throbber
Trials
`Ted Cannon; Trials; axf-ptab@fr.com; 2ial; dsmith@fr.com
`IPR50095-0046IP2@fr.com; AppleIPR127-2; nstephens@fr.com; patrick@fr.com; 2tmc; 2Jzk; 2Jup
`RE: IPR2022-01300 - Apple v. Masimo
`Monday, November 14, 2022 4:28:06 PM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Counsel:
`
`Patent Owner is authorized to file a corrected confidential POPR identical to the PDF it prepared for
`filing on November 4, except the following: (1) the caption page will be updated to indicate the
`document being filed is a corrected POPR containing confidential information and (2) the certificate
`of service will be updated to reflect the previous time of service of the redacted POPR.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`From: Ted Cannon <Ted.Cannon@knobbe.com>
`Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 4:05 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; axf-ptab@fr.com; 2ial <2ial@knobbe.com>; dsmith@fr.com
`Cc: IPR50095-0046IP2@fr.com; AppleIPR127-2 <AppleIPR127-2@knobbe.com>; nstephens@fr.com;
`patrick@fr.com; 2tmc <2TMC@knobbe.com>; 2Jzk <2Jzk@knobbe.com>; 2Jup <2Jup@knobbe.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2022-01300 - Apple v. Masimo
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s request below, the parties have met and conferred and Apple does
`not oppose Masimo’s request for authorization to file a corrected confidential version of its
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response. The parties agreed, subject to the Board’s authorization,
`that the filed corrected confidential POPR will be identical to the PDF Masimo prepared for
`filing on November 4, except the following: (1) the caption page will be updated to indicate
`the document being filed is a corrected POPR containing confidential information and (2) the
`certificate of service will be updated to reflect the previous time of service of the redacted
`POPR. Please let us know whether we are authorized to file the corrected confidential POPR.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`Ted Cannon
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Exhibit 3001
`
`

`

`
`Ted M. Cannon
`Partner
`Ted.Cannon@knobbe.com
`949-721-2897 Direct
`Knobbe Martens
`2040 Main St., 14th Fl.
`Irvine, CA 92614
`www.knobbe.com/ted-cannon
`
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 1:57 PM
`To: Ted Cannon <Ted.Cannon@knobbe.com>; axf-ptab@fr.com; 2ial <2ial@knobbe.com>;
`dsmith@fr.com
`Cc: IPR50095-0046IP2@fr.com; AppleIPR127-2 <AppleIPR127-2@knobbe.com>; nstephens@fr.com;
`patrick@fr.com; 2tmc <2TMC@knobbe.com>; 2Jzk <2Jzk@knobbe.com>; 2Jup
`<2Jup@knobbe.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Subject: RE: IPR2022-01300 - Apple v. Masimo
`
`Counsel:
`
`Patent Owner has requested authorization to file a corrected confidential version of its Patent
`Owner Preliminary Response because Paper 9, the current paper of that title, is a duplicate copy of
`Paper 10, Patent Owner’s Response to Petitioner’s Ranking of Petitions. The parties should meet
`and confer as to whether Petitioner opposes the request and report to the Board no later than COB
`on Monday, November 14. If opposed, the parties should provide their availability for a conference
`call with the Panel.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`From: Ted Cannon <Ted.Cannon@knobbe.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 2:26 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: IPR50095-0046IP2@fr.com; AppleIPR127-2 <AppleIPR127-2@knobbe.com>
`Subject: IPR2022-01300 - Apple v. Masimo
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board,
`
`
`

`

`Thank you for working with Patent Owner’s paralegal to change the filing designation of
`Exhibits 2020, 2021, 2027, 2028, 2031, 2032, and 2033 to “Available to Filing Party and Board
`Only,” pending the Board’s review of Patent Owner’s motion to seal.
`
`Eric Hawthorne, the person who dealt with our paralegal, also indicated that Paper 9 as filed
`on November 4 is not, as we intended, the confidential version of the Patent Owner
`Preliminary Response, but is, instead, a copy of Paper 10, Patent Owner Response to
`Petitioner Ranking of Petitions. We filed a redacted version of the POPR as Paper 11 on
`November 4. Mr. Hawthorne asked that we send this email, and copy opposing counsel, to
`request authorization to file a corrected confidential version of the POPR. Thus, we do hereby
`request authorization to file a corrected confidential POPR. If a conference call or other
`procedure is necessary, please let us know, and we will proceed accordingly.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`Ted Cannon
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Ted M. Cannon
`Partner
`Ted.Cannon@knobbe.com
`949-721-2897 Direct
`Knobbe Martens
`2040 Main St., 14th Fl.
`Irvine, CA 92614
`www.knobbe.com/ted-cannon
`
`
`NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
`privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not
`the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`
`
`
`NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
`privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not
`the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket