`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Daniel Kiang
`Trials
`IPR50095-0045IP1; IPR50095-0045IP3; AppleIPR745-1; AppleIPR745-3; Nicholas Stephens; AppleIPR127-1;
`"AXF-PTAB"; Andrew Patrick; bisenius@fr.com; leung@fr.com; pking@fr.com; IPR50095-0046IP1
`RE: IPR2022-01291, IPR2022-01465, IPR2022-01299 - September 27, 2023 Conference Call
`Wednesday, September 27, 2023 12:39:50 AM
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s September 5 Order in IPR2022-01291 and IPR2022-01465 and the Board’s
`September 25 email in IPR2022-01299, the parties tentatively propose the following schedule,
`subject to confirmation during the conference call, for the IPRs concerning the ’745 Patent (IPR2022-
`01291, -01465) and the IPR concerning the ’127 Patent (IPR2022-01299):
`
`Anthony Deposition (’127 Patent IPR Only)
`Duckworth Deposition (’745 Patent IPRs Only)
`Patent Owner Sur-Reply (’127 Patent IPR Only)
`Apple’s Response to Expert Testimony (’745
`Patent IPRs Only)
`Motion to Exclude (All IPRs)
`King Deposition (’127 Patent IPR Only)
`Opposition to Motion to Exclude (All IPRs)
`
`Apple’s Observations on Cross-Examination (’127
`Patent IPR Only)
`Reply to Motion to Exclude (All IPRs)
`Parties’ Exchange (Service) of Oral Hearing
`Demonstratives (All IPRs)
`Filing of Oral Hearing Demonstratives (All IPRs)
`Oral Hearing (All IPRs)
`
`Original Due Date
`
`N/A
`N/A
`Oct. 11
`N/A
`
`Oct. 13
`N/A
`Oct. 19 (’127) /Oct.
`20 (’745)
`N/A
`
`Oct. 27
`Oct. 25
`
`N/A
`Nov. 1
`
`Joint Proposed
`New Due Date
`Fri., Oct. 13
`Wed., Oct. 18
`Fri., Oct. 20
`Fri., Oct. 27
`
`Mon., Oct. 30
`Fri., Nov. 3
`Mon., Nov. 6
`
`Fri., Nov. 10
`
`Mon., Nov. 13
`Mon., Nov. 13
`
`Wed., Nov. 15
`Fri., Nov. 17
`
`Additionally, pursuant to the Board’s September 5 Order in IPR2022-01291 and -01465, Patent
`Owner confirms that its sur-replies in IPR2022-01291 and -01465 will conform to the Board’s rules,
`including the default 5,600 word limit for a sur-reply.
`
`Patent Owner has also arranged for a court reporter to attend and transcribe the conference call.
`Petitioner’s counsel has been copied on this email.
`
`Best regards,
`Daniel
`
`Exhibit 3006
`
`
`
`
`
`Daniel Kiang
`Partner
`Daniel.Kiang@knobbe.com
`949-721-5205 Direct
`Knobbe Martens
`2040 Main St., 14th Fl.
`Irvine, CA 92614
`www.knobbe.com/daniel-kiang
`
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 5:07 AM
`To: Daniel Kiang <Daniel.Kiang@knobbe.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: IPR50095-0045IP1 <IPR50095-0045IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095-0045IP3 <IPR50095-
`0045IP3@fr.com>; AppleIPR745-1 <AppleIPR745-1@knobbe.com>; AppleIPR745-3 <AppleIPR745-
`3@knobbe.com>; Nicholas Stephens <nstephens@fr.com>; 'AXF-PTAB' <AXF-PTAB@fr.com>;
`Andrew Patrick <patrick@fr.com>; bisenius@fr.com; leung@fr.com; pking@fr.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2022-01291, IPR2022-01465 - September 27, 2023 Conference Call
`
`Counsel,
`
`Yes, the Board intends to discuss those topics during this upcoming conference.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Daniel Kiang <Daniel.Kiang@knobbe.com>
`Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 4:49 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: IPR50095-0045IP1 <IPR50095-0045IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095-0045IP3 <IPR50095-
`0045IP3@fr.com>; AppleIPR745-1 <AppleIPR745-1@knobbe.com>; AppleIPR745-3 <AppleIPR745-
`3@knobbe.com>; Nicholas Stephens <nstephens@fr.com>; 'AXF-PTAB' <AXF-PTAB@fr.com>;
`Andrew Patrick <patrick@fr.com>; bisenius@fr.com; leung@fr.com; pking@fr.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2022-01291, IPR2022-01465 - September 27, 2023 Conference Call
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board,
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner understands that the Board has scheduled a conference call on September 27 at 11
`am ET in IPR2022-01299 to discuss IPR2022-01291, IPR2022-01465, and IPR2022-01299. Patent
`Owner respectfully requests confirmation that the scheduled September 27 call will also address the
`issues outlined in the Board’s September 5 Order in IPR2022-01291 and IPR2022-01465, namely:
`“a potential increase of the Board’s default 5,600 word count limitation for Sur-replies,”
`“dates when the deposition [of Patent Owner’s expert] might take place,”
`“a filing deadline for the Response to Expert Testimony,” and
`“whether oral argument in these two cases might be delayed by a few weeks to
`accommodate the deposition date and the filing deadline.”
`
`
`Petitioner’s counsel has been copied on this email.
`
`Best regards,
`Daniel
`
`Daniel Kiang
`Partner
`Daniel.Kiang@knobbe.com
`949-721-5205 Direct
`Knobbe Martens
`2040 Main St., 14th Fl.
`Irvine, CA 92614
`www.knobbe.com/daniel-kiang
`
`
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 6:08 AM
`To: Nicholas Stephens <nstephens@fr.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; 'AXF-PTAB' <AXF-
`PTAB@fr.com>; Andrew Patrick <patrick@fr.com>; bisenius@fr.com; leung@fr.com; pking@fr.com
`Cc: IPR50095-0045IP1 <IPR50095-0045IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095-0045IP3 <IPR50095-
`0045IP3@fr.com>; AppleIPR745-1 <AppleIPR745-1@knobbe.com>; AppleIPR745-3 <AppleIPR745-
`3@knobbe.com>; 2Bcc <2Bcc@knobbe.com>; 2cmp <2cmp@knobbe.com>; 2Jzk
`<2Jzk@knobbe.com>; 2Jup <2Jup@knobbe.com>; 2Dck <2Dck@knobbe.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2022-01291 - Petitioner's Unopposed Request to Correct the Petition Under 37 CFR
`§ 42.104(c)
`
`Counsel,
`
`The Board intends to discuss Petitioner’s request (below) during the anticipated conference call later
`this month per the Board’s Order of September 5, 2023.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Nicholas Stephens <nstephens@fr.com>
`Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 1:37 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: IPR50095-0045IP1 <IPR50095-0045IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095-0045IP3 <IPR50095-
`0045IP3@fr.com>; AppleIPR745-1 <AppleIPR745-1@knobbe.com>; AppleIPR745-3 <AppleIPR745-
`3@knobbe.com>
`Subject: IPR2022-01291 - Petitioner's Unopposed Request to Correct the Petition Under 37 CFR §
`42.104(c)
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`
`
`Your Honors,
`
`During the parties’ recent meet and confer in relation to Patent Owner’s requested authorizations
`for a motion to strike and to submit additional evidence with its Sur-Reply, Patent Owner contended
`that Section I.D of Petitioner’s Reply “requests a substantive change to the petition to correct
`typographical errors,” and argued that “such a request can only be made via motion under §
`42.104(c).”
`
`While the Reply cited cases that Petitioner believes demonstrates authority for the Board to correct
`a typographical error even in the absence of a motion under § 42.104(c), out of an abundance of
`caution, Petitioner respectfully requests authorization under § 42.104(c) to correct the Petition’s
`typographical error as identified in Section I.D of the Reply. Specifically, in addressing limitations
`[20.0]-[20.8] in Ground 1B, the Petition at page 27 includes a mistaken cross-citation to limitations
`from independent claim 15 (i.e., [15.0]-[15.8]) rather than independent claim 1 (i.e., [1.0]-[1.7]).
`Petitioner proposes to correct the Petition by replacing the citation to “[15.0] - [15.8]” with “Ground
`1A, [1.0] - [1.7]” on page 27, consistent with the parallel limitations recited in claims 1 and 20.
`Petitioner proposes no other corrections to the body of the Petition. Clean and redlined versions of
`the proposed corrected Petition are attached for reference.
`
`Petitioner submits that good cause exists for the correction given that the parties have consistently
`addressed corresponding limitations from claims 1 and 20 together in the POR and Reply.
`Petitioner’s intent to cross-cite limitations [1.0]-[1.7] rather than [15.0]-[15.8] is also evident from
`the Petition’s proper cross-citation to claim 1 in addressing claim 20 in Ground 2B (pages 41-42) and
`Petitioner’s proper cross-citation to claim 1 in addressing claim 20 in both grounds of the Petition in
`IPR2022-01465. The Board has also confirmed that § 42.104(c) permits corrections to petitions
`based on motions filed after institution. See, e.g., Group III Int’l, Inc. v. Targus Int’l LLC, IPR2021-
`00371, Paper 88 at pp. 9-13 (PTAB July 6, 2022).
`
`The parties have conferred and Patent Owner indicates that it does not oppose Petitioner’s request.
`
`
`
`
`Should the Board desire a conference call, the parties will provide their availability. The parties are
`also amenable to discussing this request at the conference call that we anticipate scheduling later
`this month pursuant to the Board’s Order of September 5, 2023 (Paper 43).
`
`Best Regards,
`Nick Stephens
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Apple Inc.
`
`Nick Stephens :: Principal :: Fish & Richardson P.C.
`612 766 2018 direct :: nstephens@fr.com :: fr.com
`
`************************************************************************************
`****************************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
`confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
`reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`************************************************************************************
`****************************************
`
`
`NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
`privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not
`the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`
`NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
`privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not
`the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`
`