throbber
1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`23
`24
`25
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________________
` )
`Google LLC, )
` )
` Petitioner, )
` )
` vs. )IPR2022-01411
` )IPR2022-01412
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C., )IPR2022-01413
` )
` Patent Owner. )
`_____________________________)
`
` CORRECTED TRANSCRIPT
`
` REMOTE DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM LEO HOARTY
` Deponent testifying from Morgan Hill, California
` Monday, August 21, 2023
` Volume I
`
`Stenographically Reported By:
`Melissa M. Villagran, RPR
`CSR No. 12543
`Job No. 6056498
`PAGES 1 - 103
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 1
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0001
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________________
` )
`Google LLC, )
` )
` Petitioner, )
` )
` vs. )IPR2022-01411
` )IPR2022-01412
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C., )IPR2022-01413
` )
` Patent Owner. )
`_____________________________)
`
` REMOTE DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM LEO HOARTY,
`Volume I, taken on behalf of Petitioner with all
`participants appearing remotely via videoconference
`and the Deponent testifying from Morgan Hill,
`California, beginning at 9:07 a.m. and ending at
`12:40 p.m. on Monday, August 21, 2023, before
`Melissa M. Villagran, RPR, Certified Shorthand
`Reporter No. 12543.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 2
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0002
`
`

`

`A P P E A R A N C E S :
`
`A L L A T T E N D E E S A P P E A R I N G R E M O T E L Y
`
`F o r P e t i t i o n e r :
`
` C O O L E Y
`
` B Y : E A M O N N G A R D N E R
`
` A t t o r n e y a t L a w
`
` 1 1 4 4 1 5 t h S t r e e t , S u i t e 2 3 0 0
`
` D e n v e r , C o l o r a d o 8 0 2 0 2
`
` 8 5 8 . 5 5 0 . 6 0 0 8
`
` E g a r d n e r @ c o o l e y . c o m
`
`F o r P a t e n t O w n e r :
`
` L I S T O N A B R A M S O N
`
` B Y : R O N A L D A B R A M S O N
`
` M I C H A E L L E W I S
`
` A t t o r n e y a t L a w
`
` 4 0 5 L e x i n g t o n A v e n u e , 4 6 t h F l o o r
`
` N e w Y o r k , N e w Y o r k 1 0 1 7 4
`
` 2 1 2 . 2 5 7 . 1 6 4 3
`
` r o n . a b r a m s o n @ l i s t o n a b r a m s o n . c o m
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`1 0
`
`1 1
`
`1 2
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 3
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0003
`
`

`

` INDEX
`
`DEPONENT EXAMINATION
`
`WILLIAM LEO HOARTY
`
`Volume I
`
` BY MR. GARDNER 6
`
` BY MR. GARDNER 96
`
` EXHIBITS
`
`DEPOSITION PAGE
`
`Exhibit 1101 Deposition from July 6, 2023 15
`
`Exhibit 1102 Deposition from August 3rd, 2023 15
`
`Exhibit 1594 '594 Patent 12
`
`Exhibit 1636 '636 Patent 12
`
`Exhibit 1824 '824 Patent 13
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 4
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0004
`
`

`

` PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
`
`NUMBER PAGE
`
`Exhibit 2006 10
`
`Exhibit 2007 10
`
`Exhibit 1006 68
`
`Exhibit 2002 78
`
` INFORMATION REQUESTED
`
` (None.)
`
` INSTRUCTION NOT TO ANSWER
`
` (None.)
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 5
`
`1 2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0005
`
`

`

` Morgan Hill, California; Monday, August 21, 2023
`
` 9:07 a.m.
`
` WILLIAM LEO HOARTY,
`
`having been administered an oath, was examined and
`
`testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Mr. Hoarty, can you state your full name for 09:07:56
`
`the record.
`
` A For the -- excuse me.
`
` For the record, my full name is William Leo
`
`Hoarty.
`
` Q And, Mr. Hoarty, where are you located today? 09:08:04
`
` A Today I'm in my home in Morgan Hill,
`
`California.
`
` Q Is there anyone else in the room with you
`
`today?
`
` A Nobody is in the room with me. I am alone. 09:08:17
`
` Q Before we get started, Mr. Hoarty, I just
`
`want to reflect on the record that Petitioner Google
`
`served a notice for this deposition on August 7th
`
`stating that the deposition would be recorded by
`
`stenographic audio and video means. 09:08:43
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 6
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0006
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Petitioner Google then scheduled a
`
`videographer for the deposition today. And not
`
`until shortly before the deposition did the patent
`
`owner WAG raise any objections or any issues to
`
`that. 09:09:12
`
` MR. GARDNER: Is that correct, Mr. Abramson?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: That's correct that we raised
`
`an objection -- we have raised an objection to video
`
`recording.
`
` MR. GARDNER: Today, correct? 09:09:26
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Today.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Now, Mr. Hoarty, you've been deposed before,
`
`correct?
`
` A Yes, sir. 09:09:35
`
` Q Approximately how many times have you been
`
`deposed?
`
` A I believe approximately 20.
`
` Q You have also been through multiple recent
`
`depositions, correct? 09:09:47
`
` A Correct.
`
` Q So is it fair to say that you have a good
`
`understanding of how depositions proceed and the
`
`general rules governing depositions?
`
` A Correct. 09:09:58
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 7
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0007
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q In that case, I won't spend everybody's time
`
`going through deposition basics. But I do want to
`
`remind you that we both need to do our best to not
`
`talk over each other, especially because we're doing
`
`this over the Zoom conferencing system. 09:10:16
`
` Is that fair?
`
` A That's fair.
`
` Q Also, I will try to ask the best questions I
`
`can today. But I'm sure from time to time I might
`
`ask something that is unclear. If I do that, I ask 09:10:30
`
`that you seek clarification.
`
` Is that fair?
`
` A That's fair.
`
` Q And if you answer a question without seeking
`
`clarification, I will assume that you understood the 09:10:40
`
`question.
`
` Is that fair?
`
` A That's fair.
`
` Q Is there any reason, such as medications or
`
`health condition, that you feel you cannot answer 09:10:52
`
`questions accurately today?
`
` A No. No problem.
`
` Q Do you have any materials with you today?
`
` A I have my deposition documents, the two of
`
`them, and the exhibits of this matter. 09:11:06
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 8
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0008
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q When you say "deposition documents," what do
`
`you mean by deposition documents?
`
` A I wrote two declarations for this matter
`
`covering the three patents, so the -- at issue.
`
` Q I see. 09:11:25
`
` And just to clarify, so when -- I think you
`
`had said depositions. But did you mean
`
`declarations?
`
` A I did. I'm sorry. I've only had one cup of
`
`coffee. But I'll hurry up -- I'll hurry up on the 09:11:36
`
`second cup so I'll get my words in order. My
`
`apologies.
`
` Q Sounds good.
`
` The documents you have, are those printed
`
`documents, or do you have them in electronic form? 09:11:47
`
` A I have them in electronic form on a screen
`
`next to me, just on my left.
`
` Q Do you have any printed materials with you?
`
` A I do not.
`
` Q Do you have any -- do you currently have any 09:11:58
`
`files opened on your computer?
`
` A I do.
`
` Q What files do you have opened?
`
` A My declarations, the two of them, and then
`
`the exhibits that go to this matter. 09:12:14
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 9
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0009
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q Do you have any other programs open on your
`
`computer other than the Zoom chat that you are --
`
` A No. Everything else -- Zoom -- the Zoom
`
`application is running. Everything else is shut
`
`down except for the PDF reader that has the 09:12:34
`
`documents in the matter.
`
` Q And just to clarify for the record, you had
`
`said that you have your two declarations open and
`
`available to you; is that correct?
`
` A Yes. 09:12:54
`
` Q One of those declarations is Exhibit 2002; is
`
`that correct?
`
` A Exhibit 2007 is one. I'm sorry. Let me
`
`memorize -- Exhibit 2006 and 2007 are my exhibit
`
`numbers for my two declarations. 09:13:17
`
` Q You said Exhibit 2006.
`
` Can you double-check that to see if it's
`
`2002?
`
` A Sure. I may have to ask for assistance from
`
`counsel. Let me bring up my -- my rest of -- let me 09:13:36
`
`bring up the folder that they're in.
`
` This is Google. I'm sorry. 2002 is the
`
`exhibit for Patents '826 and -- '824 and '636. My
`
`apologies.
`
` I have too many documents open. I will 09:14:15
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 10
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0010
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`straighten this out. My apologies.
`
` Q No need to apologize. I just want to make
`
`sure we're on the same page.
`
` All right.
`
` So I just want to get this into the record, 09:14:26
`
`and we'll try to make it as quickly as possible.
`
` So you understand that the -- you are here to
`
`testify today about the expert declarations, those
`
`two expert declarations that you submitted in the
`
`Google or in the IPRs that were filed by Google, 09:14:45
`
`correct?
`
` A Correct.
`
` Q All right.
`
` And those two declarations cover three
`
`patents, correct? 09:15:00
`
` A Correct.
`
` Q And the first is U.S. Patent No. 9729594.
`
` Can we call that the '594 patent for short?
`
` A Yes, of course.
`
` Q And the declaration that you submitted on the 09:15:17
`
`'594 patent, that would be Exhibit 2007, correct?
`
` A Correct.
`
` Q The other two patents are U.S. Patent
`
`No. 9762636.
`
` Can we refer to that as the '636 patent 09:15:37
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 11
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0011
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`today?
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q And U.S. Patent No. 9742824, and can we refer
`
`to that as the '824 patent today?
`
` A Yes. 09:15:51
`
` Q Exhibit 2002, I think you already said is the
`
`declaration that you provided for the IPRs that are
`
`related to both the '824 and the '636 patents; is
`
`that correct?
`
` A Correct. 09:16:08
`
` Q And it's just a single identical declaration
`
`for both the '824 and the '636 patent IPRs, correct?
`
` A It's the same document, correct.
`
` Q Now, for -- for the purposes of the
`
`deposition, we premarked and introduced the '594 09:16:30
`
`patent as Exhibit 1594. We introduced the '636
`
`patent as Exhibit 1636. And we introduced the '824
`
`patent as 1824.
`
` (Exhibit 1594 was marked for
`
` identification and is attached
`
` hereto.)
`
` (Exhibit 1636 was marked for
`
` identification and is attached
`
` hereto.)
`
` ///
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 12
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0012
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` (Exhibit 1824 was marked for
`
` identification and is attached
`
` hereto.)
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q My understanding, Mr. Hoarty, is you have 09:17:01
`
`copies available to you for the 594636 and '824
`
`patents; is that correct?
`
` A That is correct.
`
` Q What did you do to prepare for today's
`
`deposition? 09:17:20
`
` A I reviewed my two declarations. I reviewed
`
`the -- the asserted patents in the matter.
`
` Q When you say the two asserted patents in the
`
`matter, what are you refer --
`
` A No. I didn't say two patents. I said the 09:17:38
`
`asserted -- the other patents that were from
`
`the -- asserted in this matter, Exhibits 1002
`
`through 1008.
`
` Q Any other documents that you reviewed?
`
` A I have -- I reviewed the Dr. Polish 09:18:01
`
`declaration, Exhibit 2002, and the patents
`
`themselves, Exhibit 1001, which is the '594 patent.
`
`And then, of course, the two you just cited, '824,
`
`'636.
`
` Q Maybe I'll ask a better question to get us 09:18:24
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 13
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0013
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`through this quickly.
`
` Did you review any documents outside of
`
`exhibits or declarations that are already introduced
`
`into this matter?
`
` A No, I did not. 09:18:41
`
` Q Sir, you also submitted declarations in other
`
`IPR proceedings that are related to some of the same
`
`patents, correct?
`
` A Correct.
`
` Q And you were deposed in relation to those 09:18:57
`
`other IPR proceedings; is that correct?
`
` A Correct.
`
` MR. GARDNER: Mr. Abramson, I don't know the
`
`best way to do this, but I had premarked a copy of
`
`Mr. Hoarty's July 6, 2023 deposition as Exhibit 1101 09:19:11
`
`and a copy of Mr. Hoarty's August 3rd, 2023
`
`deposition as Exhibit 1102.
`
` How would you like to handle allowing
`
`Mr. Hoarty to have access -- have access to those
`
`documents? 09:19:44
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: You can put them through the
`
`Google -- through the Zoom chat, I suppose.
`
` COURT REPORTER: Can we go off the record for
`
`a minute.
`
` MR. GARDNER: Yeah, let's do that. 09:20:00
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 14
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0014
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` (Exhibit 1101 was marked for
`
` identification and is attached
`
` hereto.)
`
` (Exhibit 1102 was marked for
`
` identification and is attached
`
` hereto.)
`
` (Recess.)
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Mr. Hoarty, you've been provided a copy of
`
`Exhibit 1101. 09:27:03
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q Can you open that document?
`
` A Give me one more second, and I'll be able to
`
`do that.
`
` Okay. I have it open. 09:27:41
`
` Q And Exhibit 1101 is a copy of your deposition
`
`from July 6, 2023, correct?
`
` A It appears to be, yes.
`
` Q And during that deposition, you answered
`
`questions honestly, correct? 09:27:54
`
` A Yes, that's correct.
`
` Q And you stand by the testimony you provided
`
`during that deposition, correct?
`
` A I believe so.
`
` Q I'm hopeful that I will save us all time by 09:28:04
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 15
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0015
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`not having to recover all of the subject matter that
`
`you went through during that deposition, but I want
`
`to confirm, Mr. Hoarty, that you adopt your
`
`testimony at --
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Hold on. I'm going to object 09:28:23
`
`insofar as this transcript is not -- is not signed.
`
` MR. GARDNER: First, Mr. Abramson, you can
`
`note an objection to form, but I'm going to proceed
`
`forward.
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: I object that the 09:28:43
`
`deposition -- the transcript is -- is not signed.
`
`And I object to the extent -- that this question,
`
`whether he adopts it or not, is beyond the scope of
`
`his direct testimony in this case.
`
` Object. 09:29:00
`
` MR. GARDNER: Okay.
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: My objection is noted.
`
` You may proceed.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Mr. Hoarty, do you adopt your testimony from 09:29:07
`
`that IPR just the same as you would provide the same
`
`testimony today if I asked you the same questions?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Objection. Those questions
`
`are beyond the scope of this direct examination in
`
`this case. 09:29:23
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 16
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0016
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` THE DEPONENT: I -- I don't know how to
`
`answer because I haven't -- I haven't -- I'd have to
`
`review what I said. I think in the intervening
`
`month, I perhaps could be more concise or -- in one
`
`answer or another. 09:29:44
`
` But without reviewing this, I would be unable
`
`to say that I'm going to -- say the same thing today
`
`if you asked me the same question. Although the
`
`intent will be the same and my opinions will remain
`
`the same, I think you'll find -- I can perhaps 09:30:00
`
`better -- better -- more clearly respond to your
`
`questions than several months ago.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q And did you -- have you since that deposition
`
`reviewed those deposition transcripts? 09:30:14
`
` A Actually, I have not. I'm sorry to say. I
`
`did not.
`
` Q Let me just ask you again, for Exhibit 1101,
`
`for your July 6, 2023 deposition, you answered
`
`questions during that deposition honestly, correct? 09:30:34
`
` A I did.
`
` Q And you stand by your testimony, correct?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Objection; beyond the scope of
`
`direct.
`
` THE DEPONENT: Again, I'd like to -- in 09:30:44
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 17
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0017
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`general -- I can say in general, yes, but
`
`specifically, I would really like to have a chance
`
`to look at this.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Do you recall anything from that deposition 09:30:55
`
`that you think you answered dishonestly or
`
`incorrectly?
`
` A God, I wish my memory were that good.
`
` There are many patents at issue.
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Objection. 09:31:11
`
` THE DEPONENT: I'm sorry. Go ahead.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q So I'll just ask again.
`
` Do you recall anything from that deposition
`
`that you think you answered dishonestly or 09:31:18
`
`incorrectly?
`
` A I do not recall anything that was dishonest
`
`or incorrect.
`
` Q Let's go to Exhibit 1102. Can you open that
`
`document? 09:31:31
`
` A All right. One second. I'm sorry. It just
`
`takes it a second to open. Okay. I'm on 1102.
`
` Q And is this a copy of your deposition
`
`transcript from August 3rd, 2023?
`
` A It appears to be. 09:31:58
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 18
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0018
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q And during that deposition, did you answer
`
`questions honestly, Mr. Hoarty?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: I'm going to object again.
`
` This -- I believe this transcript is signed,
`
`and these questions are -- these questions are 09:32:16
`
`beyond the scope of direct.
`
` MR. GARDNER: Mr. Abramson, you are limited
`
`to objecting to form.
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: I'm not limited to objection
`
`to form. Go back and read the trial practice guide. 09:32:31
`
`My objection was proper, and I stand on the
`
`objection.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Mr. Hoarty, did you answer questions honestly
`
`during your August 3rd, 2023 deposition? 09:32:46
`
` A Yes.
`
` Q And do you stand by the testimony you
`
`provided during your August 3rd, 2023 deposition?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Objection. It's beyond the
`
`scope of this direct. 09:32:59
`
` THE DEPONENT: All I can say is that on
`
`occasion, I was perhaps misunderstood a question. I
`
`might not have answered as clearly as I could have
`
`or fully understand -- understood a question.
`
` So without reviewing -- without a specific 09:33:13
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 19
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0019
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`question, I can say, in general, I did my best.
`
`There were things I didn't fully understand that
`
`perhaps I could have answered better.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Are you aware -- are you aware of any 09:33:29
`
`examples of that?
`
` A Again, I truly wish my memory were that
`
`articulate, but without -- without looking at the
`
`document or being referenced to a particular
`
`question, that would not -- I don't have a specific 09:33:43
`
`example that I could provide.
`
` Q Do you have the '594 patent available,
`
`Mr. Hoarty?
`
` A I do.
`
` Q Can you open that? 09:33:57
`
` A I will. Give me one second.
`
` It's open.
`
` Q Can you go to Claim 1 of the '594 patent?
`
` A Sure.
`
` Okay. I'm there. 09:34:23
`
` Q Actually, before I do this, do you also have
`
`the '636 and '824 patents open?
`
` A I have '834 open. I can get '636. I have
`
`two of the three. But give me one second.
`
` Okay. They are open. 09:35:13
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 20
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0020
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q I want to start with Claim 1 of the '594
`
`patent.
`
` Are you there?
`
` A I am.
`
` Q And Claim 1 of the '594 patent recites a 09:35:21
`
`method for operating a media player to receive and
`
`play an audio or video program.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A I do.
`
` Q Now, I want you to move to Claim 1 of the 09:35:33
`
`'636 patent.
`
` A Okay.
`
` Q In Claim 1 -- sorry.
`
` Are you there?
`
` A Almost. I am there. 09:35:50
`
` Q Claim 1 of the '636 patent recites a method
`
`for distributing a live audio or video program.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A I do.
`
` Q And can you go to Claim 1 of the '824 patent? 09:36:01
`
` A One second.
`
` Let me just adjust something here so it's a
`
`little bit easier for me to dance around here. I'm
`
`sorry. I thought I had that lined up. My
`
`apologies. 09:36:39
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 21
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0021
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Okay. I have it.
`
` Q Claim 1 of the '824 patent recites (as read):
`
` "A method for distributing over the
`
` Internet from a server system to one
`
` or more user systems a prerecorded 09:36:51
`
` audio or video program."
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A I do.
`
` Q So just for the record, the '594, the '636,
`
`and the '824 all reference an audio or video program 09:37:10
`
`in the preamble, correct?
`
` A Correct.
`
` Q In your view, Mr. Hoarty, other than the
`
`difference between live and prerecorded, does the
`
`phrase "audio or video program" in the '594, '636, 09:37:26
`
`and '824 patents mean the same thing?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Object; beyond the scope.
`
` THE DEPONENT: On the face of it. It appears
`
`that audio and video program would mean the same
`
`thing. 09:37:48
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Can you go to back to the '594 patent?
`
` And I would like you to go to Column 14.
`
` A All right. I'm there.
`
` Q And in Column 14 at line 56, there's a 09:38:08
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 22
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0022
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`sentence that reads (as read):
`
` "The user computer then continues
`
` with additional data requests for the
`
` duration of playing the audio/video
`
` material." 09:38:26
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A I do.
`
` Q And in your opinion, Mr. Hoarty, these lines
`
`would help a person of skill in the art understand
`
`the meaning of audio or video program in the claims. 09:38:40
`
` Correct?
`
` A I would presume so. Yes.
`
` Q And you agree, Mr. Hoarty, that when the
`
`specification says, quote, for the duration of
`
`playing, end quote, that could be only 10 seconds of 09:39:02
`
`a 1-minute video, correct?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Object; beyond the scope of
`
`direct.
`
` THE DEPONENT: Without any further context,
`
`duration is whatever it implies, whatever the user 09:39:20
`
`-- as a POSITA, assume it made reference to a user
`
`of the system's choice.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q And that could be just a portion of the audio
`
`or video program, correct? 09:39:43
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 23
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0023
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A Yes. As far as I understand human nature,
`
`absolutely.
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Object to the form.
`
` THE DEPONENT: Sorry.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER: 09:39:58
`
` Q So you would agree, Mr. Hoarty, that an audio
`
`or video program might only refer to a portion of
`
`the program, correct?
`
` A I believe it could.
`
` Q Are you aware that the patent owner has taken 09:40:14
`
`the position that an audio or video program refers
`
`to the entirety of an audio or video program?
`
` A I can see how that could -- that could easily
`
`be the case. It's a term that can be used in
`
`context. 09:40:40
`
` Q But you agree in the context of the claims
`
`and in the patent that audio/video program could
`
`refer to either a portion of the audio or video
`
`program or the entirety of the audio/video program,
`
`correct? 09:40:55
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Object to the form.
`
` THE DEPONENT: If it's in reference to a
`
`claim and the intent of the claim, I would not have
`
`an opinion.
`
`/// 09:41:03
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 24
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0024
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q But at least the portion of the specification
`
`that we looked at in the '594 patent in Column 14,
`
`lines 56 through 58, you would understand that to
`
`reference that the audio or video program could be 09:41:27
`
`just a portion of the program or the entirety of the
`
`program, correct?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Object to form.
`
` THE DEPONENT: In the context of the
`
`specification, it would -- as a POSITA, I would read 09:41:43
`
`that as the duration that the user was viewing the
`
`program.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q And we agree that could be just a portion of
`
`the program, correct? 09:41:56
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Object -- just object to the
`
`form. He answer -- he answered the question.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q I'm not sure. There's no answer on the
`
`record. So -- 09:42:06
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: He answered the previous
`
`question, and you asked it again. He answered
`
`already.
`
` MR. GARDNER: I'll ask the question again.
`
`/// 09:42:17
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 25
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0025
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`BY MR. GARDNER:
`
` Q Can we agree that the duration that the user
`
`was viewing the program could just be a portion of a
`
`program, correct?
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Object to the form. 09:42:26
`
` THE DEPONENT: In the -- in the context of
`
`the specification, I would read this it would be as
`
`the user computer is playing for the duration that
`
`the user wishes the program to play.
`
`BY MR. GARDNER: 09:42:42
`
` Q I just want to be clear, Mr. Hoarty, that
`
`that could just be a portion of the program,
`
`correct?
`
` A Sure. I watched the beginning of Top Gun
`
`last night. But my wife is tired of me watching it 09:42:53
`
`for the 50th time, so I only watched the first
`
`5 minutes. So yes, it could be whatever -- whatever
`
`the user chooses.
`
` Q I want to go back to Claim 1 of the '594
`
`patent. 09:43:12
`
` A Okay.
`
` I'm there.
`
` Q You see, I guess it's in the second
`
`limitation, where it recites "receiving each" and
`
`starts there. 09:43:35
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
`
`Page 26
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1103
`Google LLC v. WAG Acquisition, IPR2022-01413
`Page 0026
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A I do.
`
` Q And

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket