throbber
Page 1
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, )
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., )
`and APPLE INC., )
` )
` Petitioner, )
` )
` vs. ) Case No.
` ) IPR2022-01248
`SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, )
` )
` Patent Owner. )
`____________________________________)
`
` VIDEOCONFERENCED DEPOSITION OF
` DR. MICHAEL A. JENSEN
` SEPTEMBER 29, 2023
`
`Reported by:
`BROOKE SILVAS
`CSR 10988
`Job No. 1029921
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 1 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, )
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., )
`and APPLE INC., )
` )
` Petitioner, )
` )
` vs. ) Case No.
` ) IPR2022-01248
`SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, )
` )
` Patent Owner. )
`____________________________________)
`
` VIDEOCONFERENCED DEPOSITION OF DR. MICHAEL A.
` JENSEN, taken remotely on behalf of Patent
` Owner, commencing at 8:59 a.m., on Friday,
` September 29, 2023, before Brooke Silvas,
` Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 10988.
`
`1
`2
`
`34
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 2 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL:
`For Petitioner:
` FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.
` BY: CHRISTOPHER GREEN, ESQ.
` SANGKI PARK, ESQ.
` 1180 Peachtree Street NE
` 21st Floor
` Atlanta, Georgia 30309
` 404-892-5005
` cgreen@fr.com
`
`For Patent Owner:
` LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX, LLP
` BY: PARHAM HENDIFAR, ESQ.
` 1016 Pico Boulevard
` Santa Monica, California 90405
` 310-307-4510
` hendifar@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`Also Present:
` PHILIP GRAVES, ESQ.
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`78
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 3 of 91
`
`

`

` I N D E X
`WITNESS: DR. MICHAEL A. JENSEN
`EXAMINATION BY PAGE
`MR. HENDIFAR 5
`
`Page 4
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
`DEPOSITION DESCRIPTION PAGE
`2031 26
`2032 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5 6 7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 4 of 91
`
`

`

` FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2023; 8:59 A.M.
`
`Page 5
`
` DR. MICHAEL A. JENSEN,
` having been duly administered an
` oath remotely by the reporter, was examined
` and testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. HENDIFAR:
` Q Good morning, Dr. Jensen. Thank you very
`much for your time.
` A Good morning.
` Q This is the deposition in connection with
`your second declaration in IPR 2022-01248. So when
`I refer to this matter, that will be the IPR that I
`will be referring to. Is that fair?
` A That's my understanding. Yes, sir.
` Q And do you have access to a copy of your
`second declaration that was filed as Exhibit 1051 in
`this matter?
` A Yes, sir, I do.
` Q And do you have access to clean copies of
`the exhibits filed in this matter?
` A Yes. I believe -- I believe so. I don't
`know if I have everything available. So I will let
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 5 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 6
`you know if you ask me for something, and I can't
`find it quickly.
` Q Yes. And if there is anything that you
`need, I will be happy to put the exhibit in the chat
`box. And that's not a problem.
` A Perfect.
` Q Do you have any notes, writings, or
`unclean exhibits that have writings on them
`available to you right now?
` A Nothing -- nothing open. Everything that
`I have open is clean.
` Q Okay. And I have no objection to you
`viewing any necessary documents in order to answer
`my questions accurately, but I do request that you
`let me know what you're reviewing. Is that fair?
` A I understand. Yes, sir.
` Q And you have been deposed in connection
`with your first declaration in this IPR; correct?
` A That's my recollection, yes, sir.
` Q And you're familiar with the rules of the
`deposition, so I will not be wasting your time with
`repeating them. But do you have any questions about
`the procedures, rules, posture, or anything else
`about the deposition?
` A No, I have no questions.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 6 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q Okay. What did you do to prepare for
`today's deposition?
` A I reread this second declaration, a
`supplemental declaration that I had written, my
`original declaration, refamiliarized myself with
`some of the primary references related to this, and
`spent some time with counsel.
` Q And how many hours did you spend with
`counsel -- and I don't need to know the contents of
`the discussion. But just how many hours did you
`spend with counsel in preparation for your
`deposition today?
` A I estimate between four and five hours.
` Q And did you review any documents in
`preparation for deposition -- for the deposition
`today that are not of the record in the IPR?
` A No, sir.
` Q May I now please refer you to
`Exhibit 1051, which is your second declaration.
` A Yes. I have my second declaration open on
`my desktop.
` Q Thank you. And who drafted this
`declaration?
` A As I have testified consistently
`throughout this case, I collaborated with counsel on
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 7 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 8
`this. However, all -- all final versions, including
`the final version of this, are my words and my -- my
`opinions.
` Q And did you determine which arguments to
`respond to in your declaration?
` A Once again, that was collaborative with
`counsel. Those things that counsel was eager for me
`to clarify my opinions on. I followed their
`guidance.
` Q And did you determine the order of the
`presentation of the arguments in your declaration?
` A Once again, I would call that
`collaborative with -- with counsel.
` Q May I refer you please to paragraph 8 of
`your declaration.
` A Okay. Yes, sir. I'm at paragraph 8.
` Q And do you see the first sentence in that
`paragraph starts with, quote, "Based solely on
`Dr. Cooklev's testimony," end quote? Do you see
`that?
` A Yes, of course.
` Q Is that the terminology that you chose to
`use in presenting your opinion?
` A I don't recall the origin of that exact
`terminology. I mean, ultimately I take
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 8 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`responsibility for the final words on the page.
` Q And is it your view that patent owner's
`evidence regarding the reasonable expectation of
`success was solely Dr. Cooklev's testimony?
` A It was the only thing that I was aware of
`on -- on this particular issue that patent owner was
`citing.
` Q And what is the basis of your knowledge
`about what you're aware of regarding patent owner's
`evidence?
` A Again, I've reviewed the documents, the
`patent owner's response. So, yeah, I would guess
`that's the main thing that I looked at in -- in this
`context, was the patent owner response.
` Q Now, how many hours would you say you
`spent preparing for today's deposition?
` A Just in preparing for today's deposition,
`approximately -- including the time that I already
`alleged or talked about with counsel, about ten
`hours.
` Q And how many hours approximately did you
`spend preparing your second declaration?
` A Oh, I don't know. Tens -- many tens of
`hours. I don't know exactly how many tens, but many
`tens of hours.
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 9 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 10
` Q May I please refer you to paragraph 58 of
`your declaration.
` A Yes, sir.
` Q And this is a list of documents that you
`have reviewed in connection with preparing your
`second deposition -- I'm sorry -- second
`declaration; correct?
` A Yes, sir. That's correct.
` Q Okay. My question is, did you review a
`copy of your deposition transcript in connection
`with drafting your second declaration?
` A I have reviewed my deposition transcript
`before -- before preparing my second declaration. I
`didn't review it deliberately during the preparation
`of my second declaration.
` Q I'm sorry. I'm not sure I understand the
`distinction. Will you please elaborate?
` A Well, I thought what you were asking me
`was specifically as I was preparing my second
`declaration was my review of my transcript of my
`first deposition part of that. I reviewed my first
`deposition transcript shortly after I received it,
`which was in advance of my work preparing the second
`declaration.
` Q Understood. And may I ask why you didn't
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 10 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 11
`see the need to review your second -- your first
`deposition transcript in connection with preparing
`your second declaration?
` A I'm not sure the question. I mean, it was
`my testimony. I verified that what I had testified
`previously had matched my opinions. So I -- I
`didn't see a need to rereview it as I was preparing
`my second declaration.
` Q Are you familiar with the term IP
`Multimedia Subsystem, also known as IMS?
` A Oh, I would not say I have a deep
`comprehension. I'm familiar with the term. I
`wouldn't say I have a deep understanding of what
`you're referring to.
` Q What is your understanding currently of
`the term IMS?
` A So, I mean, an IP-based multimedia
`subsystem, my understanding of it is exactly what --
`what the term sounds like, right. It is a
`packet-based or Internet Protocol, which is a
`packet-based, packet-switched system for multimedia
`services. But that -- beyond that, I don't know.
` Q Do you know what -- excuse me. Do you
`know what IMS is used for?
` A Beyond what I've just testified, no, sir.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 11 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 12
` Q What does -- do you refer to it as an IP
`multimedia -- I'm sorry. Excuse me. I usually have
`water. I forgot today. My colleague is grabbing
`one for me.
` Have you heard the term IMS prior to
`today's deposition?
` A Again, I -- it's something in my -- in my
`general knowledge. I can't say if -- you know,
`where I've heard it, when. So I think it's clear.
` Q What is your understanding of the term
`Voice over IP?
` A Voice over IP is a packet-based or an
`IP-based way to -- to transmit voice. Typically a
`phone conversation.
` Q So it requires a real-time ability for the
`system to support the Voice over IP transfer;
`correct?
` A It requires a low latency network. In
`order for meaningful conversation to be had, you
`need a low latency network.
` Q Are you familiar with the relationship, if
`any, between Voice over IP and IMS?
` A No, sir. I don't know how those terms
`relate.
` Q Can you give me a few examples of Voice
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 12 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`over IP systems or applications today so I can
`familiarize myself with what it really means?
` A Well, once again, Voice over IP is any
`IP-based transfer of voice. So most modern
`telephones are Voice over IP.
` Q I see. So if I pick up -- I have a cell
`phone now which is an iPhone 12. And it is on the
`Verizon network. So if I make a call, that is going
`to be a Voice over IP call?
` A I can't speak precisely to every phone.
`But generally, today's phone -- cellular networks do
`Voice over IP.
` Q I see. And what was the predecessor to
`Voice over IP?
` A Well, I'm not sure I understand your
`question. I mean, are you talking about what was --
`what was the technology behind legacy?
` Q Sure. So I'm asking -- you mentioned
`modern phones generally use Voice over IP. So my
`question is, I'm trying to understand how did the
`phones make phone calls prior to Voice over IP?
` A Oh, I mean different technologies have
`existed depending on cell phone, landline phone, to
`carry voice. They could have been digital or analog
`ways to carry voice. And generally circuit-switched
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 13 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 14
`architectures, as opposed to the packet-switched
`architectures of IP.
` Q So Voice over IP is based on a
`packet-switched architecture; correct?
` A Yes. Internet Protocol. I mean, Voice
`over IP is Voice over Internet Protocol. Internet
`Protocol is a packet-switched architecture. Yes,
`sir.
` Q There are packet-switched architecture
`other than ones relying on Internet Protocol;
`correct?
` A Yes. IP and packet-switched are not
`synonymous. But IP is packet-switched.
` Q Understood. And can you maybe provide a
`brief explanation -- and the reason I ask you these
`questions is you submitted an expert declaration.
`So I rely on what you explain to me so I can explain
`to the board this is what these terms mean. So can
`you provide a brief understanding of what a
`packet-switched network is and what that
`architecture entails?
` A Well, I'm not prepared to give you a long
`explanation of packet-switched architectures. But
`in -- but in general, I can say this much:
`Packet-switched architectures look at each
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 14 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 15
`individual packet. And each individual packet can
`be routed through the network independently of the
`other packets that are routed through the network,
`even if they belong to the same message.
` Q Understood. Now, can you name a couple of
`other examples of packet-switched architectures that
`are not based on IP?
` A Oh, I haven't reviewed this in some time.
`So I don't think that I would be -- I'm afraid I
`could make a mistake. So I don't think I'm prepared
`to -- to do that today and do it well.
` Q And you also mentioned circuit-switched
`architecture; correct?
` A Yes, sir.
` Q Okay. Can you maybe provide a short
`explanation of what that entails?
` A Again, in contrast to packet-switched,
`circuit-switched is an architecture where the
`network provides a dedicated path between the two
`ends of the link for the duration or at least some
`duration of the communication that is happening.
` Q The first generation I believe is referred
`to as 1G network -- excuse me. Strike that.
` The first generation of the protocols I
`believe is referred to as 1G. That was
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 15 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`circuit-switched; correct?
` A Yes. The earliest cell phone
`architectures relied on a circuit-switched
`architecture.
` Q And was the 2G standard also
`circuit-switched?
` A I'm not confident in exactly when the
`standard changed. But generally those early ones
`were circuit-switched.
` Q And same question for LTE. LTE is
`packet-switched; right?
` A Again, I'm not confident. LTE is
`certainly a digital standard. I believe it's
`packet-switched, but I -- I don't want to testify
`confidently. I just -- I just don't know the
`evolution of the standards. I don't recall them and
`when they went from circuit-switched to
`packet-switched.
` Q Okay. I believe I know the answer, but
`just to have the record clear, was the -- and if
`I -- I don't know if I asked earlier. I apologize
`if I already did. Was the 3G standard
`packet-switched or circuit-switched architecture?
` A Again, I'm not confident in -- in exactly
`what the architecture was for 3G. It was about that
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 16 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 17
`time that things were switching to packet-switched.
` Q May I please refer you to Exhibit 1016,
`the Ota reference.
` A Just give me a moment. I didn't have that
`one up.
` Q And, again, any exhibit that you need that
`you don't have, please let me know.
` A And I will. That one I have ready access
`to. And I now have it open on my desktop.
` Q Thank you. Did you review the Ota exhibit
`in connection with preparing your second
`declaration?
` A I did not revisit the Ota reference in --
`as I prepared my second declaration.
` Q Are you aware of how the Ota reference
`determines which of the two IP addresses to use for
`each individual packet that is transmitted?
` A I'm sorry. It's been a long time since
`I've reviewed that reference. So I don't recall the
`details of its approach. I remember generally the
`reference, but I don't remember the details of its
`approach.
` Q It's a relatively short reference. Do you
`think if you review it now, whatever portion of it
`that you need, that that would help refresh your
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 17 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`memory?
` A I -- I can certainly try if that's what
`you would ask me to do.
` Q I would request because that is an
`important question from my perspective. And I
`appreciate -- I know it's not the most convenient
`thing. But if maybe you could maybe take a look at
`the Ota reference, Exhibit 1016. And I have two
`questions that I will be asking you. So I will
`present both questions to you so you only have to
`review one time. I'm trying to ascertain how the
`Ota reference's system determines which IP address
`to use for each specific packet. And the second
`question is, where, in what part of that network is
`that decision made?
` A Okay.
` Q Do you understand the two questions?
` A I believe I do. Let me repeat them back,
`and you can make sure that I understand them. Your
`first question was how does the Ota reference
`determine the -- the -- you know, based on each
`packet, which IP address to use. And then I think
`the second one was -- can you repeat the second one?
` Q Sure. And where is that decision made?
` A And where is that decision made. Yeah.
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 18 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 19
` Q And take as long as you need. And we will
`be on the record because I'm not trying to abuse
`your time during the breaks. So just take as long
`as you need. Just let me know when you're ready,
`please.
` A Okay. I appreciate that.
` (Pause in the proceedings.)
` THE WITNESS: Okay, sir.
`BY MR. HENDIFAR:
` Q Yes. Okay.
` A So if you want to ask me the questions,
`I --
` Q Sure. So, Dr. Jensen, you now reviewed
`maybe for about ten minutes Exhibit 1016, the Ota
`reference; correct?
` A Yes, sir.
` Q And the first question is, in Ota system,
`how does the system determine which of the two IP
`addresses to use for each specific packet?
` A Ota discloses that it can make a decision
`about the route and, therefore, the IP address that
`will be used based on what Ota calls circumstances.
`Circumstances, an example given is a mobile station
`that is in a service area that could handle in this
`embodiment of free space light interface or it
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 19 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 20
`might -- the mobile station might be in the service
`area that is linked using a radio wave. So in that
`particular example, it would be based on those
`circumstances of what -- you know, what network is
`available or what communication channel is available
`to the mobile station.
` Q Can you point me to where in Ota you are
`reading, please?
` A Yes, sir. I am reading column 5. And
`essentially the paragraph line starting at line 58.
` Q Is that the only disclosure in Ota that
`you could find about which of the two IP addresses
`to use?
` A No. Then later, Figure 3 -- so that's how
`it might determine which network. Figure 3 and the
`discussion in column 6 at the bottom, starting
`around line 57, has a discussion about the functions
`that are available in order -- one makes a decision
`about which network to use, then how it's going to
`embed the different IP address in the packet for
`that routing that needs to happen over, in this
`case, the free space optical over or the radio link.
` Q Thank you. And so my question
`specifically is how the decision is made about which
`IP to use, not subsequently how to implement it. So
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 20 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 21
`the question, other than what you reviewed at the
`bottom of column 5, is there any other disclosure
`that you could find in Ota about how to determine
`which of the two IP addresses to use for each
`packet?
` A So I didn't -- I didn't look through the
`second embodiment. I only looked at this first. So
`what I showed you there was the disclosure about how
`the device makes a decision about that route. And
`according to the disclosure in Figure 3, it makes it
`clear that that route relates to the IP address that
`is used. So that is why I refer to that. It is not
`just how it is done, but that makes it clear that it
`is using an IP address based on its decision for
`which link it is going to use. Free space optical
`or wireless. So I don't think those are
`disconnected. If you would like me to look at
`Embodiment 2, I can take more time to do that. But
`I wanted to make sure that I understood the
`Embodiment 1, which I think I've given an answer
`about how Embodiment 1 does that.
` Q Thank you. So the second embodiment
`starts on which paragraph, could you please remind
`me?
` A It starts on column 8, line 24. I
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 21 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`believe. Referring to Figure 6.
` Q And in this embodiment, are there two IP
`addresses located on the mobile phone?
` A Again, I didn't review this one. I spent
`my time making sure that I understood the first
`embodiment. So I can't -- I can't tell you -- I
`can't -- I would have -- I would have to do the same
`process. And I will do that if you would ask me to.
` Q Okay. May I please refer you to column 9,
`lines 10 -- starting on line 10.
` A Okay.
` Q "In this embodiment, as shown as Figure 8,
`the mobile station 2 has an IP address, and two
`media access control addresses that is MAC-1 and
`MAC-2." Do you see that?
` A I do.
` Q So is it fair to say that in the second
`embodiment of Ota, the mobile phone only has one IP
`address?
` A Based on this disclosure, it suggests that
`it uses one IP address and two MAC addresses.
` Q Okay. So is it the case that Ota
`substitutes the second IP address with two MAC
`addresses? I'm trying to understand what the
`relationship between the two embodiments is.
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 22 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A Again, I would have to go through to
`figure out how it is using its two MAC addresses and
`single IP address in order to do the routing. So I
`can't testify confidently on exactly what it is
`doing in Embodiment 2 with the two MAC addresses and
`single IP address.
` Q And in Ota, what entity within this
`network determines which of the two IP addresses to
`use for a given packet?
` A Well, according -- again, back to the
`first embodiment and according to this discussion of
`Figure 3, there's an interface switching unit 25
`that -- and Figure 3 shows some details of this. So
`the mobile station data link layer, network layer,
`you know, that's that that mobile -- or that
`interface switching unit is the one that would be at
`least implementing which IP address would be used in
`order to communicate on the -- on the two different
`networks.
` Q So a couple of questions. Could you point
`me to what you referred to in Figure 3?
` A Well, that discussion is -- is about
`Figure 3. So -- let me back up another copy so I
`can have the -- it won't let me open a different
`copy. So Figure 3 is referring back to Figure 2.
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 23 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 24
`And Figure 3 is providing details of the interface
`switching unit. So Figure 2 identifies the
`interface switching unit 25. And then ways to embed
`21 and 22 are these interfaces that provide ways to
`embed that. So the interface switching unit is the
`one that is at least implementing that -- the use of
`the two different IP addresses.
` Q And the interface switching unit 25, is
`that the mobile phone?
` A Again, I'm doing this very quickly. But
`my -- my understanding of this is that this is all
`in the mobile phone. But, again, I'm doing it
`quickly. So my understanding is that decision is
`being made in the mobile station.
` Q So --
` A Let me -- let me clarify that.
` Q Sure.
` A Yeah. Figure 2 shows a configuration of
`the mobile station 1 or 2. Each of the mobile
`stations 1 and 2 is provided with an information
`processing body 20 like a computer. An interface
`switching unit for switching the two interfaces.
` Q Right. So as far as I understood your
`testimony, the interface switching unit 25 within
`the mobile phone implements the decision that is
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 24 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 25
`already made about which IP address to use. So my
`question is, what is the entity that actually
`determines which of the two IP addresses to use for
`a given data packet?
` A In this, I don't see an expressed
`indication of what block makes that decision. That
`doesn't mean that's not in here. But in my quick
`review, I don't -- I don't see that. But that
`information processing body certainly would have
`access to that information. Whether or not that is
`the actual decision-making block, I don't see an
`express disclosure of that here.
` MR. HENDIFAR: Okay. I think we've been
`going for about 45 minutes. Should we take like a
`five-minute break?
` THE WITNESS: That's fine with me.
` MR. HENDIFAR: Counsel, is that okay with
`you?
` Thank you. Let's come back 50 minutes past
`the hour.
` (A recess was taken.)
` MR. HENDIFAR: Welcome back, Dr. Jensen.
`I am going to put in the chat box an article, which
`we will mark as Exhibit 2031.
` And, Madam Court Reporter, this is something
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 25 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 26
`that we're going to mark. If I can put it in the chat
`box.
` (Exhibit 2031 was marked for
` identification by the deposition
` officer. Said exhibit is attached
` hereto.)
`BY MR. HENDIFAR:
` Q And please let me know when you have it,
`Doctor.
` A Okay. I have this paper open.
` Q The title of this paper is VoIP Quality
`Optimization in IP - Multimedia Subsystem (IMS). Do
`you see that?
` A Yes, sir.
` Q And at the bottom of this first page, it
`has a copyright for the year 2010; correct?
` A Yes, sir.
` Q It is an IEEE publication; right?
` A Yes, sir.
` Q Is it fair to say that IEEE publications
`are generally considered reputable publications in
`the field?
` A Yes, sir.
` Q And in the abstract of this paper, it
`says, quote, "IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) is very
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 26 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 27
`important due to the critical role it plays in the
`Next Generation Network (NGN) of the Fixed and
`Mobile Networks. Voice traffic in IMS will be
`served using Internet Protocol (IP) which is called
`Voice over IP." Do you see that?
` A Yes, sir.
` Q And then going to the second page --
`actually, on that same first page, I apologize. On
`the right-hand side, the first paragraph under
`subsection A, "IMS Architecture." The article says,
`quote, "IP Multimedia Subsystem is defined by
`3rd-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) which
`defines IMS standards as a network domain dedicated
`to the control and the integration of multimedia
`services," end quote. Do you see that as well?
` A I do.
` MR. HENDIFAR: Now, going -- I'm going now
`to put into the chat box an exhibit numbered 2032,
`which, Madam Court Reporter, that is something that
`we will mark.
` (Exhibit 2032 was marked for
` identification by the deposition
` officer. Said exhibit is attached
` hereto.)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 27 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`BY MR. HENDIFAR:
` Q Dr. Jensen, just let me know when you have
`this exhibit as well.
` A Okay. I have that open.
` Q This is a printout of a blog from the
`Internet page VoIPInfo.org. Are you familiar with
`that website?
` A No, sir.
` Q Are you familiar with what a dot-org
`domain name entails and what it means?
` A I don't know the details about how they
`decide what gets a dot-org domain name.
` Q Okay. Now, in this article on -- in
`Exhibit 2032, it says, quote, "IMS began life as a
`3GPP technology for 3G mobile networks, but has been
`adopted as a broader standard." And then it
`continues in the next paragraph to say, quote, "IP
`Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) is a generic architecture
`for offering multimedia and voice over IP services
`defined by 3rd Generation Partnership Project
`(3GPP)." Do you see that?
` A I do.
` Q Okay. So Exhibit 2032, is what it
`discloses consistent with what we read on Exhibit
`2031, the IEEE article?
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2035
`Page 28 of 91
`
`

`

`Page 29
` A I think those two are generally, yeah,
`consistent.
` Q And do they explain that the IMS network
`is what is used for Voice over IP and was introduced
`in the 3G cell phone networks?
` A Based on the brief read that we have just
`done, my understanding of what it discloses is that
`this IP Multimedia Subsystem, IMS, created this
`generic architecture for offering VoIP and
`multimedia systems over IP services. So -- and that
`was part of the 3GPP project. So, I mean, that's
`what -- that's what it discloses.
` Q Now, may I please refer you to paragraph 4
`of your second declaration.
` A Yes, sir. I'm there.
` Q And this is a somewhat long paragraph.
`But in the sentence on page 5 that starts with "At a
`minimum," do you see that?
` A Yes. I think that's the second sentence,
`yes.
` Q So the sentence reads, "At a minimum, in
`the Yegoshin-Billstrom combination, a POSITA would
`have understood and found obvious that Yegoshin's
`phone would access its 'second communication
`interface,' which is second wireless transmit and
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Sm

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket