throbber

`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper: 73
`Date: December 14, 2023
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MASIMO CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2022-01291 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01465 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)1
`
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, GEORGE R. HOSKINS, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HOSKINS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.15, and 42.54
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order is being filed in each proceeding listed in the caption, due to
`the common issues addressed. The parties are not authorized to use a
`combined caption in these proceedings.
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-01291 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01465 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`
`
`Oral argument in each of these two proceedings occurred, in a
`consolidated fashion, on November 17, 2023. A corresponding Transcript
`has been entered in each proceeding, which is viewable only by the parties
`and the Board (not the public), due to the potential of confidential
`information subject to a Protective Order previously entered in these two
`cases being discussed. See IPR2022-01291, Paper 71; IPR2022-01465,
`Paper 69 (“Transcript” or “Tr.”); see also IPR2022-01291, Paper 48, 4–5
`(Trial Hearing Order, setting forth procedures for handling the discussion of
`confidential information during the oral argument).
`In order to maximize public availability of the record presented in
`these cases, the parties shall each review the Transcript to identify whether
`any confidential information subject to the Protective Order was discussed.
`If such confidential information was discussed, the parties shall jointly
`prepare and file in each proceeding a publicly available version of the
`Transcript, in which the header (“BOARD AND PARTIES ONLY”) is
`removed, and in which the confidential information has been redacted out.
`Any such redactions must be limited to the portion of the Transcript
`corresponding to the session that was closed to the public, which begins on
`page 54 (line 1) of the Transcript. If such confidential information was not
`discussed, the parties shall jointly file in each proceeding a publicly
`available version of the entire Transcript with the header removed, and
`without redactions.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the parties shall each review the Transcript to identify
`whether any confidential information subject to the Protective Order was
`discussed; and
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-01291 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`IPR2022-01465 (Patent 10,687,745 B1)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall complete the filing of
`a publicly available version of the Transcript, as set forth above, on or before
`December 29, 2023.
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Nicholas Stephens
`Andrew B. Patrick
`Kim Leung
`Patrick J. Bisenius
`Patrick J. King
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`nstephens@fr.com
`patrick@fr.com
`leung@fr.com
`bisenius@fr.com
`pking@fr.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brian Claassen
`Carol Pitzel Cruz
`Daniel Kiang
`Jeremiah Helm
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON, & BEAR, LLP
`2bcc@knobbe.com
`2cmp@knobbe.com
`2dck@knobbe.com
`2jgh@knobbe.com
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket