
`
`In VIEW 2, 190 patients per group were estimated to provide a 90% power to demonstrate non-
`
`inferiority assuming two-sided alpha level = 0.05. To account for dropout or per-protocol set
`
`ineligibility rate of 30% and to ensure sufficient number of patients for safety assessment, 300
`
`patients per group were planned.
`
`
`
`The primary analysis (using last observation carried forward under pre-specified
`
`conditions) was conducted on the per protocol dataset and comprised a hierarchical sequence of
`
`evaluations of non-inferiority of intravitreal aflibercept arms to 0.5 mg ranibizumab to control
`
`the overall type I error. The hierarchical sequence of comparisons was: 2q4, 0.5q4, and then 2q8.
`
`95.1% confidence intervals (VIEW1) and 95% confidence intervals (VIEW2) were estimated for
`
`the difference between ranibizumab and each intravitreal aflibercept arm in the proportion of
`
`patients who maintained vision. Intravitreal aflibercept was considered to be non-inferior to
`
`ranibizumab if the confidence interval of the difference lay below 10%, where a positive
`
`difference favored ranibizumab.
`
`
`
`If all intravitreal aflibercept groups demonstrated non-inferiority to ranibizumab,
`
`additional comparisons to ranibizumab would be made with respect to the secondary endpoints
`
`in a hierarchical sequence of analyses (Appendix 4). The comparison between 2q4 and Rq4 in
`
`the primary endpoint was made, and only if non-inferiority was demonstrated at the 5% level
`
`(4.9% for VIEW 1), or 95% confidence interval (95.1% CI for VIEW 1), the analysis moved on
`
`to the next comparison between 0.5q4 and Rq4 at the 5% level (4.9% for VIEW1). Otherwise,
`
`the testing procedure would be interrupted and no subsequently formal statistical testing could be
`
`
`
`6
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`Page 6 of 34
`
`

`

`performed. If all aflibercept groups demonstrated non-inferiority to ranibizumab for the primary
`
`endpoint, additional comparisons to ranibizumab were performed on the secondary endpoints,
`
`also using a hierarchical testing sequence in which each secondary endpoint was tested for
`
`superiority of aflibercept over ranibizumab at the 5% level (4.9% for VIEW 1). Each secondary
`
`endpoint was tested using the full analysis set (all randomized patients who received any study
`
`medication and had a baseline and at least one post baseline BCVA assessment), using last
`observation carried forward. Analyses of proportions were conducted using Pearson’s Chi-
`
`Square test (in VIEW 1) and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for region (in VIEW 2)
`
`for the pairwise comparisons of 2q4, 0.5q4, and 2q8 to Rq4. Analyses of continuous variables
`
`utilized analysis of covariance with a main-effects model with baseline measure as a covariate
`
`and treatment as the main factor. Region is included in the model as an additional factor in
`
`VIEW 2. Statistical analyses were conducted by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Bayer
`
`Healthcare.
`
`
`
`7
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`Page 7 of 34
`
`

`

`APPENDIX 4: Hierarchy of Statistical Inference for Secondary Endpoints
`
`The secondary endpoint analyses were tested for superiority of Intravitreal aflibercept over
`
`ranibizumab. The hierarchical sequence of statistical hypothesis tests utilized for control of
`
`multiplicity was as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in BCVA
`
`as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline to week 52.
`
`2.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 compared to ranibizumab relative to the proportions of
`
`patients who gain 15 or more letters of vision from baseline to week 52.
`
`3.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in total
`
`NEI-VFQ-25 score from baseline to week 52.
`
`4.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 0.5q4 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in
`
`BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline to week 52.
`
`5.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 0.5q4 compared to ranibizumab relative to the proportions of
`
`patients who gain 15 or more letters of vision from baseline to week 52.
`
`6.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 0.5q4 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in total
`
`NEI-VFQ-25 score from baseline to week 52.
`
`7.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 2q8 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in BCVA
`
`as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline to week 52.
`
`8.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 2q8 compared to ranibizumab relative to the proportions of
`
`patients who gain 15 or more letters of vision from baseline to week 52.
`
`9.
`
`Intravitreal aflibercept 2q8 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in total
`
`NEI-VFQ-25 score from baseline to week 52.
`
`10. Intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in CNV
`
`area from baseline to week 52
`
`11. Intravitreal aflibercept 0.5q4 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in CNV
`
`area from baseline to week 52
`
`12. Intravitreal aflibercept 2q8 compared to ranibizumab relative to mean change in CNV
`
`area from baseline to week 52
`
`
`
`8
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`Page 8 of 34
`
`

`

`Page 9 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`9
`
`
`
`Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; Rq4 = 0.5 mg ranibizumab monthly.
`0.5q4 = 0.5 mg monthly; 2q4 = 2 mg monthly; 2q8 = 2 mg every 2 months following 3 initial monthly doses; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; ETDRS =
`
`(84)
`
`(96)
`
`(101)
`
`27.5%
`
`32.4%
`
`32.7%)
`
`(15)
`
`4.9%
`
`(250)
`
`(17)
`
`5.7%
`
`(246)
`
`(9)
`
`2.9%
`
`(241)
`
`(104)
`
`35.7%
`
`(16)
`
`5.5%
`
`(230)
`
`(114)
`
`37.9%
`
`(21)
`
`7.0%
`
`(240)
`
`(105)
`
`(139)
`
`34.9%
`
`45.7%
`
`(11)
`
`3.7%
`
`(235)
`
`(23)
`
`7.6%
`
`(254)
`
`81.7%
`
`83.1%
`
`78.0%
`
`79.0%
`
`79.7%
`
`78.1%
`
`83.6%
`
`(5)
`
`1.6%
`
`306
`
`2q8
`
`(5)
`
`1.7%
`
`296
`
`0.5q4
`
`(3)
`
`1.0%
`
`309
`
`2q4
`
`(2)
`
`0.7%
`
`291
`
`Rq4
`
`(9)
`
`3.0%
`
`(3)
`
`(3)
`
`1.0%
`
`1.0%
`
`301
`
`2q8
`
`301
`
`0.5q4
`
`304
`
`2q4
`
`(105)
`
`34.5%
`
`(17)
`
`5.6%
`
`(240)
`
`78.9%
`
`(9)
`
`3.0%
`
`304
`
`Rq4
`
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`VIEW 2
`
`VIEW 1
`
`or better, % (n)
`visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40
`Proportion with best-corrected
`ETDRS letters, % (n)
`Proportion gaining ≥ 30
`letters, % (n)
`Proportion gaining ≥ 0 ETDRS
`letters, % (n)
`Proportion losing ≥ 30 ETDRS
`
`Exploratory endpoints
`N(full analysis set)
`
`APPENDIX 5.Additional Visual Acuity Endpoints
`
`

`

`Page 10 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`10
`
`
`
`0.5q4 = 0.5 mg monthly; 2q4 = 2 mg monthly; 2q8 = 2 mg every 2 months following 3 initial monthly doses.
`bObserved case, Full analysis set.
`aDefined as absence of cystic intra-retinal edema and sub-retinal fluid on optical coherence tomography.
`
`67.7% (365/539)
`
`60.3% (318/527)
`
`72.4% (404/558)
`
`62.0% (333/537)
`
`71.9%(197/274)
`
`63.9%(170/266)
`
`80.3%(220/274)
`
`60.4%(162/268)
`
`63.4%(168/265)
`
`56.7%(148/261)
`
`64.8%(184/284)
`
`63.6%(171/269)
`
`2q8
`
`0.5q4
`
`2q4
`
`0.5q4
`
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`VIEW1 and VIEW2), % (n)
`Integrated(combined
`
`VIEW2, % (n)
`
`VIEW1, % (n)
`
`APPENDIX 6. Proportion of Patients with Dry Retinaaat Week 52 (Post-hoc Analysis)b
`
`

`

`Page 11 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`11
`
`
`
` 15 (5.0%)
` 16 (5.3%)
`16 (5.3%)
`8 (2.6%)
`12 (4.0%)
`15 (5.0%)
`10 (3.3%)
`13 (4.3%)
`23 (7.6%)
`20 (6.6%)
`19 (6.3%)
`22 (7.3%)
`21 (6.9%)
`
` 12 (3.9%)
` 15 (4.9%)
`
`9 (3.0%)
`20 (6.6%)
`13 (4.3%)
`12 (3.9%)
`17 (5.6%)
`15 (4.9%)
`17 (5.6%)
`23 (7.6%)
`23 (7.6%)
`27 (8.9%)
`23 (7.6%)
`
`360 (39.5%)
`81 (74.8%)
`
` 6
`
`131 (43.2%)
`33 (76.9%)
`
` 2
`
`120 (39.5%)
`24 (73.7%)
`
` 2
`
` 14 (4.6%)
` 15 (4.9%)
`
`8 (2.6%)
`10 (3.3%)
`13 (4.3%)
`14 (4.6%)
`16 (5.3%)
`16 (5.3%)
`9 (3.0%)
`24 (7.9%)
`26 (8.6%)
`33 (10.9%)
`40 (13.2%)
`109 (35.9%)
`24 (73.7%)
`
` 2
`
` 22 (7.2%)
` 23 (7.6%)
`
`9 (3.0%)
`19 (6.3%)
`16 (5.3%)
`22 (7.2%)
`16 (5.3%)
`11 (3.6%)
`19 (6.3%)
`20 (6.6%)
`24 (7.9%)
`26 (8.6%)
`33 (10.9%)
`144 (47.4%)
` 238 (78.3%)
`
`Intraocular pressure increased
`
`Investigations
`
`Foreign body sensation in eyes
`Maculopathy
`Eye irritation
`Intraocular pressure increased
`Macular degeneration
`Retinal pigment epitheliopathy
`Retinal haemorrhage
`Visual acuity reduced
`Vitreous detachment
`Eye pain
`Vitreous floaters
`Conjunctival haemorrhage
`
`Eye disorders
`
`TEAE in study eye
`Number of patients with at least 1 Ocular
`
`Primary System Organ Class
`
`MedDRA Version 13.0
`Preferred Term
`
`
`
`
`TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event; MedDRA = Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.
`week, respectively.Ranibizumab administered at 0.5 mg every 4 weeks.
`Note: Aflibercept 2q4, aflibercept 0.5q4, aflibercept 2q8 administered at 2 mg every 4 weeks, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks, and 2 mg every 8
` 41 (4.5%)
` 46 (5.0%)
`33 (3.6%)
`38 (4.2%)
`38 (4.2%)
`41 (4.5%)
`43 (4.7%)
`44 (4.8%)
`49 (5.4%)
`67 (7.4%)
`68 (7.5%)
`82 (9.0%)
`84 (9.2%)
`
`
`
`692 (76.0%)
`
`238 (78.5%)
`
`226 (74.3%)
`
`228 (75.0%)
`
`246 (80.9%)
`
`(N=911)
`Combined
`
`(N=303)
`
`2q8
`
`(N=304)
`0.5q4
`
`(N=304)
`
`2q4
`
`(N=304)
`0.5q4
`
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`Class and Preferred Term (Safety Analysis Set)
`Table 1. VIEW 1. Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Occurring in at Least 5% of Patients by System Organ
`
`Adverse Events
`APPENDIX 7: Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment-Emergent Adverse and Serious
`
`

`

`Page 12 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`16 (1.8%)
`23 (2.5%)
`29 (3.2%)
`
`116 (12.7%)
`
`11 (1.2%)
`42 (4.6%)
`
`125 (13.7%)
`
`9 (1.0%)
`21 (2.3%)
`34 (3.7%)
`
`134 (14.7%)
`
`17 (1.9%)
`18 (2.0%)
`21 (2.3%)
`24 (2.6%)
`27 (3.0%)
`
`12
`
`6 (2.0%)
`5 (1.7%)
`7 (2.3%)
`
`40 (13.2%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`16 (5.3%)
`45 (14.9%)
`
`1 (0.3%)
`7 (2.3%)
`12 (4.0%)
`47 (15.5%)
`
`9 (3.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`10 (3.3%)
`7 (2.3%)
`
`176 (19.3%)
`
`60 (19.8%)
`
`11 (1.2%)
`13 (1.4%)
`14 (1.5%)
`15 (1.6%)
`17 (1.9%)
`29 (3.2%)
`40 (4.4%)
`42 (4.6%)
`43 (4.7%)
`83 (9.1%)
`
`2 (0.7%)
`3 (1.0%)
`3 (1.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`7 (2.3%)
`11 (3.6%)
`17 (5.6%)
`13 (4.3%)
`18 (5.9%)
`26 (8.6%)
`
`8 (2.6%)
`7 (2.3%)
`10 (3.3%)
`37 (12.2%)
`
`7 (2.3%)
`12 (3.9%)
`47 (15.5%)
`
`6 (2.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`11 (3.6%)
`47 (15.5%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`5 (1.6%)
`9 (3.0%)
`7 (2.3%)
`11 (3.6%)
`59 (19.4%)
`
`6 (2.0%)
`5 (1.6%)
`6 (2.0%)
`4 (1.3%)
`3 (1.0%)
`11 (3.6%)
`11 (3.6%)
`15 (4.9%)
`14 (4.6%)
`24 (7.9%)
`
`302 (33.2%)
`
`104 (34.3%)
`
`102 (33.6%)
`
`
`
`2 (0.7%)
`11 (3.6%)
`12 (3.9%)
`39 (12.8%)
`
`1 (0.3%)
`14 (4.6%)
`33 (10.9%)
`
`2 (0.7%)
`8 (2.6%)
`11 (3.6%)
`40 (13.2%)
`
`5 (1.6%)
`7 (2.3%)
`6 (2.0%)
`7 (2.3%)
`9 (3.0%)
`
`57 (18.8%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`5 (1.6%)
`5 (1.6%)
`5 (1.6%)
`7 (2.3%)
`7 (2.3%)
`12 (3.9%)
`14 (4.6%)
`11 (3.6%)
`33 (10.9%)
`96 (31.6%)
`
`
`
`6 (2.0%)
`9 (3.0%)
`13 (4.3%)
`52 (17.1%)
`
`4 (1.3%)
`15 (4.9%)
`42 (13.8%)
`
`0
`
`5 (1.6%)
`19 (6.3%)
`35 (11.5%)
`
`4 (1.3%)
`4 (1.3%)
`3 (1.0%)
`7 (2.3%)
`8 (2.6%)
`
`48 (15.8%)
`
`7 (2.3%)
`6 (2.0%)
`3 (1.0%)
`14 (4.6%)
`9 (3.0%)
`8 (2.6%)
`16 (5.3%)
`17 (5.6%)
`13 (4.3%)
`23 (7.6%)
`
`Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
`Diarrhoea
`Nausea
`
`Gastrointestinal disorders
`
`Contusion
`Fall
`
`Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
`
`Transient ischaemic attack
`Dizziness
`Headache
`
`Nervous system disorders
`
`Blood pressure increased
`Blood urine present
`Urine protein/creatinine ratio increased
`Protein urine present
`Blood glucose increased
`
`Investigations
`
`Cellulitis
`Cystitis
`Gastroenteritis viral
`Pneumonia
`Influenza
`Sinusitis
`Bronchitis
`Urinary tract infection
`Upper respiratory tract infection
`Nasopharyngitis
`
`123 (40.5%)
`
`Infections and infestations
`
`674 (74.0%)
`
`223 (73.6%)
`
`231 (76.0%)
`
`220 (72.4%)
`
`234 (77.0%)
`
`TEAE
`Number of patients with at least 1 non-ocular
`
`(N = 911)
`Combined
`
`(N = 303)
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`2q8
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`(N = 304)
`
`2q4
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`Primary System Organ Class
`
`
`
`
`MedDRA Version 13.0
`
`Preferred Term
`
`Table 2. VIEW 1. Non-Ocular TEAEs Occurring in at Least 2% of Patients by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Analysis Set)
`
`

`

`Page 13 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`9 (1.0%)
`17 (1.9%)
`39 (4.3%)
`10 (1.1%)
`45 (4.9%)
`20 (2.2%)
`
`13
`
`4 (1.3%)
`5 (1.7%)
`14 (4.6%)
`6 (2.0%)
`15 (5.0%)
`8 (2.6%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`15 (4.9%)
`3 (1.0%)
`19 (6.3%)
`8 (2.6%)
`
`2 (0.7%)
`6 (2.0%)
`10 (3.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`11 (3.6%)
`4 (1.3%)
`
`7 (2.3%)
`6 (2.0%)
`21 (6.9%)
`3 (1.0%)
`19 (6.3%)
`4 (1.3%)
`
`58 (6.4%)
`
`22 (7.3%)
`
`21 (6.9%)
`
`15 (4.9%)
`
`22 (7.2%)
`
`
`
`Anxiety
`Depression
`
`Psychiatric disorders
`
`Nephrolithiasis
`
`Renal and urinary disorders
`
`Basal cell carcinoma
`(incl cysts and polyps)
`Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
`
`12 (1.3%)
`
`6 (2.0%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`
`2 (0.7%)
`
`Oedema peripheral
`
`58 (6.4%)
`
`22 (7.3%)
`
`16 (5.3%)
`
`20 (6.6%)
`
`19 (6.3%)
`
`2 (0.7%)
`16 (5.3%)
`5 (1.6%)
`4 (1.3%)
`3 (1.0%)
`24 (7.9%)
`21 (6.9%)
`30 (9.9%)
`2 (0.7%)
`5 (1.6%)
`30 (9.9%)
`4 (1.3%)
`5 (1.6%)
`7 (2.3%)
`
`34 (11.2%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`1 (0.3%)
`5 (1.6%)
`10 (3.3%)
`30 (9.9%)
`3 (1.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`
`(N = 304)
`
`2q4
`
`4 (1.3%)
`22 (7.2%)
`3 (1.0%)
`3 (1.0%)
`5 (1.6%)
`29 (9.5%)
`25 (8.2%)
`34 (11.2%)
`
`6 (2.0%)
`11 (3.6%)
`41 (13.5%)
`
`8 (2.6%)
`6 (2.0%)
`11 (3.6%)
`47 (15.5%)
`
`9 (3.0%)
`5 (1.6%)
`9 (3.0%)
`11 (3.6%)
`54 (17.8%)
`12 (3.9%)
`3 (1.0%)
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`conditions
`General disorders and administration site
`
`Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
`
`Rash
`
`Dehydration
`Hypokalaemia
`Hypercholesterolaemia
`
`Metabolism and nutrition disorders
`
`Hypertension
`
`Vascular disorders
`
`Coronary artery disease
`Atrial fibrillation
`
`Cardiac disorders
`
`Dyspnoea
`Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
`Cough
`
`Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
`
`Arthritis
`Osteoarthritis
`Back pain
`Arthralgia
`
`Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
`
`Constipation
`Vomiting
`
`Primary System Organ Class
`
`
`
`
`MedDRA Version 13.0
`
`Preferred Term
`
`8 (0.9%)
`61 (6.7%)
`13 (1.4%)
`14 (1.5%)
`15 (1.6%)
`74 (8.1%)
`62 (6.8%)
`84 (9.2%)
`11 (1.2%)
`15 (1.6%)
`91 (10.0%)
`12 (1.3%)
`17 (1.9%)
`19 (2.1%)
`95 (10.4%)
`10 (1.1%)
`12 (1.3%)
`20 (2.2%)
`27 (3.0%)
`
`0
`
`20 (6.6%)
`6 (2.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`7 (2.3%)
`24 (7.9%)
`20 (6.6%)
`28 (9.2%)
`3 (1.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`
`32 (10.6%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`7 (2.3%)
`10 (3.3%)
`36 (11.9%)
`
`2 (0.7%)
`7 (2.3%)
`9 (3.0%)
`5 (1.7%)
`
`109 (12.0%)
`
`41 (13.5%)
`
`6 (2.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`
`14 (1.5%)
`15 (1.6%)
`
`(N = 911)
`Combined
`
`6 (2.0%)
`25 (8.2%)
`2 (0.7%)
`4 (1.3%)
`5 (1.6%)
`26 (8.6%)
`21 (6.9%)
`26 (8.6%)
`6 (2.0%)
`4 (1.3%)
`29 (9.5%)
`5 (1.6%)
`5 (1.6%)
`2 (0.7%)
`25 (8.2%)
`5 (1.6%)
`4 (1.3%)
`6 (2.0%)
`12 (3.9%)
`38 (12.5%)
`
`5 (1.6%)
`3 (1.0%)
`
`(N = 303)
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`2q8
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`

`

`Page 14 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`14
`
`
`
`TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event; MedDRA = Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.
`week, respectively. Ranibizumab administered at 0.5 mg every 4 weeks.
`Note: Aflibercept 2q4, aflibercept 0.5q4, aflibercept 2q8 administered at 2 mg every 4 weeks, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks, and 2 mg every 8
`16 (1.8%)
`24 (2.6%)
`15 (1.6%)
`29 (3.2%)
`24 (2.6%)
`38 (4.2%)
`9 (1.0%)
`
`
`
`Vertigo
`
`Ear and labyrinth disorders
`
`Anaemia
`
`Blood and lymphatic system disorders
`
`Seasonal allergy
`
`Immune system disorders
`
`Insomnia
`
`8 (2.6%)
`11 (3.6%)
`6 (2.0%)
`9 (3.0%)
`9 (3.0%)
`16 (5.3%)
`3 (1.0%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`14 (4.6%)
`9 (3.0%)
`12 (3.9%)
`5 (1.6%)
`
`5 (1.6%)
`7 (2.3%)
`3 (1.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`10 (3.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`4 (1.3%)
`7 (2.3%)
`6 (2.0%)
`10 (3.3%)
`4 (1.3%)
`8 (2.6%)
`6 (2.0%)
`
`(N = 911)
`Combined
`
`(N = 303)
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`2q8
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`(N = 304)
`
`2q4
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`Primary System Organ Class
`
`MedDRA Version 13.0
`
`Preferred Term
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Page 15 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
` TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event; MedDRA = Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.
`reported one or more events.
`respectively. Ranibizumab administered as 0.5 mg every 4 weeks. At each level of subject summarization, a patient was counted once if the patient
`Note: Aflibercept 2q4, aflibercept 0.5q4, aflibercept 2q8 administered as 2 mg every 4 weeks, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks, and 2 mg every 8 weeks,
`
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`
`
`
`1 (<0.1%)
`
`1 (<0.1%)
`
`6 (0.5%)
`6 (0.5%)
`2 (0.2%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`4 (0.3%)
`5 (0.4%)
`19 (1.6%)
`
`0
`0
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`3 (0.3%)
`3 (0.3%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`3 (0.3%)
`13 (1.4%)
`
`0
`0
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`2 (0.7%)
`
`0
`
`3 (1.0%)
`
`0
`0
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`
`2 (0.7%)
`6 (2.0%)
`
`0
`0
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`3 (1.0%)
`3 (1.0%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`4 (1.3%)
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`3 (1.0%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`2 (0.7%)
`2 (0.7%)
`6 (2.0%)
`
`26 (2.1%)
`
`16 (1.8%)
`
`3 (1.0%)
`
`6 (2.0%)
`
`7 (2.3%)
`
`10 (3.3%)
`
`(N=1215)
`
`Total
`
`(N=911)
`Combined
`
`(N=303)
`
`2q8
`
`(N=304)
`0.5q4
`
`(N=304)
`
`2q4
`
`(N=304)
`0.5q4
`
`Intraocular pressure increased
`
`Investigations
`
`
`
`
`Incorrect dose administered
`
`complications
`Injury, poisoning and procedural
`
`Endophthalmitis
`
`Infections and infestations
`
`Retinal tear
`Retinal pigment epithelial tear
`Retinal oedema
`Retinal detachment
`Retinal degeneration
`Macular hole
`Keratitis
`Cataract
`Angle closure glaucoma
`Retinal haemorrhage
`Visual acuity reduced
`
`Eye disorders
`Adverse Event
`Number of patients with at least one such
`
`Primary System Organ Class
`
`MedDRA Version 13.0
`
`Preferred Term
`
`
`
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`
`
`
`System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Analysis Set)
`Table 3. VIEW 1. Number of Patients with Ocular Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events of Study Eye by Primary
`
`

`

`Page 16 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`3 (0.2%)
`3 (0.2%)
`4 (0.3%)
`2 (0.2%)
`17 (1.4%)
`44 (3.6%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`10 (1.1%)
`29 (3.2%)
`
`16
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`2 (0.7%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`5 (1.7%)
`12 (4.0%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`2 (0.7%)
`11 (3.6%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`2 (0.7%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`3 (1.0%)
`6 (2.0%)
`
`1 (0.3%)
` 1
`(0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`2 (0.7%)
`
`0
`
`7 (2.3%)
`15 (4.9%)
`
`198 (16.3%)
`
`141 (15.5%)
`
`51 (16.8%)
`
`50 (16.4%)
`
`40 (13.2%)
`
`57 (18.8%)
`
`
`
`Scrotal abscess
` sitignyrahP
`Lung infection
`Diverticulitis
`Device related infection
`Viral infection
`Vestibular neuronitis
`Urinary tract infection bacterial
`Staphylococcal bacteraemia
`Sinusitis fungal
`Sinusitis
`Septic shock
`Pyelonephritis
`Lobar pneumonia
`Escherichia urinary tract infection
`Endocarditis
`Clostridium difficile colitis
`Clostridial infection
`Arthritis bacterial
`Urinary tract infection
`Gastroenteritis
`Cellulitis
`Bronchitis
`Pneumonia
`
`Infections and infestations
`Adverse Event
`Number of patients with at least one such
`
`(N = 1215)
`
`Total
`
`(N = 911)
`Combined
`
`
`
`(N = 303)
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`2q8
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`(N = 304)
`
`2q4
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`Primary System Organ Class
`
`MedDRA Version 13.0
`
`Preferred Term
`
`
`
`
`Preferred Term (Safety Analysis Set)
`Table 4. VIEW 1. Number of Patients with Non-Ocular Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class and
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Page 17 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`3 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`9 (0.7%)
`
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`6 (0.7%)
`
`17
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`3 (1.0%)
`
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`2 (0.7%)
`2 (0.7%)
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`2 (0.7%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`
`3 (1.0%)
`
`38 (3.1%)
`
`28 (3.1%)
`
`9 (3.0%)
`
`10 (3.3%)
`
`9 (3.0%)
`
`10 (3.3%)
`
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`8 (0.7%)
`9 (0.7%)
`8 (0.7%)
`10 (0.8%)
`42 (3.5%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`1 (0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`4 (0.4%)
`6 (0.7%)
`6 (0.7%)
`8 (0.9%)
`28 (3.1%)
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`2 (0.7%)
`3 (1.0%)
`3 (1.0%)
`11 (3.6%)
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`4 (1.3%)
`3 (1.0%)
`2 (0.7%)
`3 (1.0%)
`10 (3.3%)
`
`0
`
`(N = 1215)
`
`Total
`
`(N = 911)
`Combined
`
`
`
`(N = 303)
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`2q8
`Intravitreal Aflibercept
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
` 1
`(0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`1 (0.3%)
`2 (0.7%)
`7 (2.3%)
`
`0
`
`(N = 304)
`
`2q4
`
`0
`
`1 (0.3%)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`4 (1.3%)
`3 (1.0%)
`2 (0.7%)
`2 (0.7%)
`14 (4.6%)
`1 (0.3%)
`
`(N = 304)
`
`0.5q4
`
`
`
`Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
`Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma
`Breast cancer in situ
`Prostate cancer metastatic
`Prostate cancer
`Breast cancer
`Bladder transitional cell carcinoma
`Squamous cell carcinoma of skin
`unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
`Neoplasms benign, malignant and
`
`Supraventricular tachycardia
`Cardiac failure
`Angina unstable
`Ventricular tachycardia
`Ventricular fibrillation
`Tachycardia
`Sick sinus syndrome
`Mitral valve incompetence
`Intracardiac thrombus
`Coronary artery occlusion
`Cardiac arrest
`Bradycardia
`Arrhythmia
`Aortic valve stenosis
`Acute coronary syndrome
`Acute myocardial infarction
`Coronary artery disease
`Myocardial infarction
`Cardiac failure congestive
`Atrial fibrillation
`
` cinorhc
`
`Cardiac disorders
`
`Viral pericarditis
`
`Primary System Organ Class
`
`MedDRA Version 13.0
`
`Preferred Term
`
`Ranibizumab
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Page 18 of 34
`Apotex Exhibit 1030
`
`21 (1.7%)
`
`16 (1.8%)
`
`18
`6 (2.0%)
`
`4 (1.3%)
`
`6 (2.0%)
`
`5 (1.6%)
`
`24 (2.0%)
`
`19 (2.1%)
`
`8 (2.6%)
`
`5 (1.6%)
`
`6 (2.0%)
`
`5 (1.6%)
`
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`1 (<0.1%)
`2 (0.2%)
`2 (0.2%)
`4 (0.3%)
`4 (0.3%)
`8 (

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket