throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`META PLATFORMS, INC.,
` Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`THALES VISONIX, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2022-01304
`Patent 6,922,632
`
`DECLARATION OF AKSHAY S. DEORAS IN SUPPORT OF
`UNOPPOSED MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE ON BEHALF OF
`PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`META 1032
` IPR2022-01304
` META V. THALES
`
`

`

`
`
`I, Akshay S. Deoras, do hereby declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner in the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Lead counsel in this Inter
`
`Partes review proceeding is W. Todd Baker, who is also a partner with the law
`
`firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP and is registered to practice before the United States
`
`Patent and Trademark Office under Registration No. 45,265. With respect to this
`
`proceeding, I will work closely with Mr. Baker.
`
`2.
`
`I hold Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Columbia
`
`
`
`University. I hold a Juris Doctor degree from the Columbia University School
`
`of Law.
`
`3.
`
`I have more than 14 years of experience as a litigation attorney who
`
`specializes in patent litigation and represents clients in patent litigation
`
`matters in various United States District Courts, the Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit, and before the International Trade Commission. My
`
`experience includes many matters in the electrical and computer science arts,
`
`and I have particular experience relevant to the technological and legal matters
`
`at issue in this proceeding. I am, therefore, an experienced patent litigation
`
`attorney with particular expertise that is pertinent to this proceeding. Meta
`
`Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) desires, and has a need, to be represented in certain
`
`1
`
`
`
`META 1032
`IPR2022-01304
` META V. THALES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`aspects of these proceedings by an experienced patent litigation attorney who
`
`has particular expertise that is relevant to the issues in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`5.
`
`I am very familiar with U.S. Patent No. 6,922,632 and with the legal
`
`subject matter, technical subject matter, and prior art discussed in
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,922,632
`
`which forms the basis for this proceeding. I am currently counsel to Meta
`
`in the co-pending litigation relating to the same patent (Gentex
`
`Corporation et al. v Meta Platforms, Inc. et al., Case No. 4:22-cv-03892-
`
`YGR (N.D. Cal.) and am involved with factual and technical
`
`developments in that matter.
`
`6.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of California and the
`
`State of New York. He is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court
`
`for the Northern District of California and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit.
`
`7.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`8.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application for
`
`admission to practice.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`META 1032
`IPR2022-01304
` META V. THALES
`
`
`
`

`

`
`I have never been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or
`
`9.
`
`administrative body.
`
`10.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board's Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`11.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`12.
`
`In the past 3 years, I was admitted pro hac vice as counsel for before the
`
`PTAB in the following actions:
`
` Inter Partes Review IPR2020-01579, IPR2020-01583, and IPR2020-01585 as
`counsel for Apcon, Inc.
`
` Inter Partes Review IPR2020-001517, IPR2020-001518, IPR2020-001612,
`IPR2020-001613, and IPR2021-00187 as counsel for Omnitracs, LLC
`
` Inter Partes Review IPR2021-00323, IPR2021-00324, and IPR2021-00325 as
`counsel for XRS Corporation
`
`13.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and
`
`further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful, false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`META 1032
`IPR2022-01304
` META V. THALES
`
`
`
`

`

`both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such
`
`willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of U.S. Patent No.
`
`
`
`6,922,632.
`
` Date: April 11, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Akshay S. Deoras/
`Akshay S. Deoras
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`555 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: 415-439-1400
`Facsimile: 415-439-1500
`akshay.deoras@kirkland.com
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`META 1032
`IPR2022-01304
` META V. THALES
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket