throbber
Int. J. Cancer: 125, 353–355 (2009)
`' 2009 UICC
`
`Mutational analysis of IDH1 codon 132 in glioblastomas
`and other common cancers
`Mi Ran Kang1, Min Sung Kim1, Ji Eun Oh1, Yoo Ri Kim1, Sang Yong Song2, Seong Il Seo3,
`Ji Youl Lee4, Nam Jin Yoo1 and Sug Hyung Lee1*
`1Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
`2Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
`3Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
`4Department of Urology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
`
`Missense somatic mutations in IDH1 gene affecting codon 132
`have recently been reported in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
`and other gliomas. The recurrent nature of the IDH1 mutations in
`the same amino acid strongly suggests that the mutations may
`play important roles in the pathogenesis of glial tumors. The aim
`of this study was to see whether the IDH1 codon 132 mutations
`occur in other human cancers besides glial tumors. We also
`attempted to confirm the occurrence of the IDH1 mutations in
`GBM of Korean patients. We have analyzed 1,186 cancer tissues
`from various origins, including carcinomas from breast, colon,
`lung, stomach, esophagus, liver, prostate, urinary bladder, ovary,
`uterine cervix, skin and kidney, and malignant mesotheliomas,
`primary GBM, malignant meningiomas, multiple myelomas and
`acute leukemias by single-strand conformation polymorphism
`analysis. We found four IDH1 codon 132 mutations in the GBM
`(4/25; 16.0%), two in the prostate carcinomas (2/75; 2.7%) and
`one in the B-acute lymphoblastic leukemias (B-ALL) (1/60; 1.7%),
`but none in other cancers. The IDH1 mutations consisted of five
`p.R132H and two p.R132C mutations. The data indicate that
`IDH1 codon 132 mutations occur not only in GBM, but also in
`prostate cancers and B-ALL. This study suggests that despite the
`infrequent incidence of the IDH1 mutations in prostate cancers
`and B-ALL, mutated IDH1 could be therapeutically targeted in
`these cancers and in glial tumors with the IDH1 mutations.
`' 2009 UICC
`
`Key words: IDH1; glioblastoma multiforme; mutation; IDH1 codon
`132; cancer
`
`For the comprehensive elucidation of genetic alterations in glio-
`blastoma multiforme (GBM), Parsons et al.1 recently analyzed
`20,661 genes (approximately two-thirds of total human genes) by
`a direct DNA sequencing method. In GBM tissues, they identified
`685 genes that contained at least one nonsilent somatic muta-
`tion(s). In addition to the genes with known mutations in GBM
`such as TP53, EGFR, PTEN, NF1, RB1 and PIK3CA, two genes
`isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and phosphoinositide-3-kinase
`regulatory subunit 1 (PIK3R1) harbored mutations at high inci-
`dences.1 Somatic point mutations of IDH1 were detected in 12 of
`105 GBM (11.4%). Of note, all of the 12 mutations were predicted
`to substitute an Arg residue in position 132 of amino acid sequen-
`ces. A following study using various brain tumors detected the
`IDH1 codon 132 mutations not only in GBM (primary and second-
`ary), but also in other glial tumors.2 Despite the high incidence of
`the IDH1 mutations in the brain tumors, the functional roles of the
`mutations in cancer development remain unknown.
`One of the main concerns in cancer genetics is as to whether
`any mutation found in cancer is specific to few cancer types or is
`widespread in many cancer types. For example, EGFR and JAK2
`mutation is specific to few cancer types,3,4 whereas K-RAS and
`TP53 mutations are common to many cancer types.5,6 To see if
`any other types of human cancers besides glial tumors carry the
`IDH1 codon 132 mutations, we have analyzed the IDH1 gene in
`various types of human cancers in this study.
`
`Material and methods
`
`Cancer tissues (1,186) from Korean patients (carcinomas from
`breast, colon, lung, stomach, esophagus, liver, prostate, urinary
`
`Publication of the International Union Against Cancer
`
`bladder, ovary, uterine cervix, skin and kidney, and malignant
`mesotheliomas, primary GBM, malignant meningiomas, multiple
`myelomas and acute leukemias) were used for this study (Table I).
`All of the cancers analyzed were primary cancers, but not meta-
`static cancers. We did not include cell lines in this study. For the
`solid cancers, malignant cells and normal cells were selectively
`procured from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides using a 301/2
`gauge hypodermic needle affixed to a micromanipulator, as
`described previously.7 Approval for this study was obtained from
`the Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine’s institu-
`tional review board.
`Up to now, all of the IDH1 mutations have been detected at nu-
`cleotide sequences 394 or 395 in exon 4, which would result in
`amino acid substitutions at 132.1,2 Thus, we analyzed a part of the
`exon 4 of IDH1 gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based
`single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP)
`analysis.
`Genomic DNA each from tumor cells and normal cells of
`the same patients were amplified by PCR with one primer pair
`(50-AAACAAATGTGGAAATCACC-30
`and 50-TGCCAACAT
`GACTTACTTGA-30; product size 166 base pairs). Radioisotope
`([32P]dCTP) was incorporated into the PCR products for detection
`by autoradiogram. Other procedures of the PCR-SSCP were
`described in our previous studies.7–9 After SSCP, direct DNA
`sequencing reactions were performed in the cancers with the mo-
`bility shifts in the SSCP according to the manufacturer’s recom-
`mendation (ABI Prism Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystem,
`Foster City, CA). As potential positive controls for the SSCP, we
`included GBM tissues with known IDH1 mutations.
`
`Results and discussion
`
`PCR-SSCP analysis of the exon 4 of IDH1 gene in the 1,186
`cancers identified aberrant bands in seven cancers (Fig. 1). There
`was no visible aberrant band in the other 1,179 cancers. Direct
`DNA sequencing analysis of the PCR products in the seven can-
`cers [four GBMs, two prostate cancers and one B-acute lympho-
`blastic leukemia (B-ALL)] with the aberrant SSCP bands led to
`the identification of seven IDH1 mutations (Fig. 1; Table II). None
`of the normal samples from the same patients showed evidence of
`mutations by the SSCP and direct DNA sequencing (Fig. 1), indi-
`cating the mutations had risen somatically. The IDH1 mutations
`consisted of five c.395G>A (p.R132H) and two c.394C>T
`(p.R132C; Table II). We repeated the experiments twice, includ-
`ing PCR, SSCP and sequencing analysis to ensure the specificity
`of the results and found that the data were consistent (data not
`shown).
`
`Grant sponsor: Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF);
`Grant number: R01-2008-000-10014-0.
`*Correspondence to: Department of Pathology, College of Medicine,
`The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Socho-gu, Seoul 137-
`701, Korea. Fax: 182-2-537-6586. E-mail: suhulee@catholic.ac.kr
`Received 15 December 2008; Accepted after revision 10 February 2009
`DOI 10.1002/ijc.24379
`Published online 23 February 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.
`wiley.com).
`
`Rigel Exhibit 1019
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`354
`
`KANG ET AL.
`
`the seven cancers with the IDH1
`The SSCP of all of
`mutations at
`the mutation sites showed both wild-type and
`aberrant bands (Fig. 1a), and direct sequencing analysis also
`
`TABLE I – IDH1 MUTATIONS IN 1,185 CANCERS
`
`Type of cancers
`
`Number
`of cancers
`
`Primary GBM
`Prostate carcinoma
`B-ALL
`T-ALL
`Acute myelogenous
`leukemia
`Multiple myeloma
`Malignant meningioma
`Malignant mesothelioma
`Non-small cell lung cancer
`Gastric carcinoma
`Colorectal carcinoma
`Breast carcinoma
`Hepatocellular carcinoma
`Hepatoblastoma
`Esophageal squamous
`cell carcinoma
`Urothelial carcinoma
`Uterine cervical carcinoma
`Ovarian carcinoma
`Squamous cell carcinoma,
`skin
`Renal cell cracinoma
`
`25
`75
`60
`26
`100
`
`30
`29
`6
`179
`101
`97
`94
`81
`56
`71
`
`28
`10
`85
`19
`
`14
`
`Wild
`type
`
`21
`73
`59
`26
`100
`
`30
`29
`6
`179
`101
`97
`94
`81
`56
`71
`
`28
`10
`85
`19
`
`14
`
`IDH1 codon 132
`
`Mutation Mutation
`(%)
`
`4
`2
`1
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`16
`2.7
`1.7
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`revealed both mutant and wild-type sequences (Fig. 1b). We
`used microdissected tissues that had purity of cancer cells
`over 90%.7 Thus, both SSCP and direct sequencing data indi-
`the IDH1 mutations may be heterozygous in the
`cate that
`seven cancers.
`We compared the incidences of the IDH1 mutations in primary
`GBM between the previous (7/99)1 and our data (4/25). There was
`no statistical difference between them (Fisher’s exact test, p >
`0.05). The prostate carcinomas used in the present study consisted
`of 55 TNM II, 19 TNM III and 1 TNM IV cancers. According to
`the Gleason score, the prostate carcinomas were graded as Glea-
`son score 6 (n 5 18), Gleason score 7 (n 5 47), Gleason score 8
`(n 5 8) and Gleason score 9 (n 5 2). However, there was not any
`significant association of the IDH1 mutations either with the Glea-
`son scores or the TNM stages (v2 test, p > 0.05).
`Recurrent genetic alterations have been used as therapeutic tar-
`gets in cancer treatment. For example, recurrent mutations of
`EGFR in lung cancers, BCR/ABL translocations in chronic my-
`elogenous leukemias and HER2 amplifications in breast cancers
`are being used as therapeutic targets of Gefitinib (Iressa), Imanitib
`(Gleevec) and Trastzumab (Herceptin), respectively.4,10–12 Recur-
`rent IDH1 mutations in a specific amino acid (Arg 132) suggested
`a possibility that targeting of the IDH1 mutation could be used in
`the treatment of cancers harboring the mutations as in the cases of
`EGFR, BCR/ABL and HER2.4,10–12 In the current study, we found
`that prostate cancers and B-ALL harbored the IDH1 codon 132
`mutations. Also, we confirmed the occurrence of the IDH1 muta-
`tion in the GBM of Korean patients. Despite the low frequency of
`the IDH1 mutations in these cancers compared with that of glial
`
`FIGURE 1 – Mutations of IDH1 gene in prostate cancers and B-ALL. SSCP (a) and DNA sequencing analysis (b) of DNA from tumor (Lane
`T) and normal tissues (Lane N). (a) Arrows (Lane T) indicate aberrant bands compared with the SSCP from normal tissues (N). SSCPs of DNA
`from tumors (T) show wild-type bands and additional aberrant bands. (b) Direct DNA sequencing analyses from prostate cancers #5 (left) and
`#27 (middle) and B-ALL #29 (right). There are nucleotide substitutions (red box) in tumor tissues (T) as compared with normal tissues (N).
`[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
`
`Rigel Exhibit 1019
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`IDH1 MUTATION IN CANCERS
`
`355
`
`TABLE II – SUMMARY OF THE IDH1 MUTATIONS IN THE CANCERS
`
`Case no.
`
`Type of cancers
`
`GBM 6
`GBM 23
`GBM 27
`GBM 31
`PS 5
`PS 27
`Leu 29
`
`Primary GBM
`Primary GBM
`Primary GBM
`Primary GBM
`Prostate adenocarcinoma
`Prostate adenocarcinoma
`B-ALL
`
`Nucleotide change
`(Predicted amino acid change)
`
`c.395G>A (p.R132H)
`c.395G>A (p.R132H)
`c.395G>A (p.R132H)
`c.395G>A (p.R132H)
`c.395G>A (p.R132H)
`c.394C>T (p.R132C)
`c.394C>T (p.R132C)
`
`Other clinicopathologic
`characteristics
`
`–
`–
`–
`–
`TNM stage II, Gleason score 7
`TNM stage III, Gleason score 8
`BRAF mutation (c.486G>A), no cytogenetic abnormality
`
`tumors, the IDH1 mutation may play an important role in the de-
`velopment of the cancers with the mutations, given that the IDH1
`mutations provide cancer-related functions with the affected cells.
`Also, the data suggest a possibility that not only glial tumors, but
`also prostate and B-ALL should be considered as candidate cancer
`types for future therapies targeting the IDH1 mutations. Recently,
`Bleeker et al.13 analyzed the IDH1 mutation in a large series of
`tumors, and observed comparable results to our data. They found
`no IDH1 mutation in other tumors besides GBM.
`To date, there have been six types of the IDH1 codon 132 muta-
`tions (p.R132H, p.R132C, p.R132S, p.R132G, p.R132L and
`p.R132V) detected in human cancers.1,2 In glial tumors, p.R132H
`is the most common IDH1 mutation and p.R132C is the second
`one.1,2 In agreement with these, the IDH1 mutations detected in
`our study were either p.R132H or p.R132C. However, functional
`role of the IDH1 mutations in cancer pathogenesis depending on
`the subtypes remains to be clarified.
`IDH1 is an enzyme that catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation
`of isocitrate into a-ketoglutarate utilizing either NAD or NADP as
`cosubstrates.14,15 IDH1 is mainly involved in metabolic processes
`and its roles in cancer biology are largely unknown. Thus, it is
`
`crucial to discover the functions of mutant IDH1 in cancer devel-
`opment. However, before the identification of functions, its nor-
`mal physiological functions must be found out first. One of the
`cancer-related functions of IDH1 is the cellular control of oxida-
`tive damages.16 Whether alteration of
`its oxidative damage
`response by the IDH1 mutations is crucial in cancer development,
`and/or whether alterations of other unidentified functions are cru-
`cial, should be further clarified. In addition, analysis of alterations
`of tissue expression of IDH1 gene together with the IDH1 muta-
`tions could further elucidate roles of IDH1 in cancers.
`In summary, this study identified that few types of human
`cancers harbored IDH1 codon 132 mutations, suggesting some
`overlap of pathogenesis among glial tumors, prostate cancers and
`B-ALL. Despite the infrequent incidence of the IDH1 mutations
`in prostate cancers and B-ALL, mutated IDH1 could also be thera-
`peutically targeted in these cancers with the IDH1 mutations.
`
`Acknowledgement
`
`The prostate cancer tissues were supplied from ‘The Prostate
`Bank of KoreaÕ supported by KOSEF.
`
`References
`
`3.
`
`1.
`
`Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P,
`Mankoo P, Carter H, Siu IM, Gallia GL, Olivi A, McLendon R, et al.
`An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme.
`Science 2008;321:1807–12.
`2. Balss J, Meyer J, Mueller W, Korshunov A, Hartmann C, von Deim-
`ling A. Analysis of the IDH1 codon 132 mutation in brain tumors.
`Acta Neuropathol 2008;116:597–602.
`James C, Ugo V, Le Couedic JP, Staerk J, Delhommeau F, Lacout C,
`Garc¸on L, Raslova H, Berger R, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Villeval JL,
`Constantinescu SN, et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to
`constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 2005;434:
`1144–8.
`4. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA,
`Brannigan BW, Harris PL, Haserlat SM, Supko JG, Haluska FG,
`Louis DN, Christiani DC, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal
`growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell
`lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2129–39.
`5. Braithwaite AW, Prives CL. p53: more research and more questions.
`Cell Death Differ 2006;13:877–80.
`6. Malumbres M, Barbacid M. RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years. Nat
`Rev Cancer 2003;3:459–65.
`7. Lee SH, Shin MS, Park WS, Kim SY, Kim HS, Han JY, Park GS,
`Dong SM, Pi JH, Kim CS, Kim SH, Lee JY, et al. Alterations of Fas
`(Apo-1/CD95) gene in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene 1999;
`18:3754–60.
`8. Kim HS, Lee JW, Soung YH, Park WS, Kim SY, Lee JH, Park JY,
`Cho YG, Kim CJ, Jeong SW, Nam SW, Kim SH, et al. Inactivating
`mutations of caspase-8 gene in colorectal carcinomas. Gastroenterol-
`ogy 2003;125:708–15.
`
`9. Lee JW, Kim YG, Soung YH, Han KJ, Kim SY, Rhim HS, Min WS,
`Nam SW, Park WS, Lee JY, Yoo NJ, Lee SH. The JAK2 V617F mutation
`in de novo acute myelogenous leukemias. Oncogene 2006;25:1434–6.
`10. Arteaga CL, Moulder SL, Yakes FM. HER (erbB) tyrosine kinase inhib-
`itors in the treatment of breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2002;29:4–10.
`11. Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Kantarjian H, Resta DJ, Reese SF, Ford JM,
`Capdeville R, Talpaz M. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-
`ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia
`and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome.
`N Engl J Med 2001;344:1038–42.
`12. Wakeling AE, Guy SP, Woodburn JR, Ashton SE, Curry BJ, Barker
`AJ, Gibson KH. ZD1839 (Iressa): an orally active inhibitor of epider-
`mal growth factor signaling with potential for cancer therapy. Cancer
`Res 2002;62:5749–54.
`13. Bleeker FE, Lamba S, Leenstra S, Troost D, Hulsebos T, Vandertop
`WP, Frattini M, Molinari F, Knowles M, Cerrato A, Rodolfo M,
`Scarpa A, et al. IDH1 mutations at residue p.R132 (IDH1(R132))
`occur frequently in high-grade gliomas but not in other solid tumors.
`Hum Mutat 2009;30:7–11.
`14. Geisbrecht BV, Gould SJ. The human PICD gene encodes a cytoplas-
`mic and peroxisomal NADP(1)-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase.
`J Biol Chem 1999;274:30527–33.
`Illingworth JA, Tipton KF. Purification and properties of the nicotina-
`mide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate-dependent isocitrate dehydro-
`genase from pig liver cytoplasm. Biochem J 1970;118:253–8.
`16. Xu X, Zhao J, Xu Z, Peng B, Huang Q, Arnold E, Ding J. Structures
`of human cytosolic NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase reveal
`a novel self-regulatory mechanism of activity. J Biol Chem 2004;279:
`33946–57.
`
`15.
`
`Rigel Exhibit 1019
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket