throbber
AOUAACA LY AA
`
`US 20020080862A1
`
`as) United States
`a2) Patent Application Publication (0) Pub. No.: US 2002/0080862 Al
`
` Ali (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 27, 2002
`
`
`(54) RAKE RECEIVER
`
`(30)
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor: Danish Ali, South Croydon (GB)
`
`Nov. 22, 2000
`
`(GB) woeeecceeeecessneeesesteneensees 0028392.9
`
`Correspondence Address:
`Corporate Patent Counsel
`U.S. Philips Corporation
`580 White Plains Road
`Tarrytown, NY 10591 (US)
`(73) Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELEC.
`TRONICSN.V.
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`10/003,065
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Nov. 2, 2001
`
`Publication Classification
`
`Tint, CU? ceecccsecsecsessessssssesssssessesseneees HO4B 1/707
`(51)
`(52) U.S. C1. eee ecssseseecsecnecneeeneess 375/148; 375/150
`
` ©7)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A Rakereceiver suitable for receiving, for example, direct
`sequence CDMAsignals, in which the pilot code used to
`correlate the received signal in each Rake finger (RF1, RF2,
`REN)is interpolated prior to the correlation.
`
` —_ = = I]oan
`
`300
`
`54.
`
`7 | | a6tr
`30
`60
`39
`{38 iy
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 01 of 09
`
`
`
`Samsung et al. v. XR Commc'ns.
`IPR2022-01362
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 01 of 09
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jun. 27, 2002 Sheet 1 of 4
`
`US 2002/0080862 Al
`
`QS
`
`AS
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 02 of 09
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 02 of 09
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jun. 27, 2002 Sheet 2 of 4
`
`US 2002/0080862 Al
`
`9S
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 03 of 09
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 03 of 09
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jun. 27,2002 Sheet 3 of 4
`
`US 2002/0080862 Al
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 04 of 09
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 04 of 09
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jun. 27,2002 Sheet 4 of 4
`
`US 2002/0080862 Al
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 05 of 09
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 05 of 09
`
`

`

`US 2002/0080862 Al
`
`Jun. 27, 2002
`
`RAKE RECEIVER
`
`[0001] The present invention relates to a Rake receiver
`having particular, but not exclusive, application as a direct-
`sequence CDMA(code division multiple access) receiver
`suitable for use in IS95 and third generation (3GPP) tele-
`phones.
`
`[0002] The Rake receiver is known from article by R.
`Price and P. E. Green, “A Communication Technique for
`Multipath Channel” 1958 Proceedings of the IRE pp 555 to
`570. In simple terms a Rake receiver architecture provides
`an effective immunity to the effects of inter-symbol inter-
`ference (ISI) in the presence of multipath propagation con-
`ditions which cause the same signal
`to be repeatedly
`received at an antenna at a plurality of different
`time
`intervals. The received signal is received and frequency
`down-converted and the down-converted signals are applied
`to a plurality of signal paths, frequently called Rake fingers,
`each having a different time delay. Each signal path includes
`a correlator which produces its version of the received
`signal. The versions are combined and integrated over a
`symbolperiod.
`
`In earlier versions of the Rake receiver the delays
`[0003]
`were provided by a delay line having a plurality of taps,
`successive taps being separated by substantially equal time
`delays. Only a small numberof the signal paths contribute
`energy to the received symbol andthe relative delays of
`these paths vary slowly with time.
`
`[0004] A more modern version of the disclosed Rake
`receiver has fewer taps but each has a variable delay. The
`optimum delay for each tap is maintained by a delay-locked
`loop. A typical delay-locked loop is disclosed in an article by
`J. J. Spilker, Jr. “Delay-Lock Tracking of Binary Signals”
`1963 IEEE Transactions on Space Electronics and Telem-
`etry, 9(1963) pages 1 to 8. In an implementation of a
`delay-locked loop for use in a direct-sequence CDMA
`receiver the transmitted signal includes a pilot code and at
`the Rake receiver a frequency down-converted signal in
`each ofthe signal paths is correlated with a locally generated
`version of the pilot code. The correlation is done a fraction
`of a chip early and also a fraction of a chip late and the delay
`of the delay-locked loop is adjusted in the direction of the
`more favourable correlation. This technique gives an early-
`late gate for time tracking. The optimal delay, halfway
`between the early and late signals, is multiplied with the
`output of the delayed lock loop and is combined with outputs
`from the other signal paths (or Rake fingers) for optimal
`decoding of the wanted signal.
`
`[0005] Modern implementations of a Rake receiver are
`digital and the output signal from the receiver/ADC is
`therefore digital being both level-discrete and time-discrete.
`It has been found in the case of 3GPPthat in order to extract
`
`most of the energy from a given signal path, the time delay
`in that path should be controllable to a fraction of a chip,
`typically % of a chip, so the sampling rate of the ADC needs
`to be at least four times the chip rate, the signal bandwidth
`being roughly half the chip rate. In order to prevent adjacent
`channel signals from interfering with the operation of the
`delay-locked loop, the signal from the receiver/ADC needs
`to be filtered of the order of 4 times more strongly than
`would be required by its sampling rate. Such strong filtering
`is wasteful of resources, such as the component count and
`current consumption, as larger integration time constants
`
`will be required for analogue filtering prior to analogue to
`digital conversion and/or a larger number of taps will be
`required for digitally filtering of oversampled ADCs.
`[0006] An object of the present invention is to reduce the
`effects of adjacent channel interference in a cost effective
`manner.
`
`[0007] According the present invention there is provided a
`Rake receiver comprising a radio signal receiving stage, an
`analogue-to-digital converter (ADC) coupled to the receiv-
`ing stage, the ADC output being coupled to an input of each
`of a plurality of signal paths each of the signal paths
`including signal processing means, combining means for
`combining outputs from the signal paths and means for
`recovering symbols from the combined outputs, the receiver
`further comprising code generation means for generating a
`filtered pilot code, and the signal processing means in each
`of the signal paths comprising a variable delay means for
`delaying a signal in that path by a desired amount and a
`means for correlating the delayed signal with the filtered
`pilot code.
`[0008] The present invention is based on the realisation
`that
`interference from out-of-band signals only occurs
`because the pilot code, which comprises a sequence of +1
`and -1 values, has harmonics which occur outside the signal
`bandwidth. Filtering the pilot code signal, which may be
`implemented by interpolating the pilot code signal which
`starts as +1 values, gives it a multibit representation and is
`much easier than filtering the received signal in a higher
`order filter than is justified by the chiprate.
`[0009]
`In an embodiment of the invention the signal
`processing meansincludessignal deriving means coupled to
`an output of the code generation means andto the variable
`delay meansfor deriving an early-late timing error signal for
`the signal path, which timing error signal is supplied to
`means for adjusting the variable time delay of the variable
`delay meansandfor deriving an indication ofthe strength of
`the received signal in the respective signal path, and means
`for multiplying the delayed signal from the variable delay
`means by the complex conjugate of the indication of its
`strength and applying the result to the combining means.
`{0010]
`In a further embodiment of the invention the code
`generation means comprises fixed delay means and the
`signal deriving means comprises first, second and third
`correlators, each of the first, second and third correlators
`having first and second inputs, the first input of the first
`correlator being coupled to the output of the variable delay
`means, first and second differential delay means having
`inputs coupled to the output of the variable delay means and
`outputs coupled respectively to the first inputs of the second
`and third correlators,the first differential delay means delay-
`ing the output of the variable delay means by half a chip
`period and the second differential delay means delaying the
`output of the variable delay meansby a chip period, second
`inputsof the first, second andthird correlators being coupled
`to an output of the code generation means, a differencing
`circuit having inputs connected respectively to outputs of the
`first and third correlators and an output for the early-late
`timing error signal, and the second correlator having an
`output for the indication of the strength of the received
`signal in the signal path.
`[0011] The present invention will now be described, by
`way of example, with reference to the accompanying draw-
`ings, wherein:
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 06 of 09
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 06 of 09
`
`

`

`US 2002/0080862 Al
`
`Jun. 27, 2002
`
`[0012] FIG. 1 is a block schematic diagram of a Rake
`receiver having high orderfiltering of the digitised received
`signal,
`
`[0013] FIG. 2 is a block schematic diagram of a first
`embodiment of a Rake receiver made in accordance with the
`present invention,
`
`FIG.3 isa block schematic diagram of an embodi-
`[0014]
`mentof a signal path (or Rake finger) suitable for use in the
`receiver shown in FIG.2,
`
`[0015] FIG. 4 is a block schematic diagram of another
`embodimentof a signal path (or Rake finger) suitable for use
`in the receiver shown in FIG. 2, and
`
`[0016] FIG. 5 is a block schematic diagram of a further
`embodiment of a signal path (or Rake finger) which is a
`variant of that shown in FIG.2.
`
`In the drawings, the same reference numerals have
`[0017]
`been used to indicate corresponding features.
`
`[0018] The Rake receiver shown in FIG. 1 comprises an
`antenna 10 coupled to a quadrature frequency down con-
`version stage 12 which provides quadrature related outputs
`1,Q. These outputs are digitised in an analogue-to-digital
`converter (ADC) 14. The digitised I and Q signals are
`applied to a high order digital filter 16 which is necessary to
`cope with the dynamic range of the received signals. An
`output of the digital filter 16 is applied to a signal splitter 18
`which splits the signal into a plurality of N parallel signal
`paths, generally known as Rake fingers, RF1, RF2, RFN.
`Each of the N signal paths is the same as the others and for
`convenience of description the signal path RF1 will be
`described in detail. Logic control is applied to the Rake
`fingers RF1, RF2, RENso that no twofingers track the same
`signal path, and the logic control reallocates fingers should
`a given signal path fade away and another one be formed.
`
`[0019] The signal from the signal splitter 18 is applied to
`a variable delay element 20. The delay of the variable delay
`element 20 is adjusted to optimise the signal being processed
`in the signal path RF1. The variable delay element 20
`provides three signal outputs, namely early, on-time andlate,
`which are coupled respectively to first inputs 22, 24, 26 of
`three correlators CR1, CR2 and CR3.
`
`[0020] A code generation means 300 comprises a source
`of pilot code 30 coupled to a fixed delay stage 32 which
`provides an output 36 and which is connected to second
`inputs 23, 25 and 27 of the correlators CR1, CR2 and CR3.
`
`[0021] Each of the three correlators CR1, CR2, CR3
`comprises a multiplier 40 for multiplying the signals on the
`respective first and second inputs and a stage 42 for deter-
`mining the amplitude, a, and the phase,¢, of the signal from
`the multiplier 40. Early and late outputs from the correlators
`CR1, CR3 are applied to a differencing stage 44 from which
`an early-late timing error for the Rake finger RF1 is deter-
`mined and applied to a stage 46 which decides if the delay
`of the variable delay element 20 should be updated andif so
`it sends a signal on a line 47. The timing error is generally
`compared to a threshold and if it exceeds the threshold the
`delay is adjusted, otherwiseit is left as it is. The combination
`of the variable delay element 20 and the generation of the
`feedback signal on the line 47 constitute a delay lock loop.
`
`delay element 20. This signal is delayed in a delay stage 50
`by an amount to compensate for the processing of the signals
`in the correlator CR2. In the multiplier 48 the signal from the
`delay stage 50 is multiplied by the complex conjugate of the
`correlation obtained from the correlator CR2 to provide a
`best version of the signal. This best signal is combined
`maximally with the best signals from the other Rake fingers
`RF2, RFN in a summation stage 52 and the sum signal is
`applied to a despread stage 54. The signal obtained is applied
`to an integrate and dump stage 56 in which the symbols are
`recovered.
`
`In the case of using the circuit of FIG. 1 for 3GPP
`[0023]
`telephones, in order to extract most of the energy from a
`given path,
`the finger delay should be controllable to a
`fraction of a chip, typically a % of a chip, so the sampling
`rate of the ADC14 hasto beat least four times the chip rate
`to provide 4 samples per chip. The signal bandwidthis of the
`orderof half the chip rate. To prevent adjacent channels from
`interfering with the operation of the Rake fingers RF1, RF2,
`REN,the signal from the ADC 14 must befiltered four times
`more strongly in the filter 16 than would be required byits
`sampling rate. The use of a high orderfilter is wasteful of
`resources. Such a filter requires larger integration time
`constants for analogue filtering before analogue to digital
`conversion in the ADC16 and/or a larger numberof taps for
`digital filtering of oversampled ADCs. Apart from such
`filtering requiring a relatively large area of an integrated
`circuit, it will also consumea relatively large power which
`will adversely affect
`the talk time/standby time of the
`telephone.
`
`[0024] FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of a Rake receiver
`made in accordance with the present invention. Compared to
`FIG.1, the illustrated Rake receiver includes a digital filter
`60 for interpolating the pilot code from the source of pilot
`code 30 prior to it being applied to the fixed delay stage 32.
`Optionally a filter 62 may be connected between the output
`of the summation stage 52 and the input of the despread
`stage 54 in order to remove harmonicspresent in the output
`of the ADC 14. Alternatively filtering may be implicit in the
`despread stage 54. Filtering of the despread signal may not
`be too severe because the spreading code has less harmonic
`energy. The high order digital filter 16 (FIG. 1) is omitted
`although some analoguefiltering may be carried out in the
`receiver 12 and the ADC 14. The output from the variable
`delay element 20 is suppliedto the first inputs 22, 24, 26 of
`the correlators CR1, CR2 and CR3. Thefixed delay stage 32
`has early, on-time and late outputs 34, 36, 38 which are
`supplied to the second inputs of the respective correlators
`CR1, CR2 and CR3. In the interests of brevity FIG. 2 will
`not be described in detail as it is similar to FIG.1.
`
`In operation the ADC 14 oversamples the I and Q
`[0025]
`signals at 4 times the chip rate and the correlators CR1, CR2
`and CR3are also operating at 4 times the chip rate to avoid
`aliasing. The output from the variable delay element 20 is at
`the chip rate and the output from the correlator CR2 gives
`the amplitude, a, and the phase, o, values of the on-time
`pilot. More particularly the stage 42 of the correlator CR2
`integrates and dumps the applied signals and optionally
`interpolates the output to provide a signal at lower than the
`chip rate and perhaps slower than the symbolrate.
`
`[0022] An on-time output of the correlator CR2 is applied
`to a multiplier 48 which also receives the signal from the
`
`FIG.2 is based on the realisation that the interfer-
`[0026]
`ence from out-of-band signals only occurs because the pilot
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 07 of 09
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 07 of 09
`
`

`

`US 2002/0080862 Al
`
`Jun. 27, 2002
`
`code produced by the source of pilot code 30, which code is
`a sequence of +1 and -1 values, has harmonics that occur
`outside the signal bandwidth. By digitally interpolating the
`pilot code in thedigital filter means 60 the pilot code is given
`a multibit representation and the out-of-band harmonics are
`removed. Since the pilot code starts as a sequence of +1
`values, interpolating is much easier and uses less resources
`thanfiltering the received signal in a high orderfilter, such
`as the filter 16 (FIG. 1). There is a trade-off between the
`degreeoffiltering that is done to the received signal and the
`degree offiltering of the pilot code. Factors which have to
`be considered in this trade-off include the complexity of the
`filters in the signal path as opposed to an increased degree
`ofinterpolation of the pilot code resulting in a large number
`of bits leading to complicated multiplications in the corr-
`elators CR1, CR2, CR3. As a guide, the degree of filtering
`of the signal path is adjusted to prevent aliasing and the
`balance of the filtering requirement is achieved by interpo-
`lating the pilot code.
`
`[0027] Since the interpolated pilot code from the digital
`filter 60 is no longer +1,
`the multiplications inside the
`correlators CR1, CR2, CR3 become true multiplications at
`the sample rate rather than additions or subtractions. There
`are simplications which can be made to reduce signal
`processing because the numberof interpolated pilot values
`is small.
`
`[0028] The stages 42 of the correlators CR1, CR2, CR3
`comprise integrate and dump stages which provide implicit
`filtering of the signals.
`
`FIG.3 illustrates a variant of the Rake finger RF1
`[0029]
`from that shown in FIG.2. The variant relates to the method
`
`of determining the early-late signal to be applied to the
`variable delay element 20. The early and late outputs 34, 38
`of the fixed delay stage 32 are applied to inputs 72, 74,
`respectively, of a differencing stage 70. An output 76 of the
`stage 70 and the delayed received signal from the variable
`delay element 20 are applied to a correlator CR4 comprising
`a multiplier 40 and a phase, ¢, and amplitude, a, determining
`stage 42. An output of the stage 42 is coupled to the stage
`46.
`
`[0030] FIG. 4 shows another variant of the Rake finger
`RF1 shown in FIG.2. In this embodimentthe early and late
`outputs 34, 38 of the fixed delay stage 32 are appliedto their
`respective correlators CR1, CR3 and the difference of their
`outputs is generated by difference means 44 and used by the
`stage 46 to generate a delay adjustment signal for the delay
`element 20. The on-time correlation is derived by summing
`the early and late correlations in a summation stage 80, the
`output of which forms the complex conjugate of the on-time
`correlation. The delayed received signal is multiplied with
`the complex conjugate in the multiplier 48.
`
`[0031] FIG. 5 illustrates a further variant of the Rake
`finger RF1 from that shown in FIG.2. In this embodiment
`a single output 36 from the fixed delay stage 32 is applied
`to inputs 23, 25, 27 of the multipliers 40 of the correlators
`CR1, CR2, CR3, respectively. The output of the variable
`delay element 20 is applied to time delay stages 82 and 84
`whose outputs are respectively connected to inputs 24 and
`26 of the multipliers 40 of the correlators CR2 and CR3. The
`delay stage 82 delays the output of the delay element 20 by
`2 samples (or half a chip period) and the delay stage 84
`delays the output of the delay element 20 by 4 samples(or
`
`a chip period). Normally the output of the delay element 20
`is connected directly to the input 22 of the multiplier 40 in
`the correlator CR1 so that there is no signal delay. Alterna-
`tively a delay stage 80 shown in broken lines may be
`provided if required, but the relative time delay periods
`introduced by the delay stages 82, 84 are maintained. In
`operation the correlator CR1 provides the early indication,
`the correlator CR2 provides the on-time indication and the
`correlator CR3 provides the late indication. The as described
`with reference to FIG.2.
`
`1. A Rake receiver comprising a radio signal receiving
`stage, an analogue-to-digital converter (ADC) coupled to the
`receiving stage, the ADC output being coupled to an input
`of each of a plurality of signal paths each of the signal paths
`including signal processing means, combining means for
`combining outputs from the signal paths and means for
`recovering symbols from the combined outputs, the receiver
`further comprising code generation means for generating a
`filtered pilot code, and the signal processing means in each
`of the signal paths comprising a variable delay means for
`delaying a signal in that path by a desired amount and a
`means for correlating the delayed signal with the filtered
`pilot code.
`2. A Rake receiver as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
`signal processing means includes signal deriving means
`coupled to an output of the code generation meansandto the
`variable delay means for deriving an early-late timing error
`signal for the signal path, which timing error signal
`is
`supplied to meansfor adjusting the variable time delay of the
`variable delay means and for deriving an indication of the
`strength of the received signal in the respective signal path,
`and means for multiplying the delayed signal from the
`variable delay means by the complex conjugate of the
`indication of its strength and applying the result to the
`combining means.
`3. A Rakereceiver as claimed in claim 2, characterised in
`that the code generation means comprises early, on-time and
`late outputs of the filtered pilot code, and the signal deriving
`means comprises, first, second andthird correlators, each of
`the first, second andthird correlators having first and second
`inputs, the first inputs being coupled to an output of the
`variable delay means and the second inputs being connected
`respectively to the early, on-time andlate outputs of the code
`generation means, a differencing circuit having inputs con-
`nected respectively to outputs of the first and third correla-
`tors and an output for the early-late timing error signal, and
`the second correlator having an output for the indication of
`the strength of the received signal in the signal path.
`4. A Rakereceiver as claimed in claim 2, characterised in
`that the code generation means comprises early, on-time and
`late outputs ofthe filtered pilot code and the signal deriving
`means comprises differencing means having inputs con-
`nected respectively to the early and late outputs of the code
`generation means,first and second correlators, each of the
`first and second correlators having first and second inputs,
`the first inputs being coupled to the output of the variable
`delay means and the second inputs being connected respec-
`tively to the on-time output of the code generation means
`and to an output of the differencing means, the first corr-
`elator having an output for the indication of the strength of
`the received signal in the signal path and the second corr-
`elator having an output for the early-late timing errorsignal.
`5. A Rakereceiver as claimed in claim 2, characterised in
`that the code generation means comprises early and late
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 08 of 09
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 08 of 09
`
`

`

`US 2002/0080862 Al
`
`Jun. 27, 2002
`
`outputs of the filtered pilot code and the signal deriving
`means comprises first and second correlators, each of the
`first and second correlators having first and second inputs,
`the first inputs being coupled to the output of the variable
`delay means and the second inputs being connected respec-
`tively to the early and late outputs of the code generation
`means, differencing means having inputs coupled respec-
`tively to outputs of the first and second correlators and an
`output for the early-late timing error signal and combining
`means having inputs coupled respectively to outputs of the
`first and second correlators and an output for the indication
`of the strength of the received signal in the signal path.
`6. A Rake receiver as claimed in claim 2, characterised in
`that the code generation means comprises fixed delay means
`and the signal deriving means comprises first, second and
`third correlators, each of the first, second and third correla-
`tors having first and second inputs, the first input of the first
`correlator being coupled to the output of the variable delay
`means, first and second differential delay means having
`inputs coupled to the output of the variable delay means and
`outputs coupled respectively to the first inputs of the second
`and third correlators,the first differential delay means delay-
`
`ing the output of the variable delay means by half a chip
`period and the second differential delay means delaying the
`output of the variable delay meansby a chip period, second
`inputsof the first, second andthird correlators being coupled
`to an output of the code generation means, a differencing
`means having inputs connected respectively to outputs of the
`first and third correlators and an output for the early-late
`timing error signal, and the second correlator having an
`output for the indication of the strength of the received
`signal in the signal path.
`7. A Rake receiver as claimed in claim 3 or 6, character-
`ised in that each of the first, second and third correlators
`includes an integrate and dumpstage.
`8. A Rakereceiver as claimed in claim 4 or 5, character-
`ised in that each of the first and second correlators includes
`an integrate and dumpstage.
`9. A Rake receiver as claimed in any one of claims 1 to
`8, characterised by filtering means in the signal path from
`the combining means.
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 09 of 09
`
`Exhibit 1014
`Page 09 of 09
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket