throbber
CX-0693
`
`Classical Illumination Designs
`
`57
`
`Spherical Reflector
`
`
`The light emitted from a source in the direction away
`from the optical system can be redirected toward the
`optical system by using a spherical mirror with the
`source located at the center of curvature.
`
`source
`
`source
`
`and
`image
`of
`
`--
`;
`
`If the source is solid, it is necessary to place the source
`slightly away from the center of curvature and the image
`just above, below, or alongside the physical source.
`
`— Ignoring
`losses
`on
`a reflection, the image has
`ow
`source, but the effective
`
`1
`
`the same radiance as the
`
`source area (source plus
`image)is doubled.
`
`Sometimes this technique is used to place the image of
`a source in a location where the physical source itself
`could not fit because of an obstruction such as a lamp
`
`envelope or socket.
`
`If the source is not solid, such as a coiled wire tungsten
`filament,
`imaging the source almost directly onto itself
`can help fill in the area between thecoils.
`
`source
`
`image
`
`In this case, the effective area of
`the source is not appreciably
`increased,
`but
`the
`apparent
`:
`radiance is nearly doubled.
`
`
`
`PAGE 71 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080451
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`58
`
`Illumination
`
`Abbe Illumination
`a)
`
`Abbe illumination is characterized by imaging the
`source (or imaging an image of the source) directly onto
`the illuminated area. Since the uniformity of illumination
`is directly related to the uniformity of source radiance,
`Abbe illumination requires an extended source of uniform
`radiance such as a well-controlled arc, a ribbon filament
`lamp,
`the output of a clad rod, a frosted bulb, an
`illuminated diffuser, or
`the output of an integrating
`sphere.
`
`The paraxial layout below shows Abbe illumination used
`in a projection system. The source is
`imaged by a
`condenser onto the film. The projection objective images
`the film and the image of the source onto the screen. The
`purple dotted lines show the marginal and chief rays from
`the source. The black dotted lines show the marginal and
`chief rays from the film (and the image of the source). The
`marginal rays go through the on-axis points on the object
`and image and on the edges of the pupils (which are the
`lenses in this case). The chief rays go through the edges of
`the object and image andthe on-axis points of the pupils.
`
`screen
`
`source
`
`SOUrCE
`image
`ge,
`
`film
`
`projection
`lens
`
`J
`
`
`
`
`
`=. “a. - =
`
`condenser
`
`
`
`PAGE 72 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080452
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Classical Illumination Designs
`
`5g
`
`Kohler Illumination
`
`
`Kohler illumination is used when the source is not
`uniform, such as a coiled tungsten filament. Kohler
`illumination is characterized by imaging the source
`through the film onto the projection lens. The film is
`placed adjacent to the condenser, where the illumination
`is quite uniform, provided the source has a relative
`uniform angular distribution of intensity.
`
`The paraxial layout below shows Kohler illumination used
`in a projection system. The source is
`imaged by a
`condenser onto the projection lens. The projection
`objective images the film onto the screen. The purple
`dotted lines show the marginal and chief rays from the
`source. The black dotted lines show the marginal and
`chief rays from thefilm.
`
`Sou rce
`
`projection
`
`screen
`
`image mes ae mee
`generally depends upon the type of source available.
`
`~~. ~ ~
`
`~— ~
`
`de, ~
`
`condenser,
`film
`
`condenser NAs,
`similar
`sources,
`With similar
`source/condenser étendue as limiting étendue, and
`similar screen sizes, the average screen irradiance
`levels are the same for both Abbe and Kohler
`illumination systems. The choice between the two
`
`PAGE 73 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080453
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`60
`
`Illumination
`
`Ellipsoidal and Paraboloidal Mirrors
`
`
`Very efficient collection of light from a source can be
`achieved using an ellipsoidal mirror, placing the source
`at one of the foci. The source is imaged at the other focus,
`with light collected over more than a hemisphere.
`
`ellipsoid
`
`source ~*~.
`
`oe
`
`-
`
`-
`
`to use a paraboloidal mirror to
`An alternative is
`collimate the light from a source andalens to reimageit.
`Again, the light from the source is collected over more
`than a hemisphere.
`
`paraboloid
`
`
`
`_--~ - - --------
`
`source
`
`TTS
`
`-
`
`lens
`
`> Binh
`
`we
`
`image
`
`The forward light is usually ignored in both of these types
`of designs.
`
`In both cases, the image of the source may not be good
`quality, but
`image quality may not be important
`in
`illumination systems. Also, obstructions like lamp bases,
`sockets, and mounting hardware can produce directional
`anomalies in the radiance of the image.
`
`If the quality of illumination is important, devices
`such as lenslet arrays or faceted reflectors may be
`
`used.
`
`MAS ITC_01 080454 MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`PAGE 74 OF 154
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Classical Illumination Designs
`
`61
`
`Spectral Control and Heat Management
`
`
`illumination systems often contain
`for
`Specifications
`spectral requirements. Some of these requirements can be
`partially met by the selection of lamp type, but usually
`some sort of filtering is needed. Also, for visual systems,
`especially those using tungsten lamps, unwanted heat
`from infrared light may need to be removed. Again,
`filtering is needed.
`
`The simplest type of filter is the absorbing filter placed
`in front of the light source. Filter glasses with a wide
`range of spectral characteristics are available from glass
`manufacturers. The primary concern with absorbing glass
`filters is cracking from excessive absorbed heat.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Often a cracked filter will continue to workjustfine.
`
`Interference filters use multilayer thin-film coatings
`that
`either
`transmit
`or
`reflect
`light
`at
`specific
`wavelengths. Cracking is generally not a concern unless
`the filter is made of an absorbing substrate. These filters
`are available with a much wider variety of spectral
`properties
`than absorbing filters,
`including narrow
`bandwidth and sharp cut-off, and can be designed and
`manufactured to achieve specific custom properties. They
`are also available for different angles of illumination,
`typically 0 deg and 45 deg.
`
`Interference filters shift their spectral properties with
`incident angle and therefore may not be suitable for
`uncollimated lhght with a divergence of more than
`about 10 deg from the axis.
`
`
`
`
`
`Hot mirrors and cold mirrors are excellent ways to
`manage heat that must be removed from a light source. A
`hot mirror reflects infrared light and transmits visible
`light. A cold mirror reflects visible light and transmits
`infrared light. The reflector behind the light on a dentist’s
`chair is a cold mirror.
`
`
`
`PAGE 75 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080455
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`62
`
`Illumination
`
`Illumination in Visual Afocal Systems
`
`
`take the
`such as binoculars,
`Afocal visual systems,
`collimated light
`from an extended distant object and
`present collimated light
`to the eye, but with angular
`magnification. Therefore,
`the object appears
`larger.
`However, the apparent radiance (and therefore perceived
`brightness) of the object is the same as that of the naked
`eye, provided the size of the aperture stop is the same
`with and without the binoculars. Without the binoculars,
`the aperture stop is merely the eye pupil. With the
`binoculars, the aperture stop is the smallerof:
`e
`the pupil of the eye magnified by the angular
`magnification, or
`the aperture of the objective lens.
`e
`In other words, if the collimated ray bundle entering the
`eye from the binoculars is smaller than the eye pupil, the
`apparent radiance of the object will be less with the
`binoculars than with the naked eye. If the pupil of the eye
`is
`the limiting aperture both with and without
`the
`binoculars, the apparent radiance will be the same.
`
`Binoculars are traditionally designated by two numbers,
`the first being the angular magnification, the second the
`diameter of the objective lens in mm.A light-adapted eye
`pupil with a 2-mm diameter would remain the aperture
`stop for all of the following commonsizes of bird-watching
`binoculars: 8 x 42, 8 x 32,10 x 42,6 x 25, and 10 x 25.
`These binoculars are generally used during the day.
`However, marine binoculars, which are used under all
`lighting conditions, are typically 7 x 50 to accommodate a
`7-mm-diameter dark-adapted eye pupil.
`
`Note that a true point source, such as a star, will
`have higher apparent intensity (and therefore appear
`brighter) with binoculars than with the naked eye
`because more light is collected with the binoculars,
`
`but there is no angular magnification.
`
`PAGE 76 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080456
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Uniform Illumination
`
`68
`
`Searchlight
`
`
`A searchlight can provide uniform irradiance in three
`dimensions that is extremely insensitive to the position of
`the irradiated object.
`
`A searchlight consists of a small circular Lambertian
`source at the focal point of a collimating lens. Anywhere
`inside the shaded area in the figure below,
`the source
`appears as a circular disk at infinity, subtending a full
`angle a. The entire extent of the source is visible, because
`it does not completely fill the collimating lens. Since the
`view of the source is the same anywhere inside this
`region, the irradiance is the same.
`
`Outside this region and beyond point P, the lens restricts
`the area of the source that is visible. The lens itself
`appears as a disk of the same radiance as the source. In
`this region, the irradiance falls off as the square of the
`distance from the lens.
`
`source
`
`lens
`
`region of uniform
`
`[6A
`
`angle o:
`
`angle «
`
`For real searchlights with small sources and_large-
`
`diameter lenses,
`the paraxial description above is not
`exactly valid over the entire shaded region. However, over
`a relatively small portion of this region, the irradianceis
`extremely uniform. This region of irradiance uniformity
`extends not only laterally, but longitudinally as well.
`
`A searchlight provides a volume of uniform irradiance.
`
`
`
`PAGE 77 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080457
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`64
`
`Illumination
`
`Source at a Distance
`
`
`A small source at a distance from an object can provide
`reasonably uniform irradiance across the object.
`It
`is
`somewhat counterintuitive that a bare lamp filament, with
`its obviously terrible radiance uniformity, can produce
`excellent
`irradiance uniformity. For example, a small
`(assumed Lambertian) lamp filament at 500 mm from a
`flat object whose largest dimension is 150 mm will provide
`irradiance uniformity across the object of better than 95%
`(considering only cos‘ falloff). The same lamp and object at
`1.0-meter
`distance
`produces
`nearly
`99% irradiance
`uniformity.
`
`
`
`Irradiance uniformity = E,/ E, > 0.95
`
`A source of uniform radiance can be created by
`illuminating a transmission or
`reflection diffuser
`
`with uniform irradiance.
`
`A commoncalibration laboratory method used to realize a
`standard of known radiance is to illuminate a reflection
`diffuser, typically 50 mm in diameter, with a standard of
`knownirradiance, typically a calibrated 1000-W tungsten
`halogen lamp (ANSI type FEL), at a 500-mm distance.
`The irradiance uniformity across the diffuser is better
`than 99.5%. If the reflectance factor of the diffuser is
`uniform, the radiance uniformity of the standard is also
`better than 99.5%.
`
`
`
`PAGE 78 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080458
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Uniform Illumination
`
`65
`
`Mixing Rod
`
`
`A mixing rod is a long piece of clear quartz, glass, or
`plastic. Light entering one face of the rod undergoes
`multiple total internal reflections emerging from the other
`
`parallel face.
`
`Dueto the multiple reflections, the irradiance at the exit
`face can be extremely uniform. In a well-designed and
`illuminated rod, the radiance can be quite directionally
`uniform as well. The directional uniformity of radiance
`can be enhanced by placing a diffuser at the exit face of
`the rod or simply frosting the rod-end itself.
`
`Mixing rods can have any shape desired. The rods with
`plane sides do a better mixing job in most cases.
`
`Typically the rods have an aspect ratio (length to largest
`transverse dimension) of about 10:1, and are usually
`about 75- to 150-mm long. They can be clad like an optical
`fiber, but generally are not. Unlike a fiber, the number of
`reflections in a mixing rod is quite small, and losses are
`not a serious problem.
`
`it is
`Rather than using a rod with polished faces,
`possible to achieve a similar effect using a mirrored
`
`tube with a hollow center.
`
`illuminator are
`The combination of a rod and its
`sometimes designed by computer simulation. But
`the
`degree of uniformity required doesn’t always demandthis
`level of complexity,
`so simple trial-and-error is often
`sufficient.
`
`
`PAGE 79 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080459
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`66
`
`Illumination
`
`Bent Lightpipes
`
`
`Complex lightpipes made from straight sections, bends,
`and tapers are common in many industries. Bent
`lightpipes are components used to mix or collect light
`from different paths that bend around objects or provide
`light output over an extended region. An example is
`automotive dashboard illuminators that employ lightpipes
`coupled to a small incandescent source or an LED. The
`lightpipe allows the source light to be directed around
`dials and knobs. The bends allow simple packaging and
`lower costs at the expense of design complexity.
`Any cross-sectional shape, bend angle, bend shape, and so
`forth is possible, but the simplest is a single, right-angle
`bend using common-center,
`circular bends
`and an
`arbitrary cross section. A circular cross-section is shown
`here. Two importantslices are called principal sections:
`the vertical (V), which shows the bend of the lightpipe,
`and the horizontal (H), which shows the bend going into
`the page. The vertical slice defines the transmission
`properties of the lightpipe. For normally incident input
`light coupled to the lightpipe, there are no propagation
`losses except Fresnel losses if the bend ratio, R, is
`
`R=n,/r, =1+t/7, <n,
`
`
`
`where ri and re are the two
`bend radii, ¢ is the lightpipe
`
`thickness in the_vertical
`section,
`and
`nn
`is’
`the
`lightpipe index in air. As the
`input angle increases, there
`are losses at the limit of this
`equation, but
`the equation
`is
`transcendental.
`By
`decreasing the thickness of
`the lightpipe, one can increase the acceptance angle such
`that there is no loss.
`including
`More complex parameterization of lightpipes,
`uncommon bend centers, noncircular bends, and arbitrary
`cross sections, can be foundin theliterature.
`
`
`PAGE 80 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080460
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Uniform Illumination
`
`67
`
`Integrating Sphere
`
`
`Integrating spheres produce illumination that has
`extremely
`uniform radiance
`and_
`irradiance. An
`integrating sphere is a hollow spherical shell coated on
`the inside with a highly reflecting diffuse coating. The
`projected solid angle from any point on a sphere to any
`element of area on the sphere is the same, regardless of
`location. This fact combined with the diffuse coating and
`the multiple reflections cause any light introduced into
`the sphere to produce uniform irradiance on and radiance
`of the wall of the sphere. A hole or “port” in the sphere
`allows this uniform illumination to be used in an optical
`system.
`
`the exit of an integrating sphere
`The radiance at
`extends to a full hemisphere (x projected steradians).
`The irradiance at the wall of an integrating sphere is
`
`incident from a full hemisphere.
`
`The radiance, L, of the wall of an integrating sphere
`generated by flux, ©,
`introduced into the sphere is
`L=—"_.M,
`
`oe
`where As is the area of the complete sphere wall, and M is
`the “sphere multiplier,” which is equal to the average
`numbersof reflections in the sphere. The multiplier, MW,is
`M = —
`1-p
`where p is the average reflectance of the wall of the
`sphere, counting the holes as areas of zero reflectance.
`
`A good working model of an integrating sphere is to
`consider the port
`to
`
`
`
`,
`Es
`
`PAGE 81 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080461
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`pot=* | port be a hole in a wall,
`
`ae
`
`a
`
`
`
`totally
`at
`and,

`=
`@
`arbitrary
`distance
`it,
`behind
`another
`sphere
`-0o
`wall of infinite extent
`and radiance, L.
`
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`68
`
`Illumination
`
`Lenslet Arrays
`
`
`Imaging illumination systems, whether single- or double-
`lens systems, paraboloidal reflector and lens systems, or
`single ellipsoidal reflector systems, all suffer from possible
`nonuniformities in intensity (and consequently also in
`irradiance). These are due, among other causes,
`to
`possible nonuniformities
`in the
`source
`as well
`as
`obstructions
`such
`as
`filament
`support wires,
`gas
`discharge electrodes, and LED heat-sink structures.
`
`st
`
`1
`
`array
`
`lens
`
`These nonuniformities can be smoothed out by using a
`lenslet array, an array (usually 2D) of small
`lenses.
`Typically, the arrays are used in pairs. In the diagram
`below, the dotted purple lines show the marginal rays for
`one of the lenslets in the first array; the black dotted lines
`show the marginal rays for the corresponding lenslet in
`the second array.
`“
`condensing
`
`id
`
`"4 array
`
`focusing
`lens
`
`illuminated
`
`In this configuration, the source is imaged by each lenslet
`of the first array into the corresponding lenslet of the
`second array. Each lenslet of the first array is imaged
`onto the entire target. This overlaying creates uniform
`illumination of the target. In effect,
`the lenslet arrays
`create multiple Kohler
`illumination systems,
`all
`superimposed on the target.
`
`Lenslet arrays are generally designed using illumin-
`
`ation design software.
`
`MASITC_01080462 MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`PAGE 82 OF 154
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Uniform Illumination
`
`69
`
`Small Reflectors, Lenslet Arrays, and Facets
`
`
`Ellipsoidal and paraboloidal reflectors are often “small”
`with respect to the lamp dimensions and the distances
`between the lamp and the reflecting surfaces. In these
`cases,
`in addition to the
`effects of
`lamp support
`structures, the size and structure of the lamp itself can
`produce nonuniformities in illumination.
`
`One method of minimizing these nonuniformities is to
`include a lenslet array in front of the detector. This
`broadens the beam a little, depending on the # of the
`lenslets, but
`it
`can produce much more uniform
`illumination than thereflector alone.
`
`paraboloid
`
`lenslet array
`
`
`design software.
`
`Tandem lenslet arrays also can be used to minimize
`the effects of small reflectors.
`
`Another approach is to break the reflector into small flat
`facets, either radially, circumferentially, or both.
`
`Lenslet arrays and
`faceted reflectors
`are usually designed
`with illumination
`
`PAGE 83 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080463
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`70
`
`Illumination
`
`Source Modeling Overview
`
`
`A system software model, whether a simple paraxial
`design or a detailed design of an illumination system, may
`fail to agree with experimental results due to the lack ofa
`comprehensive source model. For the simplest case,
`where the optics are far away from the source andcollect
`light over a small solid angle, a point source model or a
`simple geometrical model of the source may be sufficient.
`The directional distribution of light from these simple
`models is usually assumed to be isotropic or Lambertian.
`
`For more efficient designs with optics that are close to the
`source and collect light over a large solid angle, a more
`complete model of
`the source is
`required to obtain
`meaningful
`results. These models must
`reflect
`the
`physical size and shape of the source and should contain
`directional distributions that account for factors such as
`filament support wires and lamp envelopes.
`
`Source models are madefor all types of sources, including
`LEDs, incandescent, fluorescent, metal vapor, and high-
`pressure gas discharge sources. The modeling includes
`spectral, radiance or luminance distributions, and lifetime
`aspects. For example, accurate source models for
`the
`following have been developed:
`
`e
`
`The temperature distribution along an incandescent
`filament varies
`from its
`ends
`to
`the
`center.
`Additionally,
`the interior of
`the filament glows
`“hotter” due to the re-incident radiation.
`e Arc emission sources such as metal halide and HID
`lamps change their radiance distribution and power
`output over time due to ablation of the electrodes.
`These lamps have a deposited material to capture this
`ablation, called the “salt lake” in continuous sources
`and the “getter” in a pulsed one.
`
`There are essentially four ways of creating complex source
`models. Three are described on the next page, while the
`fourth, not presented here,
`is based on the physics of
`emission. This method is outside the confines of this text.
`
`
`
`PAGE 84 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080464
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Source Models
`
`71
`
`Source Modeling Methods
`
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`There are three source modeling methods, where the
`accuracy of the model typically increases with number:
`1.
`“Bottom-up”
`(geometrical model):
`the
`source
`geometry starting with the electrodes, supports, and
`envelope; finishes with the packaging. Emission is
`assigned to the radiative components.
`e Benefits: No complex measurements; handles re-
`incident light; provides tolerancing capabilities.
`Limitations: Emission characteristics assumed;
`approximate surface and material properties; can
`include tedious CAD development.
`“Top-down” (radiance model): the optical output of a
`representative sample of
`the lamp. These mea-
`surements are made with a goniometer, which
`moves a detector around a lamp on two axes. A
`camera measures the 2D radiance distribution of the
`lamp from each of many goniometer positions. The
`resulting 4D model represents a complete description
`of the lamp that can be used in a computer optical
`design program.
`e Benefits: Emission is based on physical measure-
`ments.
`Limitations: Does not handle reincident light; is
`limited by the variance of the number of source
`samples measured and aligned; and their complex
`measurement.
`Integrates the
`(system model):
`“Bottom to top’
`bottom-up and top-down approaches to develop a more
`thorough source model.
`e Benefits: Complete geometrical and radiative
`models.
`Limitations: Integration of two submethods.
`e
`There are many hybrid methods and methods based on
`applying the physics of
`the emission process of a
`prescribed source. Loosely,
`the first two methods show
`agreement to within 25% of experimental results, while
`the bottom-to-top method shows agreement within 10%.
`In all cases, rays are assigned, typically in a Monte Carlo
`approach, to the emission areas.
`
`
`e
`
`e
`
`PAGE 85 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080465
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`72
`
`Illumination
`
`LED Modeling
`
`
`The components of an LED include the emitting die(s),
`the lens,
`the reflecting dish, wire bond and pad, and
`standoffs. Other components can include phosphors and
`included detectors.
`
`an
`Wire
`“Bond
`Dish
`
`Die
`
`Geometrical modeling is useful to
`develop LED sources; however, it
`is difficult to obtain or measure
`the
`shapes
`and sizes of
`the
`components within
`the
`lens.
`Radiance
`modeling
`suffers
`because of the large amount of
`variance between LED samples of
`one model. The primary issues
`are the die position within the reflecting dish, the axial
`position of the die and dish with respect
`to the lens
`vertex, and the size and shape of the reflecting dish. Four
`distinct methods are available for LED modeling:
`
`Standoffs
`
`1.
`
`2,
`
`Develop a flat object and assign rays to the surface
`based upon the intensity distribution provided by the
`manufacturer. This method ignores spatial variation
`of the emission.
`Develop a geometrical model of the LED and assign
`rays to the emitting surfaces of the die. Optimize the
`dish shape (typically a cone), size, and the axial offset
`of the die-dish to the lens vertex. The lens shape must
`be measured and the die and dish placed at
`the
`transverse center of the lens. The model is complete
`when the intensity pattern from the manufacturer
`agrees with the ray-trace model.
`Same
`as method #2,
`except develop the layer
`structure within the die to generate Monte Carlo rays
`within the active layer(s). This method is tedious for
`ray tracing due to the indexof refraction discontinuity
`between the die (n = 2.5+) and the epoxy lens (n =
`1.454).
`4, Radiance by itself or a system: integrated into #2 or
`#3.
`
`3.
`
`
`
`PAGE 86 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080466
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Source Models
`
`73
`
`Incandescent Lamp Modeling
`
`
`Envelope
`
`The components of an incandescent lamp include the
`base,
`filament(s),
`supports, and the envelope. Other
`components
`can
`include
`coatings and envelope faceting.
`Note that the shapes and sizes
`of components depend on the
`application. Sources developed
`for
`the automotive headlight
`industry provide the highest
`level of
`tolerance from one
`sample to another.
`
`Filament
`
`Supports
`fi
`
`Both geometrical and radiance
`methods are useful
`for
`incandescent source modeling.
`Radiance modeling is better suited to this source since a
`goniometer can be focused on the filament source, while
`the glass envelope supplies little effect on overall optical
`ray paths. Only
`light
`rays
`that
`are
`re-incident
`(approaching grazing incidence) on the envelope show
`adverse effects. Geometric modeling involves breaking the
`glass envelope to gain access to the internal components.
`This process requires the use of calipers to measure the
`coil
`spacing,
`the
`thicknesses
`and lengths
`of
`the
`components,
`and
`the
`number
`of
`coils.
`Provided
`parameters can help with this process:
`e Maximum overall length (MOL): Overall distance
`that includes the base and pins.
`e Light center length (LCL): Distance between the
`center of the emitter and a defined reference plane.
`Filament type: Designated by @-#, where @ is a
`series of letters (e.g., C = coiled, CC = coiled coil, and
`SR = straight ribbon), and # is a number providing an
`arbitrary pattern for the filament supports.
`e Bulb type: Designated by @-#, where @ is the bulb
`shape (e.g., T = tubular), and # is the diameter in
`eighths of an inch.
`no
`have
`that
`types
`e Base
`type:
`Innumerable
`them. Examples
`shorthand notation to describe
`include screw, mogul, bipin, and prong.
`
`
`e
`
`PAGE 87 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080467
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`74
`
`Illumination
`
`Arc and Fluorescent Lamp Modeling
`
`
`The components of an arc lamp include the base(s),
`electrodes, and envelope(s). Other components can include
`coatings, salt lake (continuous)
`or getter (pulsed), and ignition
`wire (flashlamp). The optical
`radiation is represented by a
`virtual object called the arc.
`Note
`that
`the
`aspects
`of
`
`components on_thedepend
`
`application. Automotive head-
`light arcs provide the ighost ll
`level of accuracy from one
`sample to another.
`
`Region
`
`Arc
`
`Envelopes
`
`Radiance modelingis especially suited to this source since
`geometrical modeling cannot effectively represent the arc.
`The arc must be approximated with a cylinder, tube, or
`some other geometric shape. Radiance modeling is also
`suited to this source because a goniometer can be focused
`on the arc. Due to the typical smaller sizes of these
`sources compared to incandescent sources, the effect of re-
`incident
`rays is more pronounced. Thus, methods to
`integrate a simplified measurement of
`the radiance
`distribution into the geometrical model have been
`employed. One such method uses the Abel transform
`based on a single image capture of the arc. The Abel
`transform assumes symmetry of
`the arc shape and
`revolves it around a localized centroid of the arc source.
`Such system models are the most effective way to model
`such sources.
`
`Fluorescent lamps include the tube and base(s). These
`are the simplest sources to model other than the complex
`geometry of compact fluorescent
`lamps now available.
`After the geometry is entered,
`the inner surface of the
`tube acts as the emitter.
`Internally, mercury vapor is
`excited, releasing UV radiation, which is then converted
`into visible light upon being incident on the phosphor.
`Geometrical modeling is better suited to this source due to
`the large size and simplicity of the configurations.
`
`
`PAGE 88 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080468
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`Nonimaging Compound Concentrators
`
`to
`
`Nonimaging Compound Concentrators
`
`
`first
`Nonimaging compound concentrators were
`developed for solar energy collection to concentrate the
`irradiance from the sun. In solar collection, depending
`on the degree of sophistication of the sun tracking system,
`the range of sun input angles can be fairly small. The
`collectors
`(solar
`cells, water
`pipes,
`etc.)
`respond
`essentially to irradiance and can be illuminated at any
`angle. The compound concentrator trades off between
`area and solid angle, presenting a large collection area to
`the sun (collecting over a narrow solid angle) and
`delivering the energy to a smaller area (and over a wider
`solid angle). These devices come close to achieving the
`theoretical maximum concentration (in three dimensions).
`
`input projected
`solid angle(Q))

`input
`half-
`angle SS Compound)
`
` gytout
`output projected
`pag.
`solid angle(Q.)
`angle
`x
`«~(8,)
`/--\.----
`
`(8))
`
`Nonimaging
`
`Concentrator
`
`input area (a))
`
`output area (a,)
`
`If the output projected solid angle is the maximun, 7,
`(90 = 90 deg), the concentration is maximum:
`
`a;
`
`(max)
`
`sin? 6,
`
`Nonimaging compound concentrators are designed using
`the edge-ray principle, which directs all rays that are
`at the maximum input angle (0; for 8. = 90 deg in the
`drawing above) to the edge of the output aperture. All
`rays at input angles less than this maximum are directed
`inside the output aperture with no concern for image
`quality. Often this angle,
`090i,
`is called the acceptance
`angle, 0a.
`
`
`PAGE 89 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080469
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`CX-0693
`
`76
`
`Illumination
`
`Concentrators as Luminaires
`
`
`Nonimaging compound concentrators are used in
`illumination as luminaires—devices used to direct the
`light from a source for illumination. For illumination,
`they are used in the reverse direction from their
`configuration in solar collection; they collect light from as
`large an angle as possible from a small source and direct
`it over a smaller angle through a larger aperture. For
`solar collection, they collect energy over a large area and a
`small angle, delivering it to a small area.
`
`small source,
`wide solid
`
`angle \
`
`output projected
`solid angle(Q,)
`
`\
`
`output
`
`half-
`
`angle
`
`output area (a,)
`
`e
`
`Nonimaging compound concentrators are efficient
`because:
`e
`They collect light from the source over a very large
`solid angle.
`They are designed using the edge-ray principle,
`keeping all the energy within the intended field.
`
`design boundaries.
`
`Imaging systems are designed to be best on axis, with
`the edges of the field “spilling over.” Nonimaging
`compound concentrators are designed to be best at the
`edges of the field, keeping all the energy inside the
`
`Nonimaging concentrators used as luminaires are usually
`composed of an internal mirror surface with the figure of
`a
`compound
`parabolic
`concentrator
`(CPC),
`compound
`elliptical
`concentrator
`(CEC),
`or
`compound hyperbolic concentrator (CHC). Dielectric
`filled concentrators that employ total internal reflection
`are also used.
`
`
`PAGE 90 OF 154
`
`MASITC_01080470
`
`MASIMO 2054
`
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`MASIMO 2054
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01299
`
`

`

`Nonimaging Compound Concentrators
`
`oF
`
`Compound Parabolic Concentrators
`SSSSSSSSSae
`
`CX-0693
`
`The compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) is a
`common shape of nonimaging concentrator used for
`illumination. A CPC is formed by a parabola with its
`focus at one edge of the entrance (small) aperture, rotated
`around an axis that is perpendicular to and through the
`center of both apertures. CPCs can be quite long.
`
`max.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket