Case No. IPR2022-01310
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Caterpillar Inc.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-01310
`U.S. Patent 8,424,972
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Caterpillar Inc.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-01310
`U.S. Patent 8,424,972
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01310
`
`Introduction
`Petitioner Caterpillar Inc. requests that the confidential versions of the
`
`Petition, declaration Exhibit 1006, declaration Exhibits 1020 and 1049 and
`
`documentary Exhibits 1019, 1025-1030, 1032-1034, 1036, 1038-1048, and 1054-
`
`1056 be sealed under 37 C.F.R. § 42.55. Good cause to seal these documents exists
`
`because public versions of the Petition, Exhibits 1006, 1019, 1020, and 1049 have
`
`also been filed, and the redacted information in these exhibits, along with the
`
`entirety of the information in Exhibits 1025-1030, 1032-1034, 1036, 1038-1048,
`
`and 1054-1056 is sensitive, non-public corporate procedures, customer, dealer, and
`
`shipping information that a business would not make public, and/or confidential
`
`information of third-party Roadtec, Inc.
`
`II. Governing Rules and PTAB Guidance
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(1), the default rule is that all papers filed in an
`
`inter partes review are open and available for access by the public, but a party may
`
`file a concurrent motion to seal and the information at issue is sealed pending the
`
`outcome of the motion.
`
`Similarly, 37 C.F.R. § 42.14 provides:
`
`The record of a proceeding, including documents and things,
`shall be made available to the public, except as otherwise
`ordered. A party intending a document or thing to be sealed
`shall file a motion to seal concurrent with the filing of the
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01310
`
`document or thing to be sealed. The document or thing shall
`be provisionally sealed on receipt of the motion and remain so
`pending the outcome of the decision on the motion.
`It is, however, only “confidential information” that is protected from disclosure. 35
`
`U.S.C. § 316(a)(7) (“The Director shall prescribe regulations -- . . . providing for
`
`protective orders governing the exchange and submission of confidential
`
`information”). In that regard, the Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756,
`
`48760 (Aug. 14, 2012) provides:
`
`The rules aim to strike a balance between the public’s interest
`in maintaining a complete and understandable file history and
`the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive information.
`* * *
`Confidential Information: The rules identify confidential
`information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of Civil
`Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders
`for trade secret or other confidential research, development, or
`commercial information. § 42.54.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.55, a “petitioner filing confidential information with a
`
`petition may, concurrent with the filing of the petition, file a motion to seal with a
`
`proposed protective order as to the confidential information.”
`
`III.
`
`Identification of Confidential Information
`The confidential information falls into three categories. The first category
`
`consists of descriptions of Caterpillar’s sensitive customer, shipping, and dealer
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`information. This information is contained in paragraphs 21 and 34 of Exhibit
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01310
`
`1020, paragraphs 3-6, and 8-10 of Exhibit 1049, and Exhibits 1025-1030, 1032-
`
`1034, 1038-1048. The second category consists of Caterpillar internal corporate
`
`procedures and internal product information. This information is contained in
`
`paragraphs 14, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, and 68 of Exhibit 1020, Exhibit 1036,
`
`and pages 14 and 17 of Exhibit 1019. Petitioner certifies that this information has
`
`not been published or otherwise been made public. The third category consists of
`
`confidential materials provided by third-party Roadtec, Inc. in an ITC case
`
`between Wirtgen and Caterpillar. This information is contained in Exhibits 1054-
`
`1056, pages 24-25, 56, and 58 of the Petition, and paragraphs 66-67 and 155 of
`
`declaration Exhibit 1006.
`
`IV. Good Cause Exists for Sealing the Confidential Information
`The Board routinely seals confidential sales, customer, purchaser,
`
`distributor, and pricing information. See, e.g., Prong, Inc. v. Yeoshua Sorias,
`
`IPR2015-01317, Paper 32; Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Crossroads Systems, Inc.,
`
`IPR2014-01463, Paper 49. Here, the declarations (Ex. 1020, ¶21 and 34; Ex. 1049,
`
`¶¶3-6, 8-10), the invoices (Exs. 1038-1048) and the Factory Notification Lists
`
`(“FNLs”) (Exs. 1025-1030 and 1032-1034) contain this same type of information,
`
`namely customer, shipping, and dealer information. For example, these contain
`
`specific customer locations, dates of sales, dates of manufacturing, and shipments.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`Good cause exists to seal and keep this information confidential because it includes
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01310
`
`details about Caterpillar customers and dealers, which would be valuable to
`
`Caterpillar’s competitors and harmful to Caterpillar if made public. Moreover, the
`
`Board has previously sealed corresponding exhibits when they were at issue in a
`
`prior inter partes review proceeding, holding “that Petitioner has established good
`
`cause for sealing the exhibits in question” because “the exhibits—mainly invoices
`
`and FNLs—do not appear to include large amounts of information that should be
`
`made public.” Caterpillar Inc. v. Wirtgen Am., Inc., IPR2018-01091, Paper 49, at
`
`76-77. The Board also noted that public disclosure of sensitive and confidential
`
`information in the exhibits is disfavored given “that Petitioner and Patent Owner
`
`are competitors . . . .” Id. Accordingly, as in the earlier IPR between Caterpillar
`
`and Wirtgen, and as in Prong and Cisco, the Board should seal and keep the
`
`information confidential.
`
`The Board also seals confidential, internal and sensitive business
`
`information. See, e.g. Tandus Flooring, Inc. v. Interface, Inc., IPR2013-00333,
`
`Paper 60. Here, the company procedures and internal product information
`
`contained in the declaration (Ex. 1020, ¶¶14, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, and 68),
`
`Exhibit 1036, and Exhibit 1019 (14, 17) are internal documents that would be
`
`harmful if made public. Good cause exists to seal and keep this information
`
`confidential because it includes details about Caterpillar’s corporate procedures
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`and products which are essential to Caterpillar’s business and would be valuable to
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01310
`
`Caterpillar’s competitors and harmful to Caterpillar if made public. Accordingly,
`
`as in Tandus, the Board should seal and keep this information confidential.
`
`Lastly, Roadtec is a competitor to both Caterpillar and Wirtgen in the
`
`milling machine industry. Exhibit 1054 is a confidential deposition transcript
`
`containing testimony from Mr. Timothy Lewis, the Vice President of Operations
`
`for Roadtec. Mr. Lewis was deposed in the ITC case between Wirtgen and
`
`Caterpillar, and counsel for both parties was present and asked questions.
`
`Specifically, Mr. Lewis testified in detail about the features of Roadtec’s machines
`
`and sales of those machines to specific customers. Pages 24-25, 56, and 58 of the
`
`Petition and paragraphs 66-67 and 155 of declaration Exhibit 1006 cite to and
`
`quote Mr. Lewis’s testimony. Exhibits 1055 and 1056 are also confidential
`
`documents from Roadtec. These exhibits contain confidential information about
`
`the date, sale price, customer, and maintenance records for the sale of a prior-art
`
`Roadtec machine. Making the information in Exhibits 1055 and 1056 to public
`
`could significantly harm Roadtec’s competitive and strategic position in the
`
`marketplace. Each of these three documents were also marked as confidential
`
`business information in the ITC case. Accordingly, the Board should seal and keep
`
`this information confidential.
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01310
`
`V.
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`Caterpillar requests entry of the Default Standing Protective Order, which is
`
`attached to this motion as Appendix A.
`
`VI. Conclusion
`For the reasons set forth above, Petitioner respectfully requests that the
`
`Board grant this motion to seal.
`
`Date: August 4, 2022
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`By: /Joshua L. Goldberg/
`Joshua L. Goldberg, Reg. No. 59,369
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01310
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Petitioner’s Motion to
`
`Seal was served on August 4, 2022, by FedEx Priority Overnight at the
`
`following address of record for the subject patent.
`
`Lucian Beavers
`PATTERSON Intellectual Property Law, P.C.
`1600 Division Street, Suite 500
`Nashville, TN 37203
`
`A courtesy copy has also been mailed to litigation counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Jonathan Tuminaro
`Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox
`1100 New York Ave., NW
`Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`at:
`
`Date: August 4, 2022
`
` /Daniel E. Doku/
`Daniel E. Doku
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix A
`Appendix A
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Caterpillar Inc.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-01310
`U.S. Patent 8,424,972
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFAULT PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`This protective order governs the treatment and filing of confidential information,
`
`including documents and testimony.
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked “PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER MATERIAL.”
`
`
`
`2. Access to confidential information is limited to the following individuals
`
`who have executed the acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`(A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the proceeding
`
`and other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`(B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in the
`
`proceeding.
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who further
`
`certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party,
`
`or a consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the
`
`subject matter of the proceeding.
`
`(D) In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`(E) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are
`
`reasonably necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be
`
`required to sign an Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms
`
`3
`
`
`
`and requirements of the Protective Order by the person they are supporting
`
`who receives confidential information.
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the United States Patent
`
`and Trademark Office who have a need for access to the confidential
`
`information shall have such access without the requirement to sign an
`
`Acknowledgement. Such employees and representatives shall include the
`
`Director, members of the Board and their clerical staff, other support
`
`personnel, court reporters, and other persons acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`
`
`3. Employees (e.g., corporate officers), consultants, or other persons
`
`performing work for a party, other than those persons identified above in
`
`(d)(2)(A)–(E), shall be extended access to confidential information only upon
`
`agreement of the parties or by order of the Board upon a motion brought by the
`
`party seeking to disclose confidential information to that person and after signing
`
`the Acknowledgment. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have the
`
`burden of proving that such person should be restricted from access to confidential
`
`information.
`
`
`
`4. Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`4
`
`
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which persons not
`
`authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`(B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the
`
`information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the recipient
`
`uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not received from the
`
`disclosing party;
`
`(C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access to the
`
`confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to maintain
`
`the confidentiality of information received that is designated as confidential;
`
`and
`
`(D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable number
`
`of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining a record of
`
`the locations of such copies.
`
`
`
`
`
`5. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`
`
`
`
`(A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`(i) A party may file documents or information with the Board along with a
`
`Motion to Seal. The Motion to Seal should provide a non-confidential description
`
`of the nature of the confidential information that is under seal, and set forth the
`
`5
`
`
`
`reasons why the information is confidential and should not be made available to
`
`the public. A party may challenge the confidentiality of the information by
`
`opposing the Motion to Seal. The documents or information shall remain under
`
`seal unless the Board determines that some or all of it does not qualify for
`
`confidential treatment.
`
`
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the information
`
`submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file confidential and non-
`
`confidential versions of its submission, together with a Motion to Seal the
`
`confidential version setting forth the reasons why the information redacted from
`
`the non-confidential version is confidential and should not be made available to the
`
`public. A party may challenge the confidentiality of the information by opposing
`
`the Motion to Seal. The non-confidential version of the submission shall clearly
`
`indicate the locations of information that has been redacted. The confidential
`
`version of the submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted information shall
`
`remain under seal unless the Board determines that some or all of the redacted
`
`information does not qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`
`
`(B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties. Documents
`
`(including deposition transcripts) and other information designated as confidential
`
`that are disclosed to another party during discovery or other proceedings before the
`
`6
`
`
`
`Board shall be clearly marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” and shall
`
`be produced in a manner that maintains its confidentiality.
`
`
`
`
`
`6. Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, including the
`
`exhaustion of all appeals and motions, each party receiving confidential
`
`information must return, or certify the destruction of, all copies of the confidential
`
`information to the producing party.
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Caterpillar Inc.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-01310
`U.S. Patent 8,424,972
`
`
`
`
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR ACCESS
`TO PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`, affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that I will abide by its terms;
`
`that I will use the confidential information only in connection with this proceeding
`
`and for no other purpose; that I will only allow access to support staff who are
`
`reasonably necessary to assist me in this proceeding; that prior to any disclosure to
`
`such support staff I informed or will inform them of the requirements of the
`
`Protective Order; that I am personally responsible for the requirements of the terms
`
`of the Protective Order and I agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the Office and
`
`8
`
`
`
`the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for purposes of
`
`enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and providing remedies for its breach.
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: ________________________
`
`
`
`9
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
