throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`VARTA MICROBATTERY GMBH.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00399-JRG-RSP
`
`v.
`
`EVE ENERGY CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DEFENDANT EVE ENERGY CO., LTD.’S PATENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3-3 and the Court’s First Amended Docket Control Order
`
`(Dkt. 37), Defendant EVE Energy Co. Ltd. hereby provides these initial invalidity contentions to
`
`Plaintiff VARTA Microbattery GmbH (“Plaintiff” or “VARTA”) in support of Defendant’s
`
`allegations of invalidity of United States Patent Nos. 9,153,835 (“the ’835 patent”); 9,496,581
`
`(“the ’581 patent”); 9,799,913 (“the ’913 patent”); 11,024,869 (“the ’869 patent”); 11,024,904
`
`(“the ’904 patent”); 11,024,905 (“the ’905 patent”); and 11,258,092 (“the ’092 patent”)
`
`(collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).
`
`These contentions and disclosures are preliminary and Defendant reserves the right to
`
`supplement them based on fact and expert discovery, after claim terms are construed, in response
`
`to any changed infringement theories advanced by Plaintiff, and as permitted by the Court’s rules
`
`and orders.
`
`1
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 1 of 87
`EVE Energy v. VARTA
`IPR2022-01484
`
`

`

`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`As disclosed in its respective Amended P. R. 3-1 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`
`Infringement Contentions (“Infringement Contentions”) served on Defendant, Plaintiff asserts the
`
`following patents and claims:
`
`Asserted Patents
`
`Asserted Claims
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,153,835
`
`14-15, 17-23, 25
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,496,581
`
`14-15, 17-23, 25
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,799,913
`
`9-16
`
`U.S. Patent No. 11,024,869
`
`1-20, 22-29
`
`U.S. Patent No. 11,024,904
`
`1-8, 10-14, 16-17, 19, 21-24
`
`U.S. Patent No. 11,024,905
`
`1-11, 13-15, 17-18
`
`U.S. Patent No. 11,258,092
`
`1-3, 7-11, 13-22
`
`As further detailed in and supported by these Invalidity Contentions, Defendant contends that each
`
`Asserted Claim is invalid under at least 35 U.S.C. §§ 103 and/or 112.1
`
`II.
`
`AMENDMENT AND SUPPLEMENTATION
`
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions pertain to the Asserted Claims as identified in
`
`Plaintiff’s Infringement Contentions. To the extent the Court later allows Plaintiff to amend its
`
`Infringement Contentions and/or assert one or more claims or patents other than the Asserted
`
`Claims or Asserted Patents, respectively, Defendant reserves the right to modify, amend, or
`
`supplement these Invalidity Contentions accordingly to, for example, show the invalidity of any
`
`such newly asserted claims.
`
`1 References to Title 35 of the United States Code are to statutes prior to amendment under the America Invents Act
`(“AIA”), as the Asserted Patents purport to have effective filing dates prior to March 16, 2013.
`
`2
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 2 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`These Invalidity Contentions are based on Defendant’s current understanding of the
`
`Asserted Claims and Plaintiff’s apparent view of the scope of those claims as shown, for example,
`
`in Plaintiff’s Infringement Contentions. A Markman Order in this case has not yet been issued,
`
`and in no way shall these Invalidity Contentions be taken as any admission or acquiescence by
`
`Defendant as to the proper scope of the Asserted Claims and/or proper claim constructions of terms
`
`and phrases recited in those claims. By identifying prior art that renders the Asserted Claims
`
`invalid, Defendant does not admit that the claim limitations are capable of construction, does not
`
`admit that any claim limitations are supported with an appropriate written description and enabling
`
`disclosure in the applicable patent specifications, and does not adopt Plaintiff’s apparent claim
`
`constructions or admit the accuracy of any particular claim construction.2
`
`Defendant reserves all rights to later challenge or oppose any claim constructions advanced
`
`by Plaintiff and to present its own claim construction positions. Defendant further reserves the
`
`right to revise these Invalidity Contentions in view of the Court’s construction of terms and phrases
`
`recited in one or more of the Asserted Claims, additional information obtained during discovery,
`
`additional infringement theories put forth by Plaintiff during fact and/or expert discovery, any
`
`findings as to the priority date(s) of the Asserted Claims, and/or positions that Plaintiff, its fact
`
`witnesses, or its expert witness(es) may take concerning claim construction, infringement, and/or
`
`invalidity issues. Defendant further reserves the right to supplement its accompanying P. R. 3-4(b)
`
`document production should it later discover additional prior art documents, information,
`
`testimony, prior art systems and related documentation, and/or software or hardware code,
`
`
`2 Defendant does not concede that Plaintiff’s constructions are correct, but rather asserts the well-established principle
`that whatever infringes a claim if later in time anticipates if earlier in time. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue
`Labs., Inc., 246 F.3d 1368, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Thus, where Plaintiff for purposes of its infringement case alleges
`that a feature of an accused product meets a particular limitation recited in one or more of the Asserted Claims, then
`that feature, should it be found in the prior art, would also cause that limitation to be met for invalidity purposes.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 3 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`including but not limited to information provided by third parties after the date of service of these
`
`Invalidity Contentions. Defendant may further rely on inventor admissions concerning the scope
`
`or state of the prior art relevant to the Asserted Claims, the prosecution histories of the Asserted
`
`Patents, related patents, and/or patent applications, any deposition or trial testimony of a named
`
`inventor on the Asserted Patents, and the papers filed and any evidence produced or submitted by
`
`Plaintiff in connection with this case or other related proceedings. Defendant reserves the right to
`
`contend that one or more of the Asserted Claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(f) in the event
`
`Defendant obtains evidence that any of the named inventors did not invent the subject matter in
`
`the Asserted Claims with which they are associated on the face of the Asserted Patents.
`
`Prior art not included in these Invalidity Contentions, whether known or not known to
`
`Defendant, may become relevant. In particular, Defendant is currently unaware of the extent, if
`
`any, to which Plaintiff will contend that limitations of the Asserted Claims are not disclosed in the
`
`prior art identified in these Invalidity Contentions. Accordingly, Defendant reserves the right to
`
`identify other references that would disclose the allegedly missing limitation(s) of the claimed
`
`method, device, or system. The references identified in these Invalidity Contentions, which include
`
`the attached claim charts, may disclose the elements of the Asserted Claims explicitly and/or
`
`inherently, and/or they may be relied upon to show the state of the art in the relevant time frame.
`
`References identified in these Invalidity Contentions, as well as the “References Cited” on the
`
`faces of the Asserted Patents and the patents cited within the bodies of the Asserted Patents, may
`
`be used to illustrate, but not limit the scope of, the state of the art to which the Asserted Patents
`
`pertain (i.e., at a time prior to the date of alleged inventions of the Asserted Claims of the Asserted
`
`Patents). Moreover, Defendant reserves the right to rely on later identified sources of information,
`
`
`
`4
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 4 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`including but not limited to witness testimony and other discovery, to establish the state of the art
`
`in the relevant time frame pertaining to the Asserted Patents.
`
`Because discovery has just recently begun, Defendant anticipates that additional prior art
`
`and invalidity bases may be found. Defendant’s investigation and analysis of the prior art is
`
`continuing, and thus Defendant reserves the right to supplement, amend, and/or revise the
`
`information provided herein as Defendant conducts further investigation and/or analysis, including
`
`identifying, charting, and relying on additional references. Additionally, in view of likely third-
`
`party discovery that will be taken, Defendant reserves the right to present additional items of prior
`
`art under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a), (b), (e), and/or (g) and/or § 103 located during discovery or further
`
`investigation, and to assert contentions of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(c), (d), or (f). For
`
`example, Defendant may issue subpoenas to third parties believed to have knowledge, documents,
`
`and/or other evidence concerning invalidity of one or more of the Asserted Claims.
`
`In addition to the positions and prior art identified in these Invalidity Contentions
`
`(including the accompanying invalidity claim charts), Defendant also incorporates by reference all
`
`invalidity contentions, prior art, and invalidity claim charts (including, without limitation, all
`
`anticipation positions, obviousness positions (including all prior art combinations and motivations
`
`to combine), indefiniteness positions, written description positions, and non-enablement positions)
`
`concerning one or more of the Asserted Patents, as disclosed at any time. This includes without
`
`limitation disclosures in previous or related litigation, in United States Patent & Trademark Office
`
`(“USPTO”) proceedings, by the Plaintiff, by any other parties accused of patent infringement by
`
`the Plaintiff, or by the named inventors or any individuals associated with the prosecution and/or
`
`post-grant review of the Asserted Patents. Petitions for inter partes review of most, if not all, of
`
`the Asserted Patents have been filed before the USPTO. Defendant incorporates by reference each
`
`
`
`5
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 5 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`of those petitions, the expert declarations in support thereof, and cited references associated
`
`therewith. 3 Plaintiff has a duty to produce to Defendant all relevant documents from these
`
`proceedings including but not limited to all prior art, invalidity contentions, and expert declarations
`
`or reports on invalidity (among other relevant items).
`
`Defendant reserves the right to supplement or otherwise amend these Invalidity
`
`Contentions in response to any relevant discovery provided by third parties, Plaintiff, opening or
`
`rebuttal expert reports, fact or expert depositions, or in response to any claim construction ruling(s)
`
`issued by this Court (regardless of how and when such ruling is made). Defendant also reserves
`
`the right to supplement or otherwise amend these Invalidity Contentions in response to any rebuttal
`
`evidence disclosed by Plaintiff or as otherwise may be necessary or appropriate under the
`
`circumstances.
`
`III.
`
`P. R. 3-3(A) – IDENTIFICATION OF PRIOR ART
`
`Defendant’s disclosure of prior art is generally premised on the alleged priority dates of
`
`the Asserted Patents/Claims as identified in Plaintiff’s Infringement Contentions, namely, Plaintiff
`
`alleges an earliest priority date of June 18, 2009 (December 22, 2009 for the asserted ’835 patent
`
`claims). Defendant contends Plaintiff is not entitled to these alleged priority dates, much less any
`
`earlier priority dates at least because not all of the elements of the Asserted Claims appear to have
`
`support in the disclosures of the foreign priority documents. For example, at least the disclosures
`
`related to the "first part” / “second part" limitations in the ’835 patent, ’581 patent, and ’913 patent
`
`do not appear to be present in the three German priority documents. Accordingly, Plaintiff would
`
`
`3 These proceedings include but are not limited to the following: Eastern District of Texas cases, 2:20-cv-00029-JRG;
`2:20-cv-00051-JRG; 2:20-cv-00052-JRG; 2:20-cv-00054-JRG; 2:20-cv-00071-JRG; 2:20-cv-00138-JRG; 2:21-cv-
`00036-JRG; 2:21-cv-00037-JRG; 2:21-cv-00038-JRG; 2:21-cv-00400-JRG-RSP; 2:22-cv-00025-JRG; PTAB
`proceedings, IPR2020-01211; IPR2020-01212; IPR2020-01213; IPR2020-01214; IPR2021-00474; IPR2021-01206;
`IPR2021-01207.
`
`
`
`6
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 6 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`not be entitled to its claimed priority dates. Plaintiff has failed to show the Asserted Claims are
`
`entitled to the claimed priority dates. Defendant therefore reserves the right to modify, amend, or
`
`supplement its invalidity contentions with additional prior art references if any Asserted Claim is
`
`shown to not be entitled to Plaintiff’s alleged priority dates or if Plaintiff alleges any other priority
`
`date for any of the Asserted Claims.
`
`A.
`
`Prior Art References for the Asserted Patents
`
`Pursuant to P. R. 3-3, the tables below identify the prior art items that Defendant presently
`
`asserts render obvious the Asserted Claims of the Asserted Patents.
`
`Publication Number /
`Description
`2007-294111A
`3748182A
`101286572A
`2007/062838A1
`2007/0160901A1
`2006/0124973A1
`1992-162351A
`0829105B1
`2005/0233212A1
`2003-031266A
`1987-113358A
`5654114A
`2008-066040A
`1266413B1
`6066184A
`2008/0248384A1
`1332944A
`
`Abbreviation /
`Short Name
`Kobayashi
`Brown
`Higuchi
`Brenner
`Kaun
`Arai
`Fujita
`Okochi
`Kaun-212
`Kano
`Yamamoto
`Kubota
`Yamamoto-040
`Bennett
`Brenner-184
`Yabushita
`SAFT
`
`Country
`Origin
`JP
`US
`CN
`WIPO
`US
`US
`JP
`EP
`US
`JP
`JP
`US
`JP
`EP
`US
`US
`GB
`
`1.
`
`Kobayashi
`
`
`
`of
`
`Issue/Publication Date or Date
`of Availability/Sale
`11/08/2007
`07/24/1973
`10/15/2008
`06/07/2007
`07/12/2007
`06/15/2006
`06/05/1992
`05/21/2003
`10/20/2005
`01/31/2003
`05/25/1987
`08/05/1997
`03/21/2008
`05/25/2005
`05/23/2000
`10/09/2008
`10/10/1973
`
`Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2007-294111A (“Kobayashi”)
`
`was published on November 8, 2007. The application for Kobayashi was filed on April 20, 2006.
`
`Kobayashi qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Kobayashi relates to a small battery (for
`
`
`
`7
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 7 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`example, a button type battery, a coin type battery) provided with a wound electrode group, and
`
`thus is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Kobayashi [0001]).
`
`2.
`
`Brown
`
`U.S. Patent No. 3748182A (“Brown”) issued and was published on July 24, 1973. The
`
`application for Brown was filed on May 26, 1972 and claims priority to U.S. Patent No.
`
`25730972A. Brown qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Brown provides a button type
`
`cell casing and sealed button type battery, and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the
`
`Asserted Patents. (Brown [Title]).
`
`3.
`
`Higuchi
`
`Chinese Patent Application Publication No. CN101286572A (“Higuchi”) was published
`
`on October 15, 2008. The application for Higuchi was filed on April 10, 2008 and claims priority
`
`to Japanese Patent Application JP2007-105148. Higuchi qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C
`
`§102(b) for the Asserted Claims in the ’869 patent and at least §102(a) for the remaining Asserted
`
`Claims. Higuchi provides a coin-shaped non-water electrolyte secondary battery, having a high
`
`characteristic of discharge load without distorted battery when charging and discharging, and thus
`
`is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Higuchi [Abstract]).
`
`4.
`
`Brenner
`
`WO2007/062838A1 (“Brenner”) was published on June 7, 2007. The application for
`
`Brenner was filed on November 30, 2006 and claims priority to German Patent Application No.
`
`DE102005058132. Brenner qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Brenner relates to button
`
`cell batteries having a housing comprising a housing cup, a housing cover and a foil seal which
`
`insulates the housing cup from the housing cover, and thus is from the same field of endeavor as
`
`the Asserted Patents. (Brenner [Abstract]).
`
`
`
`8
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 8 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`5.
`
`Kaun
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 2007/0160901A1 (“Kaun”) was published on July 12, 2007.
`
`The application for Kaun was filed on March 6, 2007 and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent
`
`Application No. 60/305,339, filed Jul. 13, 2001 and U.S. Patent Application No. 10/192,818, filed
`
`July 10, 2002. Kaun qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Kaun relates to improved
`
`electrochemical devices, such as batteries, capacitors, fuel cells, sensors or the like, and thus is
`
`from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Kaun [0002]).
`
`6.
`
`Arai
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 2006/0124973A1 (“Arai”) was published on June 15, 2006.
`
`The application for Arai was filed on December 13, 2005. Arai qualifies as prior art under 35
`
`U.S.C §102(b). Arai relates to a cylindrical lithium secondary battery as an energy storage device,
`
`and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Arai [FIG 1]).
`
`7.
`
`Fujita
`
`Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 1992-162351A (“Fujita”) was published on
`
`June 5, 1992. The application for Fujita was filed on October 25, 1990. Fujita qualifies as prior art
`
`under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Fujita relates to the manufacture of a cylindrical battery, and thus is from
`
`the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Fujita [Title]).
`
`8.
`
`Okochi
`
`European Patent No. 0829105B (“Okochi”) issued and was published on May 21, 2003.
`
`The application for Okochi was filed on March 27, 1997 and claims priority to Japanese Patent
`
`Application 1996073529. Okochi qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Okochi relates to
`
`a non-aqueous secondary battery comprising an electrode group composed by confronting thin
`
`
`
`9
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 9 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`positive electrode and negative electrode through a separator, and thus is from the same field of
`
`endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Okochi [Abstract]).
`
`9.
`
`Kaun-212
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 2005/0233212A1 (“Kaun-212”) was published on October 20,
`
`2005. The application for Kaun-212 was filed on April 12, 2005 and claims priority to U.S.
`
`Provisional Patent Application No. 60/562,157, filed April 14, 2004. Kaun-212 qualifies as prior
`
`art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Kaun-212 relates to an improved housings for electrochemical devices,
`
`such as batteries, and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Kaun-212
`
`[0003]).
`
`10.
`
`Yamamoto-040
`
`Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2008-066040A (“Yamamoto-040”) was
`
`published on March 21, 2008. The application for Yamamoto-040 was filed on September 5, 2006.
`
`Yamamoto-040 qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Yamamoto-040 provides a battery
`
`having a high load characteristic and realizing a high energy density, and its manufacturing method,
`
`and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Yamamoto-040 [Abstract]).
`
`11.
`
`Bennett
`
`European Patent Application Publication No. EP1266413B1 (“Bennett”) was published on
`
`May 25, 2005. The application for Bennett was filed on March 21, 2001 and claims priority to U.S.
`
`Patent Application 60/188385. Bennett qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Bennett
`
`provides the structural features of electrochemical battery cells that improve the manufacturability
`
`of the cell, increase the internal volume of the cell available for active material, and improve the
`
`sealing of the cell, and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Bennett
`
`[Abstract]).
`
`
`
`10
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 10 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`12.
`
`Yabushita
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 20080248384A1 (“Yabushita”) was published on October 9,
`
`2008. The application for Yabushita was filed on March 20, 2008 and claims priority to Japanese
`
`Patent Application No. JP2007-072430. Yabushita qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b).
`
`Yabushita relates to a flat-shaped battery such as a button-type battery or a coin-type battery, and
`
`thus is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Yabushita [Abstract]; [0002]).
`
`13. Kano
`
`Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2003-31266A (“Kano”) was published on
`
`January 31, 2003. The application for Kano was filed on July 16, 2001. Kano qualifies as prior art
`
`under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Kano provides a flat nonaqueous secondary battery improved in
`
`discharge capacity, and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Kano
`
`[Abstract]).
`
`14.
`
`SAFT
`
`Great Britain Patent No.1332944A (“SAFT”) issued and was published on October 10,
`
`1973. The application for SAFT was filed on June 18, 1971 and claims priority to French Patent
`
`Application FR1970023184. SAFT qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). SAFT provides
`
`an electrochemical battery cell including an assembly of spirally wound electrodes, and thus is
`
`from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (SAFT [Abstract]; 1:26-39).
`
`15.
`
`Yamamoto
`
`Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 1987-113358A (“Yamamoto”) was published
`
`on May 25, 1987. The application for Yamamoto was filed on November 12, 1985. Yamamoto
`
`qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Yamamoto relates to an improved battery using the
`
`
`
`11
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 11 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`spiral electrode [...] spiral generating element, and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the
`
`Asserted Patents. (Yamamoto [0001]).
`
`16.
`
`Brenner-184
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6066184A (“Brenner-184”) issued and was published on May 23, 2000.
`
`The application for Brenner-184 was filed on October 14, 1997 and claims priority to German
`
`Patent Application No. DE19647593. Brenner-184 qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b).
`
`Brenner-184 relates to button cell batteries including providing a simply produced and reliable cell
`
`seal and a process for manufacturing said seal, and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the
`
`Asserted Patents. (Brenner-184 [Abstract]; 1:34-36).
`
`17. Kubota
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5654114A (“Kubota”) issued and was published on August 5, 1997. The
`
`application for Kubota was filed on March 23, 1995 and claims priority to Japanese Patent No.
`
`JP6-055614. Kubota qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C §102(b). Kubota relates to a nonaqueous
`
`secondary battery having improved charge and discharge cycle characteristics and increased safety
`
`and thus is from the same field of endeavor as the Asserted Patents. (Kubota 1:4-6).
`
`In addition to the above prior art references, Defendant identifies the following patents,
`
`printed publications, product literature, and other materials that are pertinent to invalidity of the
`
`Asserted Claims. Defendant may rely on these references as invalidating prior art, evidence of the
`
`knowledge of those skilled in the art, and/or evidence to support a motivation to combine or modify
`
`other prior art. Defendant reserves all rights to supplement or modify these invalidity contentions
`
`and to rely on these references to prove invalidity of the Asserted Claims in a manner consistent
`
`with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of this Court.
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 12 of 87
`
`

`

`
`
`Abbreviation
`Name
`
`/
`
`/ Short
`
`Publication
`Number
`Description
`Kaun-025
`2008/109025B1
`Higuchi-842
`2008-0092842A
`Kawakami-503
`2008/0003503
`Koga
`4,487,819
`Yoshikawa
`2006-40596
`Brenner
`10 2009 017 514
`Kim-327
`8,703,327
`Yamashita-728
`2007/0172728
`Arai-293
`6,495,293
`Issaev-3500
`2008/0003500
`Kumashiro-557
`2003/0068557
`Yamaki-440
`2005/0142440
`Ryou
`1 886 364 B1
`Kawamura-356
`2007/0218356
`10-2003-0087316 Kwon-316
`Batteries made by
`InvenTek Batteries
`InvenTek Corp.,
`including its
`“Rolled-Ribbon”
`battery
`Batteries made by
`Saft, including its
`LM 17130, LM
`22150, LO 34 SX,
`and VL
`34480
`batteries
`Batteries made by
`Ultralife Corp.,
`including its BA-
`5367/U battery4
`
`Saft Batteries
`
`Ultralife Batteries
`
`Country of Origin
`
`WIPO
`KR
`US
`US
`JP
`DE
`US
`US
`US
`US
`US
`US
`EP
`US
`KR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Issue/Publication
`Date or Date of
`Availability/Sale
`11/20/2008
`10/16/2008
`01/03/2008
`12/11/1984
`02/09/2006
`10/07/2010
`04/22/2014
`07/26/2007
`12/17/2002
`09/29/2009
`04/10/2003
`06/30/2005
`08/17/2011
`09/20/2007
`11/14/2003
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4 Upon information and belief: InvenTek Batteries were publicly known or used in the United States at least as early
`as May 2008, and were sold
`in
`the United States as early as November 30, 2006. See, e.g.:
`https://web.archive.org/web/20041206230046/http://inventekcorp.com/page3.html;
`https://web.archive.org/web/20071122010915/http://inventekcorp.com/technology.html;
`https://web.archive.org/web/20071122011734/http://inventekcorp.com/partners.html. Saft Batteries were publicly
`disclosed, used, sold, or offered for sale in the United States by Saft at least as early as September 2008. Saft Batteries
`are described in at least the following publications: https://www.saftbatteries.com/download_file/6X7JMG
`Anv3Fm6HdmtEv%252B2gtlbZ1bRRVHkjS11M6md92GD2EF7vU%252F3Oybbz3WOlG%252BxR8srpA5iCdJ%
`252FV3IQzTVHQyiTucngZKEg9KkYCLkowAvgaG1huqxoaYWwEfWv6kxoE6NpquTJ9LEHjIeRJNcpGqbY3pS
`kyQFeypXD%252F1xO2%252FO9nSuKg;
`https://datasheetspdf.com/pdffile/799068/SAFT/LM22150/1;
`https://www.saftbatteries.com/download_file/6X7JMGAnv3Fm6HdmtEv%252B2gtlbZ1bRRVHkjS11M6md92GD
`2EF7vU%252F3Oybbz3WOlG%252BxR8srpA5iCdJ%252FV3IQzTVHQyiTucngZKEg9KkYCLkowAvgaG1huriE
`LqxL0z4Zj5GzBqJEjHcuUmgRkyRKg%252Fb2UWjaqEJwK3wVZjeJC2cz68EzPvQHg%253D%253D/LO34SX_
`cell_datasheet.9f428e0e-b2a8-47c6-a228-7b71052cb268.pdf;
`13
`
`
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 13 of 87
`
`

`

`EP
`US
`JP
`US
`JP
`US
`US
`US
`US
`US
`JP
`US
`US
`US
`JP
`JP
`US
`US
`JP
`JP
`US
`US
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`
`12/31/2008
`07/28/2009
`12/14/1999
`01/02/2003
`07/31/2003
`09/03/2002
`08/05/2010
`01/03/1995
`02/08/2008
`10/21/2010
`10/16/2008
`02/24/2005
`04/04/2000
`10/16/2003
`10/30/2008
`10/30/2008
`10/12/2006
`8/4/2005
`5/1/2008
`12/13/1989
`3/11/2004
`04/24/2001
`3/21/2000
`6/3/2004
`12/6/2002
`11/30/2000
`09/14/1999
`7/2/1999
`
`
`
`
`
`1 315 220 B1
`7,566,515
`H11-345626
`2003/0003370
`2003217562
`6,443,999
`2010/0196756
`5,378,560
`2008/0050652
`2010/266893
`2008251192
`2005/042506
`6,045,944
`2003/193317
`2008262826
`2008262827
`2006/228629
`2005/171383
`2008103109
`H01309254
`2004/048160
`6,221,524
`2000082486
`2004158318
`2002352789
`2000331717
`H11245066
`H11176414
`
`Urairi-220
`Suzuki-515
`Shirasu-626
`Arai-370
`Hara-562
`Cantave-999
`Wakita-756
`Tomiyama-560
`Hirose-652
`Martin-893
`Hosoda-192
`Tomimoto-506
`Okada-944
`Shimamura-317
`Higuchi-826
`Higuchi-827
`Christian-629
`Arai-383
`Atsumi-109
`Oo-254
`Komaru-160
`Andrew-524
`Inoue-486
`Funemi-318
`Oguma-789
`Okada-717
`Okada-066
`Kinoshita-414
`
`https://web.archive.org/web/20071023161139/http://www.saftbatteries.com/130-Catalogue/PDF/VL_34480.pdf;
`https://www.saftbatteries.com/download_file/6X7JMGAnv3Fm6HdmtEv%252B2gtlbZ1bRRVHkjS11M6md92GD
`2EF7vU%252F3Oybbz3WOlG%252BxR8srpA5iCdJ%252FV3IQzTVHQyiTucngZKEg9KkYCLkowAvgaG1huq1
`d69jsZmwPXR1CST1MBaukKfE4jWreOo1Tyf49Ug6QCcSSU2e7%252F4OBnAwQpzpaA%253D%253D/Selecto
`-guide_54083-2-0320.pdf;
`http://jumbohan.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/SAFT_Lithium_catalogue1.pdf;
`https://web.archive.org/web/20071108183747/http://www.saftbatteries.com//130-Catalogue/PDF/Liion_Capa.pdf.
`Ultralife Batteries were publicly disclosed, used, sold, or offered for sale in the United States by Ultralife Corp. at
`least one year before the priority dates of the Asserted Patents. Ultralife Batteries are described in at least the following
`publications:
`https://web.archive.org/web/20061109153052/http://www.ultralifebatteries.com/datasheet.php?ID=UB0006#top;
`https://web.archive.org/web/20061109154446/http://www.ultralifebatteries.com/documents/techsheets/UBI5125_U
`B2519.pdf;
`https://web.archive.org/web/20061109151535/http://www.ultralifebatteries.com/documents/whitepapers/UBM-
`5041-Military_Sheet.pdf;
`https://www.ultralifecorporation.com/ECommerce/product/ub0006/type-ba-5367-33v-
`limno2;
`https://www.ultralifecorporation.com/default.asp?LINKNAME=LITRACK&Literature_ID=178&nAction=GET
`• https://web.archive.org/web/20061109151110/http://www.ultralifebatteries.com/documents/whitepapers/Prod
`uct_Summary_Guide.pdf;
`https://www.ultralifecorporation.com/default.asp?LINKNAME=LITRACK&Literature_ID=1398&nAction=GET.
`Discovery is ongoing regarding the persons, entities, and circumstances surrounding the making of these batteries.
`14
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 14 of 87
`
`

`

`Yageta-621
`2002/146621
`Soga-218
`2000156218
`Yang-667
`2005/074667
`Cho-521
`2004/115521
`Yamaki-933
`2004/202933
`Sugano-552
`2008198552
`Reynier-599
`3,960,599
`Kagawa-056
`H05121056
`Shinichi-683
`2007200683A
`Yasuhiko-761
`2009199761A
`Hiroshi-347
`1744347A
`Takayuki-842
`5273842A
`Ogawa-299
`H08293299A
`Fujita-456
`2937456B2
`Pozin-860
`8465860B2
`Pinnell-645
`20080241645A1
`20120058386A1 Wyser-386
`Gaugler-881
`20130216881A1
`4262064A
`Nagle-064
`1985148058A
`Suzuki-058
`1983154178A
`Terada-178
`1088271A
`Linton-271
`20050058904A1
`Kano-904
`1991225748A
`Tawara-748
`20100196756A1 Wakita-756
`Hara-467
`1995153467A
`20040115521A1
`Cho-521
`20070200101A1
`Asao-101
`20080318126A1
`Ishii-126
`2007220601A
`Yamashita-601
`4539271A
`Crabtree-271
`20070037058A1
`Visco-058
`2008118478A1
`Pinnell-478
`20090208849A1
`Pozin-849
`20010009737A1
`Lane-737
`20110091753A1 Wang-753
`Howard-022
`9077022B2
`5912091A
`Daio-091
`2847540Y
`Ma-540
`1984078460A
`Koichi Tanaka
`9899640B2
`Yabushita-640
`20060183020A1
`Davidson-020
`20060093894A1
`Scott-894
`
`
`
`
`
`US
`JP
`US
`US
`US
`JP
`US
`JP
`JP
`JP
`CN
`US
`JP
`JP
`US
`US
`US
`US
`US
`JP
`JP
`GB
`US
`JP
`US
`JP
`US
`US
`US
`JP
`US
`US
`WIPO
`US
`US
`US
`US
`US
`CN
`JP
`US
`US
`US
`
`15
`
`10/10/2002
`6/6/2000
`4/7/2005
`6/17/2004
`10/14/2004
`08/28/2008
`06/01/1976
`5/12/1995
`8/9/2007
`9/3/2009
`3/8/2006
`12/28/1993
`11/5/1996
`8/23/1999
`6/18/2013
`10/2/2008
`3/8/2012
`8/22/2013
`4/14/1981
`7/2/1987
`9/3/1984
`10/25/1967
`3/17/2005
`10/04/1991
`8/5/2010
`6/10/1997
`6/17/2004
`8/30/2007
`12/25/2008
`8/30/2007
`9/3/1985
`2/15/2007
`10/2/2008
`8/20/2009
`7/26/2001
`4/21/2011
`7/7/2015
`6/15/1999
`12/13/2006
`5/7/1984
`2/20/2018
`8/17/2006
`5/4/2006
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 15 of 87
`
`

`

`6277752B1
`2502410Y
`1994096750A
`4091181A
`20070122698A1
`101217188A
`201440429U
`2004362968A
`2007207535A
`3827916A
`20090123840A1
`1992249073A
`2008198552A
`20120028110A1
`5470357A
`2002324584A
`7745041B2
`2002289259A
`2004139800A
`4053687A
`3638793A1
`2002100408A
`2000082486A
`101202357A
`1630126A
`1224934A
`7641992B2
`7883790B2
`2008262825A
`2003123830A
`5128219A
`5792574A
`7195840B2
`20130130066A1
`5639569A
`1808916A1
`2002164076A
`6143440A
`19857638A1
`6312848B1
`5603737A
`4554226A
`1989307176A
`
`
`
`
`
`Chen-752
`Yu-410
`Mitsutoshi-750
`Merritt-181
`Mitchell-698
`Xue-188
`Zhao-429
`Udagawa-968
`Yamaki-535
`Fagan-916
`Shirane-840
`Ito-073
`Sugano-552
`Brenner-110
`Schmutz-357
`Hayami-584
`Kozuki-041
`Hayami-259
`Tsunekawa-800
`Coibion-687
`Sprengel-793
`Hayami-408
`Inoue-486
`Jiang-357
`Wang-126
`Nagaura-934
`Howard-992
`Howard-790
`Higuchi-825
`Hayashi-830
`Kohler-219
`Mitate-574
`Kaun-840
`Pytlik-066
`Kohler-569
`Okabe-916
`Hayashi-076
`Volz-440
`Kilb-638
`Kilb-848
`Marincic-737
`Simonton-226
`Niizaki-176
`
`US
`CN
`JP
`US
`US
`CN
`CN
`JP
`JP
`US
`US
`JP
`JP
`US
`US
`JP
`US
`JP
`JP
`US
`DE
`JP
`JP
`CN
`CN
`CN
`US
`US
`JP
`JP
`US
`US
`US
`US
`US
`EP
`JP
`US
`DE
`US
`US
`US
`JP
`
`16
`
`8/21/2001
`7/24/2002
`4/8/1994
`5/23/1978
`5/31/2007
`7/9/2008
`4/21/2010
`12/24/2004
`8/16/2007
`8/6/1974
`5/14/2009
`9/28/1993
`8/28/2008
`2/2/2012
`11/28/1995
`11/8/2002
`6/29/2010
`10/4/2002
`5/13/2004
`10/11/1977
`6/23/1994
`4/5/2002
`3/21/2000
`6/18/2008
`6/22/2005
`8/4/1999
`1/5/2010
`2/8/2011
`10/30/2008
`4/25/2003
`7/7/1992
`8/11/1998
`1/16/2003
`5/23/2013
`6/17/1997
`7/18/2007
`6/7/2002
`11/7/2000
`6/15/2000
`11/6/2001
`2/18/1997
`11/19/1985
`12/20/1990
`
`VARTA Ex. 2012 Page 16 of 87
`
`

`

`6682853B2
`2003249201A
`3902330B2
`20050064283A1
`8048570B2
`1988285878A
`2002289257A
`1999135101A
`1990060072A
`6265100B1
`7931980B2
`8435658B2
`5631104A
`2008047303A
`1137091A1
`2632871Y
`1983010375A
`2000164259A
`5626988A
`20020034680A1
`7951476B2
`S62-272472A
`5698340A
`19647593A1
`H1140189/A
`1960040A
`6042625A
`20040029004A1
`20050181276A1
`69700312T2
`2003077543A
`4220695A
`4664989A
`3069489A
`20030175589A1
`2874790Y
`2002042744A
`7432014B2
`7341802B1
`20100227217A1
`20020192559A1
`2002134073A
`2002298803A
`
`
`
`
`
`Kimijima-853
`Hirahara-201
`Kitaoka-330
`Anderson-283
`Visco-570
`Teru-878
`Hayami-257
`Okawa-101
`Isawa-072
`Saaski-100
`Kwak-980
`Yamashita-658
`Zhong-104
`Motegi-303
`Kimijima-091
`Wang-871
`Ito-375
`Yoshizawa-259
`Daniel-Ivad
`Inoue-680
`Kim-476
`Yamada-472
`Xue-340
`Brenner-593
`Ise-189
`Gao-040
`Daio-625
`Miyaki-004
`Miyaki-276
`Mao-312
`Suzuk

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket