throbber
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY(PCT)
`
`(19) World Intellectual Property Organization
`International Bureau
`
`(43) International Publication Date
`13 June 2002 (13.06.2002)
`
`
`
`PCT
`
`(10) International Publication Number
`WO 02/47286 A2
`
`(51) International Patent Classification’:
`
`HO04B 7/00
`
`(81) Designated States (national): AE, AG, AL, AM,AT, AU,
`AZ, BA, BB, BG, BR, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CN, CR, CU, CZ,
`DE, DK, DM,DZ, EE, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM,HR,
`(21) International Application Number:©PCT/EP00/12269
`HU,ID,IL,IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KP, KR, KZ, LC, LK, LR,
`LS, LT, LU, LV, MA, MD, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MZ,
`NO, NZ, PL, PT, RO, RU, SD, SE, SG, SL, SK, SL, TJ, TM,
`TR, TI, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VN, YU, ZA, ZW.
`
`(22) International Filing Date: 6 December 2000 (06.12.2000)
`
`(25) Filing Language:
`
`English
`
`(26) Publication Language:
`
`English
`
`(71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): NOKIA
`CORPORATION[FI/FI]; Keilalahdentie 4, FIN-02150
`Espoo (FD).
`
`(72) Inventors; and
`HOTTINEN,
`(for US only):
`(75) Inventors/Applicants
`Ari [FI/FI]; Ristiniementie 4 0 30, FIN-02320 Espoo
`(FID. WICHMAN,Risto [FI/FI]; Viipurinkatu 10 A 20,
`FIN-00510 Helsinki (FD. TIRKKONEN, Olav [FI/FI],
`Puroniitynpolku 5 A 6, FIN-00720 Helsinki (FID.
`
`(74) Agent: COHAUSZ & FLORACK; Kanzlcrstrasse 8a,
`40472 Diisseldorf (DE).
`
`(84) Designated States (regional): ARIPO patent (GH, GM,
`KF, LS, MW, MZ, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZW), Eurasian
`patent (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European
`patent (AT, BE, CH, CY, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR,IE,
`IT, LU, MC, NL, PT, SE, TR), OAPI patent (BF, BJ, CF,
`CG, CL, CM, GA, GN, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`Published:
`
`without international search report and to be republished
`upon receipt of that report
`
`For two-letter codes and other abbreviations, refer to the "Guid-
`ance Notes on Codes andAbbreviations" appearing at the begin-
`ning ofeach regular issue ofthe PCT Gazette.
`
`A2
`(54) Title: METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE WEIGHTING OF A DATA SIGNAL IN THE AT LEAST TWO ANTENNA
`ELEMENTS OF A RADIO CONNECTION UNIT, RADIO CONNECTION UNIT, MODULE AND COMMUNICATIONSSYS-
`oO TEM
`
`(57) Abstract: The invention relates to a method for controlling the weighting of a data signal in the at least two antenna elements
`of a first radio connection unit of a radio communications system, which data signal is to be distributed for parallcl transmission to a
`second radio connectionunit to at least two beams. In orderto improve such a method, it comprises: determining in the second radio
`connection unit a weight information enablingthe first radio connection unit to determine the sets of weights for suitable beams for
`transmission and transmitting it to the first radio connection unit; and distributing the data signal in thefirst radio connection unit to
`those sets of weights and transmitting the data signals simultaneously via the formed beams. Alternatively or additionally, the second
`unit determines the number of beams to be used and informsthefirst unit about it. ‘The invention equally relates to corresponding
`radio connection units, radio connection unit modules and radio communications systems.
`
`1
`
`AMAZON.COM,INC.,et al.
`
`EXHIBIT 1011
`
`8N
`
`O02/47
`
`S
`
`1
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`Method for controlling the weighting of a data signal in the
`
`at least two antenna elements of a radio connection unit,
`
`radio connection unit, module and communications system
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention relates to a method for controlling the
`
`weighting of a data signal in the at least two antenna
`
`elements of a first radio connection unit of a radio
`
`communications system, which data signal is to be
`
`distributed to at least two beams for parallel transmission
`
`of the data signal in at least two at least partly different
`
`streams to a second radio connection unit with at least one
`
`antenna element,
`
`the beams being formed by weighting the
`
`data signal in the antenna elements with a set of weights
`
`for each beam. The invention equally relates to a radio
`
`connection unit, a radio connection unit module and a radio
`
`communications system to be employed for such a method.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is known from wireless communications systems of the
`
`state of the art to transmit data signals between two radio
`
`connection units,
`
`in particular from a base station to a
`
`terminal,
`
`in parallel via several transmit antenna elements.
`
`When using multiple antennas with adapted transmission and
`
`detection techniques,
`
`the spatial dimension can be exploited
`
`2
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`at the terminal and the spectral efficiency of fading
`
`wireless channels can be increased significantly compared to
`
`conventional single antenna links. A terminal receiving
`
`signals from such a transceiver can be designed to
`
`distinguish several channels,
`
`if they are sufficiently
`
`uncorrelated.
`
`The document "Link-Optimal BLAST Processing With Multiple-
`
`Access Interference" by F.R. Farrokhi, G.J. Foschini, A.
`
`Lozano, R.A. Valenzuela, Bell Laboratories (Lucent
`
`Technologies)
`
`in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference,
`
`Boston, Massachussets, USA, Sept. 24-28, 2000, proceeds from
`a wireless communications system with antenna arrays at
`|
`
`both,
`
`transmitter and receiver. The system transmits
`
`parallel data streams simultaneously and in the same
`
`frequency band, using the multiple antennas. With rich
`
`propagation,
`
`the different streams can be separated at the
`
`receiver because of their distinct spatial signatures. It is
`
`proposed to make the channel and the interference covariance
`
`available to the transmitter. The transmitter finds the
`
`channel eigenmodes in the presence of the interference and
`
`sends multiple independent data streams through those
`
`eigenmodes. The total transmitted power is distributed among
`
`the eigenmodes according to an optimal water-fill process.
`
`Thereby,
`
`the maximised capacity is supposed to be achieved.
`
`The method, as described above, always assumes that the
`
`receiver has at least two antenna elements. Preferably,
`
`in
`
`the aforementioned concept,
`
`the number of transmit and
`
`receive elements is the same.
`
`3
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`The parallel transmission via a plurality of antenna
`elements in transceiver and terminal enables a reduction of
`
`Eb/No (Eb = energy per bit; No = noise power density per Hz)
`
`requirements for achieving data rates associated with higher
`
`order constellations like 8PSK,
`
`16QAM, or 64QAM. Moreover,
`
`it enables the expansion of the number of rate options for
`
`adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) and an increase of the
`
`maximum rate.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is an object of the invention to provide a further
`
`improved method for controlling the weighting of a data
`
`signal in the at least two antenna elements of a transceiver
`
`of a wireless communications system which allows for high
`
`data rates in the downlink matched to channel conditions.
`
`This object is reached on the one hand by a first method for
`
`controlling the weighting of a data signal in the at least
`
`two antenna elements of a first radio connection unit of a
`
`radio communications system, which data signal is to be
`
`distributed to at least two beams for parallel transmission
`
`of the data signal in at least two at least partly different
`streams to a second radio connection unit with at least one |
`antenna element,
`the beams being formed by weighting the
`data signal in the antenna elements with a set of weights
`for each beam,
`the method comprising:
`
`- determining in the second radio connection unit a weight
`
`information enabling the first radio connection unit to
`
`4
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`determine the sets of. weights for at least two suitable
`
`beams for transmission of a data signal from the first
`
`radio connection unit to the second radio connection
`
`unit;
`
`-~
`
`transmitting the determined weight
`
`information to the
`
`first radio connection unit; and
`
`in the first radio
`- distributing the data signal
`connection unit to at least two sets of weights
`
`determined from the received weight
`
`information and
`
`transmitting the data signals simultaneously via the at
`
`least two formed beams.
`
`the invention proceeds
`With regard to this first method,
`from the idea that the second radio connection unit is in
`
`possession of the most comprehensive information relevant
`
`for selecting suitable beams for transmission of the data
`
`signal and for determining sets of weights for the selected
`
`beams. It is therefore proposed to calculate all relevant
`
`information needed for the weighting of the data signals in
`
`the antenna elements of the first radio connection unit
`
`already at the second radio connection unit. The feedback
`
`information includes a weight information from which the
`
`first radio connection unit can determine the set of weights
`
`for each beam that is to be used for transmission of the
`
`data signals from the first radio connection unit to the
`
`second radio connection unit. Each feedback information
`
`indicates the weighting of the data signal for each of the
`
`different antenna elements of the first radio connection
`
`unit. This way,
`
`the information needed for obtaining the
`
`weight sets can be determined with the full information
`
`5
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`present at the second radio connection unit, while only the
`
`information needed is fed back to the first radio connection
`
`unit.
`
`It is to be noted that the feedback information can include
`
`the set of weights for each selected beam,
`
`the first radio
`
`connection unit only having to apply the received sets for
`
`forming the selected beams. It is not required, however,
`
`that the second radio connection unit determines and
`
`transmits all sets of weights, if there exists an a priori
`
`fixed or negotiated way of calculating multiple weights from
`
`a single feedback known to both, first and second radio
`
`connection unit. Then, a reduced feedback information is
`
`sufficient, which enables the first radio connection unit to
`
`determine the necessary sets of weights. Therefore,
`
`the
`
`second radio connection unit controls the parallel beams
`
`with weight
`
`information either directly using explicit
`
`feedback for all beams or implicitly using reduced feedback
`
`and the knowledge of beam parameterisation at the first
`
`radio connection unit.
`
`On the other hand,
`
`the object is reached by a second method
`
`for controlling the weighting of a data signal in the at
`
`least two antenna elements of a first radio connection unit
`
`of a radio communications system, which data signal is to be
`
`distributed to at least two beams for parallel transmission
`
`of the data signal in at least two at least partly different
`
`streams to a second radio connection unit with at least one
`
`antenna element,
`
`the beams being formed by weighting the
`
`6
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`data signal in the antenna elements with a set of weights
`
`for each beam, said second method comprising:
`
`- determining in the second radio connection unit the
`
`number of beams to be used for transmission of a data
`
`signal from the first radio connection unit to the second
`
`radio connection unit;
`
`- providing the first radio connection unit with
`
`information about the determined number of beams; and
`
`- distributing the data signal
`
`in the first radio
`
`connection unit to the number of beams corresponding to
`
`the number of beams determined in the second radio
`
`connection unit.
`
`Just like in the first proposed method,
`
`in the second
`
`the second radio
`proposed method according to the invention,
`connection unit makes use of its knowledge in order to
`
`determine an information relevant for beamforming in the
`
`first radio connection unit and transmits this information
`
`to the first radio connection unit. The difference is that
`
`here,
`
`the information may include the number of beams that
`
`are to be formed by the first radio connection unit.
`
`Both methods are aimed at controlling the weighting of a
`
`data signal that is to be divided, usually after encoding
`and modulation,
`into at least two parts for transmission. At
`least partly different symbols are therefore transmitted in
`
`parallel using the at least two formed beams, even though
`
`the symbols transmitted by the two beams do not have to be
`
`completely different.
`
`7
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`The weight
`
`information for the selected beams and the number
`
`of beams respectively can be signalled to the first radio
`
`connection unit using any feasible technique known in the
`
`state of the art.
`
`The transmitted data signals can be received at the second
`
`radio connection unit by one antenna element or by several
`
`antenna elements.
`
`The above stated object of the invention is equally reached
`by a radio connection unit that can be used as first and/or
`as second radio connection unit, comprising means
`respectively for realising the methods according to the
`invention. Moreover,
`the object is reached by radio
`
`connection unit modules comprising means for realising the
`
`methods according to the invention in a first or second or a
`
`combined first and second radio connection unit. Finally,
`
`also a radio communications system with radio connection
`
`units suitable for realising the methods according to the
`
`invention reaches this object of the invention.
`
`Preferred embodiments of the invention become apparent from
`
`the subclaims.
`
`In the first method according to the invention,
`
`the second
`
`radio connection unit preferably determines the set of
`
`weights for at least two dominant downlink beams that are
`
`spatially sufficiently independent or uncorrelated for
`
`reception at said second radio connection unit. The sets of
`
`8
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`. weights for forming the downlink beams that are fed back to
`
`the first radio connection unit can be calculated at the
`
`second radio connection unit so that they enable an
`
`efficient signal separation at the receiver. As an example,
`
`if the two most dominant beams are highly correlated,
`
`the
`
`first radio connection unit and the second radio connection
`
`unit can use only one of them for an efficient parallel
`
`transmission.
`
`In this case, only one of those most dominant
`
`beams is used and in addition another dominant beam with a
`
`smaller eigenvalue but which is sufficiently different from
`
`the two most dominant beams. With sufficient information
`
`about the beamforming at the first radio connection unit,
`
`instead of all needed sets of weights only some
`again,
`reduced weight
`information from which several sets of
`
`weights can be determined can be transmitted to the first
`
`radio connection unit as feedback information.
`
`In a further preferred embodiment of the first of the
`
`proposed methods,
`
`the second radio connection unit not only
`
`determines the downlink beams and the corresponding weight
`
`information indicating the sets of weights that are to be
`used for multiple transmission, but also the data rates to
`be used for each of the selected beams. The data rates are
`
`determined in the second radio connection unit according to
`
`the characteristics of the received channels and information
`
`about the determined data rates is transmitted to the first
`
`radio connection unit. This means,
`
`the data rate mapping to
`
`multiple beams is done at least partially using a second
`
`radio connection unit to first radio connection unit
`
`feedback. Thereby,
`
`the downlink data rate using multiple
`
`9
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`transmit beams or weight sets can be maximised. In order to
`
`be able to assign the data rates,
`
`the signal-to-noise ratio
`
`(SNR) or signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), or signal-to-
`
`noise-plus-interference ratio (SINR) of the different
`
`channels can be evaluated. Moreover, with correlated
`
`channels,
`
`the data rate should typically be reduced
`
`regardless of the number of transmit or receive antenna
`
`elements. The data rates can be determined in a way that the
`
`total data rate remains constant. Advantageously, however,
`
`the total data rate is determined in a way that it coincides
`
`with a data rate requested by the terminal and that the
`
`associated transmission power supports the quality-of-
`service (QoS) criteria (e.g. SIR, SNR, SINR, Bit Error Ratio
`BER, Frame Error Rate FER, Outage) set for the transmitted
`
`service by the terminal.
`
`The information about changes in the data rates transmitted
`
`from the second to the first radio connection unit can be
`
`differential or absolute.
`
`In the first case, e.g. only a
`
`requested increase or decrease in a data rate has to be
`
`indicated in the feedback, while in the second case,
`
`the
`
`data rate can change arbitrarily, but more feedback is
`
`required.
`
`The determination of multi-rate beams is preferably done in
`
`the second radio connection unit by taking into account the
`
`effective signal-to-noise ratio for parallel beams and by
`
`using in addition the knowledge of the receiver structure in
`
`the second radio connection unit. For example,
`
`some
`
`receivers can be better suited for mitigating inter-beam
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`10
`
`interferences than others. Furthermore,
`
`the inter-beam
`
`interference can be optimised when controlling jointly the
`
`transmit powers, weight coefficients and data rates.
`
`In an equally preferred embodiment of the first method
`
`according to the invention,
`
`the second radio connection unit
`
`determines alternatively or in addition to the data rate
`
`distribution an advantageous power distribution over the
`
`selected downlink beams. Like the data rates, also the power
`
`distribution is determined in the second radio connection
`
`unit according to the characteristics of the received
`
`channels. The second radio connection unit transmits
`information about this distribution to the first radio
`
`connection unit for controlling the antenna elements
`
`accordingly. Equivalent as for the data rates,
`
`the total
`
`power over all used beams can be kept constant.
`
`The optimal power allocation can be determined in a way that
`
`the desired SIR is met after the sets of weights have been
`
`fixed. A downlink power assignment for the power of downlink
`
`beams with fixed beam coefficients from a base station to a
`
`number of terminals is described in "Optimal downlink power
`
`assignment for smart antenna systems" by Weidong Yang;
`
`Guanghan Xu,
`
`in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing,
`
`1998; Proceedings of the 1998 IBEE, Vol. 6, pp. 3337-3340.
`
`This approach can be adapted for the first method of the
`
`invention to be used to jointly determine the powers and the
`
`Q0S parameters for each of several parallel downlink beams
`
`from a first radio connection unit to a given second radio
`
`connection unit rather than for the power of downlink beams
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`11
`
`from a base station to multiple users, where to each user
`
`there is assigned one beam.
`
`Alternatively,
`
`the transmit powers for the downlink beams
`
`can be determined jointly with the determination of the set
`
`of weights or corresponding weight information for the
`
`optimal beams. In the document "Joint Optimal Power Control
`
`and Beamforming in Wireless Networks Using Antenna Arrays",
`
`by F. Rashid-Farrokhi, L. Tassiulas, and K. J. Ray Liu,
`
`IEEE
`
`Transactions On Communications, vol. 46, no. 10, October
`
`1898, pp. 1313-1323, an algorithm is provided for computing
`
`transmission powers and beamforming weight vectors, such
`
`that a target SINR is achieved for each link from one base
`
`station to a plurality of terminals with minimal
`
`transmission power.
`In the documents, it is proposed that
`for a fixed power allocation, each base station maximises
`the SINR using the minimum variance distortionless response
`(MVDR) beamformer. Next,
`the mobile powers are updated to
`reduce the cochannel interference. This operation is done
`
`iteratively until the vector of transmitter powers and the
`
`weight coefficients of the beamformers converge to the
`
`jointly optimal value. Assuming that at least two spatial
`
`channels have been estimated for the second radio connection
`
`unit,
`
`the sets of weights and the power optimisation
`
`techniques proposed by Farrokhi et al. can be used in the
`
`first method of the invention to determine multiple beams
`
`for parallel transmission from the first to the (single)
`
`second radio connection unit instead of from a base station
`
`to multiple users. As a result,
`
`the second radio connection
`
`unit has all relevant information for optimising the beams
`
`12
`
`12
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`12
`
`and for distributing the signals to at least two parallel
`
`beams.
`
`Furthermore, for determining the at least two suitable
`
`downlink beams, channel
`
`information and/or interference
`
`information can be used in the second radio connection unit.
`
`A possibility for determining an interference covariance
`
`matrix that can be used in the method according to the
`
`invention to calculate the optimal eigenvectors at the
`
`second radio connection unit,
`
`is described e.g.
`
`in "Maximum
`
`bikelihood Multipath Channel Parameter Estimation in CDMA
`
`Systems", by C. Sengupta, A. Hottinen, J.R. Cavallaro, and
`B. Aazhang, 32nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences
`
`and Sysetms (CISS), Princeton, March 1998,
`
`information, which may include the sets of
`The weight
`weights, and/or the data rates and/or the power distribution
`can be determined in the second radio connection unit either
`
`based on short term variations of the received channels or
`
`based on the stationary structure of the received channels
`
`or on a combination of both.
`
`In a slowly fading channel,
`
`short term variations can be used to determine the weight
`
`information and related data rate information.
`
`Alternatively, short term information can be used for
`
`signalling only the data rate and/or the power information
`
`for beams that are determined by using the stationary
`structure of the received channels. With short term
`
`variations, high resolution beams can be calculated such
`
`that the instantaneous data rate ig maximised. This, of
`
`course, works only in slowly fading environments.
`
`13
`
`13
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`13
`
`In case the stationary structure of the received channels is
`
`used for determining the weight
`
`information for the at least
`
`two downlink beams, preferably the eigenvectors of the
`
`Spatial signal covariance matrices are calculated. However,
`
`the weight information for the preferred beams can be
`
`calculated in any other suitable way. For example,
`
`the
`
`subspace weight vectors can be tracked with a singular value
`
`decomposition and subspace tracking, which does not require
`
`the calculation of the correlation matrix and a subsequent
`
`eigenvalue decomposition. Such a tracking can be taken e.g.
`
`from "Solving the SVD Updating Problem for Subspace Tracking
`on a Fixed Sized Linear Array of Processors" by C.
`Sengupta,J.R. Cavallaro, and B. Aazhang, International
`
`Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
`
`(ICASSP), Volume 5, pp. 4137-4140, Munich, April 1997.
`
`Alternatively, an independent component analysis can be
`
`applied, as described e.g. by U.F. Cardoso and P. Comon in:
`
`"Independent Component Analysis, a Survey of Some Algebraic
`
`methods", Proc.
`
`ISCAS Conference, volume 2, pp. 93-96,
`
`Atlanta, May 1996.
`
`In this case,
`
`the beams transmitted in
`
`parallel are typically non-orthogonal.
`
`In a preferred embodiment of the second method according to
`
`the invention,
`
`the second radio connection unit determines
`
`the number of beams to be used for transmission of a data
`
`signal from the first radio connection unit to the second
`
`radio connection unit based on channel and/or interference
`
`information.
`
`14
`
`14
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`14
`
`As one possibility for transmitting the information about
`
`the determined number of beams in the second method
`
`according to the invention,
`
`the determined number of beams
`
`to be used for transmission of a data signal from the first
`
`radio connection unit to the second radio connection unit
`
`can simply be indicated by the number of beams that are
`
`transmitted from the second radio connection unit to the
`
`first radio connection unit. As mentioned above,
`
`the number
`
`of beams can also be included in the number of sets of
`
`weights determined and transmitted as proposed for the first
`
`method according to the invention.
`
`In the second method according to the invention,
`
`the first
`
`radio connection unit can signal in addition to the number
`
`of beams beam indices selected for transmission, enumerated
`
`in some way.
`
`The first method according to the invention can, but does
`
`not necessarily,
`
`include the second method according to the
`
`invention. That means,
`
`in the first method according to the
`
`invention,
`
`the number of beams to be used can be determined
`
`first in the second radio connection unit and for this
`
`number of beams, sets of weights are determined and
`
`transmitted to the first radio connection unit, or the
`
`number is included in the weight
`
`information if this weight
`
`information does not include the complete set of weights to
`
`be used. Alternatively,
`
`the number of sets of weights
`
`determined in the second radio connection unit can be fixed.
`
`15
`
`15
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`— mn
`
`In both methods according to the invention,
`
`the second radio
`
`connection unit should recover the data signals distributed
`
`to the at least two beams in the first radio connection unit
`
`and transmitted in at least two at least partly different
`
`streams to the second radio connection unit. This means,
`
`the
`
`parts transmitted by different streams have to be combined
`
`again in the correct symbol/bit order.
`
`In a preferred embodiment of both methods according to the
`
`invention,
`
`the first radio connection unit transmits weight
`
`information used for beamforming to the second radio
`connection unit and the second radio connection unit uses
`
`the received weight information for evaluation of the
`
`received data signals. With this knowledge,
`
`the quality and
`
`the speed in determining information to be transmitted to
`
`the first radio connection unit can be improved.
`
`In an
`
`alternative embodiment for the first method of the
`
`invention,
`
`the second radio connection unit can make use of
`
`its own knowledge included in the weight information
`
`transmitted to the first radio connection unit for
`
`recovering the data signals.
`
`In both embodiments,
`
`the second
`
`radio connection unit can use the channel estimates obtained
`
`for each antenna element,
`
`the transport format information,
`
`and the used beam coefficients for each beam in order to
`
`detect and decode the information most efficiently. The
`
`receiver can use any techniques known in the art to that
`
`end,
`
`including joint detection,
`
`joint decoding,
`
`joint
`
`detection/decoding and channel estimation implemented either
`
`iteratively, or non-iteratively. As an example,
`
`techniques
`
`16
`
`16
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`16
`
`analogous to those described in A. Hottinen and 0.
`
`Tirkkonen, "Iterative decoding and detection in a high data
`
`rate downlink channel," Proc. NORSIG, Kolmorden, Sweden,
`
`June 2000, can be used.
`
`In both methods of to the invention,
`
`the first radio
`
`connection unit can be a base station and the second radio
`
`connection unit a terminal,
`
`the formed beams being downlink
`
`beams. Equally,
`
`the first radio connection unit can be a
`
`terminal and the second radio connection unit a base
`
`the formed beams being uplink beams. Consequently,
`station,
`the methods can also be employed with a base station and a
`terminal which can both form the first radio connection unit
`
`and the second radio connection unit.
`
`The proposed method is of particular advantage when used in
`
`FDD systems.
`
`The first and second radio connection units are preferably
`base stations and user equipments, where base station and
`
`user equipment can include either only means for one of the
`
`first and the second radio connection unit or means for
`
`both.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`In the following,
`
`the invention is explained in more detail
`
`for three embodiments.
`
`17
`
`17
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`17
`
`All three embodiments of a method according to the invention
`
`relate to a WCDMA FDD wireless communications system,
`
`in
`
`which data signals are to be transmitted with a very high
`
`data rate from a base station to a user equipment. The base
`
`station comprises an antenna array with M antenna elements
`
`and the user equipment comprise an antenna array with N
`
`antenna elements. The data signals are transmitted in
`
`parallel and with the same frequency, but with different
`
`beams from the base station to the user equipment.
`
`The beams are formed by assigning a different set of weights
`
`the set of weights
`to the data signals assigned to one beam,
`determining the weighting with which each data bit is
`
`transmitted from each antenna element of the base station.
`
`To each beam,
`
`there is assigned a data rate with which bits
`
`are to be transmitted and an output power. The number of
`
`beams to be used,
`
`the beam weights,
`
`the data rates and the
`
`power for the selected beams are determined in the user
`
`equipment .
`
`The first embodiment of a method according to the invention
`
`is proposed for correlated spatial channels. A specific
`
`parameterised weight set for the base station antenna array
`
`is assumed. That is, it is assumed that the base station has
`
`an uniform linear array (ULA);
`
`the antennas have equal
`
`spacing, which spacing is small enough to allow significant
`
`(but not necessarily close to unit) correlation between
`
`neighbouring antennas. Under those assumptions, a particular
`
`parameterised beam-forming concept is used at the user
`
`18
`
`18
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`18
`
`equipment in which the transmit weight/array vector,
`
`parameterised by 9, is given by:
`
`w(0) = fe? get? f 4M
`
`The feedback can be calculated e.g. using the eigenvectors
`
`corresponding to the two largest eigenvalues of the channel
`matrix H"H, where H=(h,,..., h,) and where h, is the impulse
`response between the m™ array element and all antennas of
`
`the user equipment. When denoting these vectors
`= 1,2) and solving
`
`by e,,,;
`
`(1
`
`G= argmax|w(4)" emax_i
`
`
`
`2
`
`’
`
`the phases at the transmit element m are w, = Ql ner
`
`some (not
`If the user equipment finds it advantageous,
`necessarily orthogonal)
`linear combinations of the
`
`eigenvectors may be used as a basis for directing the beams
`from the ULA,
`instead of the eigenvectors e
`For example,
`max_ie
`if the data rates that may be assigned to the beams are such
`that the beam with the highest eigenvalue may support more
`
`data than can be transmitted with the highest supportable
`
`data rate,
`
`the user equipment may choose to select
`
`correlating beams, where a suitable mixture of orthogonal
`
`beams are used to reach the maximal data rate with an
`
`acceptable Quality of Service.
`
`19
`
`19
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`19
`
`The set of parameters 0i for parallel transmission is fed
`
`back to the base station applying e.g. Mode 1 feedback
`
`signalling.
`
`In Mode 1,
`
`the feedback bit signals in
`
`successive slots the real and the imaginary parts of the
`
`feedback weights, or the angular parameters Oi in this case.
`
`It is also possible to parameterise the gains of the
`
`antennas with one or more parameters. One parameterisation
`
`would be to have the gains linearly increasing or decreasing
`
`along the linear array. Other parameterisation would enhance
`
`or suppress the central antenna elements, or every second
`
`element. If antenna gains are parameterised,
`
`the
`
`maximisation above chooses the best angular and gain
`
`parameters to match the eigenvectors. This information can
`
`be transmitted e.g. by closed-loop Mode 2 signalling.
`
`In
`
`closed-loop Mode 2,
`
`the feedback weight is signalled as a
`
`Gray coded message with 3 phase bits and 1 gain bit. The
`
`gain bit,
`
`transmitted every fourth slot, selects the
`
`relative gain between the two transmit elements. Here, Mode
`
`2 signalling would convey information of the angular
`
`parameter @i
`
`in the phase bits, and one gain parameter in
`
`the gain bit.
`
`In addition,
`
`the feedback from the terminal to the
`
`transmitter can be reduced, if the terminal knows the method
`
`the transmitter uses in determining the coefficients for the
`
`parallel beams. For example, it is possible that the
`
`terminal sends the coefficients or parameters for one beam
`only, and the base station then determines two or more
`
`parallel beams using w(9-A) and w(6+A), where A is a priori
`
`20
`
`20
`
`

`

`WO 02/47286
`
`PCT/EP00/12269
`
`20
`
`fixed or negotiated between the transmitter and the
`
`terminal, and where §@ is the parameter for the two beams.
`
`Then,
`
`the terminal can optimise 90 jointly for w(@-A) and
`
`w(8+A),
`
`so that there are two parameterised beams
`
`transmitted, but with only one feedback signal
`
`(0). This
`
`generalises naturally to multiple parallel beams and
`different ways to calculate the multiple parallel beams from
`
`single feedback

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket