throbber
Case 4:22-cv-03892-YGR Document 116 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No. 4:22-cv-03892-YGR
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT AND
`PRETRIAL ORDER
`
`GENTEX CORPORATION and INDIGO
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`THALES VISIONIX, INC.,
`
` Involuntary Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`META PLATFORMS, INC. and META
`PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`
`The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint case management statement. The joint schedule
`
`is generally acceptable. Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the following pretrial dates:
`
`PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
`
`PLAINTIFFS SERVE N.D. CAL. INFRINGEMENT
`CONTENTIONS:
`
`Friday, 10/21/2022
`
`REVISED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`STATEMENT:
`
`Friday, 11/18/2022
`
`DEFENDANTS SERVE N.D. CAL. INVALIDITY
`CONTENTIONS:
`
`Monday, 12/5/2022
`
`MARKMAN HEARING:
`
`Tuesday, 12/13/2022, 9:00am1
`
`DAMAGES CONTENTIONS:
`
`Tuesday, 1/10/2023
`
`RESPONSIVE DAMAGES CONTENTIONS:
`
`Thursday, 2/9/2023
`
`DEADLINE TO ADD PARTIES AND/OR AMEND
`PLEADINGS:
`
`Thursday, 3/2/2023
`
`1 In the event that Judge Gonzalez Rogers is in trial on Tuesday, 12/13/2022 specifically
`and December generally, in United States v. Garcia, 21-cr-0429-YGR, the Markman hearing will
`be reset to Friday, January 13, at 9:00am.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`META 1031
`IPR2022-01308
`META V. THALES
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-03892-YGR Document 116 Filed 10/18/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`DEADLINE TO MEET AND CONFER TO FURTHER
`NARROW NUMBER OF CLAIMS AND PRIOR ART:
`
`Tuesday, 4/18/2023
`
`CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY:
`
`Tuesday, 5/16/2023
`
`OPENING EXPERT REPORTS:
`
`Tuesday, 6/27/2023
`
`REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORTS:
`
`CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY:
`
`Tuesday, 8/8/2023
`
`Tuesday, 9/12/2023
`
`Modification to the timing or extent of parties’ discovery obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`26 and other applicable rules may be done pursuant to a separate Court Order. The parties are
`
`directed to submit a JOINT proposed order to the Court within five (5) business days following
`
`the date of this Order which sets forward the modifications.
`
`The parties must comply with the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases; Standing Order
`
`for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases; and Standing Order re Patent Cases for additional
`
`deadlines and procedures. All Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at
`
`http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: 10/18/2022
`
`______________________________________
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`META 1031
`IPR2022-01308
`META V. THALES
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket