throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper: 8
`Entered: September 23, 2022
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MASIMO CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2022-01273 (Patent 10,912,502 B2)
`IPR2022-01274 (Patent 10,912,502 B2)
`IPR2022-01275 (Patent 10,945,648 B2)
`IPR2022-01276 (Patent 10,945,648 B2)
`IPR2022-01291 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01292 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01465 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01466 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)1
`
`
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, NEIL T. POWELL, and JAMES A. TARTAL,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POWELL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`1 This Order applies to the above-listed proceedings. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The parties are not
`authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2022-01273 (Patent 10,912,502 B2)
`IPR2022-01274 (Patent 10,912,502 B2)
`IPR2022-01275 (Patent 10,945,648 B2)
`IPR2022-01276 (Patent 10,945,648 B2)
`IPR2022-01291 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01292 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01465 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01466 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Jeremiah S. Helm, Ph.D.
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`Masimo Corporation (“Patent Owner”) filed a motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Jeremiah S. Helm, Ph.D. in each of the above-listed proceeding
`(“Motion”). 2 Paper 6. Patent Owner also filed supporting declarations from
`Dr. Helm. Ex. 2001. Patent Owner states that the Motions are unopposed.
`Paper 6, 1.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In its notice
`authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires a
`statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize
`counsel pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration of the individual
`seeking to appear in this proceeding. See Paper 4, 2 (citing Unified Patents,
`Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013)
`(Paper 7) (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission”)).
`
`
`2 All citations are to IPR2022-01273 with the understanding that the other
`proceeding includes papers having substantially the same substantive
`content.
`
`

`

`IPR2022-01273 (Patent 10,912,502 B2)
`IPR2022-01274 (Patent 10,912,502 B2)
`IPR2022-01275 (Patent 10,945,648 B2)
`IPR2022-01276 (Patent 10,945,648 B2)
`IPR2022-01291 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01292 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01465 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01466 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met, and that there is good
`cause to admit Dr. Helm pro hac vice.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that the Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah
`S. Helm, Ph.D. are granted and Dr. Helm is authorized to represent Patent
`Owner only as back-up counsel in the above-listed proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file updated
`mandatory notices identifying Dr. Helm as back-up counsel in accordance
`with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`FURTHER ORDERED that a registered practitioner will continue to
`represent Patent Owner as lead counsel in the above-listed proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Helm shall comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the Consolidated Office Patent
`Trial Practice Guide (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)) and the Board’s
`Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of
`Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Helm is subject to the USPTO’s
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and to
`the USPTO’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-01273 (Patent 10,912,502 B2)
`IPR2022-01274 (Patent 10,912,502 B2)
`IPR2022-01275 (Patent 10,945,648 B2)
`IPR2022-01276 (Patent 10,945,648 B2)
`IPR2022-01291 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01292 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01465 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01466 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Andrew Patrick
`Daniel D. Smith
`Hyun Jin In
`Grace Kim
`Gretchen DeVries
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`IPR50095-0042IP1@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`patrick@fr.com
`in@fr.com
`gkim@fr.com
`dsmith@fr.com
`devries@fr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Stephen W. Larson
`Jarom D. Kesler
`Irfan A. Lateef
`Brian C. Claassen
`Jacob L. Peterson
`Knobbe, Martens, Olson, & Bear, LLP
`2swl@knobbe.com
`2jzk@knobbe.com
`2ial@knobbe.com
`2bcc@knobbe.com
`2jup@knobbe.com
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket