`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`Caterpillar, Inc.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Patent No. 9,879,390
`
`
`Case No. IPR2022-01264
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MICHAEL W. NETKA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CATERPILLAR EXHIBIT 1020
`
`Page 1 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`I, Michael W. Netka, declare as follows:
`BACKGROUND
`I attended the University of Minnesota School of Business
`1.
`
`Accounting from 1970 to 1973 and the Elkins Electronic Institute from 1976
`
`to 1977. At the Elkins Electronic Institute, I obtained a certification of completion
`
`for coursework in electronics theory, components, and servicing.
`
`2.
`
`I attended Hennepin Vocational Technical College from 1987 to 1990,
`
`where I took courses in practical inspection and gauging, precision measurement,
`
`geometric dimensioning and tolerancing, and design print interpretation, among
`
`others.
`
`3.
`
`I attended Metropolitan State University from 1994 to 1999, where I
`
`received a B.A. in Business Management.
`
`4.
`
`I worked at Raygo Machine Assembly from 1984 to 1988, where I
`
`was responsible for machine sub-assembly for all Raygo products, including
`
`vibratory soil compactors, vibratory asphalt compactors, asphalt pavers, asphalt
`
`reclaimers, soil stabilizers, and profilers/cold planers. I joined Caterpillar Paving
`
`Products Inc. (“Caterpillar”) in 1988 and worked there until 2013.
`
`5.
`
`At Caterpillar, I worked as a Quality Control Inspector from 1988 to
`
`1990. In this position, I was responsible for in-process inspections during machine
`
`assembly, test inspections, final inspections after paint, and final inspections before
`
`1
`
`Page 2 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`shipment. These inspections covered vibratory soil compactors, vibratory asphalt
`
`compactors, asphalt pavers, asphalt reclaimers, and profilers/cold planers. In 1990,
`
`I became a Supervisor, Quality Control and worked in that position until 1993. As
`
`a Supervisor, Quality Control, I oversaw Caterpillar’s Quality Control Group in
`
`Minneapolis, Minnesota. This included overseeing inspections of incoming parts
`
`for assembly, auditing matters, machine conformance tests, and final inspections
`
`performed just before products were released for shipment. The Quality Control
`
`Group in Minneapolis was responsible for Caterpillar’s vibratory asphalt
`
`compactors, asphalt pavers, asphalt reclaimers, soil stabilizers, and profilers/cold
`
`planers.
`
`6.
`
`During my employment in the quality control department at
`
`Caterpillar (from 1988 to 1993), I was involved in the build process of cold planers
`
`and other machines. In this capacity, I often provided the final signoff before a
`
`machine was shipped from the Minneapolis plant. As part of this process, I ensured
`
`that Caterpillar shipping requirements were met. This involved relying on
`
`Caterpillar Factory Notification Lists (FNLs), which were standard-issued
`
`Caterpillar documents that listed the manuals that had to be shipped with a
`
`particular Caterpillar machine. I provide more detail on FNLs below. The types of
`
`manuals listed on the FNLs included parts manuals and operation and maintenance
`
`manuals. As part of my ordinary employment responsibilities, I would check the
`
`2
`
`Page 3 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`cold planers before shipment to ensure that the manuals listed in the FNL were in
`
`fact placed on the machine.
`
`7.
`
`I left my role as a Supervisor, Quality Control in 1993 and became an
`
`Applications Engineer at Caterpillar, where I worked until 1996. I then served as a
`
`Marketing and Sales Engineer from 1996 to 2000. In this position, I provided
`
`operator and service training for Caterpillar’s PM-465 cold planer machines, as
`
`well as other products. I also trained dealer personnel at dealerships and machine
`
`operators at jobsites.
`
`8.
`
`From 2000 to 2007, I worked at Caterpillar as a Product Support
`
`Manager. From 2007 to 2013, I served as Caterpillar’s Worldwide Product Support
`
`Manager. Between 2000 and 2013, I oversaw the development of service
`
`publications, training manuals, and owners/parts manuals for Caterpillar’s cold
`
`planers, including the PM-465 machines. I was also responsible for post-sale
`
`service and support for various Caterpillar products, including Caterpillar’s
`
`PM-465 machines. Although I was no longer involved in the day-to-day activities
`
`of the Quality Control group, I continued to interact with the Quality Control group
`
`and was fully aware of their practices during this time period.
`
`9.
`
`During my employment at Caterpillar, I have personally delivered
`
`numerous Caterpillar machines, including PM-465 cold planers, to Caterpillar
`
`dealers throughout the United States. I have also assisted numerous Caterpillar
`
`3
`
`Page 4 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`dealers with delivering Caterpillar machines, including PM-465 cold planers, to
`
`their customers.
`
`10. Additionally, I have operated PM-465 units at customer
`
`demonstrations, trade shows, and on job sites. During my visits to the customer
`
`demonstrations, trade shows, and customer/dealer job sites across the United
`
`States, I often saw the Caterpillar manuals that were shipped with the PM-465
`
`machines (i.e., the manuals listed in the FNLs that were placed in the operator’s
`
`console before shipment). I have also provided service support throughout the
`
`United States for numerous PM-465 units.
`
`11. Through my roles at Caterpillar involving training, product support,
`
`and oversight of product manuals, I gained intimate knowledge about which
`
`manuals were available to customers and how those manuals were made available.
`
`For example, the PM-465 had an Operation and Maintenance manual called the
`
`PM-465 Cold Planer Operation & Maintenance Manual No. KEBU6879-01
`
`(“PM-465 OMM,” Ex. 1002). This manual was not confidential. As explained in
`
`more detail below, from 2000 to 2003, the PM-465 OMM would have been placed
`
`in the console of every PM-465 shipped from our Minnesota manufacturing
`
`facility.
`
`12. The PM-465 also had a new sensor-driven, grade-and-slope control
`
`system designed in house by Caterpillar. Until that time, cold planer manufacturers
`
`4
`
`Page 5 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`commonly used third-party grade-and-slope systems from companies like Topcon
`
`and MOBA. Because Caterpillar’s PM-465 grade-and-slope system was the first of
`
`its kind, Caterpillar published a grade-and-slope manual called the PM-465 Cold
`
`Planer Caterpillar Grade & Slope Electronic Control System, Systems Operation
`
`Testing and Adjusting Manual (“PM-465 SOTA,” Ex. 1003). The manual is dated
`
`December 1999 and was not confidential. The PM-465 SOTA was available to the
`
`public from 2000 to 2003. For example, any Caterpillar customer could obtain the
`
`PM-465 SOTA simply by requesting one from a Caterpillar dealer. Because the
`
`grade-and-slope system in the PM-465 was new, I often discussed that system, as
`
`well as the PM-465 SOTA describing that system, with customers from 2000 to
`
`2003 in my role as a Product Support Manager.
`
`13. During my employment at Caterpillar, I became familiar with
`
`databases, applications, and asset tracking systems used to track sales and delivery
`
`information.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Page 6 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`Caterpillar can, and has, tracked the sale, shipment, and delivery of Caterpillar
`
`products, including the PM-465 cold planers.
`
`II.
`
`PUBLIC ACCESIBILITY OF THE PM-465 OMM
`14. During my employment at Caterpillar, a corporate procedure was in
`
`effect that required certain documents to be physically located on every cold planer
`
`machine shipped from a Caterpillar factory. This corporate procedure applied to
`
`the PM-465 machine and its operation and maintenance manual (OMM), meaning
`
`that an OMM was located on every PM-465 machine shipped.
`
`15. At times, Caterpillar updated its machines and/or its manuals. For
`
`example, the PM-465 Cold Planer Operation & Maintenance Manual
`
`No. KEBU6879-01 (“PM-465 OMM,” Ex. 1002) is a manual dated January 1999.
`
`The corporate procedure described above drove a system that ensured the correct
`
`version of each manual was shipped with each product.
`
`16.
`
`In particular, at least as of August 28, 1991, the operable corporate
`
`procedure required employees to use a Factory Notification List (FNL) as a guide
`
`for determining which manuals must be shipped with each product, including cold
`
`planers. Ex. 1036 at 3. If a particular version of a manual was listed in an FNL, that
`
`manual had to be physically shipped with the product. Id. Put differently, after
`
`August 28, 1991 corporate procedure required employees to include the technical
`
`6
`
`Page 7 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`information specified by an FNL in every product, including any PM-465 cold
`
`planer, shipped to customers from the Caterpillar factory. Id.
`
`17. This document references and relies on select FNLs. Caterpillar
`
`employees, including myself, use and have used FNLs such as these to ensure that
`
`the correct manuals, including operation and maintenance manuals, were
`
`distributed with Caterpillar machines.
`
`18. As mentioned, the PM-465 Cold Planer Operation & Maintenance
`
`Manual No. KEBU6879-01 (“PM-465 OMM,” Ex. 1002) is dated January 1999.
`
`Any PM-465 cold planer shipped from May 2000 to March 2003 would have
`
`included the PM-465 OMM manual having version no. KEBU6879-01 in the
`
`operator’s console.
`
`19.
`
`In the table below, I provide exemplary invoice information showing
`
`sales and shipments of PM-465 cold planers manufactured in Caterpillar’s
`
`Minnesota factory. See, e.g., Exs. 1025-1035. The sale and shipment dates I rely on
`
`all fall between May 2000 and March 2003. The invoice information identifies the
`
`transaction date, shipping date, customer who made the purchase, and purchase
`
`price for the relevant PM-465 cold planer transaction. The invoice information
`
`described in this paragraph constitutes Caterpillar business records and was created
`
`by Caterpillar during the ordinary course of business.
`
`7
`
`Page 8 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`I also include in Table 1 below select FNLs. These FNLs, which are
`
`also Caterpillar business records created by Caterpillar during the ordinary course
`
`of business, show which versions of the Caterpillar manuals accompanied the
`
`PM-465 cold planer at a particular time. The table below pairs each invoice with
`
`the specific FNL that governed at the relevant time. For example, for the PM-465
`
`machine that shipped from Caterpillar to
`
` on December 22,
`
`2000 (Ex. 1040) is paired with the December 2000 FNL (Ex. 1027) because that
`
`was the governing FNL when the shipment was made.
`
`8
`
`Page 9 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Corresponding FNL
`PM-465
`Invoice
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`Machine
`Date Shipped from
`and Exhibit No.
`
`No.
`Serial
`CATFactory to
`
`
`
`Customer
`Numberon
`
`
`
`
`
`the Invoice
` Ex. 1025
`
`
`
`
`
`(1/19/2001)
`
`
`(3/27/2001)
`
`
`
`(1/21/2002)
`FNL dated November
`
`
`2002 (Ex. 1033)
`
`
`
`
`(3/6/2003)
`
`(5/8/2000)
`
`(11/9/2000)
`
`2000 (Ex. 1026
`
`(12/22/2000)
`
`2000 (Ex. 1027
`
`Ex. 1028
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`Ex. 1030
`
`Ex. 1030
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`(7/17/2001)
`
`(7/31/2001)
`
`(11/20/2002)
`
`Table 1
`
`Ex. 1046
`
`5ZS000186
`
`Ex. 1047
`
`5ZS000187
`
`Ex. 1048
`
`5ZS000188
`
`(3/6/2003)
`
`Ex. 1034
`
`FNL dated March 2003
`(Ex. 1034)
`
`
`
`21. Each one of the FNLslisted in Table1states on its first page “The
`
`FNL identifies the operation and maintenance or owner manual and parts manual
`
`publications that must be furnished with each product as a condition of shipment
`
`from the factory.” See e.g. Exs. 1026-1034 at 1 (emphasis in original). Each one of
`
`Page 10 of 22
`
`Page 10 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`these FNLs listed in Table 1 also shows that the KEBU6879-01, PM-465 manual
`
`was the version of the operation and maintenance manual that shipped with the
`
`PM-465 machine. Ex. 1026 at 8; Exs. 1027-1032 at 7; Exs. 1033-1034 at 9. Thus,
`
`for all transactions described in Table 1, the PM-465 machine that shipped did so
`
`with the KEBU6879-01 version of the PM-465 OMM (Ex. 1002) physically
`
`located on the machine. Put differently, between May 2000 and March 2003, for
`
`all PM-465 sales and deliveries within the United States, the KEBU6879-01,
`
`PM-465 manual would have been shipped with the machine (since all PM-465
`
`machines sold in the United States were made in Caterpillar’s Minnesota
`
`manufacturing facility). The FNL and invoice information presented above shows
`
`that the KEBU6879-01, PM-465 OMM manual (Ex. 1002) was accessible to the
`
`public, including those in the road construction field.
`
`22. Moreover, the KEBU6879-01, PM-465 OMM manual applied to any
`
`PM-465 machine having serial numbers beginning with 5ZS. Ex. 1002, Cover
`
`Page (stating “5ZS1-UP”). All of the machines listed in Table 1 above have serial
`
`numbers that begin with 5ZS. This additional evidence further shows that each of
`
`the machines listed in Table 1 would have come with the KEBU6879-01, PM-465
`
`OMM manual located on it (in the operator’s console).
`
`23. The PM-465 OMM states that “[t]his manual should be stored in the
`
`operator’s compartment in the literature holder or seat back literature storage area.”
`
`10
`
`Page 11 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1002 at 2. It also states: “Read, study and keep this manual with the machine.”
`
`Ex. 1002 at 2. Thus, the PM-465 OMM described above was intended to be
`
`physically kept with the machines at all times, even after the machines were
`
`distributed to the public.
`
`24.
`
`I have seen PM-465 machines stay in circulation for many years.
`
`Companies often sell or rent PM-465 machines to other companies on the
`
`secondary market. Thus, KEBU6879-01, PM-465 manual included on PM-465
`
`machines that were shipped and delivered between May 2000 and March 2003
`
`often remained available to the public (including those in the road construction
`
`field) even after the initial ship date of a particular machine.
`
`25. Not only was the KEBU6879-01, PM-465 OMM manual shipped with
`
`all purchased PM-465 cold planers during May 2000 to March 2003, the PM-465
`
`OMM was also available to anyone who wanted to purchase and/or use a PM-465
`
`cold planer (e.g., road construction companies, technicians, machine operators,
`
`engineers, crew supervisors, etc. and others in the road construction field).
`
`26. Moreover, Caterpillar manuals are, and have been available to anyone
`
`in the public (including those in the road construction field) for years, through
`
`Caterpillar dealers at a cost, even when a cold planer has not been purchased. In
`
`other words, any person―e.g., a person interested in and knowledgeable about
`
`cold planer machines―could have purchased the PM-465 OMM manual from any
`
`11
`
`Page 12 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`Caterpillar dealer between May 2000 and March 2003. Caterpillar had no company
`
`policy between May 2000 and March 2003 preventing its dealers from distributing
`
`manuals, including manuals such as PM-465 OMM. No such policy existed after
`
`that time either. In my experience, Caterpillar manuals, including PM-465 OMM
`
`manual, were shared without restriction and were often available on the secondary
`
`market.
`
`27. Between May 2000 and March 2003, Caterpillar had over fifty (50)
`
`dealers in the United States, all of whom had permission and authority to provide
`
`the PM-465 OMM manual to the public. The information above shows that the
`
`PM-465 OMM manual (Ex. 1002) was accessible to the public, including those in
`
`the road construction field.
`
`III. PUBLIC ACCESIBILITY OF PM-465 SOTA
`28. The PM-465 Cold Planer Caterpillar Grade & Slope Electronic
`
`Control System, Systems Operation Testing and Adjusting Manual (“PM-465
`
`SOTA,” Ex. 1003) is dated December 1999. The PM-465 SOTA provides
`
`additional details regarding the PM-465’s sensor-driven, grade and slope control
`
`system.
`
`29. Although PM-465 SOTA manual was not automatically shipped with
`
`the machine per corporate policy (unlike the PM-465 OMM), a customer could
`
`obtain this manual from any Caterpillar dealer in the United States. Thus, the
`
`12
`
`Page 13 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`PM-465 SOTA manual described above was intended to be generally and widely
`
`available to the public (including customers in the road construction field) through
`
`Caterpillar dealers.
`
`30. Moreover, Caterpillar manuals are, and have been available to anyone
`
`in the public (including those in the road construction field) for years, through
`
`Caterpillar dealers at a cost, even when a cold planer has not been purchased. In
`
`other words, any person―e.g., a person interested in and knowledgeable about
`
`cold planer machines―could have purchased the PM-465 SOTA manual from any
`
`Caterpillar dealer between May 2000 and March 2003. Caterpillar had no company
`
`policy between May 2000 and March 2003 preventing its dealers from distributing
`
`manuals, including manuals such as PM-465 SOTA manual. No such policy
`
`existed after that time either. In my experience, Caterpillar manuals, including PM-
`
`465 SOTA manual, were shared without restriction and were often available on the
`
`secondary market (including to those in the road construction field).
`
`31. Between May 2000 and March 2003, Caterpillar had over fifty (50)
`
`dealers in the United States, all of which had permission and authority to provide
`
`the PM-465 SOTA manual to the public. The information above shows that the
`
`PM-465 SOTA manual (Ex. 1003) was accessible to the public, including those in
`
`the road construction field.
`
`13
`
`Page 14 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`32.
`
`I worked numerous hours for Caterpillar on product support, service,
`
`and repair issues for cold planers. I have seen how important it is for customers
`
`(including contractors) to be able to repair broken components on road milling
`
`machines quickly so that machine downtime can be avoided. To ensure that
`
`machines remain operable, contractors frequently staffed their own service
`
`technicians. I and others at Caterpillar have worked with these service technicians
`
`to ensure that the technicians were equipped with the necessary knowledge to
`
`identify problems and make the necessary repairs to Caterpillar machines,
`
`including the PM-465.
`
`33. While some cold planers used grade-and-slope systems made by third
`
`parties, Caterpillar developed its own grade-and-slope system for the PM-465.
`
`Accordingly, I and/or others at Caterpillar spent considerable time from 2000 to
`
`2003 (and before) assisting contractors’ technicians on how to operate and repair
`
`Caterpillar’s grade-and-slope system for the PM-465 machine. In my experience,
`
`these technicians were often skilled at operating and identifying problems with the
`
`Caterpillar grade-and-slope system on the PM-465 machine, and in repairing the
`
`system when broken, including broken sensors used by the system. The PM-465
`
`OMM (Ex. 1002) and PM-465 SOTA manual (Ex. 1003) were available to these
`
`technicians from 2000 to 2003 as they performed their service and repair work.
`
`14
`
`Page 15 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`IV. ADDITIONAL FEATURES ON THE PM-465 MACHINE
`DESCRIBED IN THE PM-465 OMM
`34. The grade-and-slope control system of the PM-465 described in the
`
`PM-465 OMM had the ability use and process signals from several different types
`
`of sensors at once. These signals could come from grade sensors that contacted the
`
`ground (e.g., grade slope wheel or ski), grade sensors that did not contact the
`
`ground (e.g., ultrasonic sensor), and slope sensors, among others. The PM-465’s
`
`control system would process the information it received from the grade-and-slope
`
`sensors and extend/retract the legs to ensure that the milling drum is positioned at
`
`the depth set by the operator.
`
`35. The contact grade sensors described in the previous paragraph were
`
`exposed to the environment during milling and could be damaged by debris created
`
`by the rotor drum, as well as other types of obstacles encountered in the
`
`surrounding environment during milling machine operations. The noncontact grade
`
`sensors described in the previous paragraph could be compromised by
`
`environmental conditions such as temperature and atmospheric pressure.
`
`36. For the PM-465 machine described in the PM-465 OMM, as well as
`
`other milling machines throughout the years, it was common for the milled
`
`material to be contained inside the box formed by the side plates and moldboard,
`
`and to have the milled material transported up the conveyer belt and dumped into a
`
`truck for removal. Indeed, a primary purpose of the moldboard was to scrape away
`
`15
`
`Page 16 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`the milled material generated by the rotor drum during milling operations. There
`
`were situations, however (for example, when milling country roads), where it was
`
`desirable to leave the milled material in place, mix it with additional materials, and
`
`use it to form a base onto which new asphalt was laid. In these situations, the
`
`moldboard was commonly raised so that the milled material was left in place and
`
`graded by the moldboard rather than scraped away. The PM-465 OMM calls this
`
`feature the “In Place Milling” feature. PM-465 OMM (Ex. 1002) at p. 58.
`
`37. Notably, the “In Place Milling” feature could be cumbersome and
`
`time-intensive to use. The operator would chain the moldboard up at a fixed height
`
`above the milled surface, and the moldboard would stay in that position during in-
`
`place milling. The operator could not automatically raise or lower the moldboard
`
`during in-place milling to grade at different elevations.
`
`38. The PM-465 OMM describes a service height sensor that detected
`
`when the PM-465 had been raised to service height. PM-465 OMM (Ex. 1002) at
`
`pp. 66, 108. The PM-465 OMM further describes “sensors at the right-rear corner
`
`of the engine compartment” that “are used to sense the elevation of the rear legs.”
`
`Id. at p. 112 (showing sensor/switch for detecting the presence of a lifting column
`
`within its sensor/switch field). Signals from the sensors/switches described in this
`
`paragraph were sent to and processed by a controller in the PM-465. Notably, the
`
`rear leg-elevation sensors described in this paragraph could become compromised
`
`16
`
`Page 17 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`by dust and debris, and the PM-465 OMM recommended cleaning them routinely.
`
`Id. at p. 112.
`
`V. AUTHENTICATION AND THE EVIDENCE OF BUSINESS
`RECORDS
`PM-465 OMM Manual
`A.
`39. Ex. 1002 is a true and correct copy of Caterpillar’s PM-465 OMM
`
`Manual.
`
`40. The PM-465 OMM manual in Ex. 1002 was made at or near the
`
`time—or from information transmitted by—someone with knowledge at
`
`Caterpillar. OMMs, such as Ex. 1002, are drafted by Caterpillar’s
`
`1 and reviewed by the
`
`and the
`
` before publication. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` has direct knowledge about the information
`
`contained in each OMM. A new OMM is published when a machine is first
`
`introduced, when design changes occur on the machine, or when the experiences
`
`and circumstances in the field changes.
`
`41.
`
`It is in the regular course of Caterpillar’s business to create and
`
`maintain the OMMs. As explained earlier, Caterpillar’s corporate procedure during
`
`
`1 The name of this department has changed over the years at Caterpillar.
`
`17
`
`Page 18 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`my employment required each PM-465 machine to ship with an OMM. Thus,
`
`Caterpillar was required to maintain PM-465 OMMs.
`
`42. The
`
` archives and
`
`maintains the OMMs in the ordinary course of business. The earlier archives of the
`
`OMMs were maintained in long term document storage at Caterpillar’s
`
`
`
`. Caterpillar eventually shifted to electronic storage of the OMMs
`
`when electronic storage became feasible.
`
`PM-465 SOTA Manual
`B.
`43. Ex. 1003 is a true and correct copy of Caterpillar’s PM-465 SOTA
`
`Manual.
`
`44. The PM-465 SOTA manual in Ex. 1003 was made at or near the
`
`time—or from information transmitted by—someone with knowledge at
`
`Caterpillar. SOTA manuals, such as Ex. 1003, are drafted by Caterpillar’s
`
` and reviewed by the
`
`
`
` before publication. The
`
` has direct knowledge about the
`
`information contained in each SOTA manual. A new SOTA manual is published
`
`when a machine is first introduced, when design changes occur on the machine, or
`
`when the experiences and circumstances in the field changes.
`
`18
`
`Page 19 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`45.
`
`It is in the regular course of Caterpillar’s business to create and
`
`maintain the SOTA manuals. As explained earlier, Caterpillar distributed the
`
`SOTA manuals to dealers across the United States, which were then distributed to
`
`the general public.
`
`46. The
`
` archives and
`
`maintains the SOTA manuals in the ordinary course of business. The earlier
`
`archives of the SOTA manuals were maintained in long term document storage at
`
`Caterpillar’s
`
`. Caterpillar eventually shifted to electronic storage
`
`of the SOTA manuals when electronic storage became feasible.
`
`Factory Notification Lists (FNLs)
`C.
`47. Exs. 1025 - 1034 are true and correct copies of Caterpillar’s FNLs.
`
`48. The FNLs in Exs. 1025 - 1034 were made at or near the time – or
`
`from information transmitted by – someone with knowledge at Caterpillar. FNLs
`
`are drafted and issued by
`
`2 in conjunction with the
`
`,
`
`, and the
`
` shortly before shipping an ordered machine
`
`
`
` is a subgroup of the
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`19
`
`Page 20 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`(e.g., PM-465) to a customer. Each of these departments has direct knowledge
`
`about the information contained in each FNL.
`
`49.
`
`It is in the regular course of Caterpillar’s business to create and
`
`maintain the FNLs to keep track of its sales. The FNLs are archived and
`
`maintained onsite by
`
` in conjunction with the
`
`
`
`,
`
`.
`
`, and the
`
`
`
`VI. DECLARATION
`I declare that all statements made herein of my knowledge are true
`50.
`
`and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and
`
`further, that these statements were made with knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
`
`51.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States
`
`of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`52.
`
`In signing this declaration, I understand that the declaration will be
`
`filed as evidence in a contested case before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office. I acknowledge that I may be
`
`subject to cross-examination in the case and that cross-examination will take place
`
`within the United States. If cross-examination is required of me, I will appear for
`
`20
`
`Page 21 of 22
`
`
`
`cross-examination within the United States during the time allotted for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cross-examination.
`
`
`
`Executed onthis 23 day of July 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 22 of 22
`
`21
`
`Page 22 of 22
`
`