throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`META PLATFORMS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`THALES VISIONIX, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,922,632 B2
`
`IPR2022-01308
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S
`SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`April 17, 2023
`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Patent Owner hereby objects to
`
`Petitioner’s supplemental exhibits served April 10, 2023—the Welch declaration
`
`(dated April 3, 2023), Barfield declaration (dated April 6, 2023), and Welch
`
`declaration (dated April 7, 2023)—because Petitioner does not rely on or reference
`
`those exhibits in its Petition. Because Petitioner itself did not deem those documents
`
`to be relevant to the issues raised in the Petition, the Board should ignore them as
`
`well under FRE 401 and 402.
`
`Patent Owner objects to the Welch declaration (dated April 3, 2023) under
`
`FRE 702, 703, and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65 as offering inadmissible expert testimony.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to the Welch declaration (dated April 3, 2023) as
`
`irrelevant because it fails to authenticate Exhibit 1007 (or any other exhibit)
`
`submitted with the Petition.
`
`Patent Owner objects to the Barfield declaration (dated April 6, 2023) under
`
`FRE 702, 703, and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65 as offering inadmissible expert testimony.
`
`Patent Owner objects to the Welch declaration (dated April 7, 2023) under
`
`FRE 702, 703, and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65 as offering inadmissible expert testimony.
`
`Patent Owner maintains its objections to the purported underlying exhibits
`
`referenced in the supplemental exhibits (Exhibits 1007 and 1017) as stated in Patent
`
`Owner’s objections served on April 5, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
`IPR2022-01308 U.S. Patent No. 6,922,632 B2
`
`

`

`April 17, 2023
`
`D. Shayon Ghosh
`(Reg. No. 75,865)
`Gentex-IPR@wc.com
`
`Arthur J. Argall III
`(Reg. No. 73,005)
`Gentex-IPR@wc.com
`
`Adam D. Harber
`(pro hac vice motion
`forthcoming)
`Gentex-IPR@wc.com
`
`Melissa B. Collins
`(pro hac vice motion
`forthcoming)
`Gentex-IPR@wc.com
`
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`680 Maine Avenue SW
`Washington, DC 20024
`202.434.5000
`
`Counsel for Real-Party-in-
`Interest Gentex Corporation
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/Meredith Martin Addy
`Meredith Martin Addy
`(Reg. No. 37,883)
`meredith@addyhart.com
`ADDYHART P.C.
`10 Glenlake Parkway, Suite 130
`Atlanta, Georgia 30328
`312.320.4200
`Robert Hart
`(Reg. No. 35,184)
`robert@addyhart.com
`Gregory B. Gulliver
`(Reg. No. 44,138)
`gbgulliver@addyhart.com
`Brandon C. Helms
`bhelms@addyhart.com
`(Reg. No. 61,742)
`ADDYHART P.C.
`401 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1200-1
`Chicago, Illinois 60611
`732.991.7285
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner Thales
`Visionix, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`2
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
`IPR2022-01308 U.S. Patent No. 6,922,632 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that Patent Owner
`
`Thales Visionix Inc. and licensee Gentex Corp. served the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Objections to Petitioner’s Evidence Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1) on the
`
`counsel of record for Petitioner Meta Platforms, Inc. by filing this document through
`
`the P-TACTS, as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail to the following:
`
`W. Todd Baker
`todd.baker@kirkland.com
`
`
`Yimeng Dou
`yimeng.dou@kirkland.com
`
`Ellisen Shelton Turner
`ellisen.turner@kirkland.com
`
`
`Akshay S. Deoras
`akshay.deoras@kirkland.com
`
`Date: April 17, 2023
`
`
`By: /s/ Meredith Martin Addy
`Meredith Martin Addy
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
`IPR2022-01308, U.S. Patent No. 6,922,632 B2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket