`
`
`
` CO Screening
`
`PRESS RELEASEMasimo Honored with FDNY 'Flag of Heroes'
`
`Feb 13, 2008
`
`end picture
`DANA POINT, CA - Recently, Masimo was recognized with the New York Fire
`Department's (FDNY) highest honor - the 'Flag of Heroes' - in appreciation of the
`company's tremendous contribution to the lifesaving e orts of the FDNY and the
`greater public health in the battle against the 'silent killer' known as carbon
`monoxide (CO) poisoning.
`
`The 'Flag of Heroes' is one of only 3,000 U.S. ags that was previously own at half
`mast on the rst anniversary of the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center on
`September 11, 2001. The limited-edition ag contains the names of 343 brave FDNY men and women and
`emergency services personnel who gave their lives in service, to save others on 9/11.
`
`Joe E. Kiani, Chairman and CEO of Masimo stated; "Since we rst debuted our invention of Masimo SET in 1995,
`we have received dozens of honors, but none have touched me more than this one. The 'Flag of Heroes' is a
`compelling symbol of the brave and unsel sh contribution of 343 of FDNY's nest lifesavers. During the
`presentation, representatives of the FDNY EMS Command told us that they have already saved numerous lives
`with our invention and count us among their heroes because we have provided them with a product that not
`only saves the lives of their patients, but is also saving the lives of re ghters and rescuers."
`
`Tags
`
`
`
` Carbon Monoxide Screening
`
`•
`
`
`
` EMS Heroes
`
`
`
`Be the rst
`to comment
`
`Please sign in or register to write your own comments below.
`Before commenting, please read EMS1's Commenting Policy
`
`Copyright © 2022 EMS1. All rights reserved.
`
`MASIMO 2023
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01300
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
