throbber
United States Patent 55
`5,952,084
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`[45] Date of Patent: Sep. 14, 1999
`Andersonet al.
`
`US005952084A
`
`[54]
`
`[75]
`
`TRANSPARENT SUBSTRATE PROVIDED
`WITH A THIN-FILM COATING
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`Inventors: Charles-Edward Anderson,
`Courbevoie; Jean-Paul Rousseau,
`Boulogne, both of France
`
`Assignee: Saint Gobain Vitrage, Courbevoie,
`France
`
`Appl. No.: 08/804,187
`
`Filed:
`
`Feb. 21, 1997
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`~ 22,1996
`
`[FR]
`
`France wees seeeeeeee 96 02194
`
`Int. Clo ccc B32B 17/06; B32B 7/02
`US. C1. cece 428/212; 359/359; 359/580;
`359/585; 359/586; 359/588; 428/432; 428/433;
`428/697; 428/699; 428/701; 428/702
`Field of Search o....c.cccccccceeeeee 428/212, 697,
`428/699, 701, 702, 704, 432, 433; 359/359,
`580, 585, 586, 588
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`1/1976 Franz woe eeeeectecesecneeeneeees 428/433
`3,935,351
`5,254,392 10/1993 Burnset al
`w. 428/432
`5,332,618
`7/1994 Austin .....
`ws 428/216
`5,342,676
`8/1994 Zagdoun .....
`ws 428/702
`...
`5,645,923
`7/1997 Matsuoet al.
`we 428/701
`5,776,603
`7/1998 Zagdoun etal. oo...ee 428/336
`
`
`
`
`Primary Examiner—Atrchene Turner
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Pennie & Edmonds LLP
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The subject of the invention is a transparent substrate (1), in
`particular a glass substrate, including a coating (6) of one or
`more thin films on at least one of its faces, comprising at
`least one A film containing an aluminum fluoride or alumi-
`x yo 2?
`num oxyfluoride AL,O,F., with y20.
`
`14 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`APPLE 1016
`
`WULe
`
` 1
`
`o1
`
`S
`
`Go
`
`ho
`
`APPLE 1016
`
`1
`
`

`

`Sep. 14, 1999
`
`—i__eSK—WKYYYSt
`
`4SfifSf6Sf¢Sf*&Sf7ff*&Stftif&if” 4ffifSfff6Sf7Sf4SfLSSFSf+fFLo«+
`
`Sofofff*ff&£4ffff&Sf+Sfsr
`4Of4ff4fo4ff4ff+4f+ff+Sf+
`4f4ff6f6f4fofF4Fffo&fo+
`4f4f6f6ff6f4ff&fi6fFSSFfos
`4Ofjffff¢Sf+foftfofFfo6ifFfFFSf
`4Sfffff6Lf6SoSLfffff7Sf6fos
`4Offf6ff6fffFf4Of4Sf+fFfiat
`4ffffff646f6f6f7SPSLFfT
`4f6ff6f6ff6f6fo6ftf&fo4fia”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`©oienionioesenbammnccmntomeoratmmmnbmentamenl,ahavelemmantcms,1»atcmmnbommh6 d « cmd
`
`2
`
`

`

`5,952,084
`
`1
`TRANSPARENT SUBSTRATE PROVIDED
`WITH A THIN-FILM COATING
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention relates to transparent substrates, in particu-
`lar glass substrates, which are provided with coatings com-
`posed of one or more thin films which have interference-
`scale thicknesses and are designed to give specific properties
`to the substrates which bear them, for example, thermal,
`optical or electrical properties.
`The invention also relates to the use of these coated
`
`substrates, in particular to produce glazing, as well as to the
`method of obtaining them.
`The coatings mentioned abovetherefore consist of stacks
`of films with varied chemical composition and properties.
`They are most often dielectric films, for example of the
`metal oxide or nitride or silicon oxide type, and/or conduc-
`tive films, for example films of metal such as silver or doped
`metal oxide. For optical reasons,
`in many cases these
`coatings include films whose refractive index is to be
`carefully selected.
`Atype of coating, referred to as an anti-reflection coating,
`is thus known which usually consists of an alternating
`sequence of dielectric films with high and low refractive
`indices. Deposited on a transparent substrate, a coating of
`this type has the function of reducing the light reflection
`factor of this substrate, and therefore of increasing its light
`transmission factor. A substrate coated in this way will thus
`have an increase in its transmitted-light/reflected-lightratio,
`which improvesthe visibility of objects placed behind it. It
`can then be used in many applications, for example to
`protect a picture illuminated by a light placed behind the
`observer, or to constitute or form part of a shop window,in
`order more clearly to discern what
`is contained in the
`window, even whenthe interior lighting is low compared to
`the exterior lighting, or alternatively in interior furniture or
`as an anti-glare screen arranged in front of computerscreens.
`The performance of an anti-reflection coating can be
`measured or evaluated on the basis of various criteria.
`Firstly, of course, are the optical criteria. It may be consid-
`ered that a “good” anti-reflection coating should be able to
`lower the light reflection factor of a standard clear glass
`substrate to a given value, for example 2%, or 1% and less.
`Similarly,
`it may be important for this coating to keep a
`satisfactory colorimetry for the substrate, in particular in
`reflection, for example an extremely neutral one which is
`very close to that of the bare substrate. Other criteria may
`also be taken into account depending on the application
`which is envisaged,
`in particular the chemical and/or
`mechanical durability of the coating, the cost of the mate-
`rials which are used, the manufacturing time or the tech-
`niques to be used for manufacturing it.
`In this type of anti-reflection stack, as in others, it must
`therefore be possible to manufacture films of material with
`low refractive index, for example with an index of less than
`1.65.
`
`Various materials currently meet this criterion. Mention
`may be made of magnesium fluoride MgF., with an index of
`about 1.38, which can be deposited in the form of a thin film
`by a technique of the vacuum evaporation type. This is a
`technique whichis reliable for deposits on small surfaces,
`for example surfaces of spectacles or lenses, but becomes
`expensive and complicated when deposition on larger sur-
`faces is involved, for example on glazing.
`Silicon oxide Si0,, with a refractive index of about 1.45,
`may also be mentioned. This material can be deposited using
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`a cathodic sputtering technique, which techniqueis entirely
`suitable for deposits on large surfaces of the glazing type.
`However, it is not very easy to deposit SiO, by reactive
`sputtering in the presence of oxygen. Further to the fact that
`it
`is necessary to dope the silicon target with another
`element, in particular boron or aluminium, the deposition
`rate of the SiO, film when using this technique is low, and
`the deposition conditions are sometimesdifficult to stabilize
`and control.
`
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`The object of the invention is therefore to overcome these
`drawbacks, by seeking a novel type of material with low
`refractive index, which can be deposited, on an industrial
`scale, in the form of a high-quality thin film, with a manu-
`facturing method whichis satisfactory, in particular in terms
`of cost, ease of use and/or efficiency.
`The subject of the invention is a transparent substrate, in
`particular a glass substrate, which includes a coating of one
`or more thin films on at least one of its faces. This coating
`comprisesat least one film containing an aluminium fluoride
`or an aluminium oxyfluoride Al,O,F. (with y20) which film
`will hereafter be denoted, by convention andfor the sake of
`convenience, by the term “A film”. This material actually
`has several advantages, primarily in terms of its manufac-
`turing process: aluminium fluoride or aluminium oxyfluo-
`ride can in fact be deposited in a thin film using a vacuum
`technique of the cathodic sputtering type, optionally mag-
`netic field-enhanced cathodic sputtering.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a section of a substrate
`covered with an anti-reflection stack employing at least one
`A film according to the invention.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`In contrast to a technique of the thermal evaporation type,
`the cathodic sputtering techniqueis of great benefit; it makes
`it possible to mass-produce complex thin-film stacks by
`successive deposits on the same production line, and can be
`adapted to widely varying substrate sizes, in particular large
`sizes; it is thus entirely appropriate for manufacturing coat-
`ings for windowsintended for the building or automotive
`industries.
`
`Furthermore, using a technique of this type for depositing
`aluminium oxyfluoride does not entail problems: in contrast
`to silicon oxide deposition,
`in which use is made of a
`low-conductivity silicon target which must be doped, a
`standard metal target made of aluminium is usedin this case
`(the term “standard” target is intended to mean a plane
`geometrical configuration for
`the target, as opposed to
`rotationally cylindrical targets, which may clearly also be
`used). The A film is then deposited in a reactive atmosphere
`comprising an oxidizing gas, such as oxygen, and a fluori-
`nated gas, with a standard DC electrical supply. The deposits
`thus produced are to a great extent reproducible and easy to
`control. Furthermore, the deposition rate of a film of this
`type is much higher than that of an S10, film deposited by
`sputtering, and is high enough to makeit fully compatible
`with the short manufacturing time requirements relevant to
`mass production of coatings, more particularly for glazing.
`Furthermore, the A film manufactured in this way, which
`is of high quality, is also advantageousin termsof its optical
`properties: pure aluminium oxide Al,O, has a refractive
`
`3
`
`3
`
`

`

`5,952,084
`
`3
`index of about 1.65. By introducing fluorine to obtain an
`oxyfluoride, or even by fully substituting fluorine for oxygen
`to obtain a fluoride, the index of the film can be reduced in
`controlled fashion, since the refractive index of the film
`decreases as its fluorine content increases. By adapting the
`deposition conditions, and in particular by altering the level
`of fluorinated gas relative to the oxidizing gas in the
`cathodic-sputtering deposition atmosphere, an A film with
`variable fluorine level can be obtained, up to complete
`fluorine saturation in the absence of oxidizing gas, the index
`of which film can be set very accurately within a wide range
`of values. The index of the A film is thus chosen to be less
`
`than 1.63, and is preferably chosen between 1.60 and 1.32,
`in particular between 1.35 and 1.45. This flexibility in terms
`of the choice of refractive index makes the A film very
`beneficial because it can be adapted as a function of the
`optical role which it is intended to fulfill within a given
`thin-film stack.
`In the formula Al,O,F.,
`the equation:
`3x=2y+zIs satisfied, it being understood that “y” is allowed
`to be greater than or equal to zero.
`The level of fluorine in the A film can thus be advanta-
`geously chosen so that the F/Al atomic ratio in the film is
`between 0.1 and 3.0, in particular between 0.10 and 2.50,
`preferably between 0.16 and 2.45. Similarly, the O/F atomic
`ratio can be adjusted so that it is between O and 10, in
`particular between 0.1 and 10, preferably between 0.15 and
`9,
`
`Various considerations may also lead to elements other
`than oxygen,fluorine and aluminium being introduced into
`the A film. This may, in particular, involve an oxide or a
`mixture of oxides, preferably belonging to the following
`group: silicon oxide SiO,tin oxide SnO,,, nickel oxide NiO.
`Since all these oxides have an index of at most 1.9, adding
`them to the film maybe an additional meansof adjusting the
`index of the film, as a function of its fluorine content,
`without increasing it in undesirable proportions. They may
`furthermore have a good influence on the mechanical or
`chemical durability of the film, which may prove important
`when the A film is the outermost film in the film stack of
`which it forms part, and therefore, in fact, when it may be
`exposed directly to attack such as mechanical abrasion,
`exposure to corrosive chemical products or unfavourable
`weather conditions.
`
`Alowsilicon oxide content thus provides an improvement
`in the chemical durability of the A film, in particular an
`increase in its resistance to moisture. The A film advanta-
`geously comprises a mixture of aluminium fluoride or
`aluminium oxyfluoride/silicon oxide.
`In this case,
`it
`is
`preferable to choose an Si/Al atomic ratio of between 0.05
`and 1.00, preferably between 0.06 and 0.10; an O/F atomic
`ratio of between 0.2 and 10, and preferably between 0.25
`and 8.70, and an F/Al atomic ratio of between 0.1 and 2.5,
`preferably between 0.18 and 2.40.
`Accordingto a first, non-limiting embodiment, the A film
`formspart of a thin-film stack with reflection properties in
`the infrared and/orin the solar radiation range, in particular
`stacks comprising at least one metal film, of the silver type,
`arranged between twodielectric coatings. In view ofits low
`refractive index,it is particularly well-suited for acting as an
`intermediate film with a lower index than the substrate, and
`arranged between the substrate and the stack, as described in
`patent EP-0,745,569.
`According to another non-limiting embodiment of the
`invention, the A film formspart of an anti-reflection coating
`including an alternating sequence of dielectric films with
`high and lowreflective indices, at least one of the low-index
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`films in the stack consisting of an A film. This maybe thelast
`film in the anti-reflection coating, or alternatively all the
`low-index films therein.
`In the context of the invention, the term “low index” is
`intended to mean refractive indices of between 1.65 and
`1.32, in particular less than 1.60, and the term “high index”
`is intended to mean refractive indices of at least 1.60, in
`particular between 1.9 and 2.45.
`Using films of the A type as low-index films in an
`anti-reflection coating is actually quite advantageous: it may
`be substituted for thesilica films conventionally used in this
`type of coating. It is then possible to make two different
`choices: either the A film has a fluorinelevel selected so that
`
`it has an index close to that of silica, that is to say close to
`1.45 In this case, one material has been “replaced” by
`another material which is easier to deposit by cathodic
`sputtering but is optically equivalent in the anti-reflection
`stack. Alternatively, the A film is chosen so that it has a
`substantially lower index thansilica, in particular less than
`1.40, for example of the order of 1.37 to 1.38. In this case,
`it allows a much wider choice of possible high-index mate-
`rials. Considering in broad outline the method of evaluating
`the performanceof an anti-reflection coating, it can be stated
`that
`the capacity of such a coating to lower the light
`reflection factor value of the substrate bearing it is correlated
`with the difference between the refractive indices of the
`high- and low-index films which form the stack, and more
`particularly with the difference between the indices of the
`last two high- and low-indexfilmstherein.It has to date been
`conventional to combine a high-index film of the titantum
`oxide type, that is to say one having an index ofatleast 2.25,
`with a low-index silica film. As soon as a material with lower
`
`index becomes preferable to silica, it is acceptable for the
`high-indexfilms used to be films of a material withrelatively
`lower index, for example simply at least 1.9 to 2.2, without
`sacrificing the optical performance of the anti-reflection
`coating.
`Thus, the anti-reflection coating which includesat least
`one film of type A as a low-index film, may use high-index
`films, of actually very high index, of at least 2.25 such as
`niobium oxide, Nb,O,, zirconium oxide ZrO,,
`titanium
`oxide TiO, bismuth oxide Bi,0, or cerium oxide CeO,. But
`it is nevertheless possible to employ high-index films with
`slightly lower index, in particular of the order of 1.90 to
`2.20, for example tungsten oxide WO, tin oxide SnO., zinc
`oxide ZnO, aluminium nitride AIN,silicon nitride Si,N, or
`tantalum oxide Ta,O,;. Even with this type of material, a
`refractive index difference of at least 0.5, in particular about
`0.8, may actually be maintained between high- and low-
`index films.
`It may also be industrially beneficial,
`for
`example, to use WO, or SnO, rather than Nb,O, or TiO, as
`a high-index film,
`in particular because the former films
`have a muchgreater cathodic-sputtering deposition rate than
`the latter.
`
`Furthermore, the use in anti-reflection stacks of A films
`having a lower index than silica presents two additional
`advantages in terms of optics, and moreparticularly in terms
`of the calorimetric appearance in reflection:
`the residual
`colour in reflection of the coated substrate is made more
`
`neutral, and the variations in colour as a function of the angle
`of incidence at which the coated substrate is observed are
`found to be muchless.
`
`An anti-reflection coating according to the invention,
`comprising at least one A film, may comprise only two
`successive sequences of high- and low-index films. Four
`films may in fact be sufficient
`to obtain a remarkable
`anti-reflection effect.
`
`4
`
`4
`
`

`

`5,952,084
`
`5
`Examples of an anti-reflection coating having this con-
`figuration may thus be stacks of the type:
`Sn0,/Si0,/Nb,0,/A film or
`Sn0,/A film/Nb,0./A film.
`The Nb,O,films may also be advantageously replaced by
`SnO., WO,, Bi,O, or TiO, films.
`the anti-reflection
`According to another configuration,
`stack may comprise not two but three sequences of high- and
`low-index films. The anti-reflection effect may then be even
`greater and combined with a more neutral residual colour in
`reflection, but manufacturing the stack takes a little longer
`and is slightly more expensive.
`According to another configuration, the first sequence of
`high- and low-indexfilms in the anti-reflection coating (the
`term “first sequence” is used to denote the sequence closest
`to the surface of the substrate bearing the coating),
`is
`substituted by a single film having an intermediate refractive
`index of between 1.65 and 1.80. An intermediate-index film
`of this type has an optical effect similar to that of a
`high-index film/low-index film sequence and has the advan-
`tage of reducing the overall numberof films in the stack.
`According to yet another configuration,at least one of the
`so-called high-index films in the anti-reflection stack, and in
`particular the film in the second sequence, may be a high-
`index “overall”film, the term “overall” indicating that it is
`in fact a superposition of high-index films, in particular two
`or three. In terms of optics, this “overall”film broadly fulfils
`the role of a single film with an index intermediate between
`the refractive indices of the various films which form it.
`
`It is thus possible to have stacks of the type:
`glass/SnO./A film/Bi,0,/Sn0./Bi,0,/A film or
`glass/SnO./A film/Nb,O./SnO./A film.
`The anti-reflection stack can thus be given an additional
`anti-static function by incorporating a film of a conductive
`material in the stack, in particular a material of the doped
`metal oxide type, such as tin-doped indium oxide ITO.
`Each of the faces of the substrate is preferably covered
`with an anti-reflection stack of this type, in order to obtain
`the maximum anti-reflection effect.
`With the anti-reflection stacks described above, a reduc-
`tion in the light reflection factor values R, of the substrates
`is achieved to values of at most 2%, in particular at most 1%
`or at most 0.5%. This provides an aesthetic and pleasant
`calorimetric appearance in reflection,
`in particular subtle
`blue or blue-green tints, which is expressed in the (L*, a*,
`b*) colorimetry system by negative a* and b* values of at
`most 3.5 in absolute value for a* and at most 1.5 in absolute
`value for b*.
`
`A further subject of the invention is coatings which,
`further to at least one film of type A, comprise at least one
`film with given thermal properties,
`in particular with a
`sun-protection property or with low emissivity, of the metal
`type, such as silver or aluminium, or of the doped metal
`oxide type, for example fluorine-doped tin oxide SnO,:F or
`tin-doped indium oxide ITO.
`A further subject of the invention is glazing incorporating
`the coated substrates,
`irrespective of whether they are
`monolithic, laminated, or multiple with one or more inter-
`mediate gas layers.
`This glazing can be used either as interior or exterior
`windowsfor buildings or as glass for protecting an object,
`such as a picture, shop-window display, glazed furniture
`such as a counteror refrigerated display window,etc., or as
`motor-vehicle windows such as a laminated windscreen, as
`mirrors, anti-glare screens for computers, or decorative
`glass.
`A further subject of the invention is the method for
`manufacturing transparent substrates,
`in particular glass
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`6
`substrates, with coatings containing A films. One method
`consists in depositing all the films, successively one after the
`other, using the vacuum technique, in particular by magnetic
`field-enhanced cathodic sputtering. It is thus possible to
`deposit the oxide films by reactive sputtering of the metal in
`question in the presence of oxygen, the nitride films in the
`presence of nitrogen, and the A films by reactive sputtering
`from a target containing aluminium,
`in the presence of
`fluorinated gas in order to obtain a fluoride, and in the
`presence of fluorinated gas and oxidizing gas, such as
`oxygen, in order to obtain an oxyfluoride.
`It is not, however, ruled out that some of the films in the
`stack, with the exception of the A films, be deposited by
`another technique employing a vacuum,or by a technique of
`the pyrolysis type, in particularthe first film in the stack (or
`the first two) directly in contact with the substrate bearing
`the coating, when this substrate is made of glass.
`The invention places no limitation in terms of the nature
`of the transparent substrate bearing the coating, which may
`therefore be made of glass or plastic.
`The advantageous characteristics and details of the inven-
`tion will presently emerge from the following non-limiting
`examples, with reference to FIG. 1.
`This figure very schematically represents a section of a
`substrate covered with an anti-reflection stack employing at
`least one A film according to the invention (for the sake of
`clarity,
`the relative proportions of the substrate and film
`thicknesses have not been respected). In fact, each of the
`faces of the substrate is provided with an identical stack, but
`for simplicity only a single stack has been represented.
`Throughout the following examples, a coating was used on
`each of the faces of the substrate.
`the
`in these examples,
`It should be pointed out that,
`successive thin-film deposits were made by magnetic field-
`enhanced reactive cathodic sputtering.
`The substrates on which the anti-reflection coatings are
`deposited are clear silica-soda-lime substrates of the Pla-
`nilux type marketed by Saint-Gobain Vitrage, with a thick-
`ness of 3 to 6 mm, in particular 4 mm.
`FIG. 1 represents the glass substrate 1 which, according to
`a first embodiment,
`is coated on its two faces with a
`four-film stack 6 including an alternating sequence of high-
`index thin films 2, 4 and low-index thin films 3, 5.
`A first series of examples was carried out with niobium
`oxide in film 4 and tin oxide in film 2 for the high-index
`films:
`
`EXAMPLE1
`
`This example uses a four-film coating composed of the
`following sequence (the geometrical
`thicknesses of the
`films, in nanometers, are indicated under each of them):
`
`glass‘)/Sn07)/Si0,0)/Nb,05(9/A film
`19-29
`117.84
`
`Films 2, 3 and 4 are respectively obtained from tin,
`doped-silicon and niobium targets in the presence of
`oxygen.
`The A film, with formula Al,O,F, is obtained from an
`aluminium target, in the presence of oxygen and CF,
`(other fluorinated gases may be used in combination
`with or in place of CF,, for example C,F,). The CF,
`level is adjusted to obtain a film with a refractive index
`of about 1.37. The light reflection factor R,, based on
`the D,; illuminant, measured on the coated substrate is
`0.80%. The values of a*(g) and b* gy in reflection
`
`5
`
`5
`
`

`

`5,952,084
`
`7
`according to the (L*, a*, b*) colorimetry system are
`respectively about -3 and -1. The deposition rate of the
`A film is much greater than that of the silica film 3.
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`8
`coated substrate has an R, value of about 0.35%, and
`a* and b* values of respectively about -3 and -1.
`One example wascarried out with titantum oxide for film
`4 and tin oxide for film 2:
`
`This example uses a four-film coating which this time
`employs two A films,
`in the following sequence (same
`conventions, as in all the examples
`
`EXAMPLE6
`
`A stack is used with the following sequence:
`
`10
`
`glass‘)/Sn0.2)/A Film/Nb,05(9/A Film®)
`241
`23
`11585
`
`glass‘)/Sn0.7)/Si0,©)/TIOM/A film
`26
`34
`108
`95
`
`These films are obtained as in the previous example, and
`the A films have an index of about 1.37. The coated
`substrate has an R, value of 0.96%, and a* and b*
`values of respectively about -3 and -1.
`
`EXAMPLE3
`
`A similar stack to example 2 is used, but the “outer” A
`film, numbered 5 in the figure, is this time deposited under
`conditions whichlead to a refractive index of about 1.42, the
`other A film still having an index of about 1.37.
`The A film of index 1.37 is obtained as before, this film
`therefore corresponding to the formula Al.O,F..
`The A film of index 1.42 is obtained using a target which
`is no longer made of pure aluminium, but of
`aluminium-silicon alloy with a low silicon content This
`film therefore corresponds to the formula Al,O,F-.Si,.
`The sequence is as follows:
`
`glass‘)/Sn0.2)/A Film/Nb,05(9/A Film®)
`20
`27
`117.84
`
`The coated substrate has an R; value of 0.80%, and a* and
`b* values of respectively about -3 and -1.
`A second example series was carried out with tungsten
`oxide in film 4 and tin oxide in film 2:
`the films are
`fabricated as before, the tungsten oxide being deposited by
`reactive sputtering of a metallic tungsten target
`in the
`presence of oxygen.
`
`EXAMPLE4
`
`A stack is used with the following sequence:
`
`glass‘)/Sn022)/A Film/wO3;/A Film®
`18
`33
`126
`92
`
`The first A film® has an index of about 1.37, and the
`second of about 1.42. They are obtained as in Example
`3. The coated substrate has an R, value of about 0.33%,
`with a* and b* valuesin reflection of respectively about
`-3 and -1.
`
`EXAMPLE5
`
`A stack is used with the following sequence:
`
`glass()/Sn02?/Si0,®/WO3/A film
`1736
`125
`92
`
`The A film has an index of about 1.42, and, as in Example
`3, is obtained from an Al/Si metal alloy target. The
`
`15
`
`The A film here has an index of 1.37 andis obtained as in
`
`Example 1. The coated substrate has an R, value of
`about 0.90%, and a* and b* of values ofstill respec-
`tively about -3 and -1.
`the anti-reflection
`According to a second embodiment,
`coating containing at least one A film according to the
`invention is designed so that the high-index oxide film 4 is
`in fact an “overall” film consisting of the superposition of
`two or three high-index oxide films.
`
`EXAMPLE 7
`
`A stack with 5 films in the following sequenceis used:
`
`glass‘)/Sn0,2)/A film®/[Nb305/Sn0.](9/A film®)
`22
`30
`106
`22
`80
`
`The first A filmhas an index of about 1.37, and the
`second A film®has an index of about 1.42. They are
`obtained as in Example 3.
`The coated substrate has an R, value of about 0.50% and
`a* and b* valuesin reflection of respectively about -3
`and -1.
`
`It is also possible to substitute the Nb,O, in this stack by,
`in particular, a TiO, or Bi,O, film.
`
`EXAMPLE8
`
`A stack with 6 films in the following sequenceis used:
`
`glass‘)/Sn0,2)/A film®/[Nb305/SnO/Nb,05]/A film®
`26-26
`65
`28
`«23S
`
`The two A films®and ©have an index of 1.37 and are
`obtained as in Example 4.
`The coated substrate has an R, value of about 0.52%, and
`a* and b* valuesinreflection of respectively about -3.1
`and -1.2.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`Here again, the [Nb,0,/SnO,/Nb,0.] sequence may be
`substituted by the sequence [Bi,O,/SnO./Bi,0,] or
`[TiO,/Sn0./TiO,].
`Lastly, comparative examples were carried out using
`anti-reflection coatings employing exclusively SiO, films
`for the low-index film.
`
`65
`
`A last example according to the invention wascarried out
`with an anti-reflection coating in whichthe first sequence of
`high- and low-index films (2, 3)
`is replaced by an
`intermediate-index film (7):
`
`6
`
`6
`
`

`

`9
`EXAMPLE 9
`
`5,952,084
`
`Astack with three films in the following sequenceis used:
`
`glass“/mixed Al and Sn oxidewwOx%/A film®
`index 1.8
`index 1.37
`\55 nm
`89 nm
`
`113 nm
`
`10
`CS10F type loaded with 500 grams. The light trans-
`mission factor TL based on the D,, illuminant and the
`blurring level F (diffuse light transmission) were mea-
`sured at the start, then after 150, 350 and 650 turns. The
`result is given in the following table:
`
`10
`
`Numberofturns
`0
`150
`350
`650
`
`TL (%)
`92.2
`92.4
`93.6
`91.6
`
`F (%)
`1.32
`2.18
`2.74
`2.68
`
`The mixedoxide film™ is obtained by reactive sputtering
`in the presence of oxygen from an Al/Sn target. The A
`film®is obtained as in Example 4.
`The coated substrate has an R; value of 0.66%, and a* and
`b* values in reflection of respectively -3.1 and -1.1.
`COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`It is indeed observed that the variations in T, and blur F
`are small.
`We claim:
`1. An article comprising:
`This is comparable to Example 1, since it uses the same
`a transparent substrate having opposite faces; and
`sequence, replacing the film 5 byasilica film. The stack is
`therefore as follows:
`an anti-reflection coating comprising two or more adja-
`cent dielectric films disposed over at least one of the
`faces, said coating containing an alternating sequence
`of adjacentfilms having high and lowrefractive indices
`with at least one of the films having a low refractive
`index being positioned as an outermost layer of the
`coating and comprising (1) an aluminum fluoride or
`aluminum oxyfluoride material, wherein the aluminum
`material has an O/F atomicratio of less than 10, and (2)
`at least one oxide component selected from the group
`consisting of silicon oxide, tin oxide, nickel oxide and
`mixtures thereof.
`
`glass/Sn037)/Si039/Nb205(9/SiO
`21
`34
`119
`85
`
`The R, value of the coated substrate is 0.55%.
`The following conclusions can be drawn from this set of
`results:
`incorporating films of the A type in the anti-
`reflection stacks is advantageous: the production cycle time
`can be reduced very substantially by employing these flu-
`orinated films rather than silica films.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`This substitution is not accompanied by any drawback in
`terms of the properties of the stack, more particularly the
`optical properties: the A films, with adjustable index, make
`it possible to obtain very low R, values, at least as low as
`with silica films. They also makeit possible to obtain a very
`pale green-blue appearance in reflection, which tint is cur-
`rently highly desirable.
`The thicknesses of each of the films were actually
`selected, more particularly the thicknesses of the A films, in
`order to obtain this colorimetry in conjunction with a low
`light reflection factor value. It is clear that modifying the
`thicknesses of these films, in particular by +20% relative to
`the thicknesses indicated,
`in particular with the aim of
`obtaining a slightly different colorimetry in reflection, would
`not depart from the scope of the invention.
`Furthermore, the use, as in Example 3, of an “exterior” A
`film made of fluorinated alumina additionally containing a
`small amount ofsilica. provides two advantages: this allows
`finer adjustmentof the index of the film, and it increases the
`chemicalresistance of the film comparedto a film consisting
`of only silica or only fluorinated alumina.
`This is beneficial when the substrate may be incorporated
`in glazing with the film stack facing the exterior (damage
`due to the weather) or the interior (damage due to abrasive
`cleaning).
`A test furthermore demonstrated good mechanical dura-
`bility:
`An A film according to the invention, with an index of
`1.42, consisting of a mixture of aluminium oxyfluoride
`and silica, and with a thickness of 100 nm, was depos-
`ited directly on a glass substrate. This substrate was
`subjected to the so-called Taber Abrasion Test, which
`test
`is carried out using wheels made of abrasive
`powder embedded in an elastomer. The machine is
`manufactured by the company Taber Instrument Cor-
`poration in the United States. It
`is the model 174
`“Standard Abrasion Tester”, and the wheels are of the
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2. The article according to claim 1, wherein each low-
`refractive index film in the anti-reflection coating comprises
`aluminum fluoride.
`
`3. The article according to claim 1, wherein each film
`having the high refractive index has an index ofat least 1.80
`and comprises compoundsselected from the group consist-
`ing of tungsten oxide,
`tin oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum
`nitride, silicon nitride, tantalum oxide, niobium oxide, tita-
`nium oxide, bismuth oxide, zirconium oxide, cerium oxide,
`and mixtures thereof.
`
`4. The article according to claim 1, wherein each film
`having the high refractive index has an index ofat least 2.25
`and comprises compoundsselected from the group consist-
`ing of niobium oxide, titantum oxide, bismuth oxide, zirco-
`nium oxide, cerium oxide, and mixtures thereof.
`5. The article according to claim 1, wherein the difference
`in refractive index between two adja

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket