`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SERVIER PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
`
`Patent Owner.
`______________
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01423
`Patent: 10,610,125
`
`______________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`VANESSA Y. YEN
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01423
`Patent 10,610,125
`
`Exhibit No.
`2001
`
`2002
`2003
`
`2004
`2005
`
`2006
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`Description
`Declaration of Vanessa Y. Yen in Support of Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice
`Vanessa Y. Yen Biography
`Declaration of Evan D. Diamond in Support of Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice
`Evan D. Diamond Biography
`Declaration of Hassen A. Sayeed, M.D. in Support of
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Hassen A. Sayeed, M.D. Biography
`
`-ii-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Patent Owner, Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC
`
`IPR2022-01423
`Patent 10,610,125
`
`
`
`(“Patent Owner”) respectfully requests the pro hac vice admission of attorney
`
`Vanessa Y. Yen for purposes of the above-captioned inter partes review proceeding.
`
`Patent Owner has conferred with counsel for Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner”), and Petitioner does not oppose this motion.
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS SHOWING GOOD CAUSE FOR THE BOARD TO
`RECOGNIZE VANESSA Y. YEN PRO HAC VICE IN THIS PROCEEDING
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during an inter partes review
`
`proceeding upon a showing of good cause, “subject to the condition that lead counsel
`
`be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may impose.”
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). “For example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a registered
`
`practitioner may be granted upon showing that counsel is an experienced litigating
`
`attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`
`proceeding.” Id.
`
`As set forth below and in the accompanying Declaration of Vanessa Y. Yen
`
`in Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (“Yen Decl.,” Exhibit 2001), the facts
`
`here establish good cause for the Board to recognize Vanessa Yen pro hac vice in
`
`this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`1. Ms. Yen is a member in good standing of the State Bar of New York
`
`IPR2022-01423
`Patent 10,610,125
`
`
`
`(Bar No. 4842563). See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 2.
`
`2. Ms. Yen has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before
`
`any court or administrative body. See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 3.
`
`3.
`
`None of Ms. Yen’s applications for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body have ever been denied. See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 4.
`
`4. Ms. Yen has not been sanctioned nor has she had a contempt citation
`
`imposed on her by any court or administrative body. See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 5.
`
`5. Ms. Yen has declared that she has read and will comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trial set forth in
`
`part 42 of 37 C.F.R. See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 6.
`
`6. Ms. Yen has acknowledged and agrees that she will be subject to the
`
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 11.101 et. seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 7.
`
`7. Ms. Yen is a Partner in the Life Sciences Intellectual Property practice
`
`of King & Spalding LLP, and is an experienced patent litigation attorney in the fields
`
`of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, in both federal district court patent
`
`infringement suits across the country and in inter partes review proceedings before
`
`the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 8. Ms. Yen received her
`
`J.D. from Cornell Law School and has a technical background pertinent to the issues
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`in this proceeding, including B.S. in Biology from Massachusetts Institute of
`
`IPR2022-01423
`Patent 10,610,125
`
`Technology. See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 9.
`
`8. Ms. Yen has studied and analyzed the field of technology relevant to
`
`the ’125 patent, as well as the claims, specification and prosecution history of the
`
`’125 patent. Accordingly, Ms. Yen has become very familiar with both the particular
`
`subject matter and substantive issues concerning the ’125 patent. She is also familiar
`
`with the alleged prior art references asserted by Petitioner in this inter partes review
`
`proceeding. See Exhibit 2001, ¶ 10.
`
`In view of Ms. Yen’s knowledge of the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding, Patent Owner has a substantial need for Ms. Yen’s pro hac vice
`
`admission and her involvement in this proceeding.
`
`II. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Vanessa Y. Yen pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01423
`Patent 10,610,125
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`KING & SPALDING LLP
`
`/Joseph D. Eng, Jr./
`
`Joseph D. Eng, Jr. (Reg. No. 54,084)
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC
`
`Date: September 7, 2022
`1185 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036 (212)
`556-2100
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01423
`Patent 10,610,125
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF VANESSA Y. YEN,
`
`EXHIBIT LIST and EXHIBITS 2001-2002 were served via electronic
`
`mail September 7, 2022, in their entirety on the following:
`
`Paul H. Berghoff (Reg. No. 30,243)
`James L. Lovsin (Reg. No. 69,550)
`James V. Suggs (Reg. No. 50,419)
`MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP
`300 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`berghoff@mbhb.com
`lovsin@mbhb.com
`suggs@mbhb.com
`docketing@mbhb.com
`RigelIPR@mbhb.com
`
`KING & SPALDING LLP
`
`/Joseph D. Eng, Jr./
`
`Joseph D. Eng, Jr. (Reg. No. 54,084)
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC
`
`Date: September 7, 2022
`1185 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`(212) 556-2100
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
