throbber

`
`ANDREW V. TRASK
`(202) 434-5023
`atrask@wc.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Via Email
`
`August 2, 2022
`
`
`
`Rex A. Mann, Esq.
`Winston & Strawn LLP
`2121 North Pearl Street, Suite 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`rmann@winston.com
`
`
`Re: Hardin, et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., civil action no. 2:21-cv-
`290-JRG (E.D. Tex.)
`
`Dear Rex:
`
`I write regarding petitions for inter partes review (IPR) that will be filed
`imminently against certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,779,418, 10,049,387, and 10,984,447.
`Samsung hereby stipulates that:
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01327, then
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics, America, Inc., (collectively,
`“Samsung”) will not pursue, with respect to the ’387 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-
`00290-JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in
`IPR2022-01327, or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using U.S. Patent
`Publication No. 2010/0279665 (“Hardin ’665”) as the primary reference.
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01328, then
`Samsung will not pursue, with respect to the ’387 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-00290-
`JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in IPR2022-
`01328, or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using Hardin ’665 as the primary
`reference.
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01329, then
`Samsung will not pursue, with respect to the ’387 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-00290-
`JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in IPR2022-
`01329 or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using Hardin ’665 as the primary
`reference.
`
`Exhibit 1034
`Page 01 of 03
`
`

`

`
`
`
`August 2, 2022
`Page 2
`
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01330, then
`Samsung will not pursue, with respect to the ’418 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-00290-
`JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in IPR2022-
`01330 or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using Hardin ’665 as the primary
`reference.
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01331, then
`Samsung will not pursue, with respect to the ’418 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-00290-
`JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in IPR2022-
`01331 or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using Hardin ’665 as the primary
`reference.
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01332, then
`Samsung will not pursue, with respect to the ’418 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-00290-
`JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in IPR2022-
`01332 or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using Hardin ’665 as the primary
`reference.
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01333, then
`Samsung will not pursue, with respect to the ’447 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-00290-
`JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in IPR2022-
`01333 or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using Hardin ’665 as the primary
`reference.
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01334, then
`Samsung will not pursue, with respect to the ’447 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-00290-
`JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in IPR2022-
`01334 or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using Hardin ’665 as the primary
`reference.
`
`● If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes trial in IPR2022-01335, then
`Samsung will not pursue, with respect to the ’447 patent in Case No. 2:21-CV-00290-
`JRG, invalidity of the challenged claims based on the grounds instituted in IPR2022-
`01335 or based on any 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 grounds using Hardin ’665 as the primary
`reference.
`
`In so stipulating, Samsung seeks to avoid multiple proceedings addressing the
`validity of the patents-in-suit based on the same grounds. Rather, consistent with Congressional
`intent, Samsung wishes the patentability of these patents over those grounds to be addressed at
`the PTAB. But, for the sake of clarity and to avoid any doubt, if the PTAB declines institution of
`one or more IPRs, Samsung reserves the right to pursue the grounds of those IPRs in this
`litigation.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1034
`Page 02 of 03
`
`

`

`Sincerely,
`Sincerely,
`WA
`
`
`
`Andrew V. Trask
`Andrew V. Trask
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY ie:
`
`August 2, 2022
`August 2, 2022
`Page 3
`Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1034
`
`Page 03 of 03
`
`Exhibit 1034
`Page 03 of 03
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket