throbber
Filed on behalf of: Eve Energy Co., Ltd..
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`U.S. Patent Nos.
`9,153,835
`9,496,581
`9,799,913
`
`Eve Energy Co., Ltd.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VARTA MICROBATTERY GMBH
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case Nos.
`IPR2022- 01484
`IPR2022- 01486
`IPR2022- 01487
`
`DECLARATION OF MARC JUZKOW
`
`VARTA Ex. 2013 Page 1 of 5
`EVE Energy v. VARTA
`IPR2022-01484
`
`Eve Energy Co., Ltd v. Varta Microbattery Gmbh
`
`Eve Ex. 1002, p. 1
`
`

`

`144. Kobayashi further discloses various compositions for the insulating members,
`
`such as “polyethylene or polypropylene resin, a film made of PET or polyimide, or the
`
`like.” Id. A POSITA would further understand that, beyond the specific materials disclosed
`
`by Kobayashi, a variety of materials can be used as this insulating member, including
`
`plastic polymers, such as polyolefin (such as polypropylene or polyethylene), polyester,
`
`polyimide (such as Kapton), and fluoropolymers, as discussed in §IX.A.1.d.
`
`145.
`
`I further note that this claim is directed to an insulating means arranged
`
`“between the end faces of the spiral winding and the housing cup and the housing top.”
`
`(Emphasis added). This suggests that the insulating means according to the ‘835 patent is
`
`the same on the top end face of the spiral winding and the bottom face of the spiral winding.
`
`Kobayashi still discloses this configuration, as the insulating plates disclosed are made of
`
`the same material, are in the same shape, and are arranged between both the housing cup
`
`and the housing top.
`
`k.
`
`Combining Kobayashi, Kaun, and Brenner would have been obvious to
`the POSITA
`146. A POSITA would have been motivated to combine the teachings of
`
`Kobayashi and Kaun. Kobayashi and Kaun both share the common objective of improving
`
`button cells and related types of batteries without sacrificing longevity or efficiency. For
`
`example, Kaun provides:
`
`a button-type cell enclosure. Consisting of two opposing shallow cups,
`
`which are electrically isolated from each other with a polymeric “U”
`
`- 70 -
`
`VARTA Ex. 2013 Page 2 of 5
`
`Eve Energy Co., Ltd v. Varta Microbattery Gmbh
`
`Eve Ex. 1002, p. 71
`
`

`

`shaped gasket at the outer edge. The gasket further forms a gas-tight
`
`seal for the interior contents of the cell. These cup members interface
`
`with the perpendicular electrode member of another electrochemical
`
`cell to serve as both an output conductor and a cell terminal. The
`
`positive electrode substrate is essentially of the same material as the
`
`positive terminal surface and the negative electrode substrate is
`
`essentially of the same material as the negative terminal surface. The
`
`positive is generally aluminum and the negative is generally copper.
`
`The Rolled-Ribbon cell assembly is a disc that is slightly wider that the
`
`distance between the parallel surfaces of the assembled current-
`
`collector cups to assure contact with the electrode foil substrates.
`
`Ex. 1023 (Kaun) at [0072]. Similarly, Kobayashi is directed
`
`to provid[ing] a small battery capable of improving a heavy load
`
`characteristic without impairing productivity. . . . The present inventors
`
`have found a method of safely and highly productively storing a wound
`
`electrode group in a case of a small battery such as a button shape or a
`
`coin shape.
`
`[A] container having a sealing structure is used in which a metallic
`
`negative electrode case serving as a negative electrode terminal and a
`
`- 71 -
`
`VARTA Ex. 2013 Page 3 of 5
`
`Eve Energy Co., Ltd v. Varta Microbattery Gmbh
`
`Eve Ex. 1002, p. 72
`
`

`

`metallic positive electrode case serving as a positive electrode terminal
`
`are fitted via an insulating gasket.
`
`Ex. 1004 (Kobayashi) at [0012]-[0013].
`
`147. Based on my review of these references, Kobayashi is directed to the same
`
`subject matter disclosed in Kaun – Button-cell batteries with spiral wound electrode
`
`assemblies enclosed within a cell housing. Compare Ex. 1004 (Kobayashi) at [0013] (“It
`
`has been found that a small battery excellent in heavy load characteristics can be provided
`
`by housing an electrode group in which a laminate including a positive electrode and a
`
`negative electrode is wound spirally in the container.”) with Ex. 1023 (Kaun) at [0048]
`
`(“This basic laminate cell preassembly is layered on itself, such as by winding or coiling it
`
`in a spiral to form an electrode assembly in the general shape of a flat disc (wherein the
`
`diameter is preferably greater than twice the thickness of the disk). The cell membrane is
`
`sandwiched between plate-like current collectors with the electrode interfaces primarily
`
`perpendicular to the current collectors to make up an electrochemical cell.”).
`
`148.
`
`Instead of beading, Kaun uses an insert molded gasket placed between
`
`housing top 28p and cup 28n to provide a gas-tight seal. Ex. 1023, [0116]. As discussed
`
`above, Kaun provides a sealing mechanism that closes the button cell without being beaded
`
`over. Supra §IX.A.1.f. Using insulator/gasket 32 allows for sealing of the button cell using
`
`a housing cup whose edge remains essentially perpendicular to its flat bottom area. Ex.
`
`1023, FIG. 7.
`
`- 72 -
`
`VARTA Ex. 2013 Page 4 of 5
`
`Eve Energy Co., Ltd v. Varta Microbattery Gmbh
`
`Eve Ex. 1002, p. 73
`
`

`

`149. As can be seen clearly in FIG. 1 of Kobayashi (annotated below), a significant
`
`portion of the available space within the cell is reduced by the process of crimping the cell
`
`closed. The process of crimping the cell closed can require significant extra space for the
`
`cell housing, but such space cannot be used for active materials, thus reducing the overall
`
`volumetric energy density of the cell.
`
`150. A POSITA would have been motivated to alter the housing of Kobayashi so
`
`as to incorporate the non-beaded over sealing features of the Kaun cell housing. A benefit
`
`is that the button cell of Kaun, which is sealed without being beaded over, allows for greater
`
`internal space to contain the electrode assembly, meaning that more electrode layers can
`
`be included in a button cell of a given diameter that is closed without being beaded over
`
`(i.e., according to Kaun) than one that is closed by being beaded over (i.e. according to
`
`Kobayashi).
`
`151. A POSITA would have also understood that it would be preferred to have the
`
`inner lateral side of the housing flat from top to bottom to absorb uniform radial forces
`
`from the expansion of the electrodes in the spiral winding, as provided by Kaun.
`
`- 73 -
`
`VARTA Ex. 2013 Page 5 of 5
`
`Eve Energy Co., Ltd v. Varta Microbattery Gmbh
`
`Eve Ex. 1002, p. 74
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket