`
`Downloaded from https:u/aeademicoupcom/ndt/article/27/3/902/1896811 by guest on 31 July 2023
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`La
`
`Nephrol Dial Transplant (2012) 27: 902-905
`doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr695
`Advance Access publication 13 December 2011
`
`Apoptotic cell-free DNA promotes inflammation in haemodialysis
`patients
`
`Johairna Atarnaniuk t, Chantal Kopeck Y2, Sonja Skoupy', Marcus D. Säemann2 and Thomas Weiclihart2
`
`'Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria and 2Division of Nephrology and Dialysis,
`Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
`
`Correspondence and offprint requests to: Thomas Weichhart; E-mail: thomas.weichhart@meduniwien.ac.at
`
`Abstract
`Background. A proinflarnmatory environment character-
`ized by the continuous activation of the innate immune
`system is thought to contribute to the markedly elevated
`mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients with end-stage
`renal disease (ESRD). The presence of circulating cell-free
`DNA (cfDNA) has been demonstrated as biomarker in
`many pathologies.
`Methods. We evaluated the occurrence of cfDNA in RD
`patients and its functional relevance for innate immunity
`and inflammation.
`
`Results. Here, we found that cfDNA was enhanced in the
`plasma of ESRD patients after RD compared to healthy
`controls. Functionally, cfDNA selectively stimulated the
`production of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin
`(IL)-6 by human monocytes, whereas tumour necrosis
`factor-ct or IL-10 was not induced. Conversely, plasma
`from HD patients, but not from healthy controls or DNase
`1-treated RD plasma, induced IL-6 production from mono-
`cytes.
`Conclusion. We provide the first evidence that cfDNA has
`selective immunostimulatory effects on human monocytes.
`
`© The Author 201. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.
`For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissious@oup.coin
`
`0001
`
`TwinStrand EX1094
`TwinStrand Biosciences v. Guardant Health
`IPR2022-01400
`
`
`
`Downloaded from https://acadomic.oupcorn/ndtfarticle/27/3/902/1896811 by guest on 31 July 202 3
`
`cfDNA promotes inflammation in HD
`
`This process may contribute to the proinflammatory milieu
`observed in HD patients.
`
`Keywords: apoptosis; cell-free DNA; haemodialysis; interleukin 6;
`monocytes
`
`Introduction
`
`End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients under haemodial-
`ysis (HD) are characterized by a chronic inflammatory state
`that includes aberrant and chronic production of inflamma-
`tory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6 [1-3]. This prom-
`flammatory environment occurring in ESRD patients has
`been implicated in HD cornorbidity [4]. However, the ba-
`sis for the constitutive activation of IL-6 production is un-
`clear. It has been suggested that the systemic presence of
`uraemic proteins and the dialysis procedure itself may pro-
`mote immune cell activation and hence inflammation [5]. It
`has long been recognized that innate immune cells are
`dysregulated during the course of ESRD [6, 7].
`Over the years, it has been increasingly documented
`that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is present in blood under
`various healthy and pathological conditions [8]. Hence,
`cfDNA is regularly detected in plasma or serum samples
`of patients suffering from cancer, lupus erythematosus or
`in individuals after exhaustive exercise [8-10]. cfDNA
`has been found in many cases, in which apoptosis or
`necrosis was involved suggesting that such events are
`the main source for its presence [8, 10]. Recently, it was
`described that cfDNA is released during the HD procedure
`[10-12]. However, the underlying reasons for the release
`of cfDNA and the functional effects of uraemic cfDNA
`have not been investigated.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Studs' subjects
`
`903
`
`Agarose gel electrophoresis
`
`To separate plasma DNA, agsrose gel electrophoresis was performed. Gels
`were stained with Vistra Green (Atnersham Biosciences). As positive
`control for apnptotic DNA, we loaded genomic DNA that was isolated
`from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) treated with 5 mM
`staurosporine (STS).
`
`Monoct'te stimulation
`
`Monocytes were isolated as described [13]. Freshly isolated monocytes
`were seeded in 48-well plates adjusted to a final volume of 2.5 >< 105 cells,'
`0.5 mL. M000cytes were stimulated with 250 ng/mL cfDNA or with 10,
`100 and 200 pL of plasma from HD patients or healthy controls. In some
`experiments, we treated 200 p1.. HD plasma with 8 U DNase I (New
`England Biolabs) for 24 h. Cell-free supernatants were collected after
`24 h. IL-b, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-ci and IL- 10 in the supernatants
`were measured by Lutninex (R&D Systems).
`
`Statistics
`
`Results are expressed as means di SEM. Student's t-test was used to detect
`statistical significance. For all statistical analyses, significant differences
`are marked in the graphics with * <0.05 or ***P < 0.001.
`
`Results
`
`cJDNA is enhanced in plasma of HD patients
`
`We found that plasma of ESRD patients, after the dialysis
`session (HD), contained a significantly elevated amount of
`cfDNA compared to healthy individuals (mean of 0.98 ng/
`pL plasma versus 0.43 nglpt, respectively) (Figure IA).
`To further characterize the plasma, we performed agarose
`gel electrophoresis. Interestingly, we observed that the
`cfDNA of HD patients had a pattern-like appearance that
`is typical for apoptosis (Figure IB). In contrast, the plasma
`cfDNA of healthy controls did not show this apoptotic
`pattern (Figure 113). These results indicate that the amount
`of cfDNA is augmented in plasma of HD patients poten-
`tially because of apoptosis of PBMCs induced by the dial-
`ysis procedure.
`
`Patients with ESRD undergoing maintenance MD for a minimum of 3 months
`were recruited for the study. Patients were in a stable condition and free from
`intercurrent illness and infection for at least 3 months. All patients were
`dialysed on standard bicarbonate basis for 4-5 h three times weekly using
`biocompatible polysulphone HD membranes (Fresenius). A group of healthy
`subjects with nomiat kidney function were used as control group. All indi-
`viduals gave written informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study,
`which was petfonned in accordance with the ethical standards laid down
`Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval has been provided by the locally
`ethics committee of the General Hospital of Vienna (EK 407/2007).
`
`Plasma isolation from blood
`
`Blood samples were drawn its EDTA tubes from a total of 23 HD patients
`and 14 healthy controls. The blood samples of the ED patients were drawn
`at the end of the dialysis session. Blood was immediately placed on ice and
`centrifuged at 1000 RCF for 15 ruin at 4°C to obtain plasma.
`
`Isolation aiul quuntilalion of cJDNA front blood
`
`Within the first 2 h of obtaining plasma samples, DNA from individual
`samples was either isolated from 800 pL of plasma using a DNA isolation
`mini kit (Qiamp Blood Mint Kit; Qiagen) for quantitation of cfDNA
`or from 10 mL plasma samples using the Qiamp Blood Maxi Kit (Qiagen)
`for functional assays according to the manufacturer's protocol. The DNA
`was eluted in 50 tiL (Mini Kit) or 500 ttL (Maxi Kit) of elution buffer.
`cfDNA concentration was measured using a Nanodrop measurement
`device (Themio Scientific).
`
`cJDNA selectively stimulates IL-6 production in
`human monocytes
`
`Next, we wanted to characterize the functional properties of
`cfDNA. To this end, we purified cfDNA from the plasma of
`RD patients and healthy controls and tested if cfDNA is able
`to activate primary human monocytes, one of the cardinal
`innate immune cells in the blood. We observed that cIDNA
`isolated from RD patients induced the production of the pro-
`inflammatory cytokine IL-6 in monocytes (Figure 2A). Nei-
`ther TNF-cr nor IL- 10 was induced by cfDNA indicating that
`cfDNA selectively induces IL-6 expression in monocytes
`(Figure 2A). Interestingly, cfDNA from healthy controls like-
`wise stimulated IL-6 production in a comparable fashion to
`cfDNA from HD patients (Figure 2A). These results provide
`the first evidence that cfDNA, irrespective of the origin, pro-
`motes the production of IL-6 in human monocytes.
`
`Plasma front RD patients promotes IL-6 production in
`human monocytes
`
`Although cfDNA from HD patients and healthy controls
`was similarly potent to induce IL-6, we speculated that RD
`
`0002
`
`
`
`M STS
`
`HD
`
`clii
`
`J. Atamasiiuk C/ (if
`
`904
`A
`1.5
`
`S
`
`U,
`
`0i
`
`0
`
`ctrl
`
`RD
`
`cfDNA
`
`B
`
`2072
`1050
`
`600
`500
`400
`300
`200
`100
`
`Fig. 1. cNA in plasma of HD patients and healthy controls. Plasma was obtained from 13 HD patients and 9 healthy controls. (A) DNA was isolated
`and concentrations were measured as described in the Materials and methods section. cfDNA concentrations in plasma of HD patients and controls (ctrI).
`5P < 0.05. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed to characterize DNA samples. Lane 1, molecular size marker (the size of the bands is shown in
`bp); Lane 2: apoptotic DNA; Lanes 3-6: cfDNA samples of HD patients; Lanes 7-10: cfDNA samples of healthy controls.
`
`A
`80
`
`65 -
`-J
`0
`a 40 -
`
`-J
`
`20 -
`
`B
`40
`
`30
`
`10
`
`80-
`
`80
`
`.j 60-
`S
`
`40-
`
`20
`
`med
`
`I
`tri
`
`-
`
`HO
`
`cfDNA
`
`med
`
`ctrl
`
`HO
`
`med
`
`ctrl
`
`HD
`
`cfDNA
`
`C
`
`cfDNA
`
`0
`
`25-
`
`a
`1 0
`DO
`
`med 100 100.>l 200pl l5,j
`
`lOOp] 200j>I
`
`ctrl plasma
`
`HO plasma
`
`med
`
`HO Plasma HO Plasma +
`DNase I
`
`Fig. 2. cfDNA in plasma of 1-ID patients promote expression of IL-6 in human monocytes. (A) Human monocytes were incubated with individual
`samples of cfDNA (125 ng) from HD patients (n = 10) or healthy controls for 24 ii. The amount of IL-6, TNF-n and IL-10 in the supernatants was
`measured by Luminex. Data are representative three experiments. u.s., not significant. (B) Human monocytes from three different donors were incubated
`with 10. 100 and 200 p1. plasma from HD patients (ii = 9) or healthy controls (si = 5) overnight. IL-ti concentrations in the supernatant ofmonocytes were
`measured by Luminex. *** P <0.001. (C) Monocytes from two different donors were incubated for 24 It with 200 pL HD plasma (ii = 3) that was either
`treated with DNase I or left untreated. IL-6 concentration in the supernatants were measured by Luminex. UP < 0.05.
`
`plasma might be able to more strongly activate monocytes
`as cfDNA is present in higher amounts in the plasma of HD
`patients. As shown in (Figure 213), pure plasma of HD
`patients dose dependently induced the production of IL-6
`in human monocytes, whereas plasma from healthy con-
`trols did not stimulate IL-6. To more directly address
`whether the presence of cfDNA in the plasma of HD
`patients induces IL-6 production, we treated RD plasma
`with DNase I to degrade DNA. We observed that the
`DNase I-treated HD plasma showed a reduced capacity to
`induce IL-6 in human monocytes. These results suggest
`that the cfDNA present in plasma of RD patients is a driver
`of IL-6 production.
`
`Discussion
`
`Large clinical studies have shown that the mortality rate of
`individuals with ESRD undergoing HD is markedly ele-
`vated. This has been attributed among other things to the
`constitutive occurrence of inflammation in many patients,
`and hence, inflammatory markers such as C-reactive pro-
`tein or IL-6 are powerful predictors of mortality in this
`patient group [14-1 6]. The inflammatory environment in
`HD patients has been attributed Co the incomplete removal
`of uraernic toxins that promote inflammatory reactions but
`also to the RD procedure itself [5]. Dialysis membranes
`and uraemic plasma can promote apoptosis of human
`
`0003
`
`
`
`Downloaded from https:l1academcoup.com/ndVartideI27/3I9O2I189681 1 by guest an 31 July 202 3
`
`cfDNA promotes inflammation in HD
`
`polyrnorphonuclear neutrophils and mononuclear cells
`directly as well as through their interactions with mono-
`cytes [17-22]. It is thought that these apoptotic leucoctes
`then activate the innate immune system to contribute to
`the proinflamrnatory environment in ESRD patients under-
`going HD.
`cfDNA has been found in many pathologies, in which
`apoptosis or necrosis is involved suggesting that such
`events are a source for its presence [8]. cfDNA has been
`evaluated primarily as biomarker so far, whereas potential
`functional effects of cfDNA have not been investigated [8].
`Also in ESRD patients on HD, the presence of cfDNA has
`been described [10-12]. We speculated that cfDNA present
`in RD patients may activate the innate immune system to
`promote proinflamrnatoiy events. Indeed, we observed that
`cfDNA isolated from HD patients induced the production
`of IL-6 from human monocytes. This effect was selective as
`cfDNA did not induce TNF-u, or IL-10. Moreover, it is
`noteworthy that cfDNA from healthy individuals similarly
`induced IL-6 indicating that the main difference between
`HD patients and healthy controls regarding cfDNA is the
`absolute amount of cfDNA, which is elevated in patients
`with RD. Conversely, plasma from RD patients but not
`from healthy individuals was able to induce the expression
`of IL-6 from monocytes. Moreover, DNase I-treated RD
`plasma showed a severely reduced ability to induce IL-6.
`These results suggest that cfDNA in the RD plasma con-
`tributes to the constitutive proinflammatory events in these
`patients.
`In conclusion, we found in the current study that cfDNA
`released from blood cells by ongoing apoptosis is abun-
`dantly present in the plasma of HD patients. Importantly,
`we have shown for the first time that cfDNA is able to
`selectively induce the production of the proinflammatoiy
`cytokine IL-6 in human monocytes. We further established
`that the plasma of RD patients, but not of healthy controls,
`mimicked the capacity of cfDNA to induce IL-6 in human
`monocytes indicating that this process may contribute to
`the proinflammatory environment observed in HD patients.
`
`Acknowledgements. We thank M. Merio for excellent technical assistance.
`This work was supported by the Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of
`the City of Vienna (to LA.) and by the Else-Kr6ner Fresettius Stiflung
`(to T.W.).
`
`Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
`
`References
`
`1. Bologa RM, Levine DM, Parker TS et al. Interleukin-6 predicts hy-
`poalbuminemia, hypocholesterolemia, and mortality in hemodialysis
`patients. Am JKidney Di.r 1998; 32: 107-114
`
`905
`
`2. Ishizuka T, Nuts K, Yokoyama T ci at. Increased serum levels of
`inierleukin-12 may be associated with Thl differentiation in hemo-
`dialysis patients. Nephron 2002; 90: 503-504
`3. Rysz J, Majewslca E, Stolasek RA eta!, increased levels of soluble TNF-
`alpha receptors and cellular adhesion molecules in patients undergoing
`bioincompatible hemodialysis. Am JNephrol 2006; 26: 437-444
`4. Panichi V, Paoletti S. Consani C. Inflammatory pattern in hemodiafil-
`tration. Contrib Nephrol 2008; 161: 185-190
`5. Jofre R. Rodriguez-Benitez P, Lopez-Gomez Jivl et at. Inflammatory
`syndrome in patients on hemodialysis. JAm Soc Nephrol 2006; 17
`(12 Suppl 3): S274-S280
`6. Descamps-Latscha B. The immune system in end-stage renal disease.
`Qsrr Opin Nephrol H,iperten.s 1993; 2: 883-891
`7. Descamps-Latacha B, Herbelin A, Nguyen AT et al. Immune system
`dysregulation in uremia. Semin Nephrol 1994; 14: 253-260
`S. Jung K, Fleischhacker M, Rabien A. Cell-free DNA in the blood as a
`solid tumor biomarker—a critical appraisal of the literature. Cl/n c/tim
`Ac/u 2010; 411: 1611-1624
`9. Atamaniuk J, Hsiao YY, Mustak M ci al. Analysing cell-free plasma
`DNA and SLE disease activity. Earl ('fin Invest 2010; 41: 579-583
`10. Atamaniuk 3, Ruzicka K, Stuhhneier KM et al. Cell-free plasma DNA: a
`marker for apoptosis during hemodialysis. Cl/n Client 2006; 52: 523-526
`11. Garcia Moreira V, de la Cera Martinez T, Gago Gonzalez E et al.
`Increase in and clearance of cell-free plasma DNA in hemodialysis
`quantified by real-time PCR. Cl/n ('hem Lab Med 2006; 44: 1410-1415
`12. Korabccna M, Opatrna S. Wirth Jet at. Cell-free plasma DNA during
`peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis and in patients with chronic kid-
`ney disease. Ann N YAcad Sci 2008; 1137: 296-301
`13. Weichhart T, Costantino G, Poglitsch Met al. The TSC-mTOR sig-
`naling pathway regulates the innate inflammatory response. Immunity
`2008:29:565-577
`14. Zimmermann J, Herrlinger S. Pruy A ci at. Inflammation enhances
`cardiovascular risk and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidne,v hit
`1999;55:648-658
`15. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD et al. Production of C-reactive
`protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina.
`European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina
`Pectoris Study Group. Lancet 1997; 349: 462-466
`16. Yeun JY, Levine RA, Mantadilok V et al. C-Reactive protein predicts
`all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J
`Kidney Dis 2000; 35: 469-476
`17. Nahar N, Shah H, Sin 3 at at. Dialysis membrane-induced neutrophil
`apoptosis is mediated through free radicals. Cl/n Nephrol 2001; 56: 52-59
`IS. Cendoroglo M. Jaber BL, Balakrishnan VS et at. Neutrophil apop-
`tosis and dysfunction in uremia. JAm Soc Nap/trot 1999; 10:
`93-100
`19. Saber BL, Balakrishnan VS, Cendoroglo MN et al. Modulation of
`iteutrophil apoptosis by uremic plasma during hemodialysis. Blood
`.Purif 1998; 16: 325-335
`20. Andrikos E, Buoricristiani E, D'Intini V et al. Effect of daily hemo-
`dialysis on monocytes apoptosis. Blood Purif 2005; 23: 79-82
`21. Koller H, Hochegger K, Zlabinger GJ et al. Apoptosis of human
`polymorphonuclear neutrophils accelerated by dialysis membranes
`via the activation of the complement system. NephrolDiat Transplant
`2004; 19: 3104-3111
`22. Carracedo J, Ramirez R, Soriano S et al. Caspase-3-dependent path-
`way mediates apoptosis of human mononuclear cells induced by cel-
`lulosic haemodialysis membranes. Nephrol Dial Tramplant 2002; 17:
`1971-1977
`
`Received for publication: 24.5.11; Accepted in revised form: 4.11. 11
`
`0004
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site