throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 1 of 58
`
`
`JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION

`

`Case No. 6:21-cv-00984

`

`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

`







`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Jawbone Innovations, LLC (“Jawbone” or “Plaintiff”) for its Complaint against
`
`Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple” or “Defendant”), for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271
`
`and alleges as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Jawbone is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`Texas, with a place of business located at 2226 Washington Avenue, Suite Number 1, Waco, Texas
`
`76701. Jawbone is in the business of developing software products, including products that exploit
`
`the technology disclosed in its patent portfolio.
`
`2.
`
`Apple is a California corporation and maintains its principal place of business
`
`located at One Apple Park Way, Cupertino, California 95014, and may be served with process
`
`through its registered agent, CT Corporation System at 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas
`
`75201.
`
`Page 1 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 2 of 58
`
`3.
`
`Apple does business in Texas, directly or through intermediaries, and offers its
`
`products and/or services, including those accused herein of infringement, to customers and
`
`potential customers located in Texas, including in this judicial District.
`
`4.
`
`On information and belief, Apple maintains regular and established places of
`
`business within this Judicial District including at least the following locations: 12545 Riata Vista
`
`Circle, Austin, Texas 78727; 12801 Delcour Drive, Austin, Texas 78727; and 3121 Palm Way,
`
`Austin, Texas 78758. Upon information and belief, Defendant employs individuals in this Judicial
`
`District involved in the sales and marketing of its products.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United
`
`States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`1331 and 1338(a).
`
`6.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. Defendant regularly conducts
`
`business and has committed acts of patent infringement within this Judicial District and the State
`
`of Texas that give rise to this action and has established minimum contacts with this forum such
`
`that exercise of jurisdiction over Apple would not offend traditional notions of fair play and
`
`substantial justice. Apple has committed and continues to commit acts of infringement in this
`
`Judicial District and State by, among other things, offering to sell, selling, using, importing, and
`
`making products and services that infringe the asserted patents. Apple has further induced acts of
`
`patent infringement by others and/or has contributed to patent infringement by others in this
`
`Judicial District, the State of Texas, and elsewhere in the United States.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b).
`
`Apple is registered to do business in Texas and, upon information and belief, Apple has transacted
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 3 of 58
`
`business in this Judicial District, has committed acts of direct and indirect infringement in this
`
`Judicial District, and has regular and established places of business in this Judicial District as set
`
`forth above.
`
`8.
`
`Apple is subject to this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to due process and the Texas
`
`Long Arm Statute due at least to its substantial business in this State and Judicial District, including
`
`(a) at least part of its past infringing activities, (b) regularly doing or soliciting business in Texas,
`
`and/or (c) engaging in persistent conduct and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and
`
`services provided to customers in Texas.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`9.
`
`On February 8, 2005, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,019,091 (the “’091 Patent”) entitled “Voice activity detector
`
`(VAD)-based multiple-microphone acoustic noise suppression.” A true and correct copy of the
`
`’091 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`10.
`
`On July 17, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 7,246,058 (the “’058 Patent”) entitled “Detecting Voiced and Unvoiced
`
`Speech Using Both Acoustic and Nonacoustic Sensors.” A true and correct copy of the ’058 Patent
`
`is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`11.
`
`On October 2, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,280,072 (the “’072 Patent”) entitled “Microphone Array with Rear
`
`Venting.” A true and correct copy of the ’072 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
`
`12.
`
`On November 27, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,321,213 (the “’213 Patent”) entitled “Acoustic Voice Activity
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 4 of 58
`
`Detection (AVAD) for Electronic Systems.” A true and correct copy of the ’213 Patent is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit D.
`
`13.
`
`On December 4, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,326,611 (the “’611 Patent”) entitled “Acoustic Voice Activity
`
`Detection (AVAD) for Electronic Systems.” A true and correct copy of the ’611 Patent is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit E.
`
`14.
`
`On September 15, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 10,779,080 (the “’080 Patent”) entitled “Dual Omnidirectional
`
`Microphone Array (DOMA).” A true and correct copy of the ’080 Patent is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit F.
`
`15.
`
`On September 14, 2021, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 11,122,357 (the “’357 Patent”) entitled “Forming Virtual
`
`Microphone Arrays Using Dual Omnidirectional Microphone Array (DOMA).” A true and correct
`
`copy of the ’357 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit G.
`
`16.
`
`On June 18, 2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 8,467,543 (the “’543 Patent”) entitled “Microphone and Voice Activity
`
`Detection (VAD) Configurations for Use with Communications Systems.” A true and correct copy
`
`of the ’543 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit H.
`
`17.
`
`Jawbone is the sole and exclusive owner of all right, title, and interest to and in the
`
`’091 Patent, ’058 Patent, ’072 Patent, ’213 Patent, ’611 Patent, ’‘080 Patent, ’357 Patent, and ’543
`
`Patent (together, the “Patents-in-Suit”), and holds the exclusive right to take all actions necessary
`
`to enforce its rights to the Patents-in-Suit, including the filing of this patent infringement lawsuit.
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 5 of 58
`
`Jawbone also has the right to recover all damages for past, present, and future infringement of the
`
`Patents-in-Suit and to seek injunctive relief as appropriate under the law.
`
`18.
`
`The technology of the Patents-in-Suit was developed by Jawbone, Inc. which was
`
`originally founded in 1998 as AliphCom, Inc. (“AliphCom”). AliphCom set out to develop a noise
`
`reducing headset that would allow soldiers to communicate better in combat conditions. In 2002,
`
`AliphCom won a contract with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to research noise
`
`suppression techniques for the United States military.
`
`19.
`
`AliphCom launched a mobile headset called the “Jawbone” in 2004. The
`
`“Jawbone” included the innovative noise-suppression technology that AliphCom developed for
`
`the military.1 This technology virtually eliminated background noise while increasing the volume
`
`of the speakers’ voices. AliphCom followed with a Bluetooth version of the “Jawbone” in 2008
`
`which was sold in the Apple Store.
`
`20.
`
`On the heels of the success of the “Jawbone” products, AliphCom changed its name
`
`to Jawbone, Inc. in 2011 and later expanded its product offerings into Bluetooth speakers and
`
`wearables, such as health tracking devices. Unfortunately, due to the intensely competitive
`
`marketplace, Jawbone, Inc. was forced into liquidation in 2017.
`
`21.
`
`Following Jawbone, Inc.’s liquidation “[a] host of technology companies including
`
`Apple, Samsung, Google, LG, and Fitbit [were] identified as potential buyers of Jawbone’s US
`
`Patents.”2 Upon information and belief, Envision IP (and other parties) contacted Apple regarding
`
`the value of the Patents-in-Suit, including regarding Apple’s infringement of the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`
`1 See https://www.wired.com/2004/09/military-headset-reaches-masses/
`2 See https://www.worldipreview.com/news/apple-google-and-fitbit-touted-to-acquire-jawbone-
`patents-14322; https://www.glpi.com.br/en/apple-google-and-fitbit-touted-to-acquire-jawbone-
`patents/; see also http://patentvue.com/2017/07/11/jawbone-patents-could-be-leveraged-by-a-
`competitor/
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 6 of 58
`
`Upon information and belief, Apple was notified that the Accused Products infringe the Patents-
`
`in-Suit, and/or otherwise became aware of the Patents-in-Suit and recognized that the Accused
`
`Products infringe the Patents-in-Suit at least as of 2017.
`
`INFRINGEMENT ALLEGATIONS
`
`22.
`
`The ’091 and ’058 Patents generally describe acoustic noise suppression with a
`
`voice activity detector that senses vibration in human tissue associated with voicing activity. The
`
`technology of the ’091 was developed by Dr. Gregory C. Burnett and Eric F. Breitfeller. The
`
`technology of the ’058 Patent was developed by Dr. Gregory C. Burnett. The ’091 and ’058 Patents
`
`also describe techniques for generating transfer functions and cross correlations representative of
`
`acoustic signals when voicing activity is absent, providing improved noise suppression. Some
`
`embodiments of the invention include a microphone array with one microphone which primarily
`
`captures sound (e.g., speech) and one which primarily captures unwanted noise, both of which
`
`provide signals to a noise removal algorithm.
`
`23.
`
`The noise removal algorithm may also receive physiological information from a
`
`voice activity detector (e.g., an accelerometer) to detect when a user is speaking. Such a voice
`
`activity detection signal may be assumed to be perfectly accurate, yielding substantial
`
`improvements when applied to the noise removal algorithm. For example, the noise removal
`
`algorithm may remove noise by calculating one transfer function when the system is certain that
`
`only noise is being received, and another transfer function when the system is certain that speech
`
`is being produced. The noise removal algorithm may further improve noise suppression in
`
`situations with multiple noise sources by combining such transfer functions into additional transfer
`
`functions representative of a ratio of energies received at different microphones. By taking
`
`advantage of perfect voice activity detection and transfer functions representative of a ratio of
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 7 of 58
`
`energies received at different microphones, the noise removal algorithm may effectively remove
`
`noise from a signal no matter how many noise sources are present. The invention thereby provides
`
`significant advantages for noise suppression systems, particularly in detecting, transmitting, or
`
`recording speech.
`
`24.
`
`Apple has manufactured, used, marketed, distributed, sold, offered for sale,
`
`exported from, and imported into the United States, products that infringe the ’091 and ’058
`
`Patents. For example, noise suppression techniques are incorporated into Apple products with
`
`voice activity detection devices including, but not limited to, Apple ear buds and smartphones. For
`
`example, this functionality is included and utilized in the Apple AirPods Pro. The AirPods Pro
`
`include “dual beamforming microphones” and a “speech-detecting accelerometer.”3 The “speech-
`
`detecting accelerometer” of the AirPods Pro detects vibration in human tissue and “works in
`
`tandem to attenuate background noise and hone in on relaying your voice to the person on the other
`
`end of the call.”4 Upon information and belief, the beamforming microphone array of the AirPods
`
`Pro generate transfer functions representative of a ratio of energy of the acoustic signals received
`
`at each microphone. For example, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max similarly comprises an
`
`accelerometer which, upon information and belief, is used to detect voicing activity. Upon
`
`information and belief, the beamforming microphone array of the iPhone 12 Pro Max further
`
`generates transfer functions representative of a ratio of energy of the acoustic signals received at
`
`each microphone.
`
`
`3 https://www.apple.com/airpods-pro/specs/
`4 https://www.soundguys.com/apple-airpods-pro-vs-airpods-2-27213/
`
`7
`
`Page 7 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 8 of 58
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`25.
`
`The ’072 Patent generally describes acoustic noise suppression with an array of
`
`physical microphones which forms an array of virtual microphones. The technology was
`
`developed by Dr. Gregory C. Burnett. The ’072 Patent also describes noise suppression with
`
`physical omnidirectional microphones and virtual directional microphones. In some embodiments
`
`of the invention, a greater number of physical microphones may be used to form a smaller number
`
`of virtual microphones, which are combined into an output signal with less acoustic noise than the
`
`
`5 https://www.apple.com/airpods-pro/specs/
`
`8
`
`Page 8 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 9 of 58
`
`received acoustic signals. The resulting virtual microphones may further be combined by applying
`
`transfer functions representative of a ratio of energies between physical microphones, outputting
`
`a signal with greatly reduced noise. The invention provides significant advantages for noise
`
`suppression systems, particularly in detecting, transmitting, or recording speech.
`
`26.
`
`Apple has manufactured, used, marketed, distributed, sold, offered for sale,
`
`exported from, and imported into the United States, products that infringe the ’072 Patent. For
`
`example, this functionality is included and utilized in Apple products with omnidirectional
`
`physical MEMS microphones which form virtual beamformed microphones including, but not
`
`limited to, Apple ear buds, smart phones, tablets, wearables, and smart home devices. For example,
`
`upon information and belief, the Apple AirPods Pro earbuds comprise arrays of at least four
`
`physical microphones and two beamformed microphones, the outputs of which are combined to
`
`reduce the noise of a signal. On information and belief, the AirPods Pro earbuds combine the
`
`outputs the signals generated by the beamforming microphone array of each earbud to further
`
`reduce noise. 6
`
`27.
`
`The ’611 and ’213 Patents generally describe acoustic voice activity detection
`
`based on a ratio of energies between virtual microphones formed by an array of physical
`
`microphones. The technology of the ’611 and ’213 Patents was developed by Dr. Gregory C.
`
`Burnett, Nicholas Petit, and Zhinian Jing. In some embodiments of the invention, a first virtual
`
`microphone may be generated by summing the outputs of a first physical microphone processed
`
`with a delay filter, and a second physical microphone processed with a calibration filter and an
`
`adaptive filter, while a second virtual microphone may be generated by summing the outputs of a
`
`first physical microphone processed with an adaptive filter and a delay filter, and a second physical
`
`
`6 https://www.soundguys.com/apple-airpods-pro-vs-airpods-2-27213/
`
`9
`
`Page 9 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 10 of 58
`
`microphone processed with a calibration filter. Accordingly, the invention provides virtual
`
`microphones with similar noise response magnitudes, but very dissimilar speech response
`
`magnitudes. A ratio of energies between the virtual microphones may further be compared to a
`
`threshold to detect when voicing activity is occurring. The invention of the ’611 and ’213 patents
`
`provides significant improvements in noise suppression, including by enabling accurate voice
`
`activity detection with a microphone array.
`
`28.
`
`Apple has manufactured, used, marketed, distributed, sold, offered for sale,
`
`exported from, and imported into the United States, products that infringe the ’213 and ’611
`
`Patents. For example, this functionality is included and utilized in Apple products which use virtual
`
`microphones formed by physical microphones to detect a wake word including, but not limited to,
`
`Apple ear buds, smart phones, tablets, wearables, and smart home devices. For example, upon
`
`information and belief, the iPhone 12 Pro Max forms an array of virtual microphones using an
`
`array of physical microphones. For example, upon information and belief, the Apple HomePod
`
`forms an array of virtual microphones, such as by beamforming. Upon information and belief, the
`
`iPhone 12 Pro Max and the HomePod detect user speech, such as a “Hey Siri” wake word, by
`
`comparing a ratio of energies (e.g., amplitudes), of the beamformed microphones to a threshold.7
`
`
`7 See e.g. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204389
`
`10
`
`Page 10 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 11 of 58
`
`8
`
`
`8 https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/optimizing-siri-on-homepod-in-far-field-settings
`
`11
`
`Page 11 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 12 of 58
`
`9
`
`
`
`29.
`
`The ’080 Patent generally describes noise suppression with an array of
`
`omnidirectional microphones that form virtual microphones with a similar noise response and a
`
`dissimilar speech response. The technology of the ’080 Patent was developed by Dr. Gregory C.
`
`Burnett. The ’080 Patent also describes a dual omnidirectional microphone array that forms two
`
`distinct virtual microphones that can be paired with an adaptive filter and/or VAD algorithm to
`
`significantly reduce noise without distorting speech, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio of
`
`the desired speech. In some embodiments, output of each physical microphone can be delayed,
`
`multiplied by a gain, and summed with the other in order to form at least one virtual microphone,
`
`which may be paired with an adaptive filter and/or VAD algorithm to suppress noise. The invention
`
`
`9 https://www.apple.com/iphone-12/specs/
`
`12
`
`Page 12 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 13 of 58
`
`of the ’080 Patent provides substantial advantages for noise suppression systems, particularly in
`
`detecting, transmitting, or recording speech.
`
`30.
`
`Apple has manufactured, used, marketed, distributed, sold, offered for sale,
`
`exported from, and imported into the United States, products that infringe the ’080 Patent. For
`
`example, this functionality is included and utilized in Apple products with omnidirectional
`
`physical MEMS microphones which form virtual beamformed microphones including, but not
`
`limited to, Apple ear buds, smart phones, tablets, wearables, and smart home devices. For example,
`
`upon information and belief, each Apple AirPods Pro comprises two physical omnidirectional
`
`microphones, and a processing component coupled to the microphone array generating two
`
`beamformed virtual microphones. On information and belief, the processing component generates
`
`beamformed microphones with different first and second combinations of output signals from the
`
`physical microphone array, wherein the virtual microphones have a similar noise response and a
`
`dissimilar speech response.
`
`31.
`
`The ’357 Patent generally describes acoustic noise suppression with an array of
`
`physical microphones which forms an array of virtual microphones. The technology was
`
`developed by Dr. Gregory C. Burnett. The ’357 Patent also describes noise suppression with
`
`physical omnidirectional microphones and virtual directional microphones. The physical and/or
`
`virtual microphone signals may be combined by filtering and summing in the time domain to apply
`
`a varying linear transfer function, suppressing noise in the output signal. The invention provides
`
`significant advantages for noise suppression systems, particularly in detecting, transmitting, or
`
`recording speech.
`
`32.
`
`Apple has manufactured, used, marketed, distributed, sold, offered for sale,
`
`exported from, and imported into the United States, products that infringe the ’357 Patent. For
`
`13
`
`Page 13 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 14 of 58
`
`example, this functionality is included and utilized in Apple products with physical MEMS
`
`microphones which form virtual beamformed microphones including, but not limited to, Apple ear
`
`buds, smart phones, tablets, wearables, and smart home devices. For example, upon information
`
`and belief, the Apple AirPods Pro earbuds comprise arrays of physical microphones, the outputs
`
`of which are combined into beamformed microphones to reduce the noise of a signal. On
`
`information and belief, the AirPods Pro earbuds combine the outputs the signals generated by the
`
`beamforming microphone array of each earbud to further reduce noise. Similarly, the iPhone 12
`
`Pro Max comprises an array of physical microphones, the outputs of which are, upon information
`
`and belief, combined into beamformed microphones to reduce the noise of a signal.
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`10 https://www.apple.com/iphone-12/specs/
`
`14
`
`Page 14 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 15 of 58
`
`33.
`
`The ’543 Patent generally describes communications systems comprising a voice
`
`detection subsystem and a denoising subsystem. The technology of the ’543 Patent was developed
`
`by Dr. Gregory C. Burnett, Nicholas Petit, Alexander M. Asseily, and Andrew E. Einaudi. The
`
`’543 Patent also describes microphone configurations wherein a first microphone is oriented
`
`toward a talker’s mouth, and a second microphone is oriented away from a talker’s mouth, such
`
`that the denoising subsystem may subtract noise associated with noise from an acoustic signal that
`
`includes speech and noise. In some embodiments of the invention, the denoising system selects a
`
`denoising method appropriate to data of at least one frequency subband of acoustic signals,
`
`generates noise waveform estimate, and subtracts the noise waveform estimate from signals
`
`including speech and noise when the voice detection subsystem indicates voicing activity is
`
`occurring. The invention provides significant advantages for noise suppression systems,
`
`particularly in detecting, transmitting, or recording speech.
`
`34.
`
`Apple has manufactured, used, marketed, distributed, sold, offered for sale,
`
`exported from, and imported into the United States, products that infringe the ’543 Patent. For
`
`example, noise suppression techniques are incorporated into Apple products with voice activity
`
`detection devices including, but not limited to, Apple ear buds and smartphones. For example, this
`
`functionality is included and utilized in the Apple AirPods Pro and the iPhone 12 Pro Max. The
`
`AirPods Pro include “dual beamforming microphones” and a “speech-detecting accelerometer.”11
`
`At least one microphone of the AirPods Pro (e.g. the lower microphone) is oriented towards a
`
`user’s mouth, while at least one microphone is oriented away from a user’s mouth. Similarly, the
`
`Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max comprises multiple beamforming microphones and an accelerometer
`
`
`11 https://www.apple.com/airpods-pro/specs/
`
`15
`
`Page 15 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 16 of 58
`
`which, upon information and belief, is utilized for speech detection.12 At least one microphone of
`
`the iPhone 12 Pro Max is oriented towards the user’s mouth, while at least one microphone is
`
`oriented away from the user’s mouth. On information and belief, the accelerometers of the Accused
`
`Products detect vibration in human tissue, and “work[] in tandem to attenuate background noise
`
`and hone in on relaying your voice to the person on the other end of the call.”13
`
`14
`
`
`
`12 See e.g.
`https://developer.apple.com/documentation/avfaudio/avaudiosessiondatasourcedescription
`13 https://www.soundguys.com/apple-airpods-pro-vs-airpods-2-27213/
`14 https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+12+Pro+Max+Teardown/138640
`
`16
`
`Page 16 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 17 of 58
`
`15
`
`
`15 https://www.apple.com/iphone-12/specs/
`
`17
`
`Page 17 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 18 of 58
`
`16
`
`35.
`
`Apple has infringed and is continuing to infringe the Patents-in-Suit by making,
`
`using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing, and by actively inducing others to make, use, sell,
`
`offer to sell and/or importing, Accused Products that comprise and utilize infringing microphone
`
`and/or wireless proximity sensing functionality. The Accused Products include, but are not limited
`
`to, all versions and variants of Apple iPhone, iPad, AirPods Pro, and HomePod products.
`
`36.
`
`Jawbone has at all times complied with the marking provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 287
`
`with respect to the Patents-in-Suit. On information and belief, prior assignees and licensees have
`
`also complied with the marking provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 287.
`
`
`16 https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-12-pro-max-audio-review-a-reliable-and-consistent-
`audio-performer/
`
`18
`
`Page 18 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 19 of 58
`
`COUNT I
`(Infringement of the ’091 Patent)
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 36 are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
`
`Jawbone has not licensed or otherwise authorized Apple to make, use, offer for sale,
`
`sell, or import any products that embody the inventions of the ’091 Patent.
`
`39.
`
`Defendant has and continues to directly infringe the ’091 Patent, either literally or
`
`under the doctrine of equivalents, without authority and in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271, by making,
`
`using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing into the United States products that satisfy each
`
`and every limitation of one or more claims of the ’091 Patent. Upon information and belief, these
`
`products include at least the Accused Products, such as those which comprise a microphone array
`
`and a voice activity detector. The Accused Products include at least all versions and variants of
`
`Apple iPhone and AirPods.
`
`40.
`
`For example, Defendant has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 11 of
`
`the ’091 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing into the United States
`
`products that comprise a system for removing acoustic noise from the acoustic signals, comprising:
`
`a receiver that receives at least two acoustic signals via at least two acoustic microphones
`
`positioned in a plurality of locations; at least one sensor that receives human tissue vibration
`
`information associated with human voicing activity of a user; a processor coupled among the
`
`receiver and the at least one sensor that generates a plurality of transfer functions, wherein the
`
`plurality of transfer functions includes a first transfer function representative of a ratio of energy
`
`of acoustic signals received using at least two different acoustic microphones of the at least two
`
`acoustic microphones, wherein the first transfer function is generated in response to a
`
`determination that voicing activity is absent from the acoustic signals for a period of time, wherein
`
`the plurality of transfer functions includes a second transfer function representative of the acoustic
`
`19
`
`Page 19 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 20 of 58
`
`signals, wherein the second transfer function is generated in response to a determination that
`
`voicing activity is present in the acoustic signals for the period of time, wherein acoustic noise is
`
`removed from the acoustic signals using the first transfer function and at least one combination of
`
`the first transfer function and the second transfer function to produce the denoised acoustic data
`
`stream.
`
`41.
`
`The Accused Products comprise a system for removing acoustic noise from
`
`acoustic signals. For example, the Apple AirPods Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max each use
`
`beamforming microphones in tandem with a voice detecting accelerometer to reduce noise in voice
`
`signals.
`
`42.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a receiver that receives at least two acoustic
`
`signals via at least two acoustic microphones positioned in a plurality of locations. For example,
`
`upon information and belief, the AirPods Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max each comprise a receiver
`
`that receives signals via a microphone array, with at least two microphones positioned in a plurality
`
`of locations.17
`
`43.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise at least one sensor that receives human
`
`tissue vibration information associated with human voicing activity of a user. For example, the
`
`Apple AirPods Pro comprises an accelerometer which, upon information and belief, receives
`
`human tissue vibration associated with voicing activity. For example, the iPhone 12 Pro Max
`
`similarly includes an accelerometer which, upon information and belief, is used for speech
`
`detection, and/or receives a speech detection signal from any paired AirPods.
`
`44.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a processor coupled among the receiver
`
`and the at least one sensor that generates a plurality of transfer functions, wherein the plurality of
`
`
`17 https://www.apple.com/airpods-pro/specs/
`
`20
`
`Page 20 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 21 of 58
`
`transfer functions includes a first transfer function representative of a ratio of energy of acoustic
`
`signals received using at least two different acoustic microphones of the at least two acoustic
`
`microphones. For example, on information and belief the AirPods Pro comprises a H1-based
`
`system in package with a processor.18 For example, on information and belief, the iPhone 12 Pro
`
`Max comprises an A14 Bionic SoC with a processor. Upon information and belief, each processor
`
`utilizes a microphone array to detect speech with a beamformed microphone which, upon
`
`information and belief, includes the generation of at least a plurality of transfer functions, including
`
`a first transfer function representative of a ratio of energy of acoustic signals received at different
`
`microphones in the microphone array.
`
`45.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a system wherein the first transfer function
`
`is generated in response to a determination that voicing activity is absent from the acoustic signals
`
`for a period of time. For example, upon information and belief, the AirPods Pro and iPhone 12 Pro
`
`Max each generate the first transfer function when the voice detecting accelerometer indicates that
`
`voicing activity is absent.
`
`46.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a system wherein the plurality of transfer
`
`functions includes a second transfer function representative of the acoustic signals, wherein the
`
`second transfer function is generated in response to a determination that voicing activity is present
`
`in the acoustic signals for the period of time. For example, upon information and belief, the
`
`AirPods Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max each generate a second transfer function in response to a
`
`determination that voicing activity is present, such as based on detection of human tissue vibrations
`
`
`18 https://www.apple.com/airpods-pro/specs/
`
`21
`
`Page 21 of 58
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00984-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/23/21 Page 22 of 58
`
`by the voice detecting accelerometer. For example, AirPods Pro have voice detecting
`
`accelerometer which detects vibration in human tissue. 19
`
`47.
`
`The Accused Products further comprise a system wherein acoustic noise is removed
`
`from the acoustic signals using the first transfer function and at least one combination of the first
`
`transfer function and the second transfer function to produce the denoised acoustic data stream.
`
`F

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket