Apple Inc. (Petitioner)
`v.
`Masimo Corporation (Patent Owner)
`
`Petitioner Demonstratives
`
`Case Nos. IPR2022-01291 and IPR2022-01465
`U.S. Patent No. 10,687,745
`
`Before Hon. Josiah C. Cocks, George R. Hoskins, and Robert A. Pollock,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE 1084
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01291
`
`
`v.
`Masimo Corporation (Patent Owner)
`
`Petitioner Demonstratives
`
`Case Nos. IPR2022-01291 and IPR2022-01465
`U.S. Patent No. 10,687,745
`
`Before Hon. Josiah C. Cocks, George R. Hoskins, and Robert A. Pollock,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE 1084
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2022-01291
`
`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Section
`
`Slide
`
`‘745 Patent Overview
`
`Iwamiya-Sarantos Combinations
`
`“Surface comprising a dark-colored coating” (elements [1.4] and [20.4])
`
`Recited photodiode arrangement (element [15.4] and claims 6 and 26)*
`
`Combining Iwamiya+Sarantos to determine oxygen saturation (claims 9 and 18) and include a second wavelength
`(claims 2 and 27)
`
`“Second shape comprises a width and a length, and wherein the width is different from the length” (Claim 25)*
`
`Sarantos-Shie Combinations
`
`“First shape” and a different “second shape” (elements [1.1]-[1.2] and [20.1]-[20.2])
`
`“Light block having a circular shape” (element [15.3])
`
`Recited photodiode arrangement (element [15.4] and claims 6 and 26)*
`
`“Second shape comprises a circular geometry” (claim 12)
`
`“Second shape comprises a width and a length, and wherein the width is different from the length” (Claim 25)*
`
`Reasonable Expectation of Success (“REOS”) (claims 2, 9, 18, and 27)
`
`3
`
`9
`
`10
`
`22
`
`30
`
`44
`
`47
`
`48
`
`62
`
`69
`
`73
`
`79
`
`82
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Overview
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`3
`
`
`
`Overview of the ’745 Patent
`
`• The ’745 Patent was filed March 30,
`2020, and its earliest claimed priority
`date is July 2, 2015.
`
`• The ’745 Patent includes 27 claims.
`
`• The IPR2022-01291 Petition challenges
`claims 1, 9, 15, 18, 20, and 27, of which
`claims 1, 15, and 20 are independent.
`
`• The IPR2022-01465 Petition challenges
`claims 2-6, 8, 10-14, 17, 19, and 21-26.
`
`APPLE-1001 (’745 Patent), Cover Page.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`
`
`Overview of the ’745 Patent
`
`APPLE-1001, 10:40-51, FIGS. 7A, 7B; 1291 Pet. Reply, 17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 15; Response to Expert Testimony, 6.
`
`5
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 1 and 20
`
`APPLE-1001, Claims 1 and 20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claim 15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 15
`
`7
`
`
`
`Overview of Instituted Grounds
`
`1291 Petition
`
`1465 Petition
`
`1291 Pet., 2.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1465 Pet., 2.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Iwamiya-Sarantos Combinations
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`
`
`“Surface comprising a dark-colored coating”
`(elements [1.4] and [20.4])
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 1 and 20
`
`APPLE-1001, Claims 1 and 20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`
`
`Iwamiya Includes a Light Shielding Frame
`
`APPLE-1004, 8:38-47, FIG. 4 (annotated); 1291 APPLE-1003, ¶40; 1465 APPLE-1003, ¶41; 1291 Pet., 15; 1465 Pet., 13-14.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`
`
`Sarantos Teaches a Dark-Colored Coating to Shield Light
`
`APPLE-1005, 17:3-16, FIG. 22; 1291 Pet., 16; 1465 Pet., 14-15.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos Combinations Render Obvious a
`Surface with a Dark-Colored Coating
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1291 APPLE-1003, ¶42; 1465 APPLE-1003, ¶43; 1291 Pet., 16; 1465 Pet., 15.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶8; 1291 Pet. Reply, 5-6; 1465 Pet. Reply, 3-4.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos Combinations Render Obvious a
`Surface with a Dark-Colored Coating
`
`APPLE-1004, FIG. 4 (annotated); APPLE-1042, ¶8; 1291 Pet. Reply, 5-6; 1465 Pet. Reply, 3-4.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`
`
`A POSITA Would Have Been Motivated to Combine
`Iwamiya and Sarantos to Reduce Multiple Scattering
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1291 APPLE-1003, ¶42; 1465 APPLE-1003, ¶43;
`1291 Pet., 16; 1465 Pet., 15.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶9; 1291 Pet. Reply, 6; 1465 Pet. Reply, 4.
`
`16
`
`
`
`Corroborating Evidence Supports Motivation
`
`Webster
`
`APPLE-1013, 69; APPLE-1042, ¶9; 1291 Pet. Reply, 6; 1465 Pet. Reply, 4.
`
`APPLE-1013, 96; 1291 Pet. Reply, 6; 1465 Pet. Reply, 4.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`
`
`Corroborating Evidence Supports Motivation
`
`Schulz
`
`APPLE-1067, 9:64-10:7; 1291 Pet. Reply, 4; 1465 Pet. Reply, 2.
`
`’745 Patent
`
`APPLE-1001, 8:62-9:3; Response to Expert Testimony, 4.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`
`
`Dr. Duckworth Failed to Consider Multiple Scattering in
`Iwamiya’s Device
`
`Dr. Duckworth
`
`APPLE-1081, 27:18-28:8; Response to Expert Testimony, 4.
`
`EX2100, ¶16; 1291 PO Sur-reply, 6; 1465 PO Sur-reply, 6.
`
`APPLE-1081, 32:4-8; Response to Expert Testimony, 4.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1059, 96:11-17; 1291 Pet. Reply, 6; 1465 Pet. Reply, 4.
`
`19
`
`
`
`The Alleged Option of Using a Reflective Material Does Not
`Detract From Obviousness of a Dark-Colored Coating
`Dr. Anthony:
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶14; 1291 Pet. Reply, 7; 1465 Pet. Reply, 5.
`
`“The fact that the motivating benefit comes at the expense of another benefit,
`however, should not nullify its use as a basis to modify the disclosure of one
`reference with the teachings of another. ”
`-Winner Intern. Royalty Corp. v. Wang, 202 F.3d 1340, 1349 n.8 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 7
`
`20
`
`
`
`The Board was Correct in Finding Masimo’s Arguments
`to be Insufficient
`
`Institution Decision
`
`1291 Institution Decision, 20-21.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`
`
`Recited Photodiode Arrangement
`(element [15.4] and claims 6 and 26)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 15, 6, and 26
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 6
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 26
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 15
`
`23
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims and Specification
`
`’745 Patent Element [15.4]
`
`’745 Patent Specification
`
`APPLE-1001, 16:48-52; 1291 Pet., 23-24; 1465 Pet., 27-28.
`
`’745 Patent Claim 6
`
`APPLE-1001, 16:10-13; 1465 Pet., 20.
`
`’745 Patent Claim 26
`
`APPLE-1001, 18:33-36; 1465 Pet., 38.
`
`APPLE-1001, 11:36-43, FIG. 7B; 1291 Pet. Reply, 10; 1465 Pet. Reply, 8;
`Response to Expert Testimony, 6.
`
`24
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Prosecution History – No Disclaimer Or Disavowal
`
`EX2057, 322; Response to Expert Testimony, 2.
`
`EX2057, 323; Response to Expert Testimony, 2.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`
`
`Prosecution History – No Disclaimer Or Disavowal
`
`EX2057, 325-326; Response to Expert Testimony, 2.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`
`
`Plain and Ordinary Meaning Thus Controls
`
`Merriam-Webster Dictionary
`
`Collins Dictionary
`
`APPLE-1045, 3; 1291 Pet. Reply, 10-11; 1465 Pet. Reply, 8-9.
`
`American Heritage Dictionary
`
`APPLE-1044, 3; 1291 Pet. Reply, 10-11; 1465 Pet. Reply, 8-9.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1043, 3; 1291 Pet. Reply, 10-11; 1465 Pet. Reply, 8-9.
`
`27
`
`
`
`Iwamiya Renders Obvious the Claimed Photodiode
`Arrangement
`
`Iwamiya
`
`APPLE-1004, 14:36-41; 1291 Pet., 23-24; 1465 Pet., 27-28, 20.
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos explain that the outer circumferential portion of the detection area would
`receive a greater intensity of reflected light than a middle portion of the detection area.
`
`APPLE-1004, 7:55-61; Response to Expert Testimony, 5.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005, 14:23-32; Response to Expert Testimony, 5.
`
`28
`
`
`
`Iwamiya Renders Obvious the Claimed Photodiode
`Arrangement
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`Dr. Duckworth
`
`1291 APPLE-1003, ¶56; 1465 APPLE-1003, ¶¶81, 34;
`1291 Pet., 23; 1465 Pet., 27, 20.
`
`APPLE-1081, 58:2-59:1; Response to Expert Testimony, 5.
`
`APPLE-1004, FIG. 2 (annotated);
`APPLE-1042, ¶16; 1291 Pet. Reply, 9; 1465 Pet. Reply, 7.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`
`
`Combining Iwamiya+Sarantos to determine
`oxygen saturation (claims 9 and 18) and to
`include a second wavelength (claims 2 and 27)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 2, 9, 18, and 27
`
`-01291 Proceeding
`
`-01465 Proceeding
`
`APPLE-1001, Claims 9 and 18.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`
`
`Iwamiya’s Wristwatch Measures Pulse Wave Using
`Infrared Light
`
`APPLE-1004, 5:64-66; 1291 Pet. 6; 1465 Pet. 5.
`
`APPLE-1004, 6:31-39; 1291 Pet. Reply, 14; 1465 Pet. Reply, 12.
`
`APPLE-1004, 6:7-14; 1291 Pet. 9-11; 1465 Pet. 8-10.
`
`APPLE-1004, 2:5-6; 1291 Pet. Reply, 14; 1465 Pet. Reply, 12.
`
`APPLE-1004, FIG. 4 (annotated); 1291 Pet. 7; 1465 Pet. 6.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`
`
`Iwamiya Does Not Teach Away from Determining Blood Oxygen
`Saturation Using Red and Infrared Light
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`Meiresonne v. Google, Inc., 849 F.3d 1379,
`1382 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶26; 1291 Pet. Reply, 14; 1465 Pet. Reply, 13.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`
`
`Sarantos Teaches Determining Oxygen Saturation Using
`Red and Infrared Light
`
`APPLE-1005, 13:44-53; 1291 Pet., 20; 1465 Pet., 18.
`
`APPLE-1005, 13:34-36; 1291 Pet. Reply, 12; 1465 Pet. Reply, 11.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`
`
`Sarantos Teaches Determining Oxygen Saturation Using
`Red and Infrared Light
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶22; 1291 Pet. Reply, 11; 1465 Pet. Reply, 10-11.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`
`
`Sarantos Does Not Teach Away from Determining Blood
`Oxygen Saturation Using Red and Infrared Light
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶23; 1291 Pet. Reply, 12; 1465 Pet. Reply, 11.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos Combinations Render Obvious a Wristwatch
`that Determines Oxygen Saturation Using Red and Infrared Light
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1291 APPLE-1003, ¶48; 1291 Pet., 19.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`37
`
`
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos Combinations Render Obvious a Wristwatch
`that Determines Oxygen Saturation Using Red and Infrared Light
`
`Institution Decision
`
`Institution Decision, 22-23.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Institution Decision, 24.
`
`38
`
`
`
`The Law Does Not Require Apple to Show How Iwamiya and Sarantos
`Would be Physically Combined
`
`In re Etter, 756 F.2d 852, 859 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
`
`In re Mouttet, 686 F.3d 1322, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
`
`Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC,
`973 F.3d 1321, 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2020)
`
`ClassCo, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 838 F.3d 1214,
`1219 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 11, 13; 1465 Pet. Reply, 10-11.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos Combinations Render Obvious a Wristwatch
`that Determines Oxygen Saturation Using Red and Infrared Light
`
`Dr. Anthony’s Examples of Iwamiya+Sarantos
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶25; APPLE-1004, FIG. 2 (modified based on Sarantos’s teachings); 1291 Pet. Reply, 13; 1465 Pet. Reply, 12.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`40
`
`
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos Combinations Render Obvious a Wristwatch
`that Determines Oxygen Saturation Using Red and Infrared Light
`
`Dr. Anthony’s Examples of Iwamiya+Sarantos
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶ 25; APPLE-1004, FIG. 3 (modified based on Sarantos’s teachings); 1291 Pet. Reply, 13; 1465 Pet. Reply, 12.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`41
`
`
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos Combinations Render Obvious a Wristwatch
`that Determines Oxygen Saturation Using Red and Infrared Light
`
`Dr. Anthony’s Examples of Iwamiya+Sarantos
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶ 25; APPLE-1004, FIG. 3 (modified based on Sarantos’s teachings); 1291 Pet. Reply, 13; 1465 Pet. Reply, 12.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`
`
`Iwamiya and Sarantos Combinations Render Obvious a Wristwatch
`that Determines Oxygen Saturation Using Red and Infrared Light
`
`Dr. Anthony’s Examples of Iwamiya+Sarantos
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶25; 1291 Pet. Reply, 13; 1465 Pet. Reply, 12.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`43
`
`
`
`“Second shape comprises a width and a length,
`and wherein the width is different from the
`length” (Claim 25)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`44
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claim 25
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 25.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`
`
`Iwamiya-Sarantos Renders Obvious the “second shape comprises a
`width and a length, and wherein the width is different from the length”
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1465 APPLE-1003, ¶110; 1465 Pet., 37.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶51, 1465 Pet. Reply, 21-22.
`
`APPLE-1004, FIG. 2 (annotated).
`
`46
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Sarantos-Shie Combinations
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`47
`
`
`
`“First shape” and a different “second shape”
`(elements [1.1]-[1.2] and [20.1]-[20.2])
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`48
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 1 and 20
`
`APPLE-1001, Claims 1 and 20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`49
`
`
`
`Sarantos Describes Light Shining Through Translucent
`or Transparent Material and Diffusing into Flesh
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 22 (annotated); 1291 Pet., 32; 1465 Pet., 40.
`
`APPLE-1005, 17:16-25; 1291 Pet., 31; 1465 Pet., 40.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`
`
`Shie Repeatedly Describes Changing the Shape of Light
`
`APPLE-1007, Abstract; 1291 Pet., 30; 1465 Pet., 38.
`
`APPLE-1007, 1:20-24; 1291 Pet. Reply, 25; 1465 Pet. Reply, 23.
`
`APPLE-1007, 5:35-45; 1291 Pet. Reply, 25; 1465 Pet. Reply, 23.
`
`APPLE-1007, 6:61-7:7; 1291 Pet., 30, 32; 1465 Pet., 38, 40.
`
`APPLE-1007, 7:21-27; 1291 Pet. Reply, 25; 1465 Pet. Reply, 23.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1007, 9:40-45; 1291 Pet. Reply, 25; 1465 Pet. Reply, 23.
`
`51
`
`
`
`Sarantos and Shie Combinations Render Obvious Changing a First
`Shape of Light into a Different Second Shape
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1291 APPLE-1003, ¶76; 1465 APPLE-1003, ¶119; 1291 Pet., 32; 1465 Pet., 40.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 22 (annotated); 1291 Pet., 32; 1465 Pet., 40.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`52
`
`
`
`Sarantos and Shie Combinations Render Obvious Changing a First
`Shape of Light into a Different Second Shape
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶58; 1291 Pet. Reply, 25; 1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 14; Response to Expert Testimony, 7.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 6 (annotated); APPLE-1042, ¶64; 1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`53
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Sarantos and Shie Combinations Render Obvious Changing a First
`Shape of Light into a Different Second Shape
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶58;
`1291 Pet. Reply, 25;
`1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 18 (annotated);
`APPLE-1042, ¶74; 1465 Pet. Reply, 27.
`
`54
`
`
`
`Sarantos and Shie Combinations Render Obvious Changing a First
`Shape of Light into a Different Second Shape
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶59;
`1291 Pet. Reply, 25;
`1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 14; Response to Expert Testimony, 7.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 6 (annotated); APPLE-1042, ¶64; 1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`55
`
`
`
`Sarantos and Shie Combinations Render Obvious Changing a First
`Shape of Light into a Different Second Shape
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶59;
`1291 Pet. Reply, 25;
`1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 18 (annotated);
`APPLE-1042, ¶75;
`1465 Pet. Reply, 28.
`
`56
`
`
`
`A POSITA Would Have Been Motivated to Combine Sarantos and
`Shie for Multiple Reasons
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶59; 1291 APPLE-1003, 76; 1465 APPLE-1003, 119; 1291 Pet. Reply, 25-26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 24; 1291 Pet., 32-33; 1465 Pet., 41.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`57
`
`
`
`1) A POSITA Would Have Been Motivated to Combine Sarantos and
`Shie to Increase Power Efficiency by Precisely Directing the Light
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`Corroborating Patent References
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶61.
`
`APPLE-1047 (Raley), 3:40-48.
`
`APPLE-1006 (Venkararaman), [0223].
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1074 (Hans), [0050].
`
`58
`
`
`
`2) A POSITA Would Have Been Motivated to Combine Sarantos and Shie to
`Increase Accuracy of Measurements by Directing Light to a Larger Area
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶62.
`
`APPLE-1048 (Severinghaus), 10.
`
`APPLE-1013 (Webster), 36.
`
`APPLE-1013 (Webster), 105.
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`59
`
`
`
`3) A POSITA Would Have Been Motivated to Combine Sarantos and Shie to
`Obscure the LED’s Appearance from a User
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`Corroborated by Han
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶63.
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1074, [0060]-[0061].
`
`60
`
`
`
`A POSITA Would Have Been Motivated to Combine Sarantos and
`Shie to Allow Sarantos’ Detector to Capture More Light Signal
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶64; APPLE-1005, FIG. 6 (annotated); 1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 24.
`
`61
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`“Light block having a circular shape”
`(element [15.3])
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`62
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claim 15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 15
`
`63
`
`
`
`Sarantos Describes a Light Block Separating a Light
`Source from Annular Photodetector Elements
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 22 (annotated); 1291 Pet., 35; 1465 Pet., 43.
`
`APPLE-1005,17:26-42; 1291 Pet., 35, 37; 1465 Pet., 43, 54.
`
`APPLE-1005, 19:33-35; 1291 Pet., 37; 1465 Pet., 54.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 25; 1291 Pet., 37; 1465 Pet., 54.
`
`64
`
`
`
`Sarantos Describes a Light Block Separating a Light
`Source from Annular Photodetector Elements
`
`APPLE-1005, 21:6-11; Response to Expert Testimony, 7.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 22 (annotated); 1291 Pet., 35; 1465 Pet., 43.
`
`APPLE-1005, 16:60-62; 1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 25.
`
`APPLE-1005, 19:33-35; 1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 25.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 25; 1291 Pet., 37; 1465 Pet., 54.
`
`65
`
`
`
`Sarantos Describes a Light Block Separating a Light
`Source from Annular Photodetector Elements
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶65; 1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 25.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`66
`
`
`
`A Circular Shaped Light Block Separating a Light Source from Annular
`Photodetector Elements Would Have Been an Obvious Design Choice
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶68; APPLE-1005, FIG. 25 (annotated); 1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 25.
`
`Dr. Duckworth
`
`EX2002, ¶128; 1291 POR, 65; 1465 POR, 55.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`67
`
`
`
`A Circular Shaped Light Block Separating a Light Source from Annular
`Photodetector Elements Would Have Been an Obvious Design Choice
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶69; 1291 Pet. Reply, 26; 1465 Pet. Reply, 25.
`
`Corroborated by Fontaine and Takatani
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1069 (Takatani), 8;
`1291 Pet. Reply, 26;
`1465 Pet. Reply, 25.
`
`68
`
`
`
`Recited photodiode arrangement
`(element [15.4] and claims 6 and 26)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`69
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 15, 6, and 26
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 6
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 26
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 15
`
`70
`
`
`
`Sarantos Explicitly Contemplates Multiple
`Photodetectors Arranged in a Circular Array
`
`APPLE-1005, 14:60-64, FIGS. 15, 16; Response to Expert Testimony, 8.
`
`APPLE-1005, 19:33-35; 1291 Pet., 37; 1465 Pet., 54.
`
`APPLE-1005, 20:52-57; 1291 Pet. Reply, 27; 1465 Pet. Reply, 26.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 25; 1291 Pet., 37; 1465 Pet., 54.
`
`71
`
`
`
`Sarantos Explicitly Contemplates Multiple
`Photodetectors Arranged in a Circular Array
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶72; APPLE-1005, FIG. 25 (annotated); 1291 Pet. Reply, 27; 1465 Pet. Reply, 26.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`72
`
`
`
`“Second shape comprises a circular geometry”
`(claim 12)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`73
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claim 12
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 12.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`74
`
`
`
`Sarantos Illustrates a Circular Array of Photodetectors Arranged Around Multiple Square-
`shaped LEDs that Each Emit Light in a Generally Square Shape
`
`Sarantos
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1005, 14:60-62; 1465 Pet., 72 1465 Pet. Reply, 29.
`
`1465 APPLE-1003, ¶209; 1465 Pet., 72; 1465 Pet. Reply, 28-29.
`
`APPLE-1005, 15:24-27; 1465 Pet. Reply, 27.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶74; 1465 Pet. Reply, 27.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 18 (annotated); 1465 Pet. Reply, 27.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`75
`
`
`
`Savant Teaches Light Shaping to Distribute Light Over a
`Circular Area
`
`Savant
`
`APPLE-1012, 1:16-40; 1465 Pet., 69-71; 1465 Pet. Reply, 27-28.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`76
`
`
`
`Sarantos-Shie-Savant Combination Renders Obvious the
`Second Shape of Light Having a Circular Geometry
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1465 APPLE-1003, ¶208; 1465 Pet., 71; 1465 Pet. Reply, 28.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 18 (annotated); 1465 Pet. Reply, 28.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`77
`
`
`
`A POSITA Would Have Been Motivated to Combine Sarantos, Shie, and Savant
`to Evenly Distribute Light to Each Photodiode in the Circular Array
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1465 APPLE-1003, ¶209; 1465 Pet., 72; 1465 Pet. Reply, 28-29.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 18 (annotated); 1465 Pet. Reply, 28.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`78
`
`
`
`“Second shape comprises a width and a length,
`and wherein the width is different from the
`length” (Claim 25)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`79
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claim 25
`
`APPLE-1001, Claim 25.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`80
`
`
`
`Sarantos-Shie Renders Obvious the “second shape comprises a width
`and a length, and wherein the width is different from the length”
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1465 APPLE-1003, ¶201; 1465 Pet., 67.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶77; 1465 Pet. Reply, 29.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 6 (annotated); 1465 Pet. Reply, 30.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`81
`
`
`
`Reasonable Expectation of Success (“REOS”)
`A POSITA Would Have Had REOS in Determining Oxygen Saturation at the Wrist
`
`(Claims 9 and 18 – Measuring oxygen saturation at the wrist; Claims 2 and 27 – Adding a
`second wavelength)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`82
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 9 and 18 and Claims 2 and 27
`
`1291 IPR Claims 9 and 18
`
`1465 IPR Claims 2 and 27
`
`APPLE-1001, Claims 9 and 18.
`
`APPLE-1001, Claims 2 and 27.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`83
`
`
`
`A POSITA Would Have Had REOS in Determining Oxygen
`Saturation at the Wrist
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`1291 APPLE-1003, ¶48; 1291 Pet., 19-20.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶27; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16-17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 14-15.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`84
`
`
`
`Corroborating References Demonstrate REOS
`
`Cai:
`
`Li:
`
`Pang:
`
`Maattala:
`
`APPLE-1053, Abstract; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16; 1465 Pet. Reply, 15.
`
`APPLE-1051, Abstract; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16; 1465 Pet. Reply, 15.
`
`APPLE-1050, 2; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16; 1465 Pet. Reply, 15.
`
`APPLE-1055, 5; 1291 Pet. Reply, 17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 15.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`85
`
`
`
`Corroborating References Demonstrate REOS
`
`Cai
`
`APPLE-1053, 1.
`
`APPLE-1053, 4.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶29; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16-17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 14-15.
`
`86
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1053, 4.
`
`
`
`Corroborating References Demonstrate REOS
`
`Dr. Anthony (re Cai)
`
`Dr. Duckworth (re Cai)
`
`EX2101, 43:12-17; Response to Expert Testimony, 9.
`
`APPLE-1081, 76:14-15, 77:12-21; Response to Expert Testimony, 9.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`87
`
`
`
`Corroborating References Demonstrate REOS
`
`Li
`
`Dr. Anthony (re Li)
`
`APPLE-1051, Abstract.
`
`APPLE-1051, 8.
`
`EX2101, 39:11-19; Response to Expert Testimony, 10.
`
`APPLE-1051, FIGS. 13, 14
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶30; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16-17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 14-15.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`88
`
`
`
`Corroborating References Demonstrate REOS
`
`Pang
`
`Dr. Anthony (re Pang)
`
`EX2101, 83:10-14; Response to Expert Testimony, 9.
`
`APPLE-1050, Abstract, 1, FIGS. 2, 11-12.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶32; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16-17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 14-15.
`
`89
`
`
`
`Corroborating References Demonstrate REOS
`
`Maattala
`
`Dr. Anthony (re Maattala)
`
`EX2101, 72:7-11; Response to Expert Testimony, 9-10.
`
`APPLE-1055, 1, Figures 8 and 9; APPLE-1042, ¶28
`1291 Pet. Reply, 16-17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 14-15.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`90
`
`
`
`Corroborating References Demonstrate REOS
`
`APPLE-1040, 1, 7; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16; 1465 Pet. Reply, 14.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`91
`
`
`
`Corroborating References Demonstrate REOS
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶34; 1291 Pet. Reply, 16; 1465 Pet. Reply, 14.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`92
`
`
`
`The ’745 Patent’s Limited Disclosure of Wrist-Based Pulse
`Oximetry Suggests REOS
`
`’745 Patent
`
`Dr. Duckworth
`
`APPLE-1081, 90:5-9; Response to Expert Testimony, 8.
`
`APPLE-1001, 10:40-51; 1291 Pet. Reply, 17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 15.
`
`APPLE-1059, 17:19-22; Response to Expert Testimony, 8.
`
`APPLE-1001, 12:16-20; 1291 Pet. Reply, 17; 1465 Pet. Reply, 15.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1081, 86:21-87:6; Response to Expert Testimony, 8.
`93
`
`
`
`The ’745 Patent’s Limited Disclosure of Wrist-Based Pulse
`Oximetry Suggests REOS
`
`In re Epstein, 32 F.3d 1559, 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
`
`Uber Techs., Inc. v. X One, Inc., 957 F.3d 1334, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2020)
`
`In re Publicover, 813 F. App’x 527, 532 (Fed. Cir. 2020)
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 19; 1465 Pet. Reply, 17.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`94
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 1/20 and 15 Show a Lack of
`Features Required for Measuring Oxygen Saturation
`
`APPLE-1001, Claims 1 and 15; 1291 Pet. Reply, 18; 1465 Pet. Reply, 16.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`95
`
`
`
`’745 Patent Claims 1/20 and 15 Show a Lack of
`Features Required for Measuring Oxygen Saturation
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶38; 1291 Pet. Reply, 18; 1465 Pet. Reply, 16.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`96
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶39; 1291 Pet. Reply, 20; 1465 Pet. Reply, 18.
`
`In re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
`
`In re Carlson, 980 F.2d 1032, 1037-1038 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 16; 1465 Pet. Reply, 14.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`97
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`
`Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge, Ltd., 821 F.3d 1359, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
`
`Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 754 F.3d 952, 962-63 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, 818 F. App’x 1009, 1013 (Fed. Cir. 2020)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 22;
`1465 Pet. Reply, 20.
`
`98
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`
`Dr. Anthony
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶39; 1291 Pet. Reply, 20; 1465 Pet. Reply, 18.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶40; 1291 Pet. Reply, 20-21; 1465 Pet. Reply, 18-19.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶42; 1291 Pet. Reply, 21, 23; 1465 Pet. Reply, 19, 21.
`
`APPLE-1042, ¶41; 1291 Pet. Reply, 21; 1465 Pet. Reply, 19-20.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`99
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`
`Brian Land
`
`EX2076, 958:19-24.
`
`EX2076, 965:18-20.
`
`EX-2076, 970:21 – 971:2.
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 23; 1465 Pet. Reply, 21.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX2076, 971:20-972:5.
`
`100
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`
`Mehra
`
`Venugopal
`
`EX2079, 832:23-833:6.
`
`Block
`
`EX1037, 878:4-16.
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 23; 1465 Pet. Reply, 21.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1036, 902: 13-19.
`
`101
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`
`Shui
`
`EX2082, 108:15-21.
`
`EX2082, 109:13-20.
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 23; 1465 Pet. Reply, 21.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`102
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`
`Waydo
`
`EX2078, 925:6-12.
`
`EX2078, 949:13-16.
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 23; 1465 Pet. Reply, 21.
`
`EX2081, 167:18-169:10
`
`103
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`
`Dr. Mannheimer
`
`EX2080, 136:19-137:1.
`
`EX2077, 1015:13-1016:1.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`104
`
`
`
`Apple Engineers’ Testimony Does Not Negate Strong
`Evidence of REOS from Third-Party References
`
`Dr. Mannheimer
`
`EX2080, 160:21-161:2.
`
`EX2077, 1000:23-1001:1.
`
`EX2077, 1000:6 -1000:19.
`
`EX2077, 999:5-11.
`
`EX2077, 1006:20-21.
`
`1291 Pet. Reply, 23; 1465 Pet. Reply, 21.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`105
`
`
`
`THANK YOU
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`106
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
