throbber
July 27, 2022
`
`VIA E-MAIL
`
`
`
`Raymond W. Mort, III
`raymort@austinlaw.com
`THE MORT LAW FIRM, PLLC
`100 Congress Avenue, Suite 2000
`Austin, Texas 78701
`
`Re:
`
`
`
`Jawbone Innovations, LLC v. Apple Inc., Case No. 6:21-cv-00984
`
`Counsel:
`
`We write regarding a petition for inter partes review (IPR) being filed with the Patent
`Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to address claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,122,357 (“the
`’357 patent”). The table below lists grounds asserted by Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in the
`IPR2022-01321 petition challenging claims of this patent, along with the implicated
`claims against which the grounds are asserted.
`
`We write to inform you that Apple hereby stipulates that in the event the PTAB
`institutes an inter partes review based on the IPR2022-01321 petition and including
`the grounds listed in the table below against the corresponding claims listed in the
`table for those grounds (“Instituted Grounds”), then Apple will not seek resolution in
`the above-captioned district court litigation (6:21-cv-00984) of the Instituted Grounds
`against the corresponding claims listed in the table for those same grounds.
`
`
`
`Patent No. Proceeding No.
`
`Claim(s)
`
`Ground
`
`11,122,357
`
`IPR2022-01321 1-20
`
`Obvious (§ 103) over Kanamori,
`McCowen, and Elko
`
`
`
`In so stipulating, Apple seeks to avoid multiple proceedings addressing the validity of
`the ’357 patent based on the same grounds. Rather, Apple wishes the patentability of
`this patent over the above-identified Grounds to be addressed at the PTAB. But, for
`the sake of clarity and to avoid any doubt, if the PTAB declines institution of Apple’s
`IPR petitions relating to the ’357 patent, Apple reserves the right to seek resolution of
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`July 27, 2022
`Page 2
`
`
`the above-identified Grounds in the above-captioned district court litigation (6:21-cv-
`00984).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`/s/ Ricardo Bonilla
`
`Ricardo Bonilla
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Counsel for Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Reference
`Name
`
`Kanamori
`
`McCowan
`
`Elko
`
`July 27, 2022
`Page 3
`
`List of Prior Art References
`
`
`Details
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0185804 to Kanamori et al.,
`filed November 18, 2003, and published September 23, 2004
`
`Iain A. McCowan et al., Near-field Adaptive Beamformer for
`Robust Speech Recognition, 12 Digital Signal Processing 87-
`106 (2002); published in January 2002
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,942,387 to Elko et al., claims priority to
`international application PCT/US2007/006093, filed March 9,
`2007
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket